Back to Journals » Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management » Volume 19
Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Evaluating Postoperative Outcomes of Supratentorial Glioma in the Motor Function Area [Letter]
Authors Teixeira TM , Godoy LFS, Paiva WS
Received 3 July 2023
Accepted for publication 6 July 2023
Published 10 July 2023 Volume 2023:19 Pages 579—580
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S428676
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Editor who approved publication: Professor Garry Walsh
Theo Moraes Teixeira,1 Luis Filipe de Souza Godoy,2 Wellingson Silva Paiva1
1LIM 62, Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; 2Institute of Radiology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
Correspondence: Wellingson Silva Paiva, LIM 62, Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, 05403-010, Brazil, Email [email protected]
View the original paper by Dr Duy Hung and colleagues
Dear editor
Gliomas represent about 30% of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS)1 and, in adults, about 70% of these are supratentorial.2 The most successful treatment involves chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical resection with at least 2 cm of margin,3 and studying peritumoral white matter pathways preoperatively is relevant enabling early assessment of risk and reduction of neurological complications. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a tool for mapping relevant axonal tracts since it relies on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology to offer a noninvasive and precise method for individually observing major pathways in the brain.4
Duy Hung et al assess if preoperative DTI mapping is a reliable method for predicting motor function impairment after resection.5 The article is a retrospective study of 43 patients who underwent navigation-guided surgery for histopathologically confirmed supratentorial glioma in motor function area after preoperative observation with MRI conventional and DTI sequences, all of whom also underwent pre- and postoperative clinical evaluation concerning motor function. It demonstrates a correlation between DTI observed tumoral infiltration and clinical motor impairment levels, showing that patients with greater infiltration tend to have a worst motor function prognosis. They concluded that DTI should be used in a preoperative context for better planning of surgical resection of supratentorial gliomas and predict motor function outcomes.
We deem important to discuss methodological limitations regarding a possible selection bias, DTI analysis, lack of a control group and weak outcome measurement.
The article features a small sample from a single healthcare center, weakening its generalization potential. Also, the selection and inclusion criteria are not clearly defined. The study reports that patient records were surveyed for clinical data, including the pre- and postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score and muscle strength evaluation according to the British Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, but it does not mention how the patients were deemed eligible. We considered this a limitation since several confusion factors may have been overlooked, which could otherwise change the outcome of the study.
Furthermore, DTI observation was based on color hues, which represent the craniocaudally oriented corticospinal tract but also contain thalamocortical radiations to the motor and sensory cortex. Fiber tracking could add conspicuity for detecting corticospinal fibers in corona radiata and their spatial relation with the tumor.
The article does not mention the inclusion of a control group and is based on the comparison of pre- and postoperative motor function, showing that DTI results are predictive of resection-related impairment degree. However, it is relevant to compare postoperative outcome between patients who underwent preoperative DTI with a control group. It is appropriate to investigate if DTI usage could significantly improve postoperative functional outcome.
Finally, the study measures outcome based on the British MRC scale for physical strength and the KPS score for general well-being. Although these are well-established systems, the authors do not explain why they have selected such methods. This can bias the study since patients could experience complications attributable to tumor resection that are not assessed by both scores, especially considering non-motor neurological complications.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this communication.
References
1. Goodenberger MKL, Jenkins RB. Genetics of adult glioma. Cancer Genet. 2012;205(12):613–621. doi:10.1016/S2210-7762(12)00260-8
2. Persaud-Sharma D, Burns J, Trangle J, et al. Disparities in brain cancer in the United States: a literature review of gliomas. Med Sci. 2017;5(3):16. doi:10.3390/medsci5030016
3. Iacob G, Dinca EB. Current data and strategy in glioblastoma multiforme. J Med Life. 2009;2(4):386. PMID: 20108752.
4. Le Bihan D, Mangin J-F, Poupon C, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13(4):534–546. doi:10.1002/jmri.1076
5. Duy Hung N, Duy Linh N, Ha Vi N, et al. Predictive value of preoperative diffusion tensor imaging for evaluating postoperative outcomes of supratentorial glioma in the motor function area. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023;19:269–278. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S402622
© 2023 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.