Back to Journals » Clinical Interventions in Aging » Volume 19

Association of CHAT Gene Polymorphism rs3793790 and rs2177370 with Donepezil Response and the Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease Continuum

Authors Sun H , Lv C, Zhang X, Sun X, Chen S, Li K, Hu Y, Feng Y, Yin T, Jia J

Received 3 February 2024

Accepted for publication 4 June 2024

Published 11 June 2024 Volume 2024:19 Pages 1041—1050

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S462786

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Zhi-Ying Wu



Hongmei Sun,1,2 Chao Lv,2,3 Xiaoxue Zhang,1,2 Xuan Sun,1,3,4 Siyu Chen,1,3,4 Ke Li,3,4 Yazhuo Hu,2,3 Yuxin Feng,1,2 Tong Yin,2,3 Jianjun Jia2,3

1Medical School, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Institute of Geriatrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 3National Clinical Research Center of Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Geriatric Neurology, the Second Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Jianjun Jia; Tong Yin, Institute of Geriatrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, Haidian District, 100853, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]; [email protected]

Background: Genetic variation plays an important role in drug response, there are few relevant studies on patients with Alzheimer’s disease continuum (ADC).
Objective: This study focused on the associations between two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs3793790 and rs2177370) located in the CHAT gene and donepezil response in ADC patients, and further evaluated the associations between the two SNPs and ADC.
Material and Methods: According to 2018 National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA) standard, amyloid β-protein positive (Aβ+) and negative (Aβ-) patients were recruited according to the Aβ-PET/CT standard. rs3793790 and rs2177370 were genotyped in buccal swab samples by using the MassARRAY system. We used the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) in Chinese version, caregiver evaluation, and prescribing behavior to assess therapeutic response during the 9-month period. Using logistic regression models, we analyzed the relationship between the two SNPs and donepezil response in 58 Aβ+ patients treated with donepezil alone at the initial diagnosis of ADC. We also explored a probable link between the two SNPs and ADC in 147 Aβ+ and 73 Aβ– patients using a logistic regression analysis.
Results: The chance of donepezil response was higher in patients with the G allele of rs3793790 and/or the A allele of rs2177370 than in those without (odds ratio (OR) 6.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.64– 28.49). Additionally, the rs3793790 variant was not associated with ADC, whereas the A allele in rs2177370 increased 1.51-fold the ADC risk (OR 2.51, 95% CI: 1.28– 4.95).
Conclusion: The genetic variants of rs3793790 and rs2177370 were associated with the donepezil response, and rs2177370 may have a moderate relationship with the risk of ADC.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, pharmacogenomics, variant, gene, donepezil

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the main type of dementia, is characterized by a progressive deterioration in cognition with varying degrees of psycho-behavioural symptoms, eventually leading to damage in the basic bodily functions.1 Characteristic pathological changes have occurred in the brain before the patient has clinical symptoms, and amyloid β-protein (Aβ) deposition and hyperphosphorylated tau protein are key links of AD pathogenesis.2 As pathological changes such as Aβ and tau continue to worsen, the appearance and progression of clinical symptoms are eventually elicited.3 Therefore, it is considered to be an Alzheimer’s disease continuum (ADC) rather than an entity.3 However, therapeutic options are limited, with two main categories of drugs in clinical practice, including acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) represented by donepezil and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor blockers represented by memantine.4 In the new era of advocating the concept of precision medicine, the development of pharmacogenomics (PGx) has provided new strategies for ADC treatment and helped optimize treatment using existing drugs.5

PGx focuses on the action of genetic variation in mediating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, ultimately achieving improved drug action and reducing adverse effects in clinical practice.6 Furthermore, a comprehensive insight into the genetic mechanisms of different drug responses can facilitate the development of new drugs.7 Currently, a multitude of retrospective analyses and prospective trials have been conducted on cardiovascular, oncological, and psychiatric disorders to confirm the hypothesis that pharmacogenomically guided treatment may optimize drug outcomes in clinical practice. However, few relevant studies are available on ADC pharmacogenomics.8

Heterogeneity of drug response is an almost inevitable topic in contemporary medicine, and genetic variations have been shown to play an important role in individual disparities in drug response.9 Donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, was approved by the FDA in 1996 as a commonly used drug for the treatment of AD with therapeutic efficacy rates ranging from 20–60%.10 Several studies have evaluated the relationship of genetic polymorphisms with the donepezil response in ADC patients. A study in a Canada population indicated that the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-rs733722 in CHAT gene may represent a potential marker of AChEIs response, and patients carrying T allele in the SNP were more likely to be effective than those carrying C allele.11 Lee et al12 suggested that A allele at the +4 position of CHAT gene may have a positive impact on donepezil response in ADC patients. Scacchi et al13 in an Italian population reported that a significant association of BCHE gene polymorphism rs1355534 with the efficacy of donepezil and rivastigmine was present. Braga et al14 observed that the variants of rs6494223 in CHRNA7 gene were helpful for understanding the AChEIs response in ADC patients in Brazil. As the roles of inflammatory mediators, immune factors, and oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of ADC have been described, genetic polymorphisms in IL-6 and FOXO1 have been gradually explored as potential factors influencing donepezil response in ADC patients.15,16 However, genomic research is highly Eurocentric, with 97% of the participants being European and approximately 2.2% Asian, lacking ethnic diversity.7 Therefore, it is necessary to conduct ADC-related pharmacogenomic analyses of East Asian populations.

Using the Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics knowledge base (PharmGKB, https://www.pharmgkb.org/) and Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC, https://cpicpgx.org/) databases, we searched for SNPs with a minimum allele frequency of ≥1% in East Asian populations, which may be associated with the donepezil response to ADC therapies. The search showed that two SNPs located in the CHAT gene, rs3793790 (chr10:49,632,690 (GRCh38.p14), Alleles G>A / G>C, Frequency G=0.325) and rs2177370 (chr10:49,630,828 (GRCh38.p14), Alleles A>G, Frequency G=0.470), were found to be associated with donepezil response only in a Korean population.17 Analyses of these two SNPs in other East Asian populations are lacking, and the clear advantages of pharmacogenomically guided treatment remain to be validated in future studies.

Furthermore, a decline in the level of acetylcholine (ACh) in the brain is a feature in ADC patients linking to cognitive decline.18 Although cholinergic dysfunction and ADC are not explicit causations, numerous studies have demonstrated a role for cholinergic deficits in the development of ADC, which is related to memory and cognitive processes.19 Choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) is a key enzyme that catalyzes ACh synthesis. ACh is involved in AD pathogenesis. ChAT activity is markedly reduced in the brains of ADC patients, which may be related to disease severity and can be inhibited by Aβ oligomers.20 CHAT is the gene encoding ChAT, and its polymorphism seems to influence ChAT activity, which indirectly affects the risk of ADC.21 Previous studies have found a certain relationship between CHAT gene polymorphism rs3810950 and ADC.22 Tang et al23 indicated that A-allele carriers of rs3810950 have an earlier onset of ADC than those G-allele carriers in Chinese population. Scacchi et al13 observed that CHAT gene polymorphism rs2177369 may play a relevant role in ADC risk. However, the relationship between the polymorphisms rs3793790 and rs2177370 in the CHAT gene and ADC in the Chinese population has not been explored.

Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the association of the rs3793790 and rs2177370 variants with the therapeutic response to donepezil in Chinese patients with ADC and to further analyze the potential link between the two SNPs and the risk of ADC.

Material and Methods

Study Patients

We recruited patients between January 2022 and August 2023 at the Chinese PLA General Hospital.

Donepezil response analyses were performed in 58 Aβ+ patients treated with donepezil alone at the initial ADC diagnosis. We assembled and recorded demographic information, clinical manifestations, comorbidities, family history, APOE genotype, Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores,24 Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores in Chinese version25,26 before and after treatment, and information on the subjects’ drugs. Inclusion criteria: Aβ+ patients with ADC meeting 2018 National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA) standard by the Aβ-Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET/CT) examination, and CDR scores 0.5–2, and with a caregiver who can provide relevant information and sign an informed consent form. Exclusion criteria: Patients with other disorders that cause cognitive impairment, such as thyroid dysfunction, severe hepatic and renal insufficiency, or severe systemic or psychiatric illnesses that prevent them from completing the clinical assessment.

Correlation analyses between the rs3793790 and rs2177370 variants and the risk of ADC were performed in 147 Aβ+ and 73 Aβ– patients by Aβ-PET/CT examination. We collected the demographic information, comorbidities, family history, and APOE genotype of the subjects.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chinese PLA General Hospital (S2021-640-02), and written informed consent was obtained from all the patients. It conformed to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in Tokyo 2004).

Genetic Analysis

rs3793790 and rs2177370 of CHAT were genotyped from buccal swab samples using the MassARRAY system.

Genomic DNA extraction: DNA was extracted from buccal swab samples using a Purifier 32 Nucleic Acid Extractor (Jifan Biotechnology Co., Ltd.).

PCR system configuration: Multiplex PCR primers were included in the approved clinical test kit (Zhejiang Hangzhou Machinery No. 20,210,448, Zhejiang Digena Diagnostic Technology Co., Ltd.). Specific sequence information of the primers is still under intellectual property protection.

Nucleic acid mass spectrometry flight detection: PCR amplification was performed using the Xi’an Tianlong Gentier96E PCR instrument, purification using shrimp alkaline enzyme, and extension products using a single base. Mass spectrometry was performed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS), and target region sequences were identified using mass spectrometry software.

Measures

The donepezil response was assessed after 9 months of treatment. Donepezil was considered effective when ΔMMSE (difference in MMSE scores in Chinese version between after 9 months and before applying donepezil) was ≥ −127,28 and the caregiver indicated that the patient’s symptoms had improved or not significantly changed while donepezil was applied consistently and regularly. Donepezil was defined as ineffective when ΔMMSE < −1, and the caregiver indicated that the patient’s symptoms had worsened to discontinue or change donepezil or add other drugs to improve cognition.

Statistical Analyses

SPSS software (version 27.0) was used for statistical analyses. Comparisons between groups: t-test for normally distributed measures, otherwise Wilcoxon test; χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test for count data. Logistic regression models were used to analyze factors associated with donepezil response and ADC. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results

Gene Frequencies

A total of 58 patients with ADC were included in the donepezil response analyses (27 males, 31 females), aged 70.84±8.30 years. The genotype results showed that ε3 was the most common allele (58.62%) of APOE, followed by ε4 (34.48%). (Figure 1A) In the CHAT gene, the frequency of G allele in rs3793790 was 17.24% and the frequency of A allele in rs2177370 was 18.10%. (Figure 1B) Interestingly, we found that when rs3793790 carried the G allele, rs2177370 carried the A allele simultaneously, and when rs3793790 carried the A allele, rs2177370 often carried the G allele, with a concordance rate of 91.38% (GG/AA, GA/GA, AA/GG). (Figure 1C)

Figure 1 Gene frequencies of APOE and CHAT in patients with Alzheimer’s disease continuum. (A) APOE alleles frequency. (B) The rs3793790 and rs2177370 alleles frequency. (C) CHAT genotypes frequency.

Association of rs3793790 and rs2177370 Variants with Donepezil Response

Of the 58 patients, donepezil was effective in 33 (56.90%) and ineffective in 25 (43.10%) patients with ADC. Compared to the ineffective group, the frequency of carrying the G allele in rs3793790 and the A allele in rs2177370 was significantly higher in the effective group (P<0.05, Table 1). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that baseline MMSE scores, dementia severity, and the rs3793790 and rs2177370 variants were associated with donepezil therapeutic response (P<0.05, Table 2). Further multifactorial regression analysis showed that donepezil was more likely to be effective in patients carrying the G allele in rs3793790 and/or the A allele in rs2177370 than in those who carried neither allele (OR 6.83, 95% CI: 1.64–28.49, P=0.008, Table 3).

Table 1 Comparisons Between Effective Group and Ineffective Group of Donepezil Response

Table 2 Univariate Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with Donepezil Response

Table 3 Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with Donepezil Response

Association of rs3793790 and rs2177370 Variants with ADC

The analyses included 147 patients with Aβ+ and 73 patients with Aβ–. There were significant differences in the genotype and allele distributions of APOE and rs2177370 between ADC and control groups (P<0.05, Table 4), whereas the variances of rs3793790 between groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05, Table 4). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that APOE and rs2177370 variants were associated with ADC (P<0.05, Table 5).

Table 4 Comparisons the Polymorphism of APOE and CHAT Gene Between Alzheimer’s Disease Continuum Group and Control Group

Table 5 Univariate Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with Alzheimer’s Disease Continuum

Further multifactorial regression analysis indicated that carriers of the APOE-ε4 allele were related to the risk of ADC (OR 2.85, 95% CI: 1.50–5.42, P=0.001, Figure 2), and carriers of the rs2177370-A allele were associated with a 2.51 times higher risk of ADC than non-carriers (OR 2.51, 95% CI: 1.28–4.95, P=0.008, Figure 2). A combination of rs2177370 and APOE gene analyses showed that carriers of the A/ε4 allele had a 6.10-fold increased ADC risk compared to carriers of the G/non-ε4 allele (OR 7.10, 95% CI: 2.60–19.38, P<0.001, Figure 2).

Figure 2 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Blue: the rs2177370 and APOE gene analyses in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Red: a combination of rs2177370 and APOE gene analyses in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Black: adjusted factors in multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Discussion

The use of genetic background as a predictor of drug response is an emerging and exploratory area of research in ADC. We found that polymorphism of the CHAT gene was associated with donepezil response in ADC patients, and CHAT genetic variants play a role in the risk of ADC. These findings support the use of PGx in ADC.

Efficient and rapid multi-locus testing using the MassARRAY nucleic acid mass spectrometry platform suggested that the frequency of the G allele in rs3793790 was 17.24% and that of the A allele in rs2177370 was 18.10% in patients with ADC, which was similar to the findings of a previous study.17 Additionally, we found that when rs3793790 carried the G allele, rs2177370 often carried the A allele and vice versa, with a concordance rate of 91.38%. However, this mechanism requires further investigation.

The results of this study imply that donepezil was more effective in patients carrying the G allele of rs3793790 and/or the A allele of rs2177370 than in those who did not. Yoon et al17 assessed 21 SNPs of the CHAT gene for their relationship with donepezil response and concluded that rs3793790 and rs2177370 were related to donepezil therapeutic response in patients with AD from Korea. Enhancing levels of ACh is an important therapeutic target in patients with AD, providing a basis for the development of AChEIs.18 Donepezil, an AChEI, alleviates AD symptoms by inhibiting degradation of ACh. ChAT is a critical enzyme for ACh synthesis and is encoded by CHAT. Thus, the levels of ACh synthesis may vary for each individual with CHAT gene polymorphisms, which may indirectly influence donepezil response.10

The G allele of rs3793790 and A allele of rs2177370 in CHAT may be effective alleles for donepezil treatment. Patients carrying effective alleles may acquire greater benefits from donepezil in ADC therapy. In addition, based on the findings of previous studies, pharmacogenomic effects are significantly greater in homozygotic genotypes than in heterozygotic genotypes.7 Consequently, we propose that the chance of a good donepezil response increases in patients with the GG genotype of rs3793790 and AA genotype of rs2177370. Although these findings highlight the potential benefits of testing the rs3793790 and rs2177370 genotypes in the heterogeneity of donepezil response in ADC therapy, heavy challenges remain for clinical application, such as the lack of better alternative treatments and evidence of cost-effectiveness in testing genetic variants.29

The human APOE gene has three alleles, ε2, ε3 and ε4, encoding three protein isoforms, APOE2, APOE3 and APOE4, respectively. The ε4 allele is the strongest risk gene and the ε2 allele is the strongest protective gene for sporadic AD.30 It also has been found to a higher rate of hemorrhage of amyloid associated imaging abnormality (ARIA-H) after treatment with anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies such as aducanumab in APOE ε4 carriers compared with APOE ε2 or ε3 carriers.31 Some studies have also suggested that the APOE gene may be associated with donepezil response, but current studies have mixed findings. The results of two recent meta-analyses have not found an independent impact of the APOE gene on donepezil therapeutic response in AD patients.32,33 Based on the data from this study, we did not consider the association between APOE gene and donepezil response.

The impact of cholinergic deficits on the course of AD has been elaborated in a multitude of studies.34 Some studies have indicated that other SNPs in CHAT are associated with the risk of AD. Ahn et al35 supposed that the rs3810950 and rs1880676 variants in the CHAT gene had an impact on AD, depending on APOE genotypes; the impact was only apparent in patients not carrying the APOE-ε4 allele. Hálová et al22 using an in silico approach and pointed out that the distinct structure of ChAT protein provided the molecular basis for ChAT activity related to the rs3810950 variant, facilitating the revisiting of the cholinergic hypothesis.

Further analysis suggested that the A allele in rs2177370 increased 1.51-fold the ADC risk, while the rs3793790 variant and ADC may not be relevant. When rs2177370-A is combined with APOE-ε4, there is a 7.1 times the risk of ADC. These findings indicate that rs2177370 might be a potential susceptibility gene for ADC with pharmacogenomic properties, which are reasonable and existent due to the role of the cholinergic system in the course of ADC. The favourable response to donepezil seems to indirectly support the diagnosis of ADC to some extent. However, the mechanisms by which genetic variants of the CHAT gene affect donepezil response and ADC risk are unknown.17 Alternative splicing CHAT gene can produce various mRNA transcripts causing the appearance of different ChAT isoforms such as 82-,74- and 69-kDa ChAT.36 A recent study has elucidated that older 82-kDa ChAT-expressing mice may be related to memory impairment and neuroinflammation.37 Therefore, we speculate that the rs2177370 variants located in the intronic region may influence the regulation of the CHAT gene, causing the abnormal ChAT protein isoforms, which affects their roles in specific cholinergic pathways. The mechanisms remain to be further verified by fundamental researches.

Strengths and Limitations

This study explored the use of PGx in ADC and supported the association of rs3793790 and rs2177370 variants with inter-individual differences in response to donepezil in ADC patients. In addition, we concluded that the rs2177370 variant has a moderate relationship with the risk of ADC. Significantly, the diagnosis of the subjects in our study was supported by Aβ-PET/CT examination, which enhanced the reliability of the results.

However, our study had some limitations. First, the measures of donepezil response need to be enriched, such as adding the assessment of different cognitive domains.38 Second, the risk factors for ADC were evaluated using cross-sectional analyses, and patients were not followed over the natural course of the disease. In addition to rs3793790 and rs2177370, other loci associated with the mechanism of action of donepezil require further exploration, and functional predictions and clinical guidance may evolve with new evidence.39

Conclusions

CHAT genetic variations are linked to the donepezil response. The chance of donepezil response increases in patients with the G allele of rs3793790 and/or A allele of rs2177370. In addition, rs2177370 may be a potential susceptibility gene loci for ADC with pharmacogenomic properties. These results further support the important role of PGx in ADC.

Acknowledgments

An unauthorized version of the Chinese MMSE was used by the study team without permission, this issue was rectified between the authors and PAR. The MMSE is a copyrighted instrument and may not be used or reproduced in whole or in part, in any form or language, or by any means without written permission of PAR. This work was supported by the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China (XYZ-202108). We sincerely appreciate all participants for their contributions to this study.

Funding

This study received grants from the National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases (NCRCG-PLAGH-2022002), the program of the Health Bureau of Military Commission Logistics Security Department (21BJZ20), and National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC3605403).

Disclosure

All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(4):1598–1695. doi:10.1002/alz.13016

2. Vejandla B, Savani S, Appalaneni R, Veeravalli RS, Gude SS. Alzheimer’s disease: The past, present, and future of a globally progressive disease. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e51705. doi:10.7759/cureus.51705

3. Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(4):535–562. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018

4. Singh B, Day CM, Abdella S, Garg S. Alzheimer’s disease current therapies, novel drug delivery systems and future directions for better disease management. J Control Release. 2024;367:402–424. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.01.047

5. Zuniga Santamaria T, Yescas Gomez P, Fricke Galindo I, Gonzalez Gonzalez M, Ortega Vazquez A, Lopez Lopez M. Pharmacogenetic studies in Alzheimer disease. Neurologia. 2022;37(4):287–303. doi:10.1016/j.nrleng.2018.03.022

6. Vnencak-Jones CL, Saucier LAG, Liu M, Gatto CL, Peterson JF. Pharmacogenomics: Genotype-Driven Medicine. J Appl Lab Med. 2024;9(1):183–186. doi:10.1093/jalm/jfad064

7. Roden DM, McLeod HL, Relling MV, et al. Pharmacogenomics. Lancet. 2019;394(10197):521–532. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31276-0

8. Pirmohamed M. Pharmacogenomics: current status and future perspectives. Nat Rev Genet. 2023;24(6):350–362. doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00572-8

9. Vuic B, Milos T, Tudor L, et al. Pharmacogenomics of Dementia: Personalizing the treatment of cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Genes. 2023;14(11). doi:10.3390/genes14112048

10. Lu J, Wang X, Wan L, et al. Gene Polymorphisms Affecting the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Donepezil Efficacy. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:934. doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00934

11. Harold D, Macgregor S, Patterson CE, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism in CHAT influences response to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2006;16(2):75–77. doi:10.1097/01.fpc.0000189799.88596.04

12. Lee KU, Lee JH, Lee DY, et al. The effect of choline acetyltransferase genotype on donepezil treatment response in patients with alzheimer’s disease. Clin Psychopharml Neurosci. 2015;13(2):168–173. doi:10.9758/cpn.2015.13.2.168

13. Scacchi R, Gambina G, Moretto G, Corbo RM. Variability of AChE, BChE, and ChAT genes in the late-onset form of Alzheimer’s disease and relationships with response to treatment with Donepezil and Rivastigmine. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsych Genet. 2009;150. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.30846

14. Braga IL, Silva PN, Furuya TK, et al. Effect of APOE and CHRNA7 genotypes on the cognitive response to cholinesterase inhibitor treatment at different stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015;30(2):139–144. doi:10.1177/1533317514539540

15. Zamani M, Mohammadi M, Zamani H, Tavasoli A. Pharmacogenetic Study on the Impact of Rivastigmine Concerning Genetic Variants of A2M and IL-6 Genes on Iranian Alzheimer’s Patients. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53(7):4521–4528. doi:10.1007/s12035-015-9387-8

16. Gaikwad S, Senapati S, Haque MA, Kayed R. Senescence, brain inflammation, and oligomeric tau drive cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from clinical and preclinical studies. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20(1):709–727. doi:10.1002/alz.13490

17. Yoon H, Myung W, Lim SW, et al. Association of the choline acetyltransferase gene with responsiveness to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2015;48(3):111–117. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1545300

18. Hampel H, Mesulam MM, Cuello AC, et al. Revisiting the Cholinergic Hypothesis in Alzheimer’s Disease: emerging Evidence from Translational and Clinical Research. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2019;6(1):2–15. doi:10.14283/jpad.2018.43

19. Chen XQ, Mobley WC. Exploring the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer Disease in Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Neurons: converging Insights From Alternative Hypotheses. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:446. doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00446

20. Nunes-Tavares N, Santos LE, Stutz B, et al. Inhibition of choline acetyltransferase as a mechanism for cholinergic dysfunction induced by amyloid-β peptide oligomers. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(23):19377–19385. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.321448

21. Yuan H, Xia Q, Ling K, Wang X, Wang X, Du X. Association of Choline Acetyltransferase Gene Polymorphisms (SNPs rs868750G/A, rs1880676G/A, rs2177369G/A and rs3810950G/A) with Alzheimer’s Disease Risk: a Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159022. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159022

22. Hálová A, Janoutová J, Ewerlingová L, et al. CHAT gene polymorphism rs3810950 is associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in the Czech population. J Biomed Sci. 2018;25(1):41. doi:10.1186/s12929-018-0444-2

23. Tang M, Rao D, Ma C, et al. Evaluation of choline acetyltransferase gene polymorphism (2384 G/A) in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cognit Disord. 2008;26(1):9–14. doi:10.1159/000140612

24. Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43(11):2412–2414. doi:10.1212/WNL.43.11.2412-a

25. Katzman R, Zhang MY, Ouang Ya Q, et al. A Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination; impact of illiteracy in a Shanghai dementia survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(10):971–978. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(88)90034-0

26. Li H, Jia J, Yang Z. Mini-Mental State Examination in Elderly Chinese: a Population-Based Normative Study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;53(2):487–496. doi:10.3233/JAD-160119

27. Hensel A, Angermeyer MC, Riedel-Heller SG. Measuring cognitive change in older adults: reliable change indices for the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych. 2007;78(12):1298–1303. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.109074

28. Mitrushina M, Satz P. Reliability and validity of the Mini-Mental State Exam in neurologically intact elderly. J Clin Psychol. 1991;47(4):537–543. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199107)47:4<537::AID-JCLP2270470411>3.0.CO;2-9

29. Salas-Hernández A, Galleguillos M, Carrasco M, et al. An updated examination of the perception of barriers for pharmacogenomics implementation and the usefulness of drug/gene pairs in Latin America and the Caribbean. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1175737. doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1175737

30. Serrano-Pozo A, Das S, Hyman BT. APOE and Alzheimer’s disease: advances in genetics, pathophysiology, and therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(1):68–80. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30412-9

31. Tolar M, Abushakra S, Hey JA, Porsteinsson A, Sabbagh M. Aducanumab, gantenerumab, BAN2401, and ALZ-801-The first wave of amyloid-targeting drugs for Alzheimer’s disease with potential for near term approval. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020;12(1):95. doi:10.1186/s13195-020-00663-w

32. Xiao T, Jiao B, Zhang W, Tang B, Shen L. Effect of the CYP2D6 and APOE Polymorphisms on the Efficacy of Donepezil in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. CNS Drugs. 2016;30(10):899–907. doi:10.1007/s40263-016-0356-1

33. Cheng YC, Huang YC, Liu HC. Effect of Apolipoprotein E varepsilon4 Carrier Status on Cognitive Response to Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dement Geriatr Cognit Disord. 2018;45(5–6):335–352. doi:10.1159/000490175

34. Judd JM, Jasbi P, Winslow W, et al. Inflammation and the pathological progression of Alzheimer’s disease are associated with low circulating choline levels. Acta Neuro. 2023;146(4):565–583. doi:10.1007/s00401-023-02616-7

35. Jo S A, Ahn K, Kim JH, et al. ApoE-epsilon 4-dependent association of the choline acetyltransferase gene polymorphisms (2384G>A and 1882G>A) with Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;368(1–2). doi:10.1016/j.cca.2005.12.037

36. Resendes MC, Dobransky T, Ferguson SSG, Rylett RJ. Nuclear localization of the 82-kDa form of human choline acetyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(27):19417–19421. doi:10.1074/jbc.274.27.19417

37. AlQot HE, Rylett RJ. A novel transgenic mouse model expressing primate-specific nuclear choline acetyltransferase: insights into potential cholinergic vulnerability. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3037. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-30155-4

38. Marucci G, Buccioni M, Ben DD, Lambertucci C, Volpini R, Amenta F. Efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropharmacology. 2021;190:108352. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108352

39. Cecchin E, Stocco G. Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine. Genes. 2020;11(6):679. doi:10.3390/genes11060679

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.