Back to Journals » Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology » Volume 17

Bimekizumab in Biologics-Refractory Psoriatic Arthritis: A Real-Life Analysis from a Combined Dermatology-Rheumatology Clinic

Authors Zabotti A , Cabas N, Giovannini I , Guella S, Cereser L , Zuiani C, Stinco G, Quartuccio L , Errichetti E

Received 7 March 2024

Accepted for publication 25 June 2024

Published 1 July 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 1553—1556

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S467832

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Jeffrey Weinberg



Alen Zabotti,1 Nicola Cabas,1 Ivan Giovannini,1 Silvia Guella,1 Lorenzo Cereser,2 Chiara Zuiani,2 Giuseppe Stinco,3 Luca Quartuccio,1 Enzo Errichetti3

1Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, Rheumatology Institute, Azienda sanitaria universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; 2Department of Medicine, Institute of Radiology, Azienda sanitaria universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; 3Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, Dermatology Institute, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy

Correspondence: Enzo Errichetti, Institute of Dermatology, Department of Medical Area, University of Udine, Piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia, 15, Udine, 33100, Italy, Tel +39 0432559822, Email [email protected]

Treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) may pose some difficulties in clinical practice, with a relevant proportion of patients being refractory to at least two courses of biological treatment,1 thus leading to persistent inflammation/pain and diminished quality of life (sometimes regardless of objective signs of inflammation).1 Hence, there is a need to find alternative treatments in such a subset of biologics-refractory PsA patients.

In this analysis, we investigated the efficacy of bimekizumab (BKZ), an inhibitor of IL17A and IL17F, in biologics-refractory PsA (defined as the failure of at least two courses of biological treatment) in a real-life setting. Specifically, we considered psoriatic subjects from our combined dermatology-rheumatology clinic who also had active PsA and were candidates for BKZ therapy for skin disease. A comprehensive rheumatological examination including swollen joint count (SJC) in 66 joints, tender joint count (TJC) in 68 joints and Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI), collection of PsA related Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) and a sonographic assessment in 48 joints, 36 tendons and 12 enthesis were performed at baseline (w0), as well as week 12 (w12) and 24 (w24). The active sonographic site count score (ie, US active site count) was defined by a radiologist, blinded to the clinical evaluation as the sum of active synovitis,2 active tenosynovitis3 and active enthesitis4 in each patient. All data are expressed as mean values or percentages; statistical analysis was performed by using Mann–Whitney U-test with a p-value of 0.05 deemed as statistically significant.

In total, seven psoriatic patients (mean age 54.5 ± 15 years; 4/7 male; Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI): mean 8.5 ± 5.1) with active and biologics-refractory PsA (mean Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA): 35.9 ± 20) were included in this analysis (Table 1). Among them, 5/7 (71.4%) were classified as difficult to treat (D2T) PsA patients (defined as failure of at least two mechanisms of action + persistent moderate disease activity).5 At w12, 5/7 patients (71.4%) experienced a significant joint improvement with achievement of DAPSA-low disease activity, whereas PASI100 was achieved in 5/7 patients (71.4%). Six out of seven patients (85.7%) reached the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for both DAPSA and PASI.6,7 Interestingly, we observed an improvement even in three out of four patients who had previously failed other IL-17A inhibitors. In terms of mean values, we observed DAPSA and PASI amelioration, with figures of 13.8 ± 6.9 (Δ DAPSA 22.1) and 3.2 ± 7.4 (Δ PASI 5.3), respectively; at week 24, DAPSA-low disease activity and PASI100 rates were maintained (Figure 1). Notably, six out seven patients (85.7%) did not display significant joint inflammatory objective findings during baseline clinical and sonographic examinations (SJC mean 0.67 ± 0.81; US active site count mean 0.83 ± 0.75; CRP mean 0.21 ± 0.1 mg/dl) despite experiencing active disease according to TJC (mean 11.3 ± 15.8) and patient-reported outcomes (mean PtGA 6.33 ± 2.7; mean VAS pain 6.2 ± 2.5). Considering such a subset of patients, BKZ showed a 40% decrease in TJC (Δ 4.5; p=0.26) and a significant reduction of Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores (p=0.025 and p=0.025, respectively, at w12 and p=0.045 and p=0.037, respectively, at w24) (Figure 2). No adverse events were observed during the follow-up period.

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of Patients

Figure 1 Trend of DAPSA in the seven patients represented in the figure with different colors. DAPSA, Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis.

Figure 2 Trend of PtGA and VAS pain of the six patients without the traditional objective signs of clinical and imaging inflammation during the follow-up. PtGA, Patient Global Assessment; VAS Pain, Visual Analogue Scale. *p= 0.025; **p= 0.025; p= 0.045; ††p= 0.037.

In this real-life experience, BKZ emerges as a possible effective and safe treatment for active PsA refractory to at least two courses of biologic treatments, including TNF-inhibitors, anti-IL-17A and/or anti-IL-23. Moreover, this analysis underlines that BKZ may lead to joint low-disease activity also in those subjects lacking objective signs of inflammation, especially in terms of reduction of pain and improvement in patient’s disease perception. This might be due to a possible activity on pain control by dual IL-17A and IL-17F inhibition, yet a placebo effect cannot be ruled out. Limitations of this study include the small sample size and the lack of a long-term follow-up, thus future larger studies are needed to confirm our preliminary findings.

Data Sharing Statement

All the data of the study are included in the present manuscript.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

The patients in this manuscript provided informed consent for the publication of case details, and institutional approval was not required, as the study was based on data retrospectively collected in a routine clinical setting. This study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and no ethical approval was required as it results from clinical routinary activity.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported (ie, conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation); took part in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Glintborg B, Di Giuseppe D, Wallman JK, et al. Uptake and effectiveness of newer biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in psoriatic arthritis: results from five Nordic biologics registries. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82:820–828. doi:10.1136/ard-2022-223650

2. D’Agostino M-A, Boers M, Wakefield RJ, et al. Exploring a new ultrasound score as a clinical predictive tool in patients with rheumatoid arthritis starting Abatacept: results from the APPRAISE study. RMD Open. 2016;2:e000237. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000237

3. Naredo E, D’Agostino MA, Wakefield RJ, et al. Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound score for tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1328–1334. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202092

4. Balint PV, Terslev L, Aegerter P, et al. Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound definition and scoring for enthesitis in spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: an OMERACT US initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1730–1735. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213609

5. Perrotta FM, Scriffignano S, Ciccia F, Lubrano E. Clinical characteristics of potential ‘difficult-to-treat’ patients with psoriatic arthritis: a retrospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort. Rheumatol Ther. 2022;9:1193–1201. doi:10.1007/s40744-022-00461-w

6. Schoels MM, Aletaha D, Alasti F, Smolen JS. Disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA): defining remission and treatment success using the DAPSA score. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:811–818. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207507

7. Mattei PL, Corey KC, Kimball AB. Psoriasis area severity index (PASI) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): the correlation between disease severity and psychological burden in patients treated with biological therapies. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28:333–337. doi:10.1111/jdv.12106

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.