Back to Journals » Clinical Interventions in Aging » Volume 19

Addressing the Missing Links in Cardiovascular Aging

Authors Dinetz E, Zeballos-Palacios C, Martinez CA

Received 29 December 2023

Accepted for publication 27 April 2024

Published 17 May 2024 Volume 2024:19 Pages 873—882

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S457180

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Nandu Goswami



Elliot Dinetz,1 Claudia Zeballos-Palacios,2 Claudia A Martinez3

1Department of Integrative and Family Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, Miami, FL, USA; 2Department of Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; 3Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA

Correspondence: Elliot Dinetz, Tel +786.490.5915, Email [email protected]

Abstract: The aim of this manuscript is to provide a review of available options to enhance cardiovascular health and prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the aging population using a systems-biology approach. These include the role of the gut microbiome, the early identification and removal of environmental toxins, and finally age related sex hormones and supplement replacement which all influence aging. Implementing such a comprehensive approach has the potential to facilitate earlier risk assessment, disease prevention, and even improve mortality. Further study in these areas will continue to advance our understanding and refine therapeutic interventions for a healthier cardiovascular aging process.

Keywords: vascular aging, cardiovascular aging, inflammaging, systems biology medicine, microbiome, toxic metals, bioidentical hormone replacement

Introduction

According to the US Bureau of the Census, individuals aged 85 and older are now the fastest growing population. It is estimated that by 2030, 20% of the population will be over 65 years of age. The life expectancy over the recent years has been declining while this demographic shift has been accompanied by a significant increase in age-related chronic diseases, particularly cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is widely accepted that atherosclerosis, a primary driver of CVD, is primarily caused by inflammation at the endovascular level, yet most treatments fail to address their cause.1

Aging itself is a major independent risk factor for CVD, which remains one of the leading causes of disability and death in the United States.2 As shown in different studies, age-related arterial dysfunction was found in the absence of conventional cardiovascular risk factors, suggesting that age-related arterial dysfunction is a primary effect of advancing age.3,4 This phenomenon persists despite best efforts to promote healthy lifestyle and pharmacological treatments. Additionally, it is worth noting that as much as 20% of individuals who develop coronary heart disease lack conventional risk factors.5 This suggests there are still unaddressed factors missing from the current approach to patient management. Furthermore, another study showed that up to 70% of individuals who experienced myocardial infarctions were classified as low risk based on conventional 10-year coronary heart disease risk screening.6 These findings are particularly concerning given the impact on morbidity and mortality in the United States, where the country ranks last out of 11 developed nations in terms of health care cost and avoidable mortality.7

Recent evidence suggests that three finite physiological responses to numerous insults exist in the human body, attributing to the pathophysiology of CVD: oxidative stress, inflammation, and ultimately vascular dysfunction.8,9 This process, often referred to as vascular aging or “Inflammaging”, encompasses the complex interplay of molecular and cellular events like immune dysregulation associated with aging and the acceleration of age-related diseases.10 Consequently, it is essential to consider certain overlooked and novel factors that contribute to aging as a process also contributing to the origin of traditional risk factors. For example, the gut microbiome-a complex ecosystem of organisms located throughout our body organs, including the gastrointestinal tract, serving as a transducer of environmental signals to the rest of the body-contributing either to promoting or reducing systemic inflammation and age-related cardiovascular disease risk.11,12 Understanding such factors is needed to be able to address them. In this manuscript the evidence behind this system-biology approach will be reviewed to help identify targets improve cardiovascular health.

The Microbiome and Cardiovascular Aging

Recent advancements in our understanding of aging have highlighted the crucial role of the gut microbiome, a complex ecosystem comprising bacteria and various other organisms, both commensal and pathogenic. Imbalances in this microbial composition have shown to influence overall health, including CVD.13 As individuals age, there is a notable shift in the human microbiota. Two predominant bacterial phyla, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, play a crucial role in maintaining a healthy microbiome.14,15 Disruptions in the balance of these organisms can significantly impact intestinal homeostasis and its communication with the rest of the body. Specifically, aging and age- related pathology including CAD appears to be linked to the relative abundance of the phyla Firmicutes, which increases with age, and a decrease in Bactericides.16 A recent meta-analysis highlighted differences in the gut microbiota composition in coronary artery disease patients compared to healthy controls with strikingly low ratios of the Phyla Bacteroides.17 Furthermore, the abundance of a genus of bacteria called Bifidobacterium in the microbiome that is most abundant in childhood declines with age. It has shown to up-regulate anti-inflammatory pathways and even sequester heavy metals balancing the microbiome.18 Being able to identify such imbalances would allow targeted treatment strategies such as dietary modification, shown to promote relative abundance of Bifidobacterium, like a higher proportion of organic plant-based foods.19 Microbiome organism makeup is now identifiable through qPCR or RNA sequencing of stool samples becoming more and more accessible.

Diets high in saturated fat and sucrose, contribute to detrimental changes in the microbiome. These dietary patterns increase intestinal permeability, allowing endotoxins like lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from gram-negative bacteria to enter the circulation.20 Consequently, the body experiences elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and triggers an inflammatory cascade of the three finite responses.21 This endotoxin has been associated with various age-related inflammatory conditions, including visceral fat deposition and CVD.22 Given that the intestinal wall houses the Peyer’s patches, home to approximately 70% of the immune system, LPS prompts significant dendritic cells to initiate potent T cell–dependent responses and immune dysregulation leading to numerous inflammatory disorders.23 A recent review demonstrated how pre and probiotics can mitigate the detrimental effects of LPS on the intestinal lining and the vasculature hence lowering such inflammation and subsequent CVD risk.24 This intricate connection between the microbiome and systemic aging underscores the importance of considering the microbiome in not just cardiovascular medicine but all disciplines for prevention.

Another factor influencing the cardiovascular system is the accumulation of Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), an inflammatory metabolite produced by the liver in response to specific gut bacteria. Consumption of foods high in L-carnitine and choline, such as full-fat dairy, egg yolk, and red meat, can lead to the production of trimethylamine in the gut through microbial metabolism.25 This compound is subsequently absorbed into the bloodstream, where it is metabolized by the liver into TMAO. TMAO disrupts mitochondrial function and promotes the activation of NFKb, and there is already evidence of a causal link to CVD based on animal models.26 TMAO activates monocytes, which play a significant role in various pathways leading to atherosclerosis. Consequently, TMAO is recognized as a potential independent risk factor for CVD.26,27 Further high plasma TMAO levels have been independently linked as risk factors for heart disease and correlated with poor prognosis in myocardial infarction according to systematic review.28,29 Measuring this metabolite is now easily available from all of the major labs. Supplementing specific strains of probiotics have shown to lower TMAO and thereby CVD risk based on the evidence of its influence on lipid profiles, glycemia, and homocysteine further supporting this approach see Table 1.

The gut microbiome may too influence aging via its impact on toxin accumulation. The resident microbiota may interfere with bioavailability and thereby cardiotoxicity of metals via oxidative stress over the duration of lifespan. For example, animal and even human trials have provided evidence for beneficial effects exerted by certain bacteria where probiotic strains reduced the bioaccumulation of arsenic and mercury.30 The evidence further supports the vice versa relationship where toxic exposures have shown to reduce the abundance of healthy bacterial strains of Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, and Lactobacillus. As lifestyle and nutrition interventions are the primary steps necessary before considering medications, focusing on the microbiome offers a novel starting point. Microbiome stool testing and simple interventions like dietary changes may therefore help slow cardiovascular aging.

Table 1 Manipulating the Microbiome on CVD Risk

Environmental Toxins and Cardiovascular Aging

Toxic metals play a crucial role in aging and heart disease by contributing to oxidative stress and inflammation in an insidious manner.37 One significant source of metal exposure is particulate matter in the air, which is closely associated with CVD, contributing significantly to global mortality rates.38 Toxic metals have been known to cause atherosclerosis and CVD underscoring the absence of measuring safe levels in all at-risk patients and implementing necessary and standard interventions. environmental exposure levels.39 Despite banning toxic metals such as lead, its presence is still impactful due to things like international trade and vertical transmission. Bioaccumulation of mercury occurs in key visceral organs and was shown to be associated with aging and accelerated disease development in a dose dependent manner.40 Similarly, arsenic has been found in contaminated water and contributes to CVD health outcomes from chronic exposure.41 Recent studies have also found that these toxic metals influence earlier menopause in women, further supporting their role in cardiovascular aging and heart disease.42 While conventional medicine mainly focuses on the symptoms of acute metal poisoning vs chronic accumulation and role in chronic disease toxic metals are still overlooked. Such critical lab screening could elicit a major missed factor responsible for heart disease progression. To effectively address toxic metal exposure, it is crucial to enhance the body’s detoxification process. Not uncommon issues including nutrient depletions can further hamper the liver’s ability to detoxify metals. Studies in animals and humans have shown that deficiencies in essential metals such as zinc, calcium, or iron can lead to greater absorption and toxicity of non-essential metals.43–45 Therefore, consuming foods high in these minerals and antioxidants is of particular importance as they act as natural antagonists to the toxicity of metals such as cadmium and lead.46 Chelation therapy, such as Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is another treatment which binds metals particularly lead. Intravenous EDTA more recently has shown to be more effective compared with placebo at reducing clinically important cardiovascular events.47 This can be of great benefit to patients especially with progressive or refractory CVD which may be from underlying toxicity. Supportive studies show that 2 g/week slow IV infusion (over 2 hours) did not produce adverse events in humans while effectively removing such metals.

Sauna use has shown that the body’s natural detoxification process through sweating, effectively reduces the burden of toxic metals as well. Sauna, described as a form of passive heat therapy typically hot and dry, above 100°F have been used for thousands of years rooted in Northern Europe. A systematic review showed that arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury were excreted in high concentrations in sweat especially compared to urine, highlighting the significance of such less invasive lifestyle measures in detoxification.48 Sauna use has been deemed safe for most individuals with stable coronary artery disease, prior myocardial infarction, and up to class III congestive heart failure.49 In fact, multi-session sauna use was associated with 40% reduction in all-cause mortality compared to less frequent users.50 As a result of these detoxification practices, a positive impact on both mortality and aging has been suggested by previous literature see Table 2. Screening for metal exposure and its impact may have the potential to identify factors that can be affecting the aging process, these should encourage team science including Toxicologists and Functional Medicine specialists.

Table 2 Addressing Toxic Metals on CVD Risk

The Role of Estrogen in Cardiovascular Aging

There is known gender discrepancy related to treatment and prevention of CVD, particularly in women as they age.55 Women over 60 are more likely to experience cardiovascular events compared to age-matched men due to loss of ovarian function and its protective effects.56,57 Estrogens impact on vascular regrowth and endothelial dilation likely explain this. For decades estrogen replacement therapy has been found to have positive benefits for cardiovascular health per large studies58 Controversy remains regarding the use of hormones hence continues to be an area of ongoing research. Studies support that Estradiol itself stimulates vascular endothelial integrity including replacement therapy shown to reduce progression of subclinical atherosclerosis.59–61 Furthermore, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) users depending on the age and timing of use may experience less progression to CVD and mortality benefit.62,63 As a result, recently years have seen the rise of HRT prescriptions across various medical disciplines. Further evidence refuting concerns about HRT and cancer point to Progestin’s vs use of true Progesterone to be the cause.64 Despite some studies revealing diminished mortality benefit from HRT in users beginning therapy beyond 10 years of menopause, this is primarily because estrogen may exacerbate already existing or CVD with age.65,66 Personalized decision making and proper patient selection continues to be used to address this topic. The use of newer HRT modalities including transdermal and bioidentical hormone replacement (BHRT), has sparked a recent debate. BHRT involves the use of non-synthetic estradiol and progesterone, which closely mimic our own body’s hormonal composition.67 As these are often administered transdermally they have demonstrated less adverse effects when compared to oral synthetic hormone replacement due to bypassing the first-pass metabolism in the liver and its pro-thrombotic and inflammatory pathways.68 Today the North American Menopause Society (NAMS) and The British Menopause Society support BHRT based on its mechanism of action and more recent data as a safe option for women to prevent CVD events.69,70 Such an approach has the potential to provide many benefits including restore bone mineral density and minimize medication overuse see Table 3. As medical error including medications contribute to the third cause of death in America today, this potential is critical for constant review.71,72 Estrogen’s benefits are not exclusive to women. Studies have shown an inverse relationship between estradiol levels and CVD, emphasizing its importance in hormonal decline for both genders.73 In men, declining estrogen levels often indicate testosterone deficiency as testosterone converts to estradiol. Studies using estradiol in men over the age of 65 interestingly have shown reductions in homocysteine, fibrinogen, and plasminogen activator inhibitor levels, along with improvements in lipid profiles.74 Conventional practice guidelines still remain void of hormonal recommendations therefore studies to help provide guidance towards improvement in cardiovascular health are still needed.

Table 3 Transdermal Hormone Replacement on CVD Risk

Nutraceuticals and Cardiovascular Aging

Nutraceuticals are product derived from food sources with potential health benefits in addition to the basic nutritional values. Some of these supplements available may have a potential benefit in cardiovascular health and aging. Nitric oxide (NO), for example, plays a crucial role in cardiovascular health by promoting vasodilation and protecting endothelial integrity.79 Endogenous NO production significantly decreases by the age of 40, highlighting the need for adequate support to promote healthy aging and CVD progression.80 Accumulation of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), resulting from exposure to ROS, may further impair NO production accelerating endothelial dysfunction and downstream cardiovascular complications.81 Lifestyle factors, such as Ramadan-style eating habits, have shown to improve NO bioavailability, highlighting the possibility of interventions in this area of lifestyle medicine.82 Nutraceuticals that enhance NO bioavailability, like L-citrulline and sodium nitrite, have shown promise in correcting age-related hypertension and endothelial damage.83 Medications like phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE5i) show benefits in reducing mortality in patients after myocardial infarction through similar pathways of NO production making this a very exciting area of future research.84,85 Resveratrol (RES) and Berberine are two additional nutraceuticals which offer potential as found to attenuate TMAO-induced atherosclerosis.86 RES, a stilbene-based polyphenol, has further shown to improve lipid profiles, dysglycemia, and circulatory function, reducing conventional inflammatory risk factors and increasing endothelial NOS.87,88 In a randomized controlled trial, a standardized dose of 300 mg of RES demonstrated improvement in brachial flow-mediated dilation, without major adverse events reported in meta-analyses.89 Curcumin is another well-documented nutraceutical with health benefits, including cardiovascular protection.90 Derived from Indian turmeric, curcumin, the active ingredient, exhibits strong inhibitory effects on NF-kB and interleukin 6, which are markers of CVD progression as well.91 It also activates SIRT1 genes, contributing to its anti-senescent properties. Studies have demonstrated positive effects of curcumin on central arterial hemodynamics and endothelial function among postmenopausal women, who are at higher risk for CVD compared to their male counterparts.92,93 Curcumin has also been effective in preventing progression to overt diabetes in a placebo-controlled trial, with a low daily dose of just 0.5mg, highlighting its anti-aging capabilities.94 A recent meta-analysis has confirmed the safety of curcumin at doses ranging from 80 mg to 4 grams, showing successful reduction of oxidative stress and subsequent inflammatory disease progression.95 Combining Curcumin and RES appears to have safe and potentially synergistic effects on the inflammatory cascade as and therefore warrants further large scale studies to see if it can drastically improve conservative treatment.96

Conclusion

The aging population is facing a growing burden of age-related chronic diseases and most recently a decreased life expectancy, particularly from CVD. Conventional approaches still only focus on traditional risk factors overlooking crucial factors related to aging that have more recently have been supported. The systems biology inclusive of addressing the microbiome as well as environmental factors and age related hormonal decline in a systematic manner has the potential to address additional factors that contribute to CVD. It has already been shown to enhance quality of life measures compared to conventional care among patients part of Functional Medicine practices according to a 2019 publication in JAMA. Overall, addressing these missing links of aging and tailoring treatment to the individual necessitates a more holistic approach. Integrating these factors may lead to earlier assessment of cardiovascular risk, disease prevention, and potential reversal of age-related disease on the cardiovascular system. Collaboration between specialties, including Functional and Integrative Medicine, can further optimize care outcomes as a result and improve cardiovascular health for our aging population. The future perspective lies in further research to refine these approaches, identifying mortality benefits compared to controls, and optimizing patient care and longevity.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Charo IF, Taub R. Anti-inflammatory therapeutics for the treatment of atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(5):365–376. PMID: 21532566; PMCID: PMC3947588. doi:10.1038/nrd3444

2. Dhingra R, Vasan RS. Age as a risk factor. Med Clin North Am. 2012;96(1):87–91. PMID: 22391253; PMCID: PMC3297980. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2011.11.003

3. North BJ, Sinclair DA. The intersection between aging and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2012;110(8):1097–1108. PMID: 22499900; PMCID: PMC3366686. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.246876

4. Roth G, Mensah G, Johnson C, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019: update From the GBD 2019 Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020;76(25):2982–3021. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010

5. Khot UN, Khot MB, Bajzer CT, et al. Prevalence of conventional risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease. JAMA. 2003;290(7):898–904. doi:10.1001/jama.290.7.898

6. Akosah K, Schaper A, Cogbill C, et al. Preventing myocardial infarction in the young adult in the first place: how do the national cholesterol education panel iii guidelines perform? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(9):1475–1479.

7. Schneider E, Shah E, Doty M, et al. Mirror, Mirror 2021: reflecting Poorly Health Care in the U.S. Compared to Other High-Income Countries. Commonwealth Fund. 2021:2:2.

8. Houston M. The role of noninvasive cardiovascular testing, applied clinical nutrition and nutritional supplements in the prevention and treatment of coronary heart disease. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;12(3):85–108. PMID: 29316855; PMCID: PMC5933539. doi:10.1177/1753944717743920

9. Cervantes Gracia K, Llanas-Cornejo D, Husi H. CVD and Oxidative Stress. J Clin Med. 2017;6(2):22. PMID: 28230726; PMCID: PMC5332926. doi:10.3390/jcm6020022

10. Schulman IH, Balkan W, Hare JM. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Aging Frailty. Front Nutr. 2018;5:108. PMID: 30498696; PMCID: PMC6249304. doi:10.3389/fnut.2018.00108

11. Bull MJ, Plummer NT. Part 1: the human gut microbiome in health and disease. Integr Med. 2014;13(6):17–22. PMID: 26770121; PMCID: PMC4566439.

12. Ghosh TS, Shanahan F, O’Toole PW. The gut microbiome as a modulator of healthy ageing. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;19:565–584. doi:10.1038/s41575-022-00605-x

13. Valdes AM, Walter J, Segal E, Spector TD. Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. BMJ. 2018;361:k2179. doi:10.1136/bmj.k2179

14. Rinninella E, Raoul P, Cintoni M, et al. What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases. Microorganisms. 2019;7(1):14. PMID: 30634578; PMCID: PMC6351938. doi:10.3390/microorganisms7010014

15. Nagpal R, Mainali R, Ahmadi S, et al. Gut microbiome and aging: physiological and mechanistic insights. Nutr Healthy Aging. 2018;4(4):267–285. PMID: 29951588; PMCID: PMC6004897. doi:10.3233/NHA-170030

16. Toya T, Corban MT, Marrietta E, et al. Coronary artery disease is associated with an altered gut microbiome composition. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0227147. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227147

17. Choroszy M, Litwinowicz K, Bednarz R, et al. Human gut microbiota in coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolites. 2022;12(12):1165. PMID: 36557203; PMCID: PMC9788186. doi:10.3390/metabo12121165

18. Arboleya S, Watkins C, Stanton C, Ross RP. Gut bifidobacteria populations in human health and aging. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1204. PMID: 27594848; PMCID: PMC4990546. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01204

19. De Filippo C, Cavalieri D, Di Paola M. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:14691–14696. doi:10.1073/pnas.1005963107

20. González F, Considine RV, Abdelhadi OA, Acton AJ. Saturated fat ingestion promotes lipopolysaccharide-mediated inflammation and insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(3):934–946. PMID: 30590569; PMCID: PMC6364509. doi:10.1210/jc.2018-01143

21. Lagier JC. Human gut microbiota: repertoire and variations. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:136. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2012.00136

22. Bowman JD, Surani S, Horseman MA. Endotoxin, Toll-like Receptor-4, and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2017;13(2):86–93. PMID: 27586023; PMCID: PMC5452150. doi:10.2174/1573403X12666160901145313

23. Wu HJ, Wu E. The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity. Gut Microbes. 2012;3(1):4–14. PMID: 22356853; PMCID: PMC3337124. doi:10.4161/gmic.19320

24. Moludi J, Maleki V, Jafari-Vayghyan H, et al. Metabolic endotoxemia and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review about potential roles of prebiotics and probiotics. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2020;47(6):927–939. PMID: 31894861. doi:10.1111/1440-1681.13250

25. Gatarek P, Kaluzna-Czaplinska J. Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) in human health. EXCLI J. 2021;20:301–319. PMID: 33746664; PMCID: PMC7975634. doi:10.17179/excli2020-3239

26. Witkowski W, Weeks TL, Hazen SL. Gut microbiota and cardiovascular disease. Circulation Res. 2020;127(4):553–570.

27. Wang Z. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2011;472:57–63.

28. Guasti L, Galliazzo S, Molaro M, et al. TMAO as a biomarker of cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intern Emerg Med. 2021;16(1):201–207. Epub 2020 Aug 10. PMID: 32779113. doi:10.1007/s11739-020-02470-5

29. Li N, Zhou J, Wang Y, et al. Association between trimethylamine N-oxide and prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2022;9(6):3846–3857. doi:10.1002/ehf2.14009

30. Assefa S, Köhler G. Intestinal microbiome and metal toxicity. Curr Opin Toxicol. 2020;19:21–27. PMID: 32864518; PMCID: PMC7450720. doi:10.1016/j.cotox.2019.09.009

31. Naruszewicz M, Johansson ML, Zapolska-Downar D, Bukowska H. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v on cardiovascular disease risk factors in smokers. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(6):1249–1255. PMID: 12450890. doi:10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1249

32. Barreto FM, Colado Simão AN, Morimoto HK, Batisti Lozovoy MA, Dichi I, Helena da Silva Miglioranza L. Beneficial effects of Lactobacillus plantarum on glycemia and homocysteine levels in postmenopausal women with metabolic syndrome. Nutrition. 2014;30(7–8):939–942. PMID: 24613434. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2013.12.004

33. Hendijani F, Akbari V. Probiotic supplementation for management of cardiovascular risk factors in adults with type II diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(2):532–541. PMID: 28318686. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.015

34. Zhao L, Zhang F, Ding X, et al. Gut bacteria selectively promoted by dietary fibers alleviate type 2 diabetes. Science. 2018;359(6380):1151–1156. PMID: 29590046. doi:10.1126/science.aao5774

35. Malik M, Suboc TM, Tyagi S, et al. Lactobacillus plantarum 299v supplementation improves vascular endothelial function and reduces inflammatory biomarkers in men with stable coronary artery disease. Circ Res. 2018;123(9):1091–1102. PMID: 30355158; PMCID: PMC6205737. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313565

36. Cantero MA, Guedes MRA, Fernandes R, Lollo PCB. Trimethylamine N-oxide reduction is related to probiotic strain specificity: a systematic review. Nutr Res. 2022;104:29–35. PMID: 35588611. doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2022.04.001

37. Eman M, Alissa, Gordon A. Ferns, heavy metal poisoning and cardiovascular disease. J Toxicol. 2011;2011:21. doi:10.1155/2011/870125

38. Hamanaka RB, Mutlu GM. Particulate matter air pollution: effects on the cardiovascular system. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:680. PMID: 30505291; PMCID: PMC6250783. doi:10.3389/fendo.2018.00680

39. Lamas GA, Ujueta F, Navas-Acien A. Lead and Cadmium as cardiovascular risk factors: the burden of proof has been met. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(10). doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.018692

40. Roman HA, Walsh TL, Coull BA, et al. Evaluation of the cardiovascular effects of methylmercury exposures: current evidence supports development of a dose-response function for regulatory benefits analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(5):607–614. PMID: 21220222; PMCID: PMC3094409. doi:10.1289/ehp.1003012

41. Moon K, Guallar E, Navas-Acien A. Arsenic exposure and cardiovascular disease: an updated systematic review. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2012;14:542–555. doi:10.1007/s11883-012-0280-x

42. Eum KD, Weisskopf MG, Nie LH, Hu H, Korrick SA. Cumulative lead exposure and age at menopause in the Nurses’. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(3):229–234. PMID: 24398113; PMCID: PMC3948024. doi:10.1289/ehp.1206399

43. Reeves PG, Chaney RL. Marginal nutritional status of zinc, iron, and calcium increases cadmium retention in the duodenum and other organs of rats fed rice-based diets. Environ Res. 2004;96:311–322. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2004.02.013

44. Larsson SE, Piscator M. Effect of cadmium on skeletal tissue in normal and calcium-deficient rats. Isr J Med Sci. 1971;7:495–498.

45. Hammad TA, Sexton M, Langenberg P. Relationship between blood lead and dietary iron intake in preschool children: a cross-sectional study. Ann Epidemiol. 1996;6:30–33. doi:10.1016/1047-2797(95)00097-6)

46. Zhai Q, Narbad A, Chen W. Dietary strategies for the treatment of cadmium and lead toxicity. Nutrients. 2015;7(1):552–571. PMID: 25594439; PMCID: PMC4303853. doi:10.3390/nu7010552

47. Lamas GA, Boineau R, Goertz C, et al. EDTA chelation therapy alone and in combination with oral high-dose multivitamins and minerals for coronary disease: the factorial group results of the trial to assess chelation therapy. Am Heart J. 2014;168(1):37–44.e5.

48. Sears ME, Kerr KJ, Bray RI. Arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury in sweat: a systematic review. J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:184745. PMID: 22505948; PMCID: PMC3312275. doi:10.1155/2012/184745

49. Blum N, Blum A. Beneficial effects of sauna bathing for heart failure patients. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2007;12(1):29–32. PMID: 18650976; PMCID: PMC2359619.

50. Laukkanen T, Khan H, Zaccardi F, Laukkanen JA. Association between sauna bathing and fatal cardiovascular and all-cause mortality events. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):542–548. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8187

51. Bisanz JE, Enos MK, Mwanga JR, et al. Randomized open-label pilot study of the influence of probiotics and the gut microbiome on toxic metal levels in Tanzanian pregnant women and school children. mBio. 2014;5(5):e01580–14. PMID: 25293764; PMCID: PMC4196227. doi:10.1128/mBio.01580-14

52. Ravalli F, Vela Parada X, Ujueta F, et al. Chelation therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(6):e024648. PMID: 35229619; PMCID: PMC9075296. doi:10.1161/JAHA.121.024648

53. Li Z, Jiang W. Acute and short-term efficacy of sauna treatment on cardiovascular function: a meta-analysis: reply. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021;20(7):730. PMID: 34329397. doi:10.1093/eurjcn/zvab050

54. Lee E, Kolunsarka I, Kostensalo J, et al. Effects of regular sauna bathing in conjunction with exercise on cardiovascular function: a multi-arm, randomized controlled trial. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2022;323(3):R289–R299. PMID: 35785965; PMCID: PMC9394774. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00076.2022

55. Daugherty S, Blair I, Havranek E, et al. Implicit Gender bias and the use of cardiovascular tests among cardiologists. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:12.

56. Rodgers JL, Jones J, Bolleddu SI, et al. Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Gender and Aging. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2019;6(2):19. PMID: 31035613; PMCID: PMC6616540. doi:10.3390/jcdd6020019

57. Colditz GA, Willett W, Stampfer M, et al. Menopause and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1987;(316):1105–1110. doi:10.1056/NEJM198704303161801

58. Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, et al. Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease. Ten-year follow-up from the nurses’ health study. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(11):756–762. PMID: 1870648. doi:10.1056/NEJM199109123251102

59. Hasan AS, Luo L, Baba S, Li TS. Estrogen is required for maintaining the quality of cardiac stem cells. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0245166. PMID: 33481861; PMCID: PMC7822545. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245166

60. Calabrese EJ. Hormesis and Endothelial Progenitor Cells. Dose Response. 2022;20(1):15593258211068625. PMID: 35221821; PMCID: PMC8874175. doi:10.1177/15593258211068625

61. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Henderson VW, et al. Vascular effects of early versus late postmenopausal treatment with estradiol. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(13):1221–1231.

62. Arnson Y, Rozanski A, Gransar H, et al. Hormone Replacement Therapy Is Associated With Less Coronary Atherosclerosis And Lower Mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(11_Supplement):1408.

63. Mikkola TS, Tuomikoski P, Lyytinen H, et al. Estradiol-based postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Menopause. 2015;22(9):976–983. PMID: 25803671. doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000000450

64. Campagnoli C, Clavel-Chapelon F, Kaaks R, Peris C, Berrino F. Progestins and progesterone in hormone replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;96(2):95–108. PMID: 15908197; PMCID: PMC1974841. doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.02.014

65. Ralf P. Brandes and others, Endothelial aging. Cardiovascular Res. 2005;66(2):286–294. doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.12.027

66. Boardman HM, Hartley L, Eisinga A, et al. Hormone therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:CD002229.

67. Stephenson K, Neuenschwander PF, Kurdowska AK. The effects of compounded bioidentical transdermal hormone therapy on hemostatic, inflammatory, immune factors; cardiovascular biomarkers; quality-of-life measures; and health outcomes in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Int J Pharm Compd. 2013;17(1):74–85. PMID: 23627249.

68. Holtorf K. The bioidentical hormone debate: are bioidentical hormones (estradiol, estriol, and progesterone) safer or more efficacious than commonly used synthetic versions in hormone replacement therapy? Postgrad Med. 2009;121(1):73–85. PMID: 19179815. doi:10.3810/pgm.2009.01.1949

69. The North American Menopause Society. Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society. Vol. 29. © 2022 by The North American Menopause Society; 2022. 767–794. doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000002028

70. Files J, Kling JM. Transdermal delivery of bioidentical estrogen in menopausal hormone therapy: a clinical review. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2020;17(4):543–549. PMID: 31795776. doi:10.1080/17425247.2020.1700949

71. Barlow DH. HRT and osteoporosis. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1993;7(3):535–548. PMID: 8293488. doi:10.1016/s0950-3579(05)80077-9

72. Dickinson J. Deadly medicines and organized crime: how big pharma has corrupted healthcare. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60(4):367–368. PMCID: PMC4046551.

73. Bajelan M, Etehad Roodi N, Hasanzadeh Daloee M, Farhangnia M, Samadi Kuchaksaraei A. The effect of low testosterone and estrogen levels on progressive coronary artery disease in men. Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;8(2):168–171. PMID: 31832441; PMCID: PMC6844610.

74. Fleta-Asín B. Estrógenos y enfermedad cardiovascular en el varón [Estrogens and cardiovascular disease in the male]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007. 60(6):667–668. Spanish. PMID: 17580059. doi:10.1157/13107127

75. Gordon JL, Rubinow DR, Watkins L, Hinderliter AL, Caughey MC, Girdler SS. The effect of perimenopausal transdermal estradiol and micronized progesterone on markers of risk for arterial disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(5):e2050–60. PMID: 31838497; PMCID: PMC7096310. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgz262

76. Mittal M, McEniery C, Supramaniam PR. Impact of micronised progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate in combination with transdermal oestradiol on cardiovascular markers in women diagnosed with premature ovarian insufficiency or an early menopause: a randomised pilot trial. Maturitas. 2022;161:18–26.

77. Karim R, Xu W, Kono N, et al. Effect of menopausal hormone therapy on arterial wall echomorphology: results from the Early versus Late Intervention Trial with Estradiol (ELITE). Maturitas. 2022;162:15–22. PMID: 35474254; PMCID: PMC9232990. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.02.007

78. Bontempo S, Yeganeh L, Giri R, Vincent AJ. Use of MHT in women with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Climacteric. 2024;27(1):93–103. PMID: 37933495. doi:10.1080/13697137.2023.2273524

79. Strijdom H, Chamane N, Lochner A. Nitric oxide in the cardiovascular system: a simple molecule with complex actions. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2009;20(5):303–310. PMID: 19907806; PMCID: PMC3721819.

80. Houston Marc C. Personalized and Precision Integrative Cardiovascular Medicine, 1e. Wolters Kluwer Health, 2019. Chapter 2, p6-18.

81. Szlachcic A, Krzysiek-Maczka G, Pajdo R, et al. The impact of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADAMA), the endogenous nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor, to the pathogenesis of gastric mucosal damage. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19(1):90–97. PMID: 22950506. doi:10.2174/13816128130113

82. Esmaeilzadeh F. Does intermittent fasting improve microvascular endothelial function in healthy middle-aged subjects? Biol Med. 2016;8. doi:10.4172/0974-8369.1000337

83. Houston M, Hays L. Acute effects of an oral nitric oxide supplement on blood pressure, endothelial function, and vascular compliance in hypertensive patients. J Clin Hypertens. 2014;16(7):524–529. PMID: 24962851; PMCID: PMC8031495. doi:10.1111/jch.12352

84. Hutchings DC, Anderson SG, Caldwell JL, Trafford AW. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and the heart: compound cardioprotection? Heart. 2018;104(15):1244–1250. PMID: 29519873; PMCID: PMC6204975. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312865

85. Andersson D, Landucci L, Lagerros Y, et al. Association of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors versus alprostadil with survival in men with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(12):1535–1550.

86. Yang S, Li X, Yang F, et al. Gut microbiota- dependent marker TMAO in promoting cardiovascular disease: inflammation mechanism, clinical prognostic, and potential as a therapeutic target. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1360. doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01360

87. Dyck GJB, Raj P, Zieroth S, Dyck JRB, Ezekowitz JA. The effects of resveratrol in patients with cardiovascular disease and heart failure: a narrative review. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(4):904. PMID: 30791450; PMCID: PMC6413130. doi:10.3390/ijms20040904

88. Fogacci F, Tocci G, Presta V, Effect of resveratrol on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled, clinical trials. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019;59(10):1605–1618. doi:10.1080/10408398.2017.1422480

89. Wong RH, Berry NM, Coates AM, et al. Chronic resveratrol consumption improves brachial flow-mediated dilatation in healthy obese adults. J Hypertens. 2013;31(9):1819–1827. PMID: 23743811. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e328362b9d6

90. Yadollahi A, Dastani M, Zargaran B, Ghasemi AH, Rahimi HR. The beneficial effects of curcumin on cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors. Rev Clin Med. 2019;6(1):12–19. doi:10.22038/rcm.2019.33520.1242

91. Sabira Mohammed KB. Harikumar, Chapter 8 - Antioxidant Properties of Curcumin: Impact on Neurological Disorders. Curcumin for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders, Academic Press; 2019:155–167.

92. Sugawara J, Akazawa N, Miyaki A, et al. Effect of endurance exercise training and curcumin intake on central arterial hemodynamics in postmenopausal women: pilot study. Am J Hypertens. 2012;25:651–656. doi:10.1038/ajh.2012.24

93. Akazawa N, Choi Y, Miyaki A, et al. Curcumin ingestion and exercise training improve vascular endothelial function in postmenopausal women. Nutri Res. 2012;32:795–799. doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2012.09.002

94. Chuengsamarn S, Rattanamongkolgul S, Luechapudiporn R, Phisalaphong C, Jirawatnotai S. Curcumin extract for prevention of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(11):2121–2127. PMID: 22773702; PMCID: PMC3476912. doi:10.2337/dc12-0116

95. Alizadeh M, Kheirouri S. Curcumin reduces malondialdehyde and improves antioxidants in humans with diseased conditions: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Biomedicine. 2019;9(4):23. PMID: 31724938; PMCID: PMC6855189. doi:10.1051/bmdcn/2019090423

96. Zaky A, Bassiouny A, Farghaly M, El-Sabaa BM. A Combination of Resveratrol and Curcumin is Effective Against Aluminum Chloride-Induced Neuroinflammation in Rats. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(s1):S221–S235. PMID: 28222524. doi:10.3233/JAD-161115

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.