Back to Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 8

Efficacy and tolerability of preservative-free tafluprost 0.0015% in Korean patients with glaucoma

Authors Hwang YH

Received 5 November 2013

Accepted for publication 8 November 2013

Published 18 December 2013 Volume 2014:8 Pages 71—72

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S57089

Checked for plagiarism Yes



Young Hoon Hwang

Department of Ophthalmology, Konyang University, Kim's Eye Hospital, Myung-Gok Eye Research Institute, Seoul, Korea

I read with interest the article entitled "Preservative-free tafluprost in the treatment of naive patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension" by Lanzl et al.1 I have also experienced similar treatment outcomes in Korean patients. In Korea, preservative-free tafluprost (Taflotan-S; Santen Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan) was introduced to the ophthalmic market in October 2012. Thus far, no data have been published on the efficacy and tolerability of preservative-free tafluprost in Korean patients. Thus, I investigated the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of preservative-free tafluprost in treatment-naïve Korean patients with glaucoma.

View original paper by Lanzl and colleagues.

Dear editor

I read with interest the article entitled “Preservative-free tafluprost in the treatment of naive patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension” by Lanzl et al.1 I have also experienced similar treatment outcomes in Korean patients. In Korea, preservative-free tafluprost (Taflotan-S; Santen Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan) was introduced to the ophthalmic market in October 2012. Thus far, no data have been published on the efficacy and tolerability of preservative-free tafluprost in Korean patients. Thus, I investigated the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of preservative-free tafluprost in treatment-naïve Korean patients with glaucoma.

This study included 58 Korean primary open-angle glaucoma patients who had not undergone previous glaucoma treatment. Preservative-free tafluprost was prescribed to the primary open-angle glaucoma patients and the patients were scheduled to visit the clinic after 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment. The mean (standard deviation) IOP of 58 eyes in 58 patients at the baseline visit was 20.0 (4.6) (range, 12–32) mmHg. After treatment with preservative-free tafluprost, the mean IOP decreased to 15.5 (2.5) mmHg (4.6 mmHg [23.0%] reduction from baseline) at 1 month after treatment, to 14.9 (2.8) mmHg (5.1 mmHg [25.5%] reduction from baseline) at 3 months after treatment, and to 15.1 (2.6) mmHg (4.9 mmHg [24.5%] reduction from baseline) at 6 months after treatment, respectively. No significant difference was found in IOP among 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment (P>0.05). Irritation/stinging/burning sensation, itching, tearing, and dryness were reported by 5 (8.6%), 2 (3.4%), 2 (3.4%), and 9 (15.5%) patients, respectively, during the treatment period. None, mild, moderate, and severe conjunctival hyperemia was observed in 43 (74.1%), 13 (22.4%), 2 (3.4%), and 0 (0%) eyes after treatment, respectively. No eye showed corneal staining during the treatment period.

According to my clinical experience, preservative-free tafluprost was both well tolerated and effective for IOP reduction in treatment-naïve Korean glaucoma patients. Therefore, I think that preservative-free tafluprost may be a good treatment regimen for glaucoma in Korean patients.

Disclosure

The author reports no conflicts of interest in this correspondence.


References

1.

Lanzl I, Hamacher T, Rosbach K, et al. Preservative-free tafluprost in the treatment of naive patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:901–910.

Creative Commons License © 2013 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.