Back to Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 18

Assessment of Preoperative Risk Factors for Post-LASIK Ectasia Development [Letter]

Authors Navarro-Naranjo PI , Bareño Silva J, Trujillo-Quijano MA

Received 15 February 2024

Accepted for publication 1 March 2024

Published 19 March 2024 Volume 2024:18 Pages 881—883

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S464217

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser



Pedro-Ivan Navarro-Naranjo,1 Jose Bareño Silva,2 Miguel Andrés Trujillo-Quijano3

1Ophthalmologist, Cornea, External Diseases and Laser Refractive Surgery – Master of Science in Epidemiology, Asociacion Medica de Los Andes, Bogota, Colombia; 2Professor of Epidemiology and Researcher, Master of Science in Epidemiology, CES University School of Medicine, Medellín, Colombia; 3Ophthalmology Resident, Fundacion Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud School of Medicine – San Jose Hospital, Bogotá, Colombia

Correspondence: Pedro-Ivan Navarro-Naranjo, Email [email protected]


View the original paper by Prof. Dr. El-Naggar and colleagues

A Response to Letter has been published for this article.


Dear editor

We read with enthusiasm the article “Assessment of Preoperative Risk Factors for Post-Lasik Ectasia Development” by El-Naggar MT et al.1 The authors retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients who underwent LASIK surgery for the correction of myopia and/or astigmatism whom developed secondary corneal ectasia (n=24).2 In order to identify the performance as preoperative diagnostic tests, the authors applied known combined screening diagnostic tests to identify eyes that were not in a suitable condition to have undergone surgery. Among them, they used Belin-Ambrosio Display (BAD-D), ectasia risk score system (ERSS), Navarro index for corneal ectasia (NICE index),3 Pentacam random forest index (PRFI)4 and the Percentage tissue altered (PTA) reporting the proportion of eyes identified by each of them as not ideal candidates for LASIK surgery.

We agree with the authors on the importance of an exhaustive preoperative evaluation in refractive surgery using all available diagnostic tools, in a multimodal manner, and including topometric, tomographic and biomechanical evaluations to choose risk-free candidates to avoid post-LASIK ectasia, a devastating surgical complication. The NICE index is a cumulative risk index based on elevation tomography (Pentacam, Oculus, Wetzlar – Germany) and is composed of four parameters derived from the refractive map that includes the steepest keratometry measurement (K2), the central pachymetry (PAQUI), the posterior elevation at the pupillary area (PE) and the inferior-superior corneal asymmetry index (I-S). This diagnostic test classifies patients as not at risk (score of 4) and at risk (score from 5 to 12). No eye assessed can have a score of less than 4 (Table 1). Unfortunately, El-Naggar et al made some inaccuracies calculating the NICE index in the study reporting only 50% of the eyes at risk for LASIK surgery being actually 70.83% (17 out of 24 eyes) (Figure 1), and only 2 eyes (8.2%) were identified in the study to be ruled out for any type of corneal refractive surgery due to the score (NICE > 8). Undoubtedly, the use of all screening diagnostic tests to screen more accurately candidates for LASIK surgery will allow us to quantify objectively the risk to avoid secondary corneal ectasia.

Table 1 NICE Index

Figure 1 Frequencies according to NICE, BAD-D and PRFI Indexes (n=24).

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this communication.

References

1. El-Naggar M, Elkitkat R, Ziada H, Pellegrino L, Ambrosio R. Assessment of preoperative risk factors for post-lasik ectasia. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:3705–3715. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S425479

2. Randleman JB, Russell B, Ward MA, Thompson KP, Stulting RD. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2003;110(2):267–275.

3. Navarro PI, Torres Y, Bareño J. Indice acumulativo de riesgo para tamizaje de candidatos a cirugia corneal refractiva con excimer laser. Editor Acad Españ. 2016;2016:978.

4. Lopes B, Eliasy A, Ambrosio R. Artificial intelligence in corneal diagnosis: where are we? Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2019;7:204–211. doi:10.1007/s40135-019-00218-9

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.