Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 17

Colistin Resistance Mediated by Mcr-3-Related Phosphoethanolamine Transferase Genes in Aeromonas Species Isolated from Aquatic Environments in Avaga and Pakro Communities in the Eastern Region of Ghana

Authors Mahazu S, Prah I, Ota Y, Hayashi T, Suzuki M, Yoshida M, Hoshino Y, Akeda Y, Suzuki T, Ishino T, Ablordey AS, Saito R 

Received 8 March 2024

Accepted for publication 24 June 2024

Published 15 July 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 3011—3023

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S468000

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Suresh Antony



Samiratu Mahazu,1,2 Isaac Prah,1,3 Yusuke Ota,1 Takaya Hayashi,3 Masato Suzuki,4 Mitsunori Yoshida,5 Yoshihiko Hoshino,5 Yukihiro Akeda,6 Toshihiko Suzuki,7 Tomoko Ishino,2 Anthony Samuel Ablordey,8 Ryoichi Saito1

1Department of Molecular Microbiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; 2Department of Parasitology and Tropical Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; 3Department of Molecular Virology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; 4Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan; 5Department of Mycobacteriology, Leprosy Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan; 6Department of Bacteriology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan; 7Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; 8Department of Bacteriology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana

Correspondence: Anthony Samuel Ablordey; Ryoichi Saito, Email [email protected]; [email protected]

Purpose: Colistin is classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a critically important and last-resort antibiotic for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant bacteria. However, colistin resistance mediated by chromosomal mutations or plasmid-linked mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) genes has emerged.
Methods: Thirteen mcr-positive Aeromonas species isolated from water samples collected in Eastern Ghana were analyzed using whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the broth microdilution method. Resistome analysis was performed in silico using a web-based platform.
Results: The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of colistin for all except three isolates was > 4 μg/mL. Nine new sequence types were identified and whole-genome analysis revealed that the isolates harbored genes (mcr-3-related genes) that code for Lipid A phosphoethanolamine transferases on their chromosomes. BLAST analysis indicated that the amino acid sequences of the mcr-3-related genes detected varied from those previously reported and shared 79.04– 99.86% nucleotide sequence identity with publicly available mcr-3 variants and mcr-3-related phosphoethanolamine transferases. Analysis of the genetic context of mcr-3-related genes revealed that the genetic environment surrounding mcr-3-related genes was diverse among the different species of Aeromonas but conserved among isolates of the same species. Mcr-3-related-gene-IS-mcr-3-related-gene segment was identified in three Aeromonas caviae strains.
Conclusion: The presence of mcr-3-related genes close to insertion elements is important for continuous monitoring to better understand how to control the mobilization and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes.

Keywords: Aeromonas spp, colistin, mcr-3-related gene, phosphoethanolamine transferases, whole genome analysis

Introduction

Since their discovery and introduction into clinical use, antibiotics have significantly reduced mortality and continue to be indispensable in medical care.1 Therefore, preserving their efficacy is of utmost importance.2 Despite this, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged and increased at an alarming rate, implicated in more than one million deaths in 2019, and is considered a serious public health threat.3,4 Several studies have reported the emergence of multi-drug resistant bacterial pathogens of different origins and have provided important information on the severity of this global health crisis and the need to promote the responsible use of antibiotics.4,5 Concerns regarding antibiotic resistance are further deepened by the increased prevalence of bacteria resistant to last-tier antibiotics such as carbapenems. In instances where severe infections are caused by carbapenem-resistant strains, treatment has been limited to tigecycline, colistin, aminoglycosides and fosfomycin,6 but the extensive use of colistin has resulted in the unavoidable emergence of resistance.7

Colistin, also called polymyxin E, is an important last line antibiotic discovered in 1947 and approved for clinical use in 1959. The medical gains from colistin use had previously been unsatisfactory and were abandoned by the 1980s due to reports of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity associated with its use and the introduction of safer antibiotics.8,9 However, the increased incidence of multidrug resistant organisms necessitated the reintroduction of colistin in clinical practice for systemic treatment.10,11

Colistin functions by binding to the negatively charged phosphate group of lipid A in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of bacterial outer membranes, disrupting the membrane, causing leakage of cytoplasmic contents, and ultimately causing cell death.12,13 The clinical efficacy of colistin has been eroded by the recent rise and continuous reports of plasmid-mediated mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) genes encoding colistin resistance, in addition to previously known mechanisms emerging from chromosomal mutations involving several two-component systems.14 To date, ten mcr-genes (mcr-1 to mcr-10) with many variants have been identified in diverse Gram-negative bacterial species from different sources. Nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that some variants do not confer phenotypic resistance.15

To control the spread of colistin resistance, regular investigations into the occurrence of resistant bacteria and studies of the genetic context of the detected genes are necessary to improve our knowledge of how the genes are transferred or spread, to serve as a guide for the development of interventions.

Although like in many parts of the world the study of antibiotic resistance in Ghana has largely been within the ambit of hospital environments,16 the extensive use of antibiotics in human and veterinary medicine and their successive release into water bodies have greatly contributed to the global distribution of antibiotic-resistant strains.14,17,18 Thus, water bodies represent a reservoir of mobile genetic elements associated with antibiotic resistance. Therefore, our study aimed to analyze mcr-gene-carrying colistin resistant Gram-negative bacteria isolated from water samples collected from two communities in Eastern Ghana.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection, Processing and Bacterial Isolation

Water samples (10mL −1000mL) were collected from rivers, wells, mud water, surface water of a reservoir and irrigation pond, at six and nine sites in the Avaga and Pakro Adesa communities (Figure 1), respectively, far from animal farms and medical facilities where colistin may be used, at Nsawam, in the Eastern region of Ghana, in June 2021. These samples were collected to investigate the status of colistin resistance under the low selective pressure of colistin. The samples were transported to the Bacteriology Department of the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research for initial processing. The samples were filtered serially through different filter dimensions and then through a 0.45µm filter to remove large particles. The filtrates were aliquoted into 5 mL tubes and transported in cold chain (in ice packs) to the Tokyo Medical and Dental University for further analysis. After vigorous vortexing, portions (100µL) of the samples were enriched in 2mL of tryptic soy broth (TSB) at 37°C overnight. Twenty microliters (20µL) of the overnight cultures were spread on antibiotic-supplemented bromothymol blue agar plates (colistin 2µg/mL, cefotaxime 4µg/mL, ampicillin/sulbactam 16/8µg/mL, tigecycline 4µg/mL) to suppress the growth of most Gram-positive bacteria and increase the chances of selecting colistin or tigecycline resistant isolates. Approximately five to eight morphologically different colonies from each plate were passaged onto fresh agar plates and stored in skimmed milk for further analysis.

Figure 1 Overview of sampling sites in Eastern region of Ghana. (A) Map showing area of sample collection in Avaga community. (B) Map showing area of sample collection in Pakro Adesa community. Maps were generated using maps.google.com (https://www.google.com/maps) last accessed 17/11/2023.

16S rRNA Species Identification

The isolated bacteria were identified using 16S rRNA sequencing. Crude DNA was extracted from the isolates as described earlier.19 Ten (10µL) microliters PCR reaction mix were prepared with 5µL of 2x Emerald premix (Takara, Japan), 0.5µL each of forward (16S-8UA: AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG) and reverse (16S-1485B: ACGGGCGGTGTGTRC) primers,20 3µL of nuclease-free water and 1µL of DNA template. The PCR was run with an initial denaturation at 98°C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of 98°C for 5s, 57°C for 10s, and 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 3 min. The expected band size was ~1500bp. PCR products were purified with EXOSAP IT (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan) and sequenced on a 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan) with BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan). Identification was performed using a BLAST search of sequencing results.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Mcr-Genes Screening

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibiotics were determined by broth microdilution using DP45 plates (Eiken Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan). Antibiotic activity was interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institutes (CLSI) guidelines (CLSI M100, 2022, 32nd edition). Multiplex PCR detection of mcr (110) genes was performed using primer sets designed by Masato Suzuki (unpublished data), as listed in Table 1. The PCR products of the positive isolates were purified using the FastGene Gel/PCR Extraction Kit (NIPPON Genetics Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and subjected to Sanger sequencing. The results were analyzed using BLAST searches.

Table 1 List of Primers for Mcr-1-10 Detection in This Study

Genome Sequencing and Analysis

For short-read sequencing, genomic DNA was extracted from mcr-positive isolates using the Magattract HMW DNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Paired-end libraries were prepared using Illumina DNA prep with the IDT for Illumina DNA/RNA UD Indexes and sequenced on an Illumina Miniseq (Illumina Inc., San Diego, USA) generating reads of length 149bp. Short reads were assessed for quality using fastqc v0.11.9 (https://github.com/s-andrews/FastQC). Reads were subjected to quality trimming and filtering with fastp21 v0.23.1 (https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp). Libraries for long-read sequencing were prepared using native barcoding and ligation sequencing kits EXP-NB104 and SQK-LSK109, respectively, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries were loaded onto FLO-MIN106 R9.4.1 flow cells, and sequencing was conducted using MinION Mk1B (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, United Kingdom). Barcoded Fast5 reads generated were basecalled using Guppy v1.1.4 (https://community.nanoporetech.com/protocols/Guppy-protocol/). Demultiplexing of reads and adapter sequence trimming were performed using the Porechop22 v0.2.4. Long reads with low quality (MinION Q < 10) and long reads (<1000 bp) were filtered out using filtlong (https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong). Hybrid assembly of long-read and short-read sequences was performed using Unicycler23 v0.4.8 (https://github.com/rrwick/Unicycler). The quality of the assembled genomes was checked using QUAST24 v5.2.0 (https://github.com/ablab/quast). Genomes were uploaded to the RAST25 online server (https://rast.nmpdr.org/) for annotation. The assembled genomes were screened for acquired antibiotic resistance genes and sequence types (ST) using the web-based Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE) databases, ResFinder26 v4.1 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ResFinder/) and MLST27 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/MLST/), respectively. Plasmids and other extra-chromosomal structures were confirmed using BLAST. The insertion elements were determined using the ISFinder28 (isfinder.biotoul.fr/blast.php). Virulence factors were identified using an online virulence factor database29 (VFDB) (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/cgi-bin/VFs/v5/main.cgi). The identities of the isolates were confirmed using FastANI30 (https://github.com/ParBLiSS/FastANI). The genetic relatedness of STs was assessed using a minimum spanning tree generated by PHYLOViZ Online31 (https://online.phyloviz.net/index). Amino acid sequences of publicly available mcr-3 variants were retrieved from NCBI and aligned with Multiple Sequence Comparison by Log- Expectation (MUSCLE) integrated within megaX, along with sequences from this study and based on the alignment generated, a maximum likelihood phylogeny with 1000 bootstrap replicates was constructed with megaX v10.2.6.32 Accession numbers of all the genomes used in this study are listed in Supplementary Data 1. Comparison and visualization of the genetic contexts of the identified mcr-3-related genes were performed using EasyFig v.2.2.2.33

The complete genomes of all sequenced isolates were deposited in GenBank under Bioproject PRJNA473419. Sequences of all mcr-3-related genes have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers OP176034-OP176041.

Results

Detection and Prevalence of Mcr-Positive Colistin-Resistant Strains

A total of 112 non-duplicate Gram-negative isolates from 12 genera were obtained from all the water samples. These included Acinetobacter spp. (n = 36), Aeromonas spp. (n = 27), Bordetella hinzii (n = 1), Chryseobacterium spp. (n = 1), Enterobacter spp. (n = 2), Escherichia coli (n = 2), Herbaspirillum spp. (n = 2), Klebsiella spp. (n = 2), Providencia rettgeri (n = 1), Pseudomonas spp. (n = 34), Rheinheimera tangshanensis (n = 1), Vogesella perlucida (n = 3).

Isolates were classified as resistant to colistin if their colistin MIC was ≥4 µg/mL.14,34 Thirteen Aeromonas spp. were resistant to colistin, namely Aeromonas dhakensis (n = 5), Aeromonas veronii (n = 1), Aeromonas hydrophila (n = 4), Aeromonas jandaei (n = 1), Aeromonas caviae strain (n = 1), and Aeromonas spp. (n = 1). Nine (9) out of the 13 resistant isolates (A. dhakensis, n = 4, A. hydrophila, n = 3, A. jandaei, n = 1, Aeromonas spp. n = 1) were positive for mcr-3, as determined by PCR and Sanger sequencing. Four other isolates, three of which had colistin MIC ≤1µg/mL and identified as A. caviae were positive for mcr-3 target by PCR, and the remaining one isolate (A. dhakensis) with colistin MIC >4µg/mL was PCR negative. At the end, the nine PCR-positive isolates and four isolates aforementioned (n = 13) were selected for whole-genome sequencing. Further analysis focused on the selected Aeromonas species designated BC01, BC02, BC03, BC04, BC05, BC11, BC13, BC14, BC15, BC16, BC17, BC18, and BC19. The proportions of resistance to colistin and other tested antibiotics among all Aeromonas species including the selected 13 are shown in Table 2. The MIC values for the selected 13 Aeromonas spp. are provided in Supplementary Data 2.

Table 2 Antibiotic Resistance Profiles of All Aeromonas Species (n = 27)

Characterization of Mcr-Positive Isolates and Mcr-3-Related Genes

Hybrid de novo assembly of reads from illumina and nanopore generated complete genomes of sizes ranging from 4.7Mbp to 5Mbp with GC contents between 58.92% and 61.72% (Supplementary Data 4). The genomes of BC01, BC02 and BC11 were composed of chromosomes of size 4.6Mbp, three plasmid sequences and one uncharacterized sequence of length 1712bp. These plasmid/extra-chromosomal sequences did not contain any identifiable antibiotic-resistance genes. Sequence type prediction based on the allele numbers of six housekeeping genes of Aeromonas spp. (gyrB, groLgltA, metGppsA, recA) using the MLST web server on the CGE platform yielded indeterminate results (unknown STs) for all but one isolate. The genomes of the isolates were submitted to PubMLST for assignment of new STs (https://pubmlst.org/bigsdb?db=pubmlst_aeromonas_isolatesandpage=submitandgenomes=1). MLST analysis yielded nine (9) new STs: ST1417, ST1426, ST1427, ST1428, ST1429, ST1430, ST1431, ST1432, ST1433, and a previously identified ST340 (Table 3). Most STs occurred as singletons and shared no genetic relationship with each other or with STs from other countries (Figure 2, Supplementary Data 4). A clonal complex (CC) was identified, comprising A. dhakensis ST1427 from this study and A. dhakensis ST1298 isolated in Bangladesh, and linked by a single difference in allele number. Further genome mining identified open reading frames (orf) encoding mcr-3-related lipid A phosphoethanolamine transferases of variable sequence lengths in all 13 isolates. Two different coding sequences of the mcr-3-related lipid A phosphoethanolamine transferase (EptA), one of length 1398bp and made of 465 amino acids (aa), was identified in the genomes of BC01 (A. caviae), BC02 (A. caviae), and BC11 (A. caviae), and shared 99.57% amino acid identity with mcr-3.27 (WP_017778762.1). The second sequence which was 1626bp in length in BC11 with 541aa, appeared to be truncated in BC01 and BC02 with a length of 1044bp, made of 347 aa (Figure 3). The sizes of mcr-3-related EptA genes in all the isolates are listed in Supplementary Data 3.

Table 3 Characteristics of Thirteen (13) Mcr Positive Aeromonas Species Used in Further Analysis

Figure 2 Minimum spanning tree based on the allelic profile of 10 STs identified in Aeromonas species in this study (ST1417, ST1426, ST340, ST1427, ST1428, ST1429, ST1430, ST1431, ST1432, ST1433) and others from PubMLST database generated with PHYLOViZ online. The different STs are represented by a unique node color. Node size is indicative of the number of isolates for each ST. Number of isolates forming node size has been illustrated (n). Red numbers on connecting lines represent the number of locus variants between the STs.

Figure 3 Linear comparison of genetic context of chromosomal mcr-3-related genes in isolates from Ghana generated with EasyFig v2.2.2. All genetic structures surrounding mcr-3-related genes are represented by arrows. Dark grey color gradient represents BLAST hits with the maximum (100%) identity and light grey area shows BLAST hits with the minimum identity. Mcr-3-related genes are shown in purple color. Insertion sequences are shown in sea-blue/blue color. Same genetic structures are shown in the same color. Truncated sequences are indicated with small triangles.

Resistome analysis revealed that the Aeromonas spp not only carried mcr-3-related genes but also carried sulphonamide resistance genes sul1, aminoglycoside resistance genes aadA1, tetracycline resistance genes tetE, blaOXA-2-like, blaMOX-6-like, qacE-like, ampH-like, cphA1-like, imiH-like, cphA7, amp5-like, blaCEPH-A3-like genes on their chromosomes (Supplementary Data 3). Virulome assessment identified virulence factors, such as flp type IV pili, lateral flagella, polar flagella, mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin pilus (MSH), type IV pili, type 1 fimbriae, type II, III, and VI secretion systems (T2SS, T3SS, and T6SS, respectively), aerolysin AerA/cytotoxic enterotoxin, hemolysin HlyA and hemolysin III toxins in Aeromonas spp. Details of virulence factors and their related genes are available in Supplementary Data 1. Virulence genes were more abundant in A. dhakensis species than in other species, and A. caviae carried the least number of virulence genes. Flp type IV pili were only present in A. hydrophila species, whereas lateral flagella were only present in A. dhakensis and A. jandaei species. The mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin, polar flagella, tap type IV pili, and T2SS were carried in all species, but the genes encoding these factors were more copious in some species than in others.

Location, Genetic Context of Mcr-3-Related Genes and Phylogeny

The mcr-3-related genes were located on the chromosomes of all the 13 isolates. Similar genetic contexts of mcr-3-related genes were observed in the five mcr-positive A. dhakensis (BC03, BC04, BC05, BC15, and BC18), characterized by the presence of an orf, rhomboid family proteins, and a major facilitator superfamily type transporter protein (MFS) in the upstream region, and an orf and virulence proteins in the downstream region. In A. hydrophila species (BC13, BC16, and BC19), an MFS transporter was found upstream, with an orf and a virulence protein located downstream. In the upstream region of mcr-3-related gene in Aeromonas spp. BC14, an orf, rhomboid family protein and an MFS transporter were identified, with an orf and virulence proteins downstream of the gene. Three A. caviae species (BC01, BC02, and BC11) harbored a mcr-3-related-gene-ISApu2-like-ISApu2-like-ISApu2-like-mcr-3-related-gene segment. Notably, the second copy of the mcr-3-related gene labelled “B” (Figure 3) was ostensibly truncated in BC01 and BC02. Immediately upstream of the first mcr-3-related gene (A) in BC01 was the insertion sequence ISKpn15, followed by two copies of truncated insertion elements that shared 99% similarity to ISAs17 belonging to the IS2 family of insertion sequences, a rhomboid family protein, integral membrane protein, and an IS4 family insertion element ISApu2-like. The same structures were found in BC02 and BC11 except for the absence of ISKpn15. Three truncated and two full-length copies of insertion elements that shared 99% similarity with ISApu2 were located downstream of A (Figure 3).

To explain the evolutionary relationship of mcr-3-related genes identified in this study with other previously described mcr-3 variants, a maximum likelihood tree was constructed comprising amino acid sequences of 52 publicly available colistin resistance gene variants and those from this study. The mcr variants were divided into subgroups. The 465aa mcr-3-related EptA in BC01, BC02, and BC11 was differentiated into the same subgroup, and the sequence appeared to be more homologous to mcr-3.15, mcr-3.27 and mcr-3.38. BC17 mcr-3-related (538aa) seemingly shared an evolutionary relationship with mcr-7.1. However, the remaining mcr-3-related genes were differentiated into distinct subgroups, which diverged from previously reported mcr-3 variants (Figure 4).

Figure 4 Maximum likelihood phylogeny of mcr-3 variants based on amino acid sequences. Tree was constructed using the JTT matrix-based model with 1000 bootstrap repeats. Sequences of mcr-3-related genes from this study are labelled with the prefix BC. BC01-BC11 were identified in samples collected from Avaga and BC13-BC19 from Pakro-Adesa communities in Ghana.

Discussion

Aeromonas species are distributed across many different habitats, despite being native to aquatic environments35 and notwithstanding that A. hydrophila has been demonstrated to be an efficient organism for degrading polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) with good prospects for bioremediation of PAHs polluted river systems,36 the Aeromonas genus is also known to cause human infections ranging from meningitis, respiratory, and genitourinary infections to gastroenteritis and soft skin tissue infections in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised persons.37,38 These species were identified as the most prevalent colistin-resistant organisms carrying mcr-3-related genes in this study, similar to the results of a study in South Africa.14 The species carrying the mcr-3-related genes were isolated from well, surface water of reservoir, pond water and more abundantly from mud water, and even though they were not obtained from clinical sources, they constitute a threat in the effort to confront the antimicrobial resistance situation because resistance can spread between different bacterial species across environments by horizontal gene transfer, and the aquatic environment could potentially be a reservoir for the distribution of colistin resistance.39 Furthermore, the detection of colistin-resistant organisms in these water sources poses a human health risk, as some of these serve as water sources for domestic activities for the inhabitants of Pakro and Avaga.

As opposed to other bacterial species, Aeromonas MLST scheme applies to the whole genus40 (http://pubmlst.org/Aeromonas/). MLST analysis produced 10 distinct STs, with most occurring as singletons, suggesting that they are distantly related, as expected. The analysis also revealed A. dhakensis ST1427 from this study and A. dhakensis ST1298 isolated from drinking water in Dakar, Bangladesh (s://pubmlst.org/bigsdb?page=infoanddb=pubmlst_aeromonas_isolatesandid=1283) were clonal, sharing five out of the six alleles, suggesting that they may have evolved from a similar ancestor. Additionally, the appearance of ST1417 three times (Figure 2) raises concerns regarding the possibility of clonal dissemination of the mcr-3-related genes. A. dhakensis ST340 was identified as similar to that isolated from a stool sample in a previous study in Malaysia.41 Isolation of ST340 from both environmental and clinical sources suggests that ST340 can cause human infections through ingestion of contaminated water.

Various genes encoding virulence factors have been identified in Aeromonas spp., some of which are markedly specific to different species. A. dhakensis is described to exhibit extensive virulence among Aeromonas spp.,41,42 and causes infections, with some leading to fatalities.43 As expected, A. dhakensis carried the most virulence-determining genes. Hemolysin Ahh1 is a major virulence factor of A. dhakensis and A. hydrophilia, responsible for severe tissue necrosis during severe soft tissue infections.42 Consistent with our findings, this gene was found mostly in A. dhakensis and A. hydrophila. Pili are well-characterized virulence factors in pathogenic bacteria that aid in adherence to surfaces.44 Three pili types were identified: the flp type IV, the tap type IV, and the MSH. The flp types have been found to affect biofilm formation, autoaggregation, and rough colony morphology.45 While some MSH- and tap type IV-related genes were carried by all 13 species, the flp type was found only in the A. hydrophila species. The T2SS plays a role in releasing aerolysin-related cytotoxic enterotoxins (Act), which can potentially cause diarrhea and wound infections. While T3SS and T6SS contribute to Aeromonas infections, T6SS in particular has been described to secrete an effector involved in cell apoptosis.46 All these virulence factors suggestively contribute to the virulence of some Aeromonas species as medically important pathogens.

Although plasmid-mediated resistance is problematic, the cost associated with chromosomally-mediated resistance makes it a preferable option, as plasmids can easily be lost through evolutionary events or in the absence of antibiotic selection pressure. In contrast, chromosomally-mediated resistance is irreversible, and bacteria can maintain the genes in perpetuity, provided that their carriage does not incur a fitness cost.47 Mcr-3-related genes identified in this study were borne on chromosomes, which is a cause for concern because these genes will likely persist with or without the availability of colistin.

Insertion elements belonging to the IS2 (ISAs17-like) and IS4 (ISApu2-like) families were identified in multiple copies, and ISKpn15 in a single copy, in the flanking regions of mcr-3-related genes in A. caviae species, but not in other Aeromonas species. This suggests that the insertion sequences may be involved in the mobilization of mcr-genes and also a requisite for insertion of mcr-3-related genes in A. caviae48 and given that Aeromonas spp. are normal microflora in fish and poultry, the transfer of mobile mcr genes could be facilitated among other bacterial species in the same environment.34,49

Biofilm formation is characteristic of Aeromonas spp. It enables the pathogens to persist in water distribution systems as well as in the human body.49 The process of biofilm formation is controlled by quorum sensing.50 The rhomboid family proteins, which are reported to be involved in bacterial quorum sensing, were located upstream of mcr-3-related genes in all species except A. hydrophila species.51 Although the quorum sensing or biofilm formation ability of the species was not explored in this study, it is plausible that this protein acts to enhance quorum sensing, thereby affecting biofilm formation ability, as demonstrated in other studies.49 In addition, a dgkA gene, which encodes diacylglycerol kinase and catalyzes the conversion of diacylglycerol to phosphatic acid, was identified immediately downstream of mcr-3-related gene in the A. jandaei strain, which is consistent with previous reports where dgkA was found immediately downstream of mcr-3 genes on both chromosomes and plasmids.34,52,53

Phylogenetic analysis based on the amino acid sequences indicated that the amino acid sequences of BC01, BC02, and BC11, encoding a protein of 465 amino acids, were mostly similar to those of mcr-3.27 and mcr.3.15, whereas the sequences coding for proteins of 347 or 541 amino acids were more divergent from other sequences, suggesting distinct evolutionary origins.54 The similarity in sequences between BC17 EptA and mcr-7.1 is not surprising, as mcr-7.1 is reported to have originated from Aeromonas species and shares sequence similarity with mcr-3.55

Conclusion

We isolated colistin-resistant Aeromonas species with wide array of virulence determinants from water samples collected from communities in Eastern Ghana, and whole-genome analysis revealed the presence of mcr-3-related genes close to insertion elements with potential for mobilization. This suggests that environmental water samples could be reservoirs of colistin-resistant bacterial species and supports the call for investigation of antibiotic resistance to transcend hospital environments. Also, findings from the study implied clonal dissemination of mcr-3-related gene-carrying Aeromonas spp. and highlight the potential risk posed by their presence in the aquatic environments. The isolation of colistin-resistant bacteria from water samples represents a threat to human health, and the findings of this study offer a rationale to reinforce the implementation of control measures to restrict the spread of antibiotic resistance and improve human health.

Data Sharing Statement

Dataset generated from the study is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Ethical Considerations

The ethical committee and review board of the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana (FWA00001824) and the Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (M2017-208) reviewed and approved the protocols for this study.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to the management and staff of Effia Nkwanta Regional Hospital Public Health Reference Laboratory for their support.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This research was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED, URL: http://www.amed.go.jp/en/) under grant numbers JP20wm0125007 (TH, TS, TI, RS), JP20wm0225004 (MS, YH, TS, RS), JP20wm0225013 (YA, TS, RS), JP23wm0225022 (MS, MY, YH, TS, RS), JP23gm1610003, JP23fk0108642, JP23fk0108665, JP23fk0108683, JP23wm0325037, and JP23wm0225022 (MS), JP23fk0108608, JP23wm0125007, JP23wm0225022, JP23wm0325054, JP23gm1610003, JP23gm1610007, and JP23fk0108673 (YH). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, interpretation of data, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal interests that could be misconstrued as potential conflicts of interest.

References

1. Zhou X. Antibiotic culture: a history of antibiotic use in the second half of the 20th and early 21st century in the People’s Republic of China. Antibiotics. 2023;12(3). doi:10.3390/antibiotics12030510

2. Adebisi YA. Balancing the risks and benefits of antibiotic use in a globalized world: the ethics of antimicrobial resistance. Global Health. 2023;19(1):27. doi:10.1186/s12992-023-00930-z

3. Algammal A, Hetta HF, Mabrok M, Behzadi P. Editorial: Emerging multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens “superbugs”: a rising public health threat. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1135614. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1135614

4. Collaborators AR. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629–655. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0

5. Algammal AM, Alfifi KJ, Mabrok M, et al. Newly emerging MDR B. cereus in Mugil seheli as the first report commonly harbor nhe, hbl, cyt K, and pc-plc virulence genes and bla 1, bla 2, tet A, and erm A resistance gene. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;15:2167–2185. doi:10.2147/IDR.S365254

6. Chirabhundhu N, Luk-In S, Phuadraksa T, et al. Occurrence and mechanisms of tigecycline resistance in carbapenem- and colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Thailand. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):5215. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-55705-2

7. Liu JH, Liu YY, Shen YB, et al. Plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance genes: mcr. Trends Microbiol. 2024;32(4):365–378. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2023.10.006

8. Abavisani M, Bostanghadiri N, Ghahramanpour H, et al. Colistin resistance mechanisms in Gram-negative bacteria: a focus on Escherichia coli. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2023;76(2). doi:10.1093/lambio/ovad023

9. Hamame A, Davoust B, Cherak Z, Rolain JM, Diene SM. Mobile colistin resistance genes in cats and dogs and their zoonotic transmission risk. Pathogens. 2022;11(6). doi:10.3390/pathogens11060698

10. Riquelme MP, Martinez RW, Brito B, García P, Legarraga P, Wozniak A. Chromosome-mediated colistin resistance in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli: mutation analysis in the light of genetic background. Infect Drug Resist. 2023;16:6451–6462. doi:10.2147/IDR.S427398

11. Portal EAR, Sands K, Farley C, et al. Characterisation of colistin resistance in Gram-negative microbiota of pregnant women and neonates in Nigeria. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):2302. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45673-6

12. Hussein NH, Al-Kadmy IMS, Taha BM, Hussein JD. Mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) genes from 1 to 10: a comprehensive review. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(3):2897–2907. doi:10.1007/s11033-021-06307-y

13. Ling Z, Yin W, Shen Z, Wang Y, Shen J, Walsh TR. Epidemiology of mobile colistin resistance genes mcr-1 to mcr-9. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(11):3087–3095. doi:10.1093/jac/dkaa205

14. Snyman Y, Whitelaw AC, Barnes JM, Maloba MRB, Newton-Foot M. Characterisation of mobile colistin resistance genes (mcr-3 and mcr-5) in river and storm water in regions of the Western Cape of South Africa. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021;10(1):96. doi:10.1186/s13756-021-00963-2

15. Teo JWP, Octavia S, Rama Sridatta Prakki S, Venkatachalam I, Marimuthu K, Ng OT. Prevalence and distribution of mcr genotypes in a large retrospective collection of clinical carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, Singapore. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66(9):e0101922. doi:10.1128/aac.01019-22

16. Berglund B. Environmental dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes and correlation to anthropogenic contamination with antibiotics. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2015;5:28564. doi:10.3402/iee.v5.28564

17. Cherak Z, Loucif L, Moussi A, Rolain JM. Epidemiology of mobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes in aquatic environments. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021;27:51–62. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2021.07.021

18. Zou HY, He LY, Gao FZ, et al. Antibiotic resistance genes in surface water and groundwater from mining affected environments. Sci Total Environ. 2021;772:145516. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145516

19. Mahazu S, Prah I, Ayibieke A, et al. Possible dissemination of Escherichia coli sequence type 410 closely related to B4/H24RxC in Ghana. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:770130. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.770130

20. Okamoto K, Ayibieke A, Saito R, et al. A nosocomial cluster of Roseomonas mucosa bacteremia possibly linked to contaminated hospital environment. J Infect Chemother. 2020;26(8):802–806. doi:10.1016/j.jiac.2020.03.007

21. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–i890. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560

22. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb Genom. 2017;3(10):e000132. doi:10.1099/mgen.0.000132

23. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(6):e1005595. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595

24. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. Quast: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(8):1072–1075. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086

25. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D206–14. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1226

26. Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(12):3491–3500. doi:10.1093/jac/dkaa345

27. Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(4):1355–1361. doi:10.1128/JCM.06094-11

28. Siguier P, Perochon J, Lestrade L, Mahillon J, Chandler M. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D32–6. doi:10.1093/nar/gkj014

29. Liu B, Zheng D, Zhou S, Chen L, Yang J. VFDB 2022: a general classification scheme for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D912–D917. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1107

30. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5114. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9

31. Ribeiro-Gonçalves B, Francisco AP, Vaz C, Ramirez M, Carriço JA. PHYLOViZ Online: web-based tool for visualization, phylogenetic inference, analysis and sharing of minimum spanning trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W246–51. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw359

32. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547–1549. doi:10.1093/molbev/msy096

33. Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(7):1009–1010. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039

34. Wang Y, Hou N, Rasooly R, Gu Y, He X. Prevalence and genetic analysis of chromosomal mcr-3/7 in Aeromonas from US animal-derived samples. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:667406. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.667406

35. Gonzalez-Avila LU, Loyola-Cruz MA, Hernández-Cortez C, Bello-López JM, Castro-Escarpulli G. Colistin resistance in Aeromonas spp. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11). doi:10.3390/ijms22115974

36. Alegbeleye OO, Opeolu BO, Jackson V. Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) compounds: (acenaphthene and fluorene) in water using indigenous bacterial species isolated from the Diep and Plankenburg rivers, Western Cape, South Africa. Braz J Microbiol. 2017;48(2):314–325. doi:10.1016/j.bjm.2016.07.027

37. Gray HK, Bisht A, Caldera JR, et al. Nosocomial infections by diverse carbapenemase-producing Aeromonas hydrophila associated with combination of plumbing issues and heat waves. Am J Infect Control. 2024;52(3):337–343. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2023.09.013

38. Kaki R. A retrospective study of Aeromonas hydrophila infections at a University tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. BMC Infect Dis. 2023;23(1):671. doi:10.1186/s12879-023-08660-8

39. An T, Cai Y, Li G, et al. Prevalence and transmission risk of colistin and multidrug resistance in long-distance coastal aquaculture. ISME Commun. 2023;3(1):115. doi:10.1038/s43705-023-00321-w

40. Meng S, Du XL, Wang YL, et al. Comparative study of the genetic diversity, antimicrobial resistance, and pathogenicity of Aeromonas Isolates from clinical patients and healthy individuals. Biomed Environ Sci. 2021;34(6):454–464. doi:10.3967/bes2021.062

41. Lau TTV, Tan JMA, Puthucheary SD, Puah SM, Chua KH. Genetic relatedness and novel sequence types of clinical Aeromonas dhakensis from Malaysia. Braz J Microbiol. 2020;51(3):909–918. doi:10.1007/s42770-020-00239-8

42. Su YC, Wang CC, Chen YW, et al. Haemolysin Ahh1 secreted from Aeromonas dhakensis activates the NLRP3 inflammasome in macrophages and mediates severe soft tissue infection. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024;128:111478. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2023.111478

43. Luo D, Dai L. A 26-year-old man with multiple organ failure caused by Aeromonas dhakensis infection: a case of report and literature review. Front Med. 2024;11:1289338. doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1289338

44. Fernández-Bravo A, Figueras MJ. An update on the genus Aeromonas: taxonomy, epidemiology, and pathogenicity. Microorganisms. 2020;8(1). doi:10.3390/microorganisms8010129

45. Alteri CJ, Rios-Sarabia N, De la Cruz MA, et al. The Flp type IV pilus operon of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is expressed upon interaction with macrophages and alveolar epithelial cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:916247. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.916247

46. Chen PL, Lamy B, Ko WC. Aeromonas dhakensis, an increasingly recognized human pathogen. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:793. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00793

47. Hu X, Chen Y, Xu H, et al. Genomic epidemiology and transmission characteristics of mcr1-positive colistin-resistant Escherichia coli strains circulating at natural environment. Sci Total Environ. 2023;882:163600. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163600

48. Li R, Yu H, Xie M, et al. Genetic basis of chromosomally-encoded mcr-1 gene. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;51(4):578–585. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.11.015

49. Batra P, Mathur P, Misra MC. Aeromonas spp.: an emerging nosocomial pathogen. J Lab Physicians. 2016;8(1):1–4. doi:10.4103/0974-2727.176234

50. Zhou L, Zhang Y, Ge Y, Zhu X, Pan J. Regulatory mechanisms and promising applications of quorum sensing-inhibiting agents in control of bacterial biofilm formation. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:589640. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.589640

51. Adrain C, Cavadas M. The complex life of rhomboid pseudoproteases. FEBS J. 2020;287(19):4261–4283. doi:10.1111/febs.15548

52. Ling Z, Yin W, Li H, et al. Chromosome-mediated mcr-3 variants in Aeromonas veronii from chicken meat. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(11). doi:10.1128/AAC.01272-17

53. Yin W, Li H, Shen Y, et al. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-3 in Escherichia coli. mBio. 2017;8(3). doi:10.1128/mBio.00543-17

54. Cheng Z, Bethel CR, Thomas PW, et al. Carbapenem use is driving the evolution of imipenemase 1 variants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65(4). doi:10.1128/AAC.01714-20

55. Yang YQ, Li YX, Lei CW, Zhang AY, Wang HN. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-7.1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(7):1791–1795. doi:10.1093/jac/dky111

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.