Back to Browse Journals » Comparative Effectiveness Research » Volume 1

Telemedicine vs in-person cancer genetic counseling: measuring satisfaction and conducting economic analysis

Authors Datta SK, Buchanan AH, Hollowell GP, Beresford HF, Marcom PK, Adams MB

Published Date May 2011 Volume 2011:1 Pages 43—50

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CER.S19179

Published 19 May 2011

Santanu K Datta1,2, Adam H Buchanan3, Gail P Hollowell4, Henry F Beresford5, Paul K Marcom1,3, Martha B Adams1,6
1
Department of Medicine, Duke University; 2Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center; 3Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University; 4Department of Biology, North Carolina Central University; 5School of Nursing, Duke University; 6Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Abstract: Cancer genetic counseling (CGC) provides benefits and is the standard of care for individuals at increased risk of having a hereditary cancer syndrome. CGC services are typically centered in urban medical centers, leading to limited access to counseling in rural communities. Telemedicine has the potential to improve access to CGC, increase efficient use of genetic counselors, and improve patient care in rural communities. For telemedicine CGC to gain wide acceptance and implementation it needs to be shown that individuals who receive telemedicine CGC have high satisfaction levels and that CGC is cost-effective; however little research has been conducted to measure the impact of telemedicine CGC. This paper describes the design and methodology of a randomized controlled trial comparing telemedicine with in-person CGC. Measurement of patient satisfaction and effectiveness outcomes are described, as is measurement of costs that are included in an economic analysis. Study design and methodologies used are presented as a contribution to future comparative effectiveness investigations in the telemedicine genetic counseling field.

Keywords: cancer genetics, genetic counseling, rural health services, telemedicine, satisfaction, cost

Download Article [PDF] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Readers of this article also read:

Understanding kangaroo care and its benefits to preterm infants

Campbell-Yeo ML, Disher TC, Benoit BL, Johnston CC

Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics 2015, 6:15-32

Published Date: 18 March 2015

Ramucirumab: hitting another target in gastric cancer

Cohen MJ, Wainberg ZA

Gastrointestinal Cancer: Targets and Therapy 2015, 5:73-77

Published Date: 24 February 2015

Antifungal cyclic peptides from the marine sponge Microscleroderma herdmani [Corrigendum]

Zhang X, Jacob MR, Ranga Rao R, Wang YH, Agarwal AK, Newman DJ, Khan IA, Clark AM, Li XC

Research and Reports in Medicinal Chemistry 2013, 3:9-10

Published Date: 13 March 2013

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-II receptor blockers: do future research needs differ across disease states?

Crowley MJ, Powers BJ, Myers ER, McCrory DC, McBroom AJ, Sanders GD

Comparative Effectiveness Research 2013, 3:1-9

Published Date: 10 January 2013

The evaluation and optimal use of rituximab in lymphoid malignancies

Robak T, Robak P, Smolewski P

Blood and Lymphatic Cancer: Targets and Therapy 2012, 2:1-16

Published Date: 4 January 2012

The basic regulatory considerations and prospects for conducting bioavailability/bioequivalence (BA/BE) studies – an overview

Shaik Mastan, Thirunagari Bhavya Latha, Sathe Ajay

Comparative Effectiveness Research 2011, 1:1-25

Published Date: 22 March 2011