Back to Journals » International Journal of Nanomedicine » Volume 19

Chitosan/Alginate-Based Nanoparticles for Antibacterial Agents Delivery

Authors Wathoni N , Herdiana Y , Suhandi C, Mohammed AFA, El-Rayyes A, Narsa AC 

Received 19 March 2024

Accepted for publication 22 May 2024

Published 30 May 2024 Volume 2024:19 Pages 5021—5044

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S469572

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Kamakhya Misra



Nasrul Wathoni,1,* Yedi Herdiana,1,* Cecep Suhandi,1,* Ahmed Fouad Abdelwahab Mohammed,2,* Ali El-Rayyes,3,* Angga Cipta Narsa4,*

1Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, 45363, Indonesia; 2Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, 61519, Egypt; 3Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia; 4Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, 71157, Indonesia

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Nasrul Wathoni, Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, 45363, Indonesia, Tel +62-22-842-888-888, Email [email protected]

Abstract: Nanoparticle systems integrating alginate and chitosan emerge as a promising avenue to tackle challenges in leveraging the potency of pharmacological active agents. Owing to their intrinsic properties as polysaccharides, alginate and chitosan, exhibit remarkable biocompatibility, rendering them conducive to bodily integration. By downsizing drug particles to the nano-scale, the system enhances drug solubility in aqueous environments by augmenting surface area. Additionally, the system orchestrates extended drug release kinetics, aligning well with the exigencies of chronic drug release requisite for antibacterial therapeutics. A thorough scrutiny of existing literature underscores a wealth of evidence supporting the utilization of the alginate-chitosan nanoparticle system for antibacterial agent delivery. Literature reviews present abundant evidence of the utilization of nanoparticle systems based on a combination of alginate and chitosan for antibacterial agent delivery. Various experiments demonstrate enhanced antibacterial efficacy, including an increase in the inhibitory zone diameter, improvement in the minimum inhibitory concentration, and an enhancement in the bacterial reduction rate. This enhancement in efficacy occurs due to mechanisms involving increased solubility resulting from particle size reduction, prolonged release effects, and enhanced selectivity towards bacterial cell walls, stemming from ionic interactions between positively charged particles and teichoic acid on bacterial cell walls. However, clinical studies remain limited, and there are currently no marketed antibacterial drugs utilizing this system. Hence, expediting clinical efficacy validation is crucial to maximize its benefits promptly.

Keywords: alginate, chitosan, polymeric nanoparticle, antibacterial agents, drug delivery, controlled release, nano-delivery systems

Introduction

One of the primary challenges encountered by drug molecules, particularly newly developed ones, is their limited solubility. Studies indicate that nearly 40% of newly discovered chemical entities exhibit low solubility in water.1,2 This low solubility adversely affects their bioavailability, resulting in restricted absorption by the body.3 Consequently, drugs often need to be administered in high doses to achieve the desired therapeutic effect.4 A concrete example of this problem can be found in drugs classified as Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class II and IV.5 Class II drugs exhibit low solubility but high permeability, whereas class IV drugs display low solubility and permeability.6 Such circumstances present a significant challenge in the development of effective and efficient drug formulations.

Among the many drug candidates with solubility issues in water, antibacterial agents are the most affected. For instance, the use of marketed antibiotics, such as amoxicillin, faces challenges due to its low solubility in water. This limits the oral use of amoxicillin, as the reconstitution process with water is restricted to 150 mg/mL. With the need for higher doses, clinicians generally prefer intravenous injection, which poses issues regarding patient comfort and increases healthcare facility costs.7 In addition, curcumin, a prominent example characterized by low water solubility, measuring a mere 11 ng/mL.8 This inherent limitation translates to poor bioavailability of curcumin, whether administered orally or topically.9 Furthermore, curcumin is prone to rapid degradation during distribution processes.10,11 Consequently, despite the minimal amount of the drug that reaches the bloodstream, its swift elimination significantly limits its effectiveness in treating diseases.

The insufficient effectiveness of antibacterial drugs often serves as a major trigger for bacterial resistance.12 Resistant bacteria have the ability to adapt and evade the effects of antibacterial drugs.13 Compounding this issue, approximately 70% of the existing antibacterial agents have already encountered resistance.14 While the main cause of this resistance is generally attributed to patient non-compliance with medication instructions,15 the root of the problem may also lie in the complexity of dosing and frequency of drug intake due to the low bioavailability of the drug.16,17 These findings underscore the need for innovative breakthroughs to address the multifaceted challenges surrounding antibacterial agents, whether they are still in the developmental stage or already available on the market. To address these critical solubility and resistance challenges, nanotechnology offers targeted solutions through enhanced drug delivery mechanisms.

Nanotechnology emerges as a leading solution to address the challenge of low drug solubility in water.18–21 Among the array nano-delivery systems available, polymeric nanoparticles stand out with additional advantages. Beyond enhancing drug solubility, polymeric nanoparticles provide excellent stability during storage and distribution through the bloodstream.22 The optimal drug absorption capacity within the polymer matrix enables sustained release of the drug.23 Notable examples of drugs already leveraging polymeric nanoparticles in the market include Abraxane (paclitaxel encapsulated in nano-albumin), Zilretta (triamcinolone acetonide dispersed in PLGA hydrogel), and Taxotere (docetaxel encapsulated in PLGA micelles).24–26 However, it’s crucial to acknowledge that the widespread application of polymeric nanoparticles in antibacterial agents remains limited, leading to a gap in the development of antibacterial drugs using this technology until they attain marketable status.

Natural polymers are generally preferred in their application to form polymeric nanoparticle systems.22 Their main advantage lies in their biodegradable nature, minimizing the risk of toxicity within the body.27 Among biodegradable polymers, chitosan and alginate emerge as preferred choices due to their facile solubility in water, simplifying the manufacturing process.28 Moreover, they sourced from abundant and unused materials, with chitosan derived from crustacean shells like shrimp and crab, and alginate extracted from brown algae.29,30 The use of alginate for drug encapsulation in nanoparticle systems began in the 1980s, while chitosan-based nanoparticles were first developed for delivering the antitumor agent 5-fluorouracil in 1994.31,32 Progress continued, leading to the development of nanoparticles combining both materials in 2004 by Douglas et al for gene delivery as non-viral transfection agents.33

In terms of their chemical properties, alginate and chitosan possess pH-sensitive release properties. Alginate, with its carboxyl groups (COO), undergoes protonation under acidic conditions, causing it to contract, and swells under basic conditions due to the exchange of Ca2+ ions with Na+.34 Conversely, chitosan exhibits opposite behavior due to its amine groups along its polymer chain. The protonation of amine groups in chitosan under acidic conditions causes it to swell, enabling drug release at that pH.35 The combination of both materials can be advantageous for controlling drug release at specific pH levels by adjusting the ratio of alginate to chitosan used. The promising potential of alginate and chitosan-based polymeric nanoparticles in addressing problems without creating new issues is evident. This review endeavors to provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence-based development of alginate and chitosan-based polymeric nanoparticles for delivering antibacterial agents. It is hoped that this review will catalyze continued development until these formulations evolve into marketable products.

Method

This present study conducted a literature review, by utilizing Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus databases. Keywords such as “alginate”, “chitosan”, “nano”, “nanoparticle”, “nanoformulation”, “nanodrug”, “nano-delivery systems”, “controlled release”, “antibacterial”, “antimicrobial”, “antimicrobe”, and “antibacterial” were employed to ensure comprehensive search. The search was performed without any time restrictions to maximize the inclusivity of the review. Selection criteria were established, delineating specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria comprised literature focusing on polymeric nanoparticle development utilizing a combination of chitosan and alginate, employing antibacterial agents as loaded drugs, and conducting antibacterial activity evaluations. Exclusion criteria encompassed review papers, case reports, case series, editorial letters, and publications lacking full-text availability.

Chitosan and Alginate as Basis for Nanoparticle Delivery System

Polymeric Nanoparticle

Polymeric nanoparticles, an innovation in drug delivery, offer a revolutionary solution with extremely small particle sizes ranging from 1 to 1000 nm.36 Divided into two main categories, nanospheres and nanocapsules, these types of nanoparticles combine the advantages of polymers in drug delivery with the sophistication of nano-technology.37,38 Nanocapsules, as one type, involve the formation of a polymeric membrane encapsulating drugs on a nano scale.39 Meanwhile, nanospheres involve the formation of a polymeric matrix in which drugs are dispersed both molecularly and on a nano scale within the matrix.40 The process of forming polymeric nanoparticle systems occurs through a self-assembly mechanism, where polymer chains cross-link independently to form the desired nanoparticle structure (Figure 1).38 This enables the nanoparticles to exhibit controlled release kinetics and targeted delivery, addressing limitations of conventional drug delivery systems.41 The versatility and tunability of polymeric nanoparticles make them promising candidates for various biomedical applications, including drug delivery, imaging, and diagnostics.23 Through continuous advancements in polymer science and nanotechnology, polymeric nanoparticles hold significant potential to revolutionize modern medicine by enhancing therapeutic efficacy, reducing side effects, and improving patient outcomes.42

Figure 1 The mechanism of forming alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticles through chemical cross-linking involves several steps. Created with BioRender.com.

Polymeric nanoparticles emerged historically as a solution to the challenge of drug bioavailability.23 Drugs, typically organic compounds, often struggle with solubility in water, complicating their effective delivery.1 Polymers offer a solution due to their high molecular weight, enabling the creation of hollow structures capable of encapsulating drugs.43 Engineered to improve drug solubility, polymeric nanoparticles are crafted to transport drugs more efficiently to target sites in higher concentrations.44 This improved solubility stems from the increased surface area resulting from the reduction in particle size.45 By leveraging polymer properties and principles of nanotechnology, polymeric nanoparticles represent a promising approach to overcoming the limitations of traditional drug delivery systems, eventually enhancing therapeutic outcomes. Their ability to increase drug solubility and target specific areas holds significant potential for advancing medical treatments, particularly in areas where conventional methods fall short. As research in this field progresses, polymeric nanoparticles are poised to revolutionize drug delivery, offering new avenues for improving patient care and treatment efficacy.

Polymeric nanoparticles stand out among various nano-delivery systems due to their numerous advantages. These nanoparticles leverage intermolecular interactions between drugs and polymers for absorption, enabling sustained release capabilities.46 Within polymeric nanoparticle systems, drug release can be finely tuned for specific durations, enhancing therapeutic outcomes. Moreover, various polymers exhibit unique physical properties.47 For instance, polymethacrylic acid, chitosan, dextran, and alginic acid are known for their high pH sensitivity, allowing for controlled drug release at specific pH levels.48 Additionally, the production process for polymeric nanoparticles is relatively straightforward; stabilizers are not required as the polymer itself serves this function.49 This inherent simplicity streamlines manufacturing processes and significantly reduces production costs, rendering polymeric nanoparticles an appealing option for drug delivery applications. With their unparalleled versatility, precise control over drug release kinetics, and ease of production, polymeric nanoparticles offer a promising avenue for advancing targeted drug delivery systems. By harnessing the capabilities of polymeric nanoparticles, researchers can explore innovative approaches to drug delivery, ultimately improving patient outcomes and expanding the possibilities of medical treatment.

Chitosan and Alginate in Developing Nanoparticle

The use of natural polymers presents significant appeal due to their ease of acquisition and relative avoidance of toxicity issues.50 Among these, chitosan stands out as a linear polysaccharide family composed of varying amounts of (β1→4)-linked residues of N-acetyl-2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucose (glucosamine, GlcN), and 2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucose (N-acetyl-glucosamine, GlcNAc) residues.51 Chitosan exhibits solubility in aqueous acidic media through primary amine protonation and is the sole natural polycation, with its charge density, governed by the degree of acetylation and pH of the medium.52 Furthermore, alginate, another natural polymer sourced from algae, emerges as a promising material due to its abundant presence in nature. Comprising (1,4)-linked β-d-mannuronic and α-l-guluronic acids, alginates forms diverse structures, molecular weights, and physicochemical properties, driven by homogeneous (MM or GG) and heterogeneous (MG or GM) blocks.53 As an anionic polymer, alginate also demonstrates adequate capability in forming polymeric matrices sensitive to pH, similar to chitosan.54 These natural polymers offer versatile platforms for various applications, including drug delivery, owing to their inherent properties and environmental sustainability.

The synthesis of nanoparticle systems from chitosan and alginate involves cross-linking processes (as depicted in Figure 1).55,56 Chitosan, with its polycationic nature, features NH3+ groups along its polymer chain, enabling them to bind to cross-linking agents, typically polyanions such as tripolyphosphate ions.57 In contrast, alginate, cross-links through interaction with bivalent cations like calcium, presenting a contrasting mechanism to chitosan.54 This cross-linking event results in the formation of interconnected structures from polymers, giving rise to nano-sized cavities capable of entrapping drugs.58 This robust cross-linking process leads to the development of stable nanoparticle structures with enhanced drug encapsulation and controlled release properties, making chitosan and alginate promising candidates for drug delivery applications.59

In addition to their inherent biocompatibility advantages, both chitosan and alginate stand out for their distinctive benefits compared to other polymer types. Chitosan, with its polycationic chains, excels in enhancing specificity in drug delivery to negatively charged surfaces, such as bacterial cell walls.57 While inherently insoluble in water, chitosan can dissolve under acidic conditions, making it invaluable for drug release in acidic environments.60 However, the utilization of chitosan’s release profile varies significantly depending on polymer chain modifications, which can be easily performed.61 On the other hand, alginate not only exhibits pH-dependent release capabilities but also boasts high mucoadhesive properties.62 This additional advantage enables efficient drug adhesion in topical applications on mucosal surfaces, further enhancing drug delivery efficacy. Consequently, both chitosan and alginate offer versatile options for drug delivery systems, each with unique properties that can be tailored to specific therapeutic needs, rendering them invaluable assets in pharmaceutical research and development.

However, despite their numerous advantages, the utilization of natural polymers often comes with inherent limitations, with stability emerging as a primary concern in polysaccharide applications.63 Specifically, Chitosan tends to exhibit aggregation due to its inherent ionic instability.64 This challenge can be mitigated by combining chitosan with other polysaccharides. In this context, alginate emerges as a compatible partner, given the contrasting nature of chitosan’s polycationic properties and alginates anionic characteristics.65 Leveraging the difference in their pH dissolution tendencies becomes advantageous for forming a stable composite system with a tunable release profile based on their composition ratio.66 The complementary nature of their utilization ultimately yields a synergistic effect in nano-scale drug delivery, where the drawbacks of one polymer are compensated by the strengths of the other, resulting in enhanced overall performance and efficacy.

Preparation Methods in Developing Chitosan/Alginate-Based Nanoparticles

Ionic Gelation Method

The ionic gelation method is widely employed in producing nanoparticles using alginate or chitosan as the polymer matrix. Nanoparticle formation arises from the interaction between positively and negatively charged entities. Alginates, as negatively charged polymers, engage with positively charged polymer cations, typically calcium (Ca2+), to establish cross-links.67 Conversely, chitosan, a cationic polymer, interacts with polyanions such as sodium tripolyphosphate (Na-TPP) to form cross-links.68 The presence of cross-linking agents induces a sol-gel transition within polymer, leading to nanoparticle formation. Through this method, nanoparticles with precise control over size and properties can be crafted, enabling tailored applications in various fields such as drug delivery, tissue engineering, and food technology.69 This approach offers distinct advantages in scalability, reproducibility, and versatility, positioning it as a preferred choice for nanoparticle synthesis. Additionally, the ability to manipulate parameters like polymer concentration, cross-linker type, and reaction conditions allows fine-tuning of nanoparticle characteristics, facilitating the design of materials with specific functionalities and performance attributes.67

The ionic gelation method offers distinct advantages over other chitosan and alginate-based nanoparticle fabrication techniques. Its relative simplicity, devoid of sophisticated equipment and organic solvents, coupled with shorter processing times, renders it exceptionally efficient. Moreover, optimizing the polymer-to-drug ratio can enhance drug encapsulation efficiency within the formed nanoparticles.70 Additionally, the reversible nature of ionic interactions reduces the potential for toxicity compared to covalent interactions.69 However, this reversibility also poses challenges, as it compromises the mechanical stability of the nanoparticles. To address this drawback, increasing the degree of ionic interaction through the modification of polymer functional groups to introduce more ionic charges emerges as a viable strategy.68 By enhancing the extent of ionic interactions, the stability and performance of nanoparticles can be improved, thereby overcoming this limitation and further advancing the applicability of the ionic gelation method in drug delivery and related fields.

Polyelectrolyte Complexation Technique

Nanoparticle fabrication based on chitosan and alginate is facilitated through the polyelectrolyte complexation technique, offering a straightforward approach to synthesis. This method capitalizes on electrostatic interactions to induce cross-linking within the polymer matrix, akin to the principles underlying ionic gelation.71,72 Through this technique, cross-linking occurs via ionic interactions, leading to the formation of stable nanoparticles. Notably, these ionic interactions can occur between polymers themselves, between polymers and drugs, or within the polymer-drug-polymer complex.71 In the context of alginate and chitosan utilization, ionic interactions occur between the two polymers due to their opposite charges—alginate being negatively charged and chitosan positively charged.73 This electrostatic attraction fosters the formation of stable nanoparticles.

The polyelectrolyte complexation technique offers a simpler alternative to the ionic gelation method, notably eliminating the need for organic solvents. This simplicity, coupled with the ability to fine-tune nanoparticle properties by adjusting parameters such as polymer composition and drug loading, enhances its appeal for drug delivery applications. Its streamlined nature is evident as it eliminates the requirement for cross-linking agents, thereby optimizing material usage.71 However, the absence of cross-linking agents does entails certain drawbacks. One significant consequence is the compromised mechanical stability of the resulting nanoparticles compared to those produced by ionic gelation. This instability arises from the relatively immobile polymer-polymer interactions, often hindered by steric effects.74 To address this limitation, the use of polymers with shorter monomer chains emerges as a viable option for nanoparticle manufacturing using this technique. By employing shorter monomer chains, the mobility of the polymers is enhanced, leading to improved mechanical stability of the nanoparticles.74,75 Despite these drawbacks, the polyelectrolyte complexation technique remains a viable option for nanoparticle synthesis, offering simplicity and versatility in material selection and fabrication processes.

Ionic Gelation Method Combined with Polyelectrolyte Complexation Technique

The combination of both methods has been developed to address their respective limitations effectively. The process commences with the formation of alginate nanoparticles via the ionic gelation method. Alginate undergoes cross-linking through calcium ions (Ca2+), inducing a sol-gel transition.76 Subsequently, chitosan is introduced using the polyelectrolyte complexation technique. The presence of chitosan complements the unbound anionic functional groups in alginate, enhancing nanoparticle stability. By integrating these techniques, the resulting nanoparticles benefit from the mechanical stability conferred by ionic gelation and the simplicity of material usage and fabrication offered by polyelectrolyte complexation.77 This synergistic approach enables the production of nanoparticles with improved properties suitable for various applications, including drug delivery and tissue engineering. Moreover, the versatility of this combined method allows for fine-tuning of nanoparticle characteristics, ensuring compatibility with specific biomedical requirements.78 In summary, the integration of ionic gelation and polyelectrolyte complexation stands as a promising strategy for overcoming the inherent limitations of each technique, advancing nanoparticle synthesis towards enhanced efficacy and versatility.

Ionic Gelation Method Combined with Emulsification Technique

The combined use of ionic gelation and emulsification techniques is often employed for the encapsulation of oil-based active pharmaceutical ingredients, such as essential oils.79 Alginates undergo sol-gel transition facilitated by calcium ion cross-linkers, complemented by emulsification with stabilizers like Tween 80 to form micelles.80 The addition of chitosan in the final stage aims to enhance the stability of the formed micelles. This approach offers an effective strategy for encapsulating oil-based drugs, ensuring improved stability and controlled release properties for pharmaceutical applications.

However, this method tends to be relatively costly and time-consuming due to the need for multiple additives and sequential processing steps. Moreover, the emulsification process often requires the use of organic solvents like dichloromethane to disperse the oil into the stabilizer, potentially leading to residual organic solvent in the formed particles.69 Nevertheless, nanoparticles produced through this combined approach exhibit excellent physical stability, owing to the role of the added stabilizers during the emulsification process.80,81 Despite its drawbacks, the utilization of both techniques offers a promising strategy for achieving enhanced stability and controlled release properties in drug-loaded nanoparticles.

Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly Technique

The Layer-by-Layer (LbL) self-assembly technique is employed to coat nanoparticles using polyelectrolyte polymers.82 Typically utilized in drug delivery systems, it accommodates a wide array of active pharmaceutical ingredients, including inorganic substances and coarse nanosuspensions.83 Encapsulated nanoparticles are obtained by gradually adding polyelectrolyte polymers such as chitosan and alginate alternately drop by drop through titration.84 The layering process can be repeated multiple times, depending on the desired nanoparticle size. This method offers precise control over nanoparticle properties, making it suitable for tailored drug delivery applications with enhanced efficacy and stability.

In addition to providing advantages in physical stability, the Layer-by-Layer (LbL) self-assembly technique offers relative safety from potential toxicity by circumventing the need of organic solvents.85 Through the layering process, drug release kinetics can be precisely tailored by adjusting the thickness and number of layers as needed to meet specific requirements. Despite its benefits, the method is inherently time-consuming due to the meticulous drop-by-drop layering process.86 Furthermore, while the physical stability increases with each added layer, careful consideration is required regarding the impact on particle size increment, ensuring it aligns with the desired application requirements for effective drug delivery and biomedical applications.

Factors Affecting the Stability of Chitosan/Alginate-Based Nanoparticles

There are several factors that can influence the stability and effectiveness of a nanoparticle system based on a combination of alginate and chitosan. As depicted in Figure 2, there are six main factors that significantly affect the stability of the nanoparticle system produced. Below is a detailed explanation of their respective influences and strategies that can be used to address them.

Figure 2 Factors influencing the stability of alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticle systems. Created with BioRender.com.

pH

Alginates and chitosan require ionization processes to form polyelectrolyte complexation, where the strength interaction is significantly influenced by the environmental pH.87 This presents a significant challenge, given that alginate ionizes in basic environments, while chitosan ionizes in acidic conditions. Thus, achieving optimal animalization competitions is imperative to ensure effective nanoparticle formation. Ionization occurs when the pH exceeds the pKa for acids and falls below the pKa for bases.88 The pKa of alginate typically ranges between 3.4 to 4.4, while that of chitosan is approximately 6.5.58,89 Consequently, the optimal pH conditions for forming alginate/chitosan-based nanoparticles lie between the pKa values of alginate and chitosan, facilitating effective polyelectrolyte interaction and stable nanoparticle formation.

Organic Solvents

The utilization of organic solvents is commonly employed in processes requiring co-solvency. Organic solvents play a crucial role in aiding the dispersion of drugs with extremely low solubility in water during the bottom-up nanoparticle fabrication process.90 While these solvents typically evaporate readily, even at ambient temperatures, the potential for leaving behind residues cannot be overlooked. Such residues may pose negative implications for the toxicity profile of the resultant formulations. To address this concern, before opting for methods necessitating the use of organic solvents, careful consideration of their risk-to-benefit ratio is paramount. Additionally, the selection of organic solvents should prioritize those not only effective for application but also safe. Among the safe choices of organic solvents are triacetin, ethyl formate, butyl lactate, benzyl alcohol, and ethyl acetate.91,92

Mixing Speed

In the manufacturing of nanoparticles, the collision frequency between particles increases proportionally with the stirring speed, thereby augmenting the likelihood of particle breakup and size reduction.93 This phenomenon has been extensively investigated in studies focused on alginate/chitosan-based nanoparticle synthesis. Notably, Emami et al and Samprasit et al conducted experiments where stirring speeds ranging from 500 to 1500 rpm were explored, unveiling that the highest stirring speeds yielded the smallest particle sizes.94,95 However, it is imperative to carefully consider the optimal stirring speed, particularly when transitioning to larger production scales, to ensure reproducibility and scalability while maintaining the desired particle characteristics. Striking this delicate balance between stirring speed and nanoparticle properties is paramount for the successful implementation of nanoparticle technology across various industrial applications.

Droplet Size

In the layer-by-layer self-assembly method, the droplet size plays a pivotal role, determining the thickness of the nanoparticle coating process. As the droplet size of the polymer solution decreases, thinner polymer layers are formed.96 While a monolayer is generally desired, in certain situations, such as enhancing stability, multilayer conditions may be necessary. Small droplet sizes can be achieved through the use of nozzles with small diameters. However, when selecting the nozzle size, it is imperative to consider not only the desired droplet size but also the viscosity characteristics of the polymer solution.97 Viscous fluids typically face challenges in flowing through small nozzles.98 Achieving optimal conditions for layer-by-layer self-assembly requires careful consideration of these factors to ensure precise control over the coating thickness and the desired properties of the resulting nanoparticles.

Crosslinker Concentration

The key to fabricating nanoparticles using alginate and chitosan polymers lies in the cross-linking process. Therefore, the quantity or concentration of cross-linking agents becomes exceptionally crucial as a determining factor for successful nanoparticle formation. Previous studies, such as those conducted by Mokhtari et al, have indicated that the use of high concentrations of CaCl2 can yield small-sized nanoparticles with high encapsulation efficiency.99 This phenomenon arises from the fact that elevated concentrations of cross-linking agents enhance polymer chain folding, leading shorter chains.100 However, it’s important to note that an excessive concentration of cross-linker can also yield negative consequences. Such a scenario may result in a reduction in crystallinity, rendering the particles brittle and impacting the mechanical stability of the nanoparticles.101 Thus, achieving an optimal balance in cross-linker concentration is essential for the successful synthesis of alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticles.

Alginate to Chitosan Concentration Ratio

Considerations regarding the ratio of alginate to chitosan usage are essential to achieve optimal conditions for nanoparticle formation, tailored to specific objectives. A higher proportion of chitosan relative to alginate may inadvertently diminish encapsulation efficiency.102 This phenomenon arises due to an excess of amino groups in chitosan, which competes for interaction with M residues in alginate with the crosslinker (calcium ions).103 Furthermore, this imbalance fosters an increased propensity for electrostatic interactions among particles, leading to aggregation and a subsequent decrease in the physical stability of the formed nanoparticles.104

While mitigating such occurrences remains imperative, it is crucial to also weigh the impact of the alginate-chitosan ratio on release profile dynamics. Utilizing a higher quantity of chitosan can yield sustained release profiles for drugs under basic pH conditions. This attribute holds significant promise for the treatment of infected wounds, given that wound pH typically resides in basic conditions (≥7.3).105

Evidence of Antibacterial Agents’ Delivery Using Chitosan/Alginate-Based Nanoparticles

In its function as a drug delivery system, alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticles generally can enhance and improve antibacterial efficacy through four main mechanisms (Figure 3). Firstly, reducing the size of drug particles increases drug solubility, resulting in improved drug absorptivity.106 Secondly, drugs are protected during delivery to the target site of action, in this case, bacterial cells, ensuring high bioavailability.107 Thirdly, the ionic interaction between the positive charge on chitosan and the negative charge on the surface of bacterial cells enhances drug selectivity.108 Lastly, drugs are sustainably released, providing prolonged bacterial-killing effects.109 These benefits can be applied to various types of drugs, ranging from pure chemical drugs (marketed drugs), natural sourced drugs, biologic agents, to inorganic drugs. Evidence-based findings regarding the benefits of using alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticles for each type of active substance are detailed as follows.

Figure 3 The mechanism underlying the enhancement of antibacterial efficacy through the delivery of antibacterial drugs into the alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticle system. Created with BioRender.com.

Application in Delivering Marketed Antibacterial Drugs

Nanoparticles based on alginate and chitosan have been extensively explored to enhance the efficacy and overcome limitations of existing drugs. The evidence of their utilization is summarized in Table 1, reflecting their broad applicability, notably in augmenting the effectiveness of antibiotics across various classes. From penicillins, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, rifampicin, to polypeptides such as daptomycin, and glycopeptides like vancomycin, all can be harnessed through this approach.108–117 These nanoparticles adeptly tackle various physicochemical challenges associated with antibiotics, notably by ameliorating solubility issues. For instance, the solubility of amoxicillin, typically sparingly soluble in water, can be significantly enhanced through this strategy.111 Moreover, the protective effects conferred by alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticles play a pivotal role in safeguarding water-sensitive drugs such as amoxicillin and peptide antibiotics, ensuring stability throughout storage and transportation processes.118

Table 1 Evidence of Alginate/Chitosan Nanoparticles Utilization for Delivering Marketed Antibacterial Drugs

The selection of fabrication methods for alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticles is pivotal, especially considering the physical and chemical characteristics of the intended drug. Modern antibiotics often exhibit relative instability in aqueous environments; for instance, amoxicillin, with its active beta-lactam moiety, is prone to beta-lactam ring hydrolysis.118 In such cases, the oil-in-water emulsification method proves more suitable for manufacturing such medications.111 Moreover, evidence underscores the prevalence of the ionic gelation method due to its straightforwardness. Selecting the drug’s base or salt form is also critical to ensure optimal compatibility with alginate and chitosan. The variance in ionization properties significantly impacts the molecular interactions within the resultant nanoparticle system.108–110,113 Therefore, a thorough consideration of these factors is imperative to develop effective drug delivery systems that enhance stability and efficacy while mitigating potential degradation issues in aqueous environments.

Enhancing the efficacy of marketed drugs can be achieved through mechanisms aimed at improving drug bioavailability. One such approach involves loading drugs into nano-sized particles based on alginate and chitosan. Through this method, drug release can occur in a sustained manner.109 For instance, in the treatment of ocular infections, daptomycin has been encapsulated within chitosan and alginate-based polymeric nanoparticles. Consequently, drug release proceeds steadily, with only 9.37% of the drug released at the 240th minute. This stands in contrast to the free delivery of daptomycin, which exhibits a permeability profile of up to 21.21% at the 240th minute.115 The rapid release kinetics associated with the free drug delivery system may result in transient drug presence at the target site, necessitating more frequent dosing. Thus, sustaining drug presence on the ocular surface over an extended period through nanoparticle utilization can significantly enhance overall drug efficacy.

Application in Delivering Antibacterial Agents from Natural Sources

The challenge in utilizing natural-source drugs lies in their complex composition, where the efficacy is often intertwined with the synergy among their constituents. This complexity arises as the pharmacological activity of natural-source drugs typically depends on the interplay between various constituents, each complementing and augmenting the pharmacological activity of the others.120 Moreover, the relatively poor solubility of natural-source constituents in water further compounds these challenges.121 However, by employing alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticle systems, these issues can be addressed effectively. These systems excel in encapsulating the chemical constituents of natural-source drugs, ensuring there protection and sustained release Additionally, the reduction in particle size to the nano-scale indirectly enhances the solubility of active substituents in water by increasing the surface area available for interaction with the solvent.122 As a result, the use of nanoparticle systems offers a promising avenue for overcoming the challenges associated with natural-source drugs, thereby potentially unlocking their therapeutic potential.

In formulating natural-source drugs into nanoparticle systems based on alginate and chitosan, careful consideration of the physicochemical properties of the natural materials to be encapsulated is crucial. Table 2 presents various instances of natural-source materials successfully loaded into these systems. These range from single chemical constituents such as quercetin and curcumin to oils like oregano oil and various essential oils, as well as crude extracts.106,123–134 Ionic gelation, either alone or in combination with polyelectrolyte complexation techniques, is predominantly employed across the encapsulation of various types of natural-source materials. Particularly for organic substituents like oils, a more suitable approach involves formulating them using the oil-in-water emulsification method, followed by combining them with ionic gelation.106,124,127,130,133 This method not only enhances the encapsulation of oils but also improves the stability of the active ingredients, preventing their premature release during storage.

Table 2 Evidence of Alginate/Chitosan Nanoparticles Utilization for Delivering Antibacterial Agents from Natural Sources

Emerging evidence suggests that the application of alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticle systems significantly enhances the potency and efficacy of natural-source drugs. These nanoparticle systems offer superior targeting capabilities, particularly against bacteria, leveraging the positively charged chitosan’s remarkable affinity to interact with teichoic acid on bacterial cell walls.123,128,132 Furthermore, the increased solubility of substances such as oregano oil reduces the required dosage for effective treatment.106 The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of oregano oil experiences a significant reduction upon loading into alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticle systems. Across various bacteria strains, including Streptococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Escherichia coli, the MIC of oregano oil decreases from 0.0625% to 0.0078%.106,124 Similar to marketed drugs, active constituents are encapsulated efficiently and can be released in a sustained manner. For instance, curcumin achieves an impressive loading efficiency of 93% with sustained release extending up to 58%.125,128 Such compelling findings shows the immense potential of nanoparticle system in optimizing the therapeutic effects of natural-source drugs.

Application in Delivering Inorganic Antibacterial Agents

The utilization of alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticles confers benefits similar to those observed with natural compound-derived counterparts, even extending to pharmacologically active inorganic substances. Notably, inorganic substances such as metals generally exhibit low solubility in water, presenting a notable challenge.135 For instance, silver, renowned for its practical antibacterial efficacy, which exhibits poor solubility in aqueous environments. To address this challenge, silver nanoparticles are often engineered at the nanoscale for medical applications.136 However, mere size reduction does not consistently enhance silver’s antibacterial efficacy, owing to the nanoparticles’ low selectivity in reaching their intended targets within the body. Hence, in numerous applications, inorganic nanoparticles like silver undergo modifications to enable targeted action.137 Evidence indicates that loading silver nanoparticles can enhance their effectiveness as antibiotics by precisely targeting silver ions towards bacterial cell walls, ensuring a potent action against microbial pathogens. Similarly, other inorganic substances, such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), copper oxide (CuO), and zinc oxide (ZnO), exhibit comparable phenomena.138–142

In Table 3, several pieces of evidence underscore the utilization of alginate- and chitosan-based nanoparticles for the delivery of inorganic metals. Despite the general suitability of the layer-by-layer self-assembly method for inorganic substances, the ionic gelation method is more commonly employed due to its procedural simplicity. However, it’s noteworthy that formulations involving copper oxide (CuO) combined with zinc oxide (ZnO) utilize the layer-by-layer self-assembly technique, particularly advantageous for loading mixed active ingredients.142 The modification of inorganic materials into alginate- and chitosan-based nanoparticles yields promising outcomes. Notably, processes aimed at reducing particle size significantly enhance the permeability of inorganic pharmaceutical ingredients into bacterial cells, as observed in the delivery of zinc oxide (ZnO).141 Release reaches maximum values when ZnO concentration is at its peak; nevertheless, release remains sustained regardless of concentration, rendering it suitable for chronic antibacterial therapy.

Table 3 Evidence of Alginate/Chitosan Nanoparticles Utilization for Delivering Inorganic Antibacterial Agents

Application in Delivering Biologic Antibacterial Agents

The challenge in delivering biologic drugs lies in their susceptibility to degradation due to environmental factors.143 Enzymes and proteins composed of polypeptide chains of amino acid monomers, are particularly vulnerable to denaturation triggered by extreme temperature and pH conditions within the body.144 This susceptibility extends not only to enteral delivery, but also in parenteral delivery, necessitating modifications to shield biologic substances from direct environmental effects.107 In this context, alginate- and chitosan-based nanoparticles play a crucial role in preserving the stability of drug substances throughout storage and delivery to the target site.

Various biologic materials have been effectively incorporated into alginate- and chitosan-based nanoparticles, as outlined in Table 4. Despite the often-complex molecular structures of biologic substances, straightforward techniques such as ionic gelation and polyelectrolyte complexation technique are sufficient to form optimal nanoparticle systems. Although biologic substances typically have large molecular sizes, their loading into alginate- and chitosan-based nanoparticle systems is not restricted. This versatility stems from the Zwitterionic properties of biologic materials, where both ion charges can strongly interact ionically with NH4+ from chitosan and COO from alginate.145 In contrast to loading probiotic materials, the layer-by-layer self-assembly method is preferable as it provides multilayered vesicular systems capable of maintaining bacteria viability until reaching their intended delivery target.146

Table 4 Evidence of Alginate/Chitosan Nanoparticles Utilization for Delivering Biologic Antibacterial Agents

As previously explained, the primary function of using alginate- and chitosan-based nanoparticle systems for biologic delivery is to enhance the physical and chemical stability of the substances.146–151,153 Although nanoparticle size is advantageous, it is not the primary benefit obtained, owing to the constraints imposed by the relatively large molecular size of biologic agents. Consequently, the critical point of this modification for biologic agents lies in their ability to achieve high entrapment efficiency and proven stability against temperature and pH fluctuations. Experimental evidence concerning antibacterial peptides (Ib−M1) demonstrates that the system exhibits good stability against pH changes (pH 2 and 11), temperature variations (4 and 100°C), and proteinases (trypsin and pepsin), thus ensuring no reduction in antibacterial efficacy of the active substance.153 This is a promising indication that antibacterial peptides can also be delivered orally.

Challenges and Future Perspective

The use of natural polymers presents significant advantages compared to synthetic and semi-synthetic polymers due to their ease of acquisition and relative avoidance of toxicity issues. In contrast, the use of synthetic polymers such as Tween 80 and PLGA (polylactic-co-glycolic acid) has been associated with hypersensitivity problems, particularly in pediatric consumers.155,156 Moreover, the use of semi-synthetic polymers like poloxamer carries the risk of producing toxic residues following the ultrasonication process.157 While the utilization of alginate- and chitosan-based nanoparticle systems presents a promising solution, it encounters limitation and hurdles that may hinder its translation into practical solution for patient use. The availability of antibacterial drug formulations loaded into nanoparticle systems remains scarce in the market, with VivaGel® being a notable example of a dendrimer nanoparticle system for bacterial vaginosis treatment.158 This scarcity is attributed to the difficulty in technology transfer from lab-scale to production scale settings. Although these systems may exhibit efficacy at the lab scale, the same assurance may not be obtained at the production scale due to factors such as equipment quality and capacity. For instance, the use of high-speed mixers necessitates sophisticated technology equipment on a large scale. In contrast to the use of technology in the development of drugs at the micro scale, such as microemulsions, the technology required for microemulsion development tends to be simpler and does not necessitate equipment with high-energy capacity for the mixing process.159 Consequently, these limitations ultimately contribute to high production costs.160 Therefore, the development of production systems with the simplest possible approach may be the best effort to facilitate smooth technology transfer and indirectly reduce formulation production costs, thus fostering smoother pathways for the integration of nanoparticle based antibacterial drug formulations into clinical practice. Additionally, the development of drugs in the form of nanoparticles frequently encounters regulatory challenges. These issues include the absence of standardized testing and characterization protocols for nanoparticle drugs, as well as the lack of an established nomenclature for naming drugs that have been modified into nanoparticles.161

Despite its drawbacks, alginate- and chitosan-based nanoparticle systems hold considerable promise for the future of antibacterial drug delivery. Based on existing evidence, not all antibacterial agents have been explored for integration into this advanced delivery system. For example, in tuberculosis treatment, where resistance poses a significant challenge, none of the anti-tuberculosis drug regimens have been modified into this system. Such a system would not only aid in combating resistance but also potentially reduce the dosage requirement, thereby enhancing patient compliance and treatment outcomes.162 The use of alginate and chitosan in nanoparticle development is also considered to support green nanotechnology. This is not only due to the simplicity of the development process but also because alginate and chitosan are readily sourced from various unused marine natural materials.163 Utilizing these materials before they become harmful waste has a beneficial impact on the environment. Furthermore, it’s the development of alginate- and chitosan-based nanoparticle systems remain highly tunable. Researchers have the flexibility to modify the side chains of chitosan and the salt form of alginate to fine-tune the physicochemical properties, to address the specific challenges of each antibacterial drug.

Conclusion

The medical applications of alginate and chitosan in drug delivery offer an effective solution to maximize the efficacy of various antibacterial agents. Alginate and chitosan have been extensively utilized as the basis for forming polymeric nanoparticle systems for antibacterial drug delivery purposes. With a variety of suitable methods, these systems have proven to be applicable not only to well-established drugs that have broad approval for public use but also to with various materials presenting challenges due to their unique physical and chemical properties. This review findings indicate that alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticles exhibit promising capabilities in enhancing the efficacy of various types of antibacterial agents, ranging from marketed antibiotics to natural-source, inorganic, and biologic antibacterial agents. Understanding the success achieved with this system holds promise for providing solutions to various challenges encountered in antibacterial treatment in the future, thereby opening opportunities for researchers to conduct further clinical trials until licensure is obtained for alginate and chitosan-based nanoparticle-based products that can be marketed.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank The Rector of Universitas Padjadjaran for the APC and The President of Kumamoto University for BioRender student plan account. The authors also would like to extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Northern Border University, Arar, KSA, for funding this research work with the project number “NBU-FPEJ-2024-2985-01.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Kalepu S, Nekkanti V. Insoluble drug delivery strategies: review of recent advances and business prospects. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2015;5(5). doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2015.07.003

2. Suhandi C, Alfathonah SS, Hasanah AN. Potency of xanthone derivatives from Garcinia mangostana L. for COVID-19 treatment through angiotensin-converting Enzyme 2 and main protease blockade: a computational study. Molecules. 2023;28(13). doi:10.3390/molecules28135187

3. Bhalani DV, Nutan B, Kumar A, Singh Chandel AK. Bioavailability enhancement techniques for poorly aqueous soluble drugs and therapeutics. Biomedicines. 2022;10(9). doi:10.3390/biomedicines10092055

4. Fasinu P, Pillay V, Ndesendo VMK, Du Toit LC, Choonara YE. Diverse approaches for the enhancement of oral drug bioavailability. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2011;32(4). doi:10.1002/bdd.750

5. Papich MG, Martinez MN. Applying Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) criteria to predict oral absorption of drugs in dogs: challenges and pitfalls. AAPS J. 2015;17(4). doi:10.1208/s12248-015-9743-7

6. Markovic M, Zur M, Ragatsky I, Cvijić S, Dahan A. BCS Class IV oral drugs and absorption windows: regional-dependent intestinal permeability of furosemide. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(12). doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12121175

7. Binson G, Grignon C, Le Moal G, et al. Overcoming stability challenges during continuous intravenous administration of high-dose amoxicillin using portable elastomeric pumps. PLoS One. 2019;14(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221391

8. Stohs SJ, Chen O, Ray SD, Ji J, Bucci LR, Preuss HG. Highly bioavailable forms of curcumin and promising avenues for curcumin-based research and application: a review. Molecules. 2020;25(6). doi:10.3390/molecules25061397

9. Hewlings SJ, Kalman DS. Curcumin: a review of its effects on human health. Foods. 2017;6(10). doi:10.3390/foods6100092

10. Schneider C, Gordon ON, Edwards RL, Luis PB. Degradation of curcumin: from mechanism to biological implications. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.5b00244

11. Hsu KY, Ho CT, Pan MH. The therapeutic potential of curcumin and its related substances in turmeric: from raw material selection to application strategies. J Food Drug Anal. 2023;31(2). doi:10.38212/2224-6614.3454

12. Salam MA, Al-Amin MY, Salam MT, et al. Antimicrobial resistance: a growing serious threat for global public health. Healthcare. 2023;11(13). doi:10.3390/healthcare11131946

13. Urban-Chmiel R, Marek A, Stępień-Pyśniak D, et al. Antibiotic resistance in bacteria—a review. Antibiotics. 2022;11(8). doi:10.3390/antibiotics11081079

14. Mancuso G, Midiri A, Gerace E, Biondo C. Bacterial antibiotic resistance: the most critical pathogens. Pathogens. 2021;10(10). doi:10.3390/pathogens10101310

15. Endashaw Hareru H, Sisay D, Kassaw C, Kassa R. Antibiotics non-adherence and its associated factors among households in southern Ethiopia. SAGE Open Med. 2022;10. doi:10.1177/20503121221090472

16. Jimmy B, Jose J. Patient medication adherence: measures in daily practice. Oman Med J. 2011;26(3). doi:10.5001/omj.2011.38

17. Pomalingo DR, Suhandi C, Megantara S, Muchtaridi M. The optimization of α-mangostin as a new drug candidate through molecular docking and dynamic simulations. Rasayan J Chem. 2021;14(2). doi:10.31788/RJC.2021.1425770

18. Patra JK, Das G, Fraceto LF, et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects. J Nanobiotechnology. 2018;16(1). doi:10.1186/s12951-018-0392-8

19. Suhandi C, Wilar G, Lesmana R, et al. Propolis-based nanostructured lipid carriers for α-mangostin delivery: formulation, characterization, and in vitro antioxidant activity evaluation. Molecules. 2023;28(16). doi:10.3390/molecules28166057

20. Suharyani I, Suhandi C, Rizkiyan Y, et al. Molecular docking in prediction of α-mangostin/cyclodextrin inclusion complex formation. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 2706; 2023. doi:10.1063/5.0120782.

21. Megantara S, Wathoni N, Mohammed AFA, Suhandi C, Ishmatullah MH, Mffd P. In silico study: combination of α-mangostin and chitosan conjugated with trastuzumab against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Polymers. 2022;14(13). doi:10.3390/polym14132747

22. Elmowafy M, Shalaby K, Elkomy MH, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles for delivery of natural bioactive agents: recent advances and challenges. Polymers. 2023;15(5). doi:10.3390/polym15051123

23. Begines B, Ortiz T, Pérez-Aranda M, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery: recent developments and future prospects. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(7). doi:10.3390/nano10071403

24. Ho MY, Mackey JR. Presentation and management of docetaxel-related adverse effects in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2014;6(1). doi:10.2147/CMAR.S40601

25. Paik J, Duggan ST, Keam SJ. Triamcinolone acetonide extended-release: a review in osteoarthritis pain of the knee. Drugs. 2019;79(4). doi:10.1007/s40265-019-01083-3

26. Yuan H, Guo H, Luan X, et al. Albumin nanoparticle of paclitaxel (Abraxane) decreases while taxol increases breast cancer stem cells in treatment of triple negative breast cancer. Mol Pharm. 2020;17(7). doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b01221

27. Alaswad SO, Mahmoud AS, Arunachalam P. Recent advances in biodegradable polymers and their biological applications: a brief review. Polymers. 2022;14(22). doi:10.3390/polym14224924

28. Martau GA, Mihai M, Vodnar DC. The use of chitosan, alginate, and pectin in the biomedical and food sector-biocompatibility, bioadhesiveness, and biodegradability. Polymers. 2019;11(11). doi:10.3390/polym11111837

29. Niculescu AG, Grumezescu AM. Applications of chitosan-alginate-based nanoparticles— an up-to-date review. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(2). doi:10.3390/nano12020186

30. Florowska A, Hilal A, Florowski T, Mrozek P, Wroniak M. Sodium alginate and chitosan as components modifying the properties of inulin hydrogels. Gels. 2022;8(1). doi:10.3390/gels8010063

31. Paques JP, Van Der Linden E, Van Rijn CJM, Sagis LMC. Preparation methods of alginate nanoparticles. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;209. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2014.03.009

32. Bashir SM, Ahmed Rather G, Patrício A, et al. Chitosan nanoparticles: a versatile platform for biomedical applications. Materials. 2022;15(19). doi:10.3390/ma15196521

33. Douglas KL, Taheri M, Tabrizian M. Non-viral cell transfection using alginate-chitosan nanoparticles. In: Transactions - 7th World Biomaterials Congress. Australian Society for Biomaterials; 2004.

34. Lin D, Kelly AL, Miao S. The impact of pH on mechanical properties, storage stability and digestion of alginate-based and soy protein isolate-stabilized emulsion gel beads with encapsulated lycopene. Food Chem. 2022;372. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131262

35. Pilipenko I, Korzhikov-Vlakh V, Sharoyko V, et al. pH-sensitive chitosan–heparin nanoparticles for effective delivery of genetic drugs into epithelial cells. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(7). doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics11070317

36. Zielinska A, Carreiró F, Oliveira AM, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles: production, characterization, toxicology and ecotoxicology. Molecules. 2020;25(16). doi:10.3390/molecules25163731

37. Guterres SS, Alves MP, Pohlmann AR. Polymeric nanoparticles, nanospheres and nanocapsules, for cutaneous applications. Drug Target Insights. 2007;2(1). doi:10.33393/dti.2007.1300

38. Perumal S. Polymer nanoparticles: synthesis and applications. Polymers. 2022;14(24). doi:10.3390/polym14245449

39. Kothamasu P, Kanumur H, Ravur N, Maddu C, Parasuramrajam R, Thangavel S. Nanocapsules: the weapons for novel drug delivery systems. BioImpacts. 2012;2(2). doi:10.5681/bi.2012.011

40. Muttaqien S, El Khoris IM, Pambudi S, Park EY. Nanosphere structures using various materials: a strategy for signal amplification for virus sensing. Sensors. 2023;23(1). doi:10.3390/s23010160

41. Deng S, Gigliobianco MR, Censi R, Di Martino P. Polymeric nanocapsules as nanotechnological alternative for drug delivery system: current status, challenges and opportunities. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(5). doi:10.3390/nano10050847

42. Kamaly N, Yameen B, Wu J, Farokhzad OC. Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles: mechanisms of controlling drug release. Chem Rev. 2016;116(4). doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00346

43. Sánchez A, Mejía SP, Orozco J. Recent advances in polymeric nanoparticle-encapsulated drugs against intracellular infections. Molecules. 2020;25(16). doi:10.3390/molecules25163760

44. Devulapally R, Paulmurugan R. Polymer nanoparticles for drug and small silencing RNA delivery to treat cancers of different phenotypes. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2014;6(1). doi:10.1002/wnan.1242

45. Morgen M, Bloom C, Beyerinck R, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles for increased oral bioavailability and rapid absorption using celecoxib as a model of a low-solubility, high-permeability drug. Pharm Res. 2012;29(2). doi:10.1007/s11095-011-0558-7

46. Sadeghi A, PourEskandar S, Askari E, Akbari M. Polymeric nanoparticles and nanogels: how do they interact with proteins? Gels. 2023;9(8). doi:10.3390/gels9080632

47. Madawi EA, Al Jayoush AR, Rawas-Qalaji M, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles as tunable nanocarriers for targeted delivery of drugs to skin tissues for treatment of topical skin diseases. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(2). doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020657

48. Rizwan M, Yahya R, Hassan A, et al. pH sensitive hydrogels in drug delivery: brief history, properties, swelling, and release mechanism, material selection and applications. Polymers. 2017;9(4). doi:10.3390/polym9040137

49. Sakhi M, Khan A, Khan I, et al. Effect of polymeric stabilizers on the size and stability of PLGA paclitaxel nanoparticles. Saudi Pharm J. 2023;31(9). doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101697

50. Ponnusamy PG, Mani S. Material and environmental properties of natural polymers and their composites for packaging applications—a review. Polymers. 2022;14(19). doi:10.3390/polym14194033

51. Aranaz I, Alcántara AR, Civera MC, et al. Chitosan: an overview of its properties and applications. Polymers. 2021;13(19). doi:10.3390/polym13193256

52. Jiménez-Gómez CP, Cecilia JA. Chitosan: a natural biopolymer with a wide and varied range of applications. Molecules. 2020;25(17). doi:10.3390/molecules25173981

53. Abka‐khajouei R, Tounsi L, Shahabi N, Patel AK, Abdelkafi S, Michaud P. Structures, properties and applications of alginates. Mar Drugs. 2022;20(6). doi:10.3390/md20060364

54. Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37(1). doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003

55. Szekalska M, Sosnowska K, Zakrzeska A, Kasacka I, Lewandowska A, Winnicka K. The influence of chitosan cross-linking on the properties of alginate microparticles with metformin hydrochloride - In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Molecules. 2017;22(1). doi:10.3390/molecules22010182

56. Wathoni N, Suhandi C, Purnama MFG, et al. Alginate and chitosan-based hydrogel enhance antibacterial agent activity on topical application. Infect Drug Resist. 2024:17. doi:10.2147/IDR.S456403

57. Yilmaz Atay H. Antibacterial activity of chitosan-based systems. In: Functional Chitosan: Drug Delivery and Biomedical Applications. Springer; 2020. doi10.1007/978-981-15-0263-7_15

58. Li P, Dai YN, Zhang JP, Wang AQ, Wei Q. Chitosan-alginate nanoparticles as a novel drug delivery system for nifedipine. Int J Biomed Sci. 2008;4(3). doi:10.59566/ijbs.2008.4221

59. Li S, Zhang H, Chen K, et al. Application of chitosan/alginate nanoparticle in oral drug delivery systems: prospects and challenges. Drug Deliv. 2022;29(1). doi:10.1080/10717544.2022.2058646

60. Seidi F, Khodadadi Yazdi M, Jouyandeh M, et al. Chitosan-based blends for biomedical applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021:183. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.003

61. Chen Q, Qi Y, Jiang Y, et al. Progress in research of chitosan chemical modification technologies and their applications. Mar Drugs. 2022;20(8). doi:10.3390/md20080536

62. Abourehab MAS, Rajendran RR, Singh A, et al. Alginate as a promising biopolymer in drug delivery and wound healing: a review of the State-of-The-Art. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(16). doi:10.3390/ijms23169035

63. Lovegrove A, Edwards CH, De Noni I, et al. Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57(2). doi:10.1080/10408398.2014.939263

64. Szymańska E, Winnicka K. Stability of chitosan - A challenge for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Mar Drugs. 2015;13(4). doi:10.3390/md13041819

65. ALSamman MM, Sánchez J. Chitosan- and alginate-based hydrogels for the adsorption of anionic and cationic dyes from water. Polymers. 2022;14(8). doi:10.3390/polym14081498

66. Fletcher NA, Von Nieda EL, Krebs MD. Cell-interactive alginate-chitosan biopolymer systems with tunable mechanics and antibody release rates. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;175. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.035

67. Guerra-Valle M, Petzold G, Orellana-Palma P. Optimization of encapsulation by ionic gelation technique of cryoconcentrated solution: a response surface methodology and evaluation of physicochemical characteristics study. Polymers. 2022;14(5). doi:10.3390/polym14051031

68. Hoang NH, Le Thanh T, Sangpueak R, et al. Chitosan nanoparticles-based ionic gelation method: a promising candidate for plant disease management. Polymers. 2022;14(4):662. doi:10.3390/polym14040662

69. Gadziński P, Froelich A, Jadach B, et al. Ionotropic gelation and chemical crosslinking as methods for fabrication of modified-release gellan gum-based drug delivery systems. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(1). doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15010108

70. Dodero A, Pianella L, Vicini S, Alloisio M, Ottonelli M, Castellano M. Alginate-based hydrogels prepared via ionic gelation: an experimental design approach to predict the crosslinking degree. Eur Polym J. 2019;118. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.06.028

71. Lankalapalli S, Kolapalli VRM. Polyelectrolyte complexes: a review of their applicability in drug delivery technology. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2009;71(5). doi:10.4103/0250-474X.58165

72. Kulig D, Zimoch-Korzycka A, Jarmoluk A, Marycz K. Study on alginate-chitosan complex formed with different polymers ratio. Polymers. 2016;8(5). doi:10.3390/polym8050167

73. Loquercio A, Castell-Perez E, Gomes C, Moreira RG. Preparation of chitosan-alginate nanoparticles for trans-cinnamaldehyde entrapment. J Food Sci. 2015;80(10). doi:10.1111/1750-3841.12997

74. Hamman JH. Chitosan based polyelectrolyte complexes as potential carrier materials in drug delivery systems. Mar Drugs. 2010;8(4). doi:10.3390/md8041305

75. Schoeller J, Itel F, Wuertz-Kozak K, et al. pH-responsive chitosan/alginate polyelectrolyte complexes on electrospun PLGA nanofibers for controlled drug release. Nanomaterials. 2021;11(7). doi:10.3390/nano11071850

76. Ciro Y, Rojas J, Salamanca CH, Alhajj MJ, Carabali GA. Production and characterization of chitosan–polyanion nanoparticles by polyelectrolyte complexation assisted by high-intensity sonication for the modified release of methotrexate. Pharmaceuticals. 2020;13(1). doi:10.3390/ph13010011

77. Jha R, Mayanovic RA. A review of the preparation, characterization, and applications of chitosan nanoparticles in nanomedicine. Nanomaterials. 2023;13(8). doi:10.3390/nano13081302

78. Henao E, Delgado E, Contreras H, Quintana G. Polyelectrolyte complexation versus ionotropic gelation for chitosan-based hydrogels with carboxymethylcellulose, carboxymethyl starch, and alginic acid. Int J Chem Eng. 2018;2018. doi:10.1155/2018/3137167

79. Cutrim CS, Alvim ID, Cortez MAS. Microencapsulation of green tea polyphenols by ionic gelation and spray chilling methods. J Food Sci Technol. 2019;56(8). doi:10.1007/s13197-019-03908-1

80. Ahmed MM, El-Rasoul SA, Auda SH, Ibrahim MA. Emulsification/internal gelation as a method for preparation of diclofenac sodium-sodium alginate microparticles. Saudi Pharm J. 2013;21(1). doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2011.08.004

81. Altaf M, Sreedharan, Charyulu N. Ionic gelation controlled drug delivery systems for gastric-mucoadhesive microcapsules of captopril. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2008;70(5). doi:10.4103/0250-474X.45410

82. Rawtani D, Agrawal YK. Emerging strategies and applications of layer-by-layer self-assembly. Nanobiomedicine. 2014;1. doi:10.5772/60009

83. Lv H, Chen Z, Yang X, Cen L, Zhang X, Gao P. Layer-by-layer self-assembly of minocycline-loaded chitosan/alginate multilayer on titanium substrates to inhibit biofilm formation. J Dent. 2014;42(11). doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.003

84. Yitayew MY, Tabrizian M. Hollow microcapsules through layer-by-layer self-assembly of Chitosan/Alginate on E. coli. MRS Adv. 2020. doi:10.1557/adv.2020.261

85. Zhang C, Li C, Aliakbarlu J, Cui H, Lin L. Typical application of electrostatic layer-by-layer self-assembly technology in food safety assurance. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2022;129. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2022.09.006

86. Whitesides GM, Boncheva M. Beyond molecules: self-assembly of mesoscopic and macroscopic components. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(8). doi:10.1073/pnas.082065899

87. Seo JY, Lee B, Kang TW, et al. Electrostatically interactive injectable hydrogels for drug delivery. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;15(5). doi:10.1007/s13770-018-0146-6

88. Gierszewska M, Ostrowska-Czubenko J, Chrzanowska E. pH-responsive chitosan/alginate polyelectrolyte complex membranes reinforced by tripolyphosphate. Eur Polym J. 2018;101. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.02.031

89. Jardim KV, Palomec-Garfias AF, Andrade BYG, et al. Novel magneto-responsive nanoplatforms based on MnFe2O4 nanoparticles layer-by-layer functionalized with chitosan and sodium alginate for magnetic controlled release of curcumin. Mater Sci Eng C. 2018:92. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2018.06.039

90. Dos Santos AM, Meneguin AB, Fonseca-Santos B, et al. The role of stabilizers and mechanical processes on physico-chemical and anti-inflammatory properties of methotrexate nanosuspensions. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2020:57. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101638

91. Stahr PL, Keck CM. Preservation of rutin nanosuspensions without the use of preservatives. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2019;10. doi:10.3762/bjnano.10.185

92. Aldeeb MME, Wilar G, Suhandi C, Elamin KM, Wathoni N. Nanosuspension-based drug delivery systems for topical applications. Int J Nanomed. 2024;19:825–844. doi:10.2147/IJN.S447429

93. Baghbani F, Moztarzadeh F, Mohandesi JA, Yazdian F, Mokhtari-Dizaji M, Hamedi S. Formulation design, preparation and characterization of multifunctional alginate stabilized nanodroplets. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;89. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.05.033

94. Emami J, Shetab Boushehri MS, Varshosaz J. Preparation, characterization and optimization of glipizide controlled release nanoparticles. Res Pharm Sci. 2014;9(5):301–314.

95. Samprasit W, Akkaramongkolporn P, Jaewjira S, Opanasopit P. Design of alpha mangostin-loaded chitosan/alginate controlled-release nanoparticles using genipin as crosslinker. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2018;46. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2018.05.029

96. Danaei M, Dehghankhold M, Ataei S, et al. Impact of particle size and polydispersity index on the clinical applications of lipidic nanocarrier systems. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10(2). doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics10020057

97. Aßmann S, Münsterjohann B, Huber FJT, Will S. In situ determination of droplet and nanoparticle size distributions in spray flame synthesis by wide-angle light scattering (Wals). Materials. 2021;14(21). doi:10.3390/ma14216698

98. Jiang T, Huang Z, Li J, Zhou Y, Xiong C. Effect of nozzle geometry on the flow dynamics and resistance inside and outside the cone-straight nozzle. ACS Omega. 2022;7(11). doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c07050

99. Mokhtari S, Jafari SM, Assadpour E. Development of a nutraceutical nano-delivery system through emulsification/internal gelation of alginate. Food Chem. 2017;229. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.02.071

100. Ahdyani R, Novitasari L, Martien R, Danarti R. Formulation and characterization of timolol maleate-loaded nanoparticles gel by ionic gelation method using chitosan and sodium alginate. Int J Appl Pharm. 2019;11(6). doi:10.22159/ijap.2019v11i6.34983

101. Kader Sabbagh HA, Hussein-Al-Ali SH, Hussein MZ, Abudayeh Z, Ayoub R, Abudoleh SM. A statistical study on the development of metronidazole-chitosan-alginate nanocomposite formulation using the full factorial design. Polymers. 2020;12(4). doi:10.3390/POLYM12040772

102. Rahaiee S, Shojaosadati SA, Hashemi M, Moini S, Razavi SH. Improvement of crocin stability by biodegradeble nanoparticles of chitosan-alginate. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;79. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.04.041

103. Sarmento B, Ferreira D, Veiga F, Ribeiro A. Characterization of insulin-loaded alginate nanoparticles produced by ionotropic pre-gelation through DSC and FTIR studies. Carbohydr Polym. 2006;66(1). doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.02.008

104. Gazori T, Khoshayand MR, Azizi E, Yazdizade P, Nomani A, Haririan I. Evaluation of Alginate/Chitosan nanoparticles as antisense delivery vector: formulation, optimization and in vitro characterization. Carbohydr Polym. 2009;77(3). doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.02.019

105. Liu L, Li X, Nagao M, Elias AL, Narain R, Chung HJ. A pH-Indicating colorimetric tough hydrogel patch towards applications in a substrate for smart wound dressings. Polymers. 2017;9(11). doi:10.3390/polym9110558

106. Yoncheva K, Benbassat N, Zaharieva MM, et al. Improvement of the antimicrobial activity of oregano oil by encapsulation in chitosan–alginate nanoparticles. Molecules. 2021;26(22). doi:10.3390/molecules26227017

107. Akbarian M, Chen SH. Instability challenges and stabilization strategies of pharmaceutical proteins. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(11). doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14112533

108. Kadhum WN, Al-Ogaidi IAZ. Evaluation of chitosan-alginate nanoparticle as a stable antibacterial formula in biological fluids. Iraqi J Sci. 2022;63(6). doi:10.24996/ijs.2022.63.6.8

109. Naeimi M, Noohi N. Fabrication and characterisation of antibacterial porous alginate/aloe vera structures containing chitosan nanoparticles for wound dressing applications. Mater Technol. 2022;37(8). doi:10.1080/10667857.2021.1898713

110. Kumar D, Kumar S, Kumar S, Rohatgi S, Kundu PP. Synthesis of rifaximin loaded chitosan-alginate core-shell nanoparticles (Rif@CS/Alg-NPs) for antibacterial applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;183. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.022

111. Khoshnood S, Negahdari B, Kaviar VH, et al. Amoxicillin-docosahexaenoic acid encapsulated chitosan-alginate nanoparticles as a delivery system with enhanced biocidal activities against Helicobacter pylori and improved ulcer healing. Front Microbiol. 2023:14. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1083330

112. Luo W, Ju M, Liu J, Algharib SA, Dawood AS, Xie S. Intelligent-responsive enrofloxacin-loaded chitosan oligosaccharide–sodium alginate composite core-shell nanogels for on-demand release in the intestine. Animals. 2022;12(19). doi:10.3390/ani12192701

113. Kadhum WN, Zaidan IA. The synergistic effects of chitosan-alginate nanoparticles loaded with doxycycline antibiotic against multidrug resistant proteus mirabilis, Escherichia coli and enterococcus faecalis. Iraqi J Sci. 2020;61(12). doi:10.24996/ijs.2020.61.12.6

114. Scolari IR, Páez PL, Musri MM, Petiti JP, Torres A, Granero GE. Rifampicin loaded in alginate/chitosan nanoparticles as a promising pulmonary carrier against Staphylococcus aureus. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2020;10(5). doi:10.1007/s13346-019-00705-3

115. Costa JR, Silva NC, Sarmento B, Pintado M. Potential chitosan-coated alginate nanoparticles for ocular delivery of daptomycin. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(6). doi:10.1007/s10096-015-2344-7

116. Deacon J, Abdelghany SM, Quinn DJ, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of tobramycin polymeric nanoparticles for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis: formulation, characterisation and functionalisation with dornase alfa (DNase). J Control Release. 2015:198. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.11.022

117. Friedman AJ, Phan J, Schairer DO, et al. Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity of chitosan-alginate nanoparticles: a targeted therapy for cutaneous pathogens. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(5). doi:10.1038/jid.2012.399

118. Turner J, Muraoka A, Bedenbaugh M, et al. The chemical relationship among beta-lactam antibiotics and potential impacts on reactivity and decomposition. Front Microbiol. 2022:13. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.807955

119. Arora S, Gupta S, Narang RK, Budhiraja RD. Amoxicillin loaded chitosan-alginate polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles as mucopenetrating delivery system for H. pylori. Sci Pharm. 2011;79(3). doi:10.3797/scipharm.1011-05

120. Vaou N, Stavropoulou E, Voidarou C, et al. Interactions between medical plant-derived bioactive compounds: focus on antimicrobial combination effects. Antibiotics. 2022;11(8). doi:10.3390/antibiotics11081014

121. Lajoie L, Fabiano-Tixier AS, Chemat F. Water as green solvent: methods of solubilisation and extraction of natural products—past, present and future solutions. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15(12). doi:10.3390/ph15121507

122. Antunes Filho S, Dos Santos MS, Dos Santos OAL, et al. Biosynthesis of nanoparticles using plant extracts and essential oils. Molecules. 2023;28(7). doi:10.3390/molecules28073060

123. Nalini T, Basha SK, Sadiq AM, Kumari VS. In vitro cytocompatibility assessment and antibacterial effects of quercetin encapsulated alginate/chitosan nanoparticle. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;219. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.08.007

124. Zaharieva MM, Kaleva M, Kroumov A, et al. Advantageous combinations of nanoencapsulated oregano oil with selected antibiotics for skin treatment. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(12). doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14122773

125. Rezagholizade-shirvan A, Fathi Najafi M, Behmadi H, Masrournia M. Preparation of nano-composites based on curcumin/chitosan-PVA-alginate to improve stability, antioxidant, antibacterial and anticancer activity of curcumin. Inorg Chem Commun. 2022;145. doi:10.1016/j.inoche.2022.110022

126. Essid R, Ayed A, Srasra M, et al. Assessment of nanoencapsulated Syzygium aromaticum essential oil in chitosan-alginate nanocareer as a new antileishmanial and antimicrobial system approach. J Polym Environ. 2023;31(11). doi:10.1007/s10924-023-02911-0

127. Sathiyaseelan A, Zhang X, Wang MH. Enhancing the antioxidant, antibacterial, and wound healing effects of melaleuca alternifolia oil by microencapsulating it in chitosan-sodium alginate microspheres. Nutrients. 2023;15(6). doi:10.3390/nu15061319

128. Silvestre ALP, Dos Santos AM, De Oliveira AB, et al. Evaluation of photodynamic therapy on nanoparticles and films loaded-nanoparticles based on chitosan/alginate for curcumin delivery in oral biofilms. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023:240. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124489

129. Najafpour F, Arabzadeh S, Kalalinia F, et al. Evaluation of wound healing effect of Solanum nigrum L. leaf extract-loaded sodium alginate nanoparticles embedded in chitosan hydrogel, In vivo study. Nanomed J. 2022;9(1). doi:10.22038/NMJ.2022.62218.1644

130. Elghobashy SA, Abeer Mohammed AB, Tayel AA, Alshubaily FA, Abdella A. Thyme/garlic essential oils loaded chitosan-alginate nanocomposite: characterization and antibacterial activities. E-Polymers. 2022;22(1). doi:10.1515/epoly-2022-0090

131. Costa JR, Xavier M, Amado IR, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles as oral delivery systems for a grape pomace extract towards the improvement of biological activities. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021:119. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2020.111551

132. Kaewkod T, Tragoolpua K, Tragoolpua Y. Encapsulation of Artocarpus lacucha Roxb. Extract in alginate chitosan nanoparticles for inhibition of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and bacteria causing skin diseases. Chiang Mai J Sci. 2016;43(5):946–958.

133. Esmaeili A, Rafiee R. Preparation and biological activity of nanocapsulated Glycyrrhiza glabra L. var. glabra. Flavour Fragr J. 2015;30(1). doi:10.1002/ffj.3225

134. Rajendran R, Radhai R, Kotresh TM, Csiszar E. Development of antimicrobial cotton fabrics using herb loaded nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;91(2). doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.064

135. Varrica D, Alaimo MG. Determination of water-soluble trace elements in the PM10 and PM2.5 of Palermo Town (Italy). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(1). doi:10.3390/ijerph20010724

136. Alam AM, Shon YS. Water-soluble noble metal nanoparticle catalysts capped with small organic molecules for organic transformations in water. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2021;4(4). doi:10.1021/acsanm.1c00335

137. Gomes HIO, Martins CSM, Prior JAV. Silver nanoparticles as carriers of anticancer drugs for efficient target treatment of cancer cells. Nanomaterials. 2021;11(4). doi:10.3390/nano11040964

138. Kermanian K, Farahpour MR, Tabatabaei ZG. Accelerative effects of alginate-chitosan/titanium oxide@geraniol nanosphere hydrogels on the healing process of wounds infected with Acinetobacter baumannii and Streptococcus pyogenes bacteria. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;254:127549. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127549

139. Oe T, Dechojarassri D, Kakinoki S, Kawasaki H, Furuike T, Tamura H. Microwave-assisted incorporation of AgNP into chitosan–alginate hydrogels for antimicrobial applications. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(4). doi:10.3390/jfb14040199

140. Wang B, Wang H, Wang Z, et al. Preparation of AgBrNPs@copolymer-decorated chitosan with synergistic antibacterial activity. Mater Today Commun. 2023;37:107482. doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107482

141. Ramzan A, Mehmood A, Ashfaq R, et al. Zinc oxide loaded chitosan-elastin-sodium alginate nanocomposite gel using freeze gelation for enhanced adipose stem cell proliferation and antibacterial properties. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023:233. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123519

142. Guan G, Zhang L, Zhu J, Wu H, Li W, Sun Q. Antibacterial properties and mechanism of biopolymer-based films functionalized by CuO/ZnO nanoparticles against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J Hazard Mater. 2021;402. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123542

143. Suhandi C, Mohammed AFA, Wilar G, El-Rayyes A, Wathoni N. Effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell secretome on wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2023. doi:10.1007/s13770-023-00570-9

144. Zhu Q, Chen Z, Paul PK, Lu Y, Wu W, Qi J. Oral delivery of proteins and peptides: challenges, status quo and future perspectives. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11(8). doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.04.001

145. Shan W, Zhu X, Tao W, et al. Enhanced oral delivery of protein drugs using zwitterion-functionalized nanoparticles to overcome both the diffusion and absorption barriers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(38). doi:10.1021/acsami.6b08183

146. Cui LH, Yan CG, Li HS, et al. A new method of producing a natural antibacterial peptide by encapsulated probiotics internalized with inulin nanoparticles as prebiotics. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;28(4). doi:10.4014/jmb.1712.12008

147. Liu J, Xiao J, Li F, Shi Y, Li D, Huang Q. Chitosan-sodium alginate nanoparticle as a delivery system for ε-polylysine: preparation, characterization and antimicrobial activity. Food Control. 2018;91. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.04.020

148. Zimet P, Mombrú ÁW, Faccio R, et al. Optimization and characterization of nisin-loaded alginate-chitosan nanoparticles with antimicrobial activity in lean beef. LWT. 2018:91. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2018.01.015

149. Bernela M, Kaur P, Chopra M, Thakur R. Synthesis, characterization of nisin loaded alginate-chitosan-pluronic composite nanoparticles and evaluation against microbes. LWT. 2014;59(2P1). doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2014.05.061

150. Zohri M, Alavidjeh MS, Haririan I, et al. A comparative study between the antibacterial effect of nisin and nisin-loaded chitosan/alginate nanoparticles on the growth of staphylococcus aureus in raw and pasteurized milk samples. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2010;2(4). doi:10.1007/s12602-010-9047-2

151. Zohri M, Shafiee Alavidjeh M, Mirdamadi SS, et al. Nisin-loaded chitosan/alginate nanoparticles: a hopeful hybrid biopreservative. J Food Saf. 2013;33(1). doi:10.1111/jfs.12021

152. Li W, Li W, Wan Y, Wang L, Zhou T. Preparation, characterization and releasing property of antibacterial nano-capsules composed of ε-PL-EGCG and sodium alginate-chitosan. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;204. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.123

153. Osorio-Alvarado CE, Ropero-Vega JL, Farfán-García AE, Flórez-Castillo JM. Immobilization systems of antimicrobial peptide Ib−M1 in polymeric nanoparticles based on alginate and chitosan. Polymers. 2022;14(15). doi:10.3390/polym14153149

154. Kaur J, Kour A, Panda JJ, Harjai K, Chhibber S. Exploring endolysin-loaded alginate-chitosan nanoparticles as future remedy for Staphylococcal infections. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2020;21(6). doi:10.1208/s12249-020-01763-4

155. Barillet S, Fattal E, Mura S, et al. Immunotoxicity of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles: influence of surface properties on dendritic cell activation. Nanotoxicology. 2019;13(5). doi:10.1080/17435390.2018.1564078

156. Kriegel C, Festag M, Kishore RSK, Roethlisberger D, Schmitt G. Pediatric safety of polysorbates in drug formulations. Children. 2020;7(1). doi:10.3390/children7010001

157. Wang R, Hughes T, Beck S, et al. Generation of toxic degradation products by sonication of Pluronic® dispersants: implications for nanotoxicity testing. Nanotoxicology. 2013;7(7). doi:10.3109/17435390.2012.736547

158. Sinokrot H, Smerat T, Najjar A, Karaman R. Advanced prodrug strategies in nucleoside and non-nucleoside antiviral agents: a review of the recent five years. Molecules. 2017;22(10). doi:10.3390/molecules22101736

159. Nam NH, Luong NH. Chapter 7 - Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications. In: Grumezescu V, Grumezescu AM, editors. Materials for Biomedical Engineering. Elsevier; 2019:211–240. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102814-8.00008-1

160. Taheri RA, Goodarzi V, Allahverdi A. Mixing performance of a cost-effective split-and-recombine 3D micromixer fabricated by xurographic method. Micromachines. 2019;10(11). doi:10.3390/mi10110786

161. Allan J, Belz S, Hoeveler A, et al. Regulatory landscape of nanotechnology and nanoplastics from a global perspective. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021:122. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104885

162. Liebenberg D, Gordhan BG, Kana BD. Drug resistant tuberculosis: implications for transmission, diagnosis, and disease management. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.943545

163. Xu D, Li E, Karmakar B, et al. Green preparation of copper nanoparticle-loaded chitosan/alginate bio-composite: investigation of its cytotoxicity, antioxidant and anti-human breast cancer properties. Arabian J Chem. 2022;15(3). doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103638

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.