Back to Journals » Advances in Medical Education and Practice » Volume 13
![Highly-accessed](assets/img/article_icons/highly-accessed.png)
Attitude and Perception of Medical Students Towards Histology Subject at Wollo University, Ethiopia
Authors Teshome D
Received 24 January 2022
Accepted for publication 4 April 2022
Published 19 April 2022 Volume 2022:13 Pages 337—344
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S359703
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Md Anwarul Azim Majumder
Daniel Teshome
Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Amhara, Ethiopia
Correspondence: Daniel Teshome, PO.BOX-1145, Tel +251919158464, Email [email protected]
Introduction: Students’ perceptions and feedback have a significant impact on academic progress.
Objective: To assess the attitude and perception of medical students towards histology subject at Wollo University, Northern Ethiopia.
Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study design was carried out in Wollo University from January, 2021 to February, 2021. A pre-tested and structured self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. All opinions were rated using a positive-point Likert scale, which ranges from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree.” The data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20.
Results: A total of 184 students participated in this study, with a 100% response rate. Of the respondents, 84.24% of them were very much interested in histology subject. However, only 31 (16.85%) thought of histology as a career choice. The two major reason for not joining histology was less chance of promotion (65, 35.33%) and financial growth (41, 22.28%) followed by difficulty of the subject (23, 12.5%). Most of the respondents (155, 84.24%) agreed or strongly agreed that histology knowledge will help them a lot in their future clinical practice. Regarding different methods of teaching histology, our study reveals that there were 82.61% of participants who agreed with the proposed integration of histology and pathology. Moreover, system approach in teaching pathology with other disciplines was preferred by 70.1% and was comparable to several studies.
Conclusion: Overall, the study findings indicate that medical students have a favorable attitude toward histology courses. But, they are unable to join the field due to the lower chance of promotion and financial growth. The curricular integration of histology and pathology in the first year needs to be continued, and much effort is needed to increase students’ affinity for microscopic anatomy. This evidence serves as an additional motive for the development of histology courses focusing on practical application of knowledge in a clinically oriented setting.
Keywords: Attitude, Perception, Medical Students, Wollo University
A Letter to the Editor has been published for this article.
Introduction
Histology is the science of microscopic structures of human tissues and organs.1 Since it is a pre-clinical medical subject, it is important for understanding the complexity of cell and tissue organization and function.2,3 Understanding the normal morphology and function of organs is important not only in the early years of medical school, but also serves as a foundation for pathology.4 Understanding disease mechanisms in terms of altered human body structure necessitate a thorough understanding of histology.5 Anatomy is a highly tough subject for the vast majority of students, and it is regarded as the most extensive subject of the first year of medical school.6 Gross anatomy education receives the majority of the overall number of hours allotted to anatomy instruction. Students are slower to recognize the importance of histology because gross anatomy is overemphasized, and their attitudes against histology form early in the course.7
Teaching histology as an image-intensive science is one of the most difficult tasks encountered by medical educators. Both “traditional” and “nontraditional” methods have been used8 and modalities such as peer teaching,9 audiovisual tools,10 and technological and traditional drawing approaches have been extensively studied and tested.11,12 Furthermore, virtual microscopy has proven to be advantageous in a variety of ways.13 Understanding histology is essential for every medical student when doing pathology at medical school.14,15
In many Ethiopian medical schools, innovative curriculums have been implemented, all of which have in one way or another achieved system-based curricula or curricula based on problem-based learning, In our medical school, the students taught the course histology during their first and second years of study. At our university, a systemic approach to teaching histology was used, with 40–45 students in a single class and an adequate instructor lecturing in person. Both a laboratory-based and a theoretical method of teaching histology were applied.16
According to a study conducted in Pakistan on the clinical importance of histology, students do not recognize the importance of histology in clinical practice.17 Another study conducted by Pushpa et al, on the perception and attitudes of first-year medical students in India found that the majority of the students’ attitudes towards histology improved over the course of a year, from ambiguity to clarity, neglect to interest, and lastly, increased self-confidence.18 Furthermore, medical students have a favorable attitude toward histology, according to a survey done in Serbia on the relevance and attitudes toward histology courses.19
Many researches has been done to show how important gross anatomy is in clinical practice.20–23 However; there have been few studies on the importance of histology in medical school. There have been no studies in Ethiopia to analyze medical students’ perceptions of the clinical importance of histology to date. Histology teachers will be able to design methods for excellence in academic and clinical competency based on an assessment of medical students’ attitudes toward histology. The purpose of this study is to determine how medical students feel about the clinical importance of histology. In order to construct effective learning strategies for teaching microscopic anatomy, it will be necessary to first identify student attitudes.
Materials and Methods
Study Design, Area, and Period
An institution-based cross-sectional study design was carried out from January 2021 – February 2021 at the College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University which is a public university in Northern Ethiopia.
Data Collection Tool and Procedure
For data collection, a pre-tested and structured self-administered questionnaire was used. The questionnaire was adapted from previous research on the subject.17–19,24–26 A pre-test was conducted on 5% of the sample size to assess the substance and clarity of the questionnaire. During the 2021 academic calendar, all PC-II (Pre-clinical II or second-year medical students), C-I (Clinical year I or third-year medical students), C-II (Clinical year II or fourth-year medical students), and interns undergraduate medical students at Wollo University’s College of Medicine and Health Sciences were participated in this study. A total of 184 questionnaires were given to the students after receiving their consent for participation in this study. The survey comprised of the questions on socio-demographic characteristics, students’ attitudes towards histology subjects, interest and career choices of the students, different methods of teaching histology, and their perceptions regarding the integration of histology and pathology in integrated courses. All opinions were rated using a positive point Likert scale, which ranges from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree.” After completion of data collection, the data has been checked for errors and completeness to assure the quality of the data.
Data Entry and Analyses
For this study, Epi-info version 7.1 was used to clean, code, and enter the data, which was then exported to SPSS version 20 for analysis. All levels of opinion were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s chi-square test were used.
Results
Socio-Demographic Characteristics
A total of 184 students participated in this study, with a 100% response rate. More than one-third of the respondents (128, 69.57%) were within the age group of 23–27. The majority of the respondents (151, 82.07%) were males. More than half of the participants (102, 55.98%) came from rural areas of the country. Nearly half of the respondents (88, 47.82%) were of Orthodox religion (57, 30.98%). Almost one-third of the participants (58, 31.52%) were from the Amhara ethnic group, followed by the Oromo (53, 28.8%). Among the respondents involved in this study, 49 (26.63%), 46 (25%), 48 (26.1%), and 41 (22.27%) were PC-II, C-I, C-II, and intern students, respectively (Table 1).
![]() |
Table 1 Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Respondents |
Attitude Towards the Course Histology
One hundred sixty-two (88.02%) of the respondents perceived that histology is important in medicine. More than three-fourths of them agreed that learning histology (155, 84.24%) and histology lab sessions (144, 78.26%) was interesting. Out of the 184 respondents, 121 (65.76%) of them found practical histology was more difficult than theory. Of the participants, only 76 (41.3%) of the respondents reported that their grades in practical histology exams were higher than theoretical exams. When compared to other disciplines, only 68 (36.96%) of the participants felt histology was easier than other basic medical science subjects. More than one-third of the respondents (72, 39.13%) perceived that practical histology needs more lab sessions and more effort was put forth by the instructor than what the student took. Most of the respondents (155, 84.24%) agreed or strongly agreed that histology knowledge will help them a lot in their future clinical practice. Regarding the knowledge retention of histology, 134 (72.83%) students responded that they remembered normal microscopic morphology well when they tried to identify microscopic disease morphology in the introductory pathology course (Table 2).
![]() |
Table 2 Medical Student Attitudes Towards the Course Histology During Their Study Year |
Interest and Career Choice of Histology
Of the respondents, one hundred fifty-five (84.24%) of them were very much interested in histology subjects. However, only 31 (16.85%) of the respondents thought of histology as a career choice. In addition, only 33 (17.93%) of the respondents will guide their juniors to join histology as a career. The two major reasons for not joining histology were less chance of promotion (65, 35.33%) and financial growth (41, 22.28%) followed by the difficulty of the subject (23, 12.5%). More than three-fourths of the respondents (145, 78.8%) agreed that the histology teachers encourage the students to join the field. Out of 184 study participants, more than half (121, 65.76%) of them perceived that an integrated curriculum increased their interest in the histology course (Table 3).
![]() |
Table 3 Career Choice and Interest of Medical Students Towards Histology Subject |
Perception Toward Teaching Methodology of Histology
One hundred and fifty-two (82.61%) of the respondents preferred the integration of histology and pathology lectures and lab sessions into integrated courses starting from the first year instead of teaching each discipline alone. Besides, adding case discussion (PBL) combining histology and pathology was preferred by the majority of the respondents (125, 67.93%). The majority of the respondents (110, 59.78%) agreed that the microscope is more effective than showing images in teaching histology and that preparing tissue slides was the preferred teaching methodology, as indicated by the majority of the respondents (165, 89.67%). But, nearly half (85, 46.2%) of them agreed that it is more effective to draw microscopic images during teaching histology. In addition, most of the study participants (129, 70.1%) responded that the systemic approach is more effective in teaching histology than teaching each discipline alone. About half (83, 45.12%) of the study participants agreed or strongly agreed that examining a normal and abnormal example of the same tissue at the same time is better than observing alone. However, 76 (41.3%) of them perceived that histology lab material in the first year was not restricted to what needed to be compared with common pathologic conditions (Table 4).
![]() |
Table 4 Participants’ Perceptions of Different Methods for Improving Histology Teaching |
Discussion
A variety of strategies were tried to improve students’ comprehension and knowledge retention. Students at our institution complete general histology courses by the end of the second semester of their second year. The course’s major goal is to educate students on how to recognize and understand the structures of cells, tissues, and organs using light microscopy in connection to their function. This is a prerequisite for the succeeding years of education, when students will be exposed to abnormal organ structure and function. In addition, their capacity to integrate the knowledge gained in basic and clinical medical courses will be predicated on their ability to diagnose and treat diverse diseases properly and critically in their future medical practice.27
In our study, a large number of students found histology is important in medicine and were interested to learn. Besides, the majority of students thought that practical histology was more difficult than theory and gross morphology. This was higher than the number reported in a recent study from Serbia (79.2%).19 This discrepancy may be due to variations in the teaching methodology of histology instructors in two countries. In our study, the majority of students agreed that histology knowledge would be very useful to them in their future clinical practices, and they remembered practical histology well during the pathology introductory course, which helped them in practical pathology. This finding is in agreement with the study conducted in Serbia.19 However; these findings contradict a study conducted in central Jordan, which found that only 31.3% of respondents remembered practical histology well during the pathology introductory course.23 This difference may be due to variation in the organization of histology labs and integrated curricular differences between the two countries.
In the present study, 84.24% of medical students were interested in histology subjects. But, only 16.85% of them wish to join the field as a future career. Besides, the main reasons for not joining the basic medical science field were that there was less chance of promotion and less financial growth in these fields. This finding is in line with the study conducted in Ethiopia, China, Malaysia, and South Asia, which found that there is a limited opportunity in basic medical science, restricted to teaching, research, and diagnostic laboratories.28,29 In our study, nearly one-third of the medical students acknowledge the significance of the integration of histology with clinical discipline, which helps in a better understanding of respective subjects. However, 34.24% of those polled said the integrated curriculum had not increased their interest in basic medical sciences. This finding is in agreement with Teshome et al reports.28 Regarding different methods of teaching histology, our study reveals that there were 82.61% of participants who agreed or strongly agreed with the proposed integration of histology and pathology. Furthermore, a system approach to teaching pathology in conjunction with other disciplines was preferred by 70.1%, which was consistent with previous researches.24,30,31
An integrated curriculum in teaching laboratory medicine has been shown to be effective in medical students’ satisfaction and better understanding.32,33 The need to start the integration of histology and pathology in the first year is well highlighted by the ratio of students who were unsatisfied with practical histology in the first year (39.13%) and the significant proportion of students who were uncomfortable with co-presenting normal and abnormal examples at the same time in the second year pathology introduction (45.12%). Correlating normal histology of organs with the morphology of disease is a major learning outcome that boosts students’ knowledge and understanding.34 In addition, combining this integration with new teaching and learning methods such as virtual microscopy needs to be tested.35 However, our results showed that microscopy is still the preferred tool for 59.74% of students.
Conclusion
This cross-sectional study examined the attitudes and perceptions of medical students towards histology subjects at Wollo University, Ethiopia. Overall, the study findings indicate that medical students have a favorable attitude toward histology courses. But, they are unable to join the field due to the lower chance of promotion and financial growth. The curricular integration of histology and pathology in the first year needs to be continued, and much effort is needed to increase students’ affinity for microscopic anatomy. This evidence could be used as an additional motive for the development of histology courses, with special emphasis on the practical application of knowledge in a clinically-oriented setting.
Data Sharing Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Ethical clearance was obtained from Wollo University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences. All study participants were informed about the purpose and confidentiality issues related to the study. Participation was voluntary and written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Finally, the data were collected and confidentiality of client information was maintained. Lastly, the author confirmed that this study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.
Acknowledgments
I acknowledge the contributions of all medical students of Wollo University who participated in the study.
Disclosure
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest in this work.
References
1. Mescher AL. Junqueira’s Basic Histology: Text and Atlas.
2. Hamilton PW, van Diest PJ, Williams R, Gallagher AG. Do we see what we think we see? The complexities of morphological assessment. J Pathol. 2009;218(3):285–291. doi:10.1002/path.2527
3. Johnson S, Purkiss J, Holaday L, Selvig D, Hortsch M. Learning histology—dental and medical students’ study strategies. Eur J Dent Educ. 2015;19(2):65–73. doi:10.1111/eje.12104
4. Moxham BJ, Emmanouil-Nikoloussi E, Brenner E, et al. The attitudes of medical students in Europe toward the clinical importance of histology. Clin Anat. 2017;30(5):635–643. doi:10.1002/ca.22889
5. Hussein I, Raad M, Safa R, Jurjus RA, Jurjus A. Once upon a microscopic slide: the story of histology. J Cytol Histol. 2015;6(6):1–5. doi:10.4172/2157-7099.1000377
6. Gupta S, Gupta AK, Verma M, Kaur H, Kaura Singh K. The attitudes and perceptions of medical students towards basic science subjects during their clinical years: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2014;4(1):16–19. doi:10.4103/2229-516X.125675
7. Cotter JR, Cohan CS. The timing, format and role of anatomical sciences in medical education. Med Sci Educ. 2010;20(3):276–279.
8. Hightower JA, Boockfor FR, Blake CA, Millette CF. The standard medical microscopic anatomy course: histology circa 1998. Anat Rec. 1999;257(3):96–101.
9. Beck A, Wood C, Helms R, Arvizo C, Cherry BM, Ziats NP. Peer assisted learning in introductory histopathology improves learner scores and delivers learner satisfaction. Med Sci Educ. 2016;26(1):85–92. doi:10.1007/s40670-015-0207-6
10. Campos-Sánchez A, López-Núñez JA, Scionti G, et al. Developing an audiovisual notebook as a self-learning tool in histology: perceptions of teachers and students. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(3):209–218. doi:10.1002/ase.1386
11. Cogdell B, Torsney B, Stewart K, Smith RA. Technological and traditional drawing approaches encourage active engagement in histology classes for science undergraduates. Biosci Educ. 2012;19(1):1–15. doi:10.11120/beej.2012.19000003
12. Rafi A, Rauf A, Anwar MI. Significance of actually drawing microscopic images and its impact on students’ understanding of histology. J Dow Univ Health Sci Karachi. 2017;11(3):77–81. doi:10.36570/jduhs.2017.3.540
13. Hortsch M. Using virtual microscopy–advancing anatomical education worldwide. FASEB J. 2017;31(1 Suppl.):
14. Malau-Aduli BS, Lee AY, Cooling N, Catchpole M, Jose M, Turner R. Retention of knowledge and perceived relevance of basic sciences in an integrated case-based learning (CBL) curriculum. B M C Med Educ. 2013;139:1–8.
15. Shaw PA, Friedman ES. Clinico-histologic conferences: histology and disease. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(1):55–61. doi:10.1002/ase.1252
16. Abraham Y, Azaje A. The new innovative medical education system in Ethiopia: background and development. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2013;27(1):36–40.
17. Waseem N, Rasheed A, Gill M, Asad A, Shamim MO, Waseem F. The attitudes of medical students towards clinical relevance of histology. PAFMJ. 2021;71(1):351–356. doi:10.51253/pafmj.v71i1.3756
18. Pushpa and Suruchi Histology. Perception and attitude of first year MBBS students; 2017: 2.
19. Zaletel I, Marić G, Gazibara T, et al. Relevance and attitudes toward histology and embryology course through the eyes of freshmen and senior medical students: experience from Serbia. Ann Anat. 2016;1(208):217–221. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2016.07.002
20. Moxham BJ, Plaisant O. Perception of medical students towards the clinical relevance of anatomy. Clin Anat. 2007;20(5):560–564. doi:10.1002/ca.20453
21. Olowo-Ofayoku A, Moxham BJ. Comparisons between the attitudes of medical and dental students toward the clinical importance of gross anatomy and physiology. Clin Anat. 2014;27(7):976–987. doi:10.1002/ca.22417
22. Getu AA. Basic science courses in the eyes of medical students during their clinical study years at University of Gondar. Int J Biomed Adv Res. 2019;10(10):
23. Nayak S, Ramnarayan K, Somayaji N, Bairy KL. Teaching anatomy in a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum. Neuroanatomy. 2006;5:2–3.
24. Khader AA, Obeidat FN, Shahin NA, et al. Medical students’ perceptions of pathology and a proposed curricular integration with histology: a future vision of curricular change. Int J Morphol. 2020;38(1):38–42.
25. Jayanthi A, Sarjna MV, Benjamin B. Students’ perception of teaching learning method in dissection and histology lab. IOSR J Dental Med Scie. 2014;13(11):24–28. doi:10.9790/0853-131162428
26. Xu C, Li Y, Chen P, Pan M, Bu X. A survey on the attitudes of Chinese medical students towards current pathology education. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):1–7. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02167-5
27. Amin NF, Akter M, Kabir MH, Shamim KM. Medical undergraduates residual knowledge of structural, functional and clinical aspects of cell and histology at recall and understanding levels. Bangladesh j Anat. 2013;11(1):34–43. doi:10.3329/bja.v11i1.20507
28. Teshome D, Tiruneh C, Berhanu L, Berihun G. Medical students’ attitude and perception towards basic medical science subjects at Wollo University, Northeast Ethiopia. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021;12:431. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S309440
29. Kumar A, Mitra K, Nagarajan S, Poudel B. Factors influencing medical students’ choice of future specialization in medical sciences: a cross- sectional questionnaire survey from medical schools in China, Malaysia and regions of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation. N Am J Med Sci. 2014;6(3):119–125. doi:10.4103/1947-2714.128473
30. Shah AR, Shethwala ND, Parmar BH. Perception of undergraduate medical students towards the subject of pathology at one of the medical colleges of Gujarat, India. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014;3(7):863–865. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2014.140420142
31. Emerald NM, Han TZ, Oo SS. Students’ perception on effectiveness of pathology teaching in Phase 1 medical program at UCSI University. Int J Med Sci Educ. 2016;3(3):264–273.
32. Osman MT, Adnan A, Kutty MK, Al-Naggar RA. Evaluation of laboratory medicine teaching and learning by medical students in hybrid integrated curriculum. Data from public Malaysian University. J Basic Appl Sci Res. 2014;4:151–157.
33. Osman MT, Kutty MK, Adnan A, et al. Perceptions of year one Malaysian medical students towards teaching and learning of general pathology in hybrid integrated curriculum. World Appl Sci J. 2013;23(7):977–982.
34. Amin NF, Yesmin ZA, Akter M. Effective cell biology and histology teaching for medical undergraduates in Bangladesh: a review. Ann Int Med Dent Res. 2015;2(1):3–8.
35. Kumar RK, Freeman B, Velan GM, De Permentier PJ. Integrating histology and histopathology teaching in practical classes using virtual slides. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2006;289(4):128–133. doi:10.1002/ar.b.20105
© 2022 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.