Back to Journals » Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity » Volume 17

Distribution of the ACE Gene Polymorphisms in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients, Their Associations with Nephropathy Biomarkers and Metabolic Indicators at a Tertiary Hospital in Uganda

Authors Kiconco R , Kalyesubula R , Kiwanuka GN

Received 3 February 2024

Accepted for publication 23 May 2024

Published 5 June 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 2211—2220

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S462740

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Juei-Tang Cheng



Ritah Kiconco,1,2 Robert Kalyesubula,3,* Gertrude N Kiwanuka4,*

1Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda; 2Department of Biochemistry, Soroti University, Soroti, Uganda; 3Departments of Internal Medicine and Physiology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; 4Department of Biochemistry, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Ritah Kiconco, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda, Tel +256 783990501, Fax +256-485-20782, Email [email protected]

Purpose: We aimed at determining the distribution of the ACE insertion/deletion gene polymorphisms among type 2 diabetic patients and their association with the nephropathy biomarkers and the metabolic indicators.
Patients and Methods: Data were collected from 237 adult type 2 diabetes mellitus patients receiving healthcare at the diabetic clinic of Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital. Peripheral blood genomic DNA was amplified using a conventional PCR technique and analyzed for the ACE homozygous forms of the insertion (II), deletion (DD) and heterozygous insertion deletion (ID) genotypes as well as their respective allele counts. Biomarkers of nephropathy were analyzed on a Beckman coulter AU480 chemistry analyzer using system compatible reagents.
Results: Majority of the participants were older persons (Median = 57, IQR = 49– 64) and female 171 (72.2%). Most of them had the Deletion allele 198 (83.5%) and DD genotype 116 (48.9%). At multivariate logistic regression, the nephropathy biomarkers that is microalbuminuria, serum creatinine, urea, eGFR and electrolytes had no association with the ACE I/D alleles or genotypes (p > 0.05). On the other hand, selected metabolic indicators had a positive relationship. The insertion allele was associated with increasing glycated hemoglobin (OR = 1.082, p = 0.019) and decreasing serum glucose levels (OR = 0.891, p = 0.001). Deletion allele was associated with decreasing glycated hemoglobin (OR = 0.924, p = 0.047) and increasing serum glucose levels (OR = 1.208, p = 0.001). ACE II genotype was associated with decreasing serum glucose levels (OR = 0.873, p = 0.029). ACE DD genotype was associated with decreasing glycated hemoglobin (OR = 0.917, p = 0.010) and increasing serum glucose levels (OR = 1.132, p = 0.001). ACE ID genotype was associated with increasing glycated hemoglobin (OR = 1.077, p = 0.022), triglyceride levels (OR = 1.316, p = 0.031) and decreasing serum glucose levels (OR = 0.933, p = 0.038).
Conclusion: The presence or absence of the ACE I/D alleles and genotypes affects the ultimate increase or decrease in the serum glucose, glycated hemoglobin and triglyceride levels. Although there was no significant association between the biomarkers of nephropathy and the ACE I/D alleles or genotypes, the above implicated metabolic indicators should be included in healthcare guidelines used when attending to type 2 diabetic patients.

Keywords: angiotensin converting enzyme gene, insertion, deletion, polymorphism, biomarkers, type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetic nephropathy, Uganda

Introduction

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the major microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus.1,2 It is a multifactorial and polygenic disorder that occurs in a quarter to a third of all patients with prolonged diabetes mellitus and has been widely implicated as the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD).3 Typically, the disease is diagnosed after significant damage has occurred to the kidney tissue.4 While DN is known to cause glomerular and tubular basement membrane thickening, and ultimately nephron loss, diagnosis using kidney biopsies are not a common routine practice in resource-limited settings. This creates a pressing need to look for possible early-disease biological markers.

A cross-sectional study conducted in adult patients at the diabetic clinic of Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH) in southwestern Uganda established a prevalence of diabetic nephropathy at 22.9% among 140 patients who were sampled.5 Also, evidence from studies has shown that there is clustering of diabetic nephropathy in families, and it is hypothesized that this could be the reason for the observed large variation in its prevalence among diverse populations.3 In the progression of diabetes mellitus and its complications, one’s genetic background is considered to contribute to an inherent susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy.6

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), a key enzyme in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS),7,8 catalyzes the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II. Angiotensin II has been implicated in inducing progressive renal injury by increasing cellular growth, proliferation and matrix synthesis, leading to glomerular sclerosis as well as precipitating changes in the renal hemodynamic such as an increase in intra-glomerular pressure9,10 The ACE gene insertion/deletion polymorphisms are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which have been closely associated with the development of nephropathy among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. The ACE gene is made up of 21 kilobases on the long arm of human chromosome 17q23 forming three possible genotypes that is to say II, ID or DD.11 These ACE genetic mutations have been considered to be putative mediators of renal disease,9 although some studies are quite controversial.6,11

Some studies have demonstrated an association between ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphisms and various metabolic indicators in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) patients, while others found otherwise. A study found an association between these polymorphisms with coronary heart disease and dyslipidemia in T2D patients.12 Another found blood pressure with new onset T2D and essential hypertension to have no association with the ACE I/D polymorphisms.13 A recent meta-analysis found that ACE I/D polymorphism was associated with insulin-resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome, especially among Asians.14 It is important to note that the exact relationship between ACE I/D polymorphisms and metabolic indicators could vary depending on several other variables such as population demographics, study design, and other genetic or environmental factors. In the current study, we elucidate the relationship between the ACE I/D polymorphisms and metabolic indicators among T2DM patients.

Studies have elucidated that the II genotype protects against the development of diabetic nephropathy, while the DD genotype predicts poor renal disease outcomes.12 In two separate meta-analyses, Ng et al reported that there was a noticeable protective role of the II genotype against diabetic nephropathy, especially among T2DM patients of Asian (Chinese, Japanese, and Korean) descent compared to Caucasians.13,14 The authors reported that the presence of the ACE II genotype among Asians with T2DM was also associated with a lower risk of macroalbuminuria but was slightly associated with the risk of microalbuminuria. There is limited research that has validated these findings.

In this study, we determined the association between metabolic indicators, biomarkers of nephropathy and the ACE insertion/deletion gene polymorphisms among type 2 diabetic patients at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in southwestern Uganda.

Materials and Methods

Study Setting

The study was conducted at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH) located in Mbarara City, southwestern Uganda. The facility receives patients from neighboring districts and across the country’s borders like Tanzania, Rwanda and Democratic Republic of Congo. The hospital is a government entity where all services are free, although a private wing also exists. It is also the teaching hospital of Mbarara University of Science and Technology Medical School. Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital has a bed capacity of 350. It provides in-patient, outpatient, and specialized services, which include a diabetic clinic, a nephrology unit, medical wards, an eye care center, and other specialized clinics. The hospital receives about 500–600 diabetic patients annually of which 10% are new cases.

Study Design and Participants’ Information

We enrolled 237 already-diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus adult patients receiving healthcare at the diabetic clinic of MRRH as participants in this cross-sectional study. We excluded patients who had a kidney disease diagnosis prior to the actual type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis and pregnant women with gestational diabetes. We consecutively enrolled participants who met the inclusion criteria until the target sample size was achieved as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Flow diagram for study participants selection.

Data Collection

Following clinical examination at the diabetic clinic, 4 mills of blood were collected from each participant into a vacutainer without anticoagulant for the biochemical analyses, and the same amount was collected into an ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) tube for the genetic analyses. One spot urine samples were also obtained for subsequent measurement of microalbuminuria.

Urine and Blood Sample Collection for Laboratory Analysis

Urine samples were collected during unrestricted daily life activities to measuring microalbumin. Samples of venous blood were collected and serum obtained following centrifugation at 12,000 revolutions per minute for 5 minutes. Sera was used to measure urea, creatinine, glycated hemoglobin, glucose, sodium, potassium, chloride, triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol using standard methods. The eGFR was estimated using the updated CKD-EPI formula.15 Both the blood in the plain tube and urine specimen were analyzed on the AU480 Beckman Coulter chemistry analyzer using commercial reagent kits as per the manufacturer’s guidelines.

Identification of ACE Alleles and Genotypes

Red Blood Cell Lysis

Blood samples collected in ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes were used to harvest the red blood cells. The red blood cells were lysed by lysis buffer (2M Tris pH 7.6, 1M MgCl2, 3M NaCl) by adding lysis buffer to 1 mL of blood, incubated for 5 minutes, centrifuged, and the supernatant poured off. The above process was repeated until the red blood cells were completely lysed by forming a colourless solution.

DNA Extraction

Exactly 500 μL of cell lysis buffer (0.1M Tris pH 8.0, 50 mM EDTA, 1% SDS) was mixed with the lysed red blood cells and vortexed for 1 minute. To the mixture, 275 μL of 7M ammonium acetate pH 7.0 was added. The mixture was incubated for 5 minutes at 65°C (dry bath) and 5 minutes on ice. To this, 500 ul of chloroform was added, vortexed for 1 minute, and spun at 15,000 revolutions per minute for 5 minutes. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and one mL of isopropanol was added. The mixture was incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature (with mixing by inverting the tube several times) before being spun at 15,000 revolutions per minute for 7 minutes. Isopropanol was removed, and the pellet was suspended in 500 μL of 70% ethanol. Spinning at 15,000 revolutions per minute for 3 minutes, ethanol was removed by decanting. The remaining ethanol was removed with a pipette tip after a hard spin in a microcentrifuge. The DNA pellet was dried at room temperature in open microcentrifuge tubes. The dry DNA pellet was suspended in 50 μL of nuclease free water. The extracted DNA was stored at −20°C.

DNA Quantification

DNA purity and quantification were measured using a NanoDrop lite spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific-168 Third Avenue Waltham, MA USA 02451).

Detection of ACE I/D Encoding Gene

The presence of the ACE gene was established by PCR amplification using the following primer sets: forward primer 5’CTGGAGAGCCACTCCCATCCTTTCT3’; reverse primer 5’GACGTGGCCATCACATTCGTCAGAT3’; and insertion-specific primer 5′-TTTGAGACGGAGTCTCGCTC-3′.11 The primers used in this study were manufactured by Eurofins Genomics. The expected product size lengths were 490 bp and 190 bp for insertion and deletion alleles, respectively. In case of insertion deletion presence from the gel, another run was set which included the previous primers and insertion-specific primers added together. The PCR master mix was prepared as follows: 2.5µL 10x buffer, 0.5 µL dNTPs, 0.5 Taq polymerase – New England Bio-labs, 0.5µL forward (10µM), 0.5µL reverse (10µM), 3.0µL DNA template and 17.5µL RNAase-Free-H2O making up to 25.0µL final reaction volume.

PCR Conditions

The PCR DNA amplification was carried out in a conventional PCR Thermocycler (CLASSIC K960 Thermal Cycler) following an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 minutes. This was followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 minute, annealing at 58°C for 1 and a half minutes and elongation at 72°C for 2 minutes, and the final extension cycle at 72°C for 2 minutes.

Gel Electrophoresis

DNA amplicons were electrophoresed using 1.5% agarose gel in 1X Tris-Borate EDTA buffer (TBE), 5µL Safe View ClassicTM DNA stain (cat # G108), 6X loading dye (Thermo Scientific #R0611), and DNA ladder/marker 1kb (NEB-Biolabs #N3231L). Electrophoresis was run at 200V and 80mA for 1 hour. Bands were visualized using the Gene-Flash Trans-illuminator called Dark Reader® trans-illuminator manufactured by Clare Chemical Research.

Statistical Analyses

Raw data were transferred into STATA version 17 for further analysis. Continuous variables were expressed as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR) after checking for normality. Frequencies and percentages were used for categorical variables. Associations of binary variables were done using chi-square (χ2) for categorical variables. A non-parametric Mann-Witney test (Wilcoxon-rank-sum test) was used to compare the median levels of the continuous variables (metabolic biomarkers of nephropathy) in the two groups (present or absent) of the outcome genotypic variables (ACE I/D alleles or genotypes). This is because all the continuous variables were not normally distributed according to the Shapiro-Wilk normality test. The relationship between ACE I/D alleles or genotypes (binary variables; dependent variables) and other variables (metabolic biomarkers of nephropathy; independent variables) was further explored using binary and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify those independent variables that could be significantly associated with the binary genotypic variables. A p-value less than 0.05 after multivariate analysis was taken to be significant. All the variables in the bivariate analysis, whether statistically significant or not at p-value < 0.05, were included in the multivariate analysis because of their biological association with the dependent variable.

Results

The study comprised mostly older people and females dominated. Majority of the participants resided with in the same geographical location as the study site which is within greater Mbarara as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Participants’ Sociodemographic Characteristics

Each of the independent variables (age and gender) was compared with each of the dependent binary variable (ACE I/D alleles or genotypes). There were no statistically significant associations between the distribution of the allelic genotypes and the two groups of the binary variables indicated in Table 2.

Table 2 Distribution of ACE Insertion or Deletion Alleles and Genotypes Categorized by Age and Gender

In Table 3, the presence of the ACE insertion allele was significantly associated with increasing glycated hemoglobin and decreasing serum glucose levels, whereas the presence of the ACE D allele was associated with increasing serum glucose and chloride levels and decreasing glycated hemoglobin.

Table 3 Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of ACE I and D Alleles with Metabolic Biomarkers of Diabetic Nephropathy

As shown in Table 4, ACE II genotype was associated with decreasing serum glucose and chloride levels, whereas the ACE ID genotype was associated with increasing glycated hemoglobin, serum triglyceride levels and decreasing serum glucose levels. ACE DD genotype was associated with decreasing glycated hemoglobin and increasing serum glucose levels.

Table 4 Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of ACE II, ID and DD Genotypes with Metabolic Biomarkers of Diabetic Nephropathy

Discussion

In this study, the majority of the participants were older persons and female. This finding is not surprising, as the occurrence of type 2 diabetes mellitus is mostly in older people. Although the diabetic clinic at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital receives more female than male patients in routine care probably due to the differences in health-seeking behavior, previous studies have reported an overrepresentation of females in research studies.16,17

Most of our study participants had the DD genotype (116/237), and a few of them had the II genotype (22/237). Majority had at least a D allele (198/237), and there was an equal distribution of the I allele. These findings are in contrast to what Sapkota et al observed that the II genotype was common among patients with T2D.18 The reason why most type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) patients have the ACE DD genotype compared to the ACE II genotype is not fully understood, although it may be due to a combination of genetic and environmental factors.19 Additionally, several studies have suggested that the ACE DD genotype may be associated with an increased risk of T2D and its complications, such as hypertension20 and diabetic nephropathy.21 This could perhaps explain why we had more ACE DD or ID genotypes present in our T2D study participants. However, the evidence for this association is not consistent across all populations, and more research is needed to fully understand the role of the ACE I/D polymorphism in the development and progression of T2D with associated complications such as nephropathy. Moreover, other factors that may contribute to the higher prevalence of the ACE DD genotype in T2D patients include lifestyle factors such as diet, physical activity, and obesity, as well as other genetic and environmental factors that we did not fully characterize in our current study.

There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of ACE I/D alleles and genotypes by age and sex. This finding is similar to what was observed by Jayapalan et al. In their study, they found that neither gender nor ethnicity exerted any influence on the ACE I/D gene polymorphisms22. ACE I allele was associated with increasing glycated hemoglobin and decreasing serum glucose levels, while the D allele was associated with decreasing glycated hemoglobin, and increasing serum glucose and chloride levels. ACE II genotype was associated with decreasing serum glucose and chloride levels, whereas the ID genotype was associated with increasing glycated hemoglobin and triglyceride levels and decreasing serum glucose levels. The DD genotype was associated with decreasing glycated hemoglobin and increasing serum glucose levels. Our findings partly agree with a study done in a Chinese T2D population that found a significant association between dyslipidemia and the ACE genotypes.23 Unlike this previous study, we specified the dyslipidemia fraction to be triglyceride levels, and the ACE genotype implicated was the ID genotype. A recent study on the ACE I/D gene polymorphisms in Hyderabad, India, implicated the glycated hemoglobin, triglyceride levels, and DD genotype, among other factors, as independent putative mediators of diabetic nephropathy.24

We did not find any association between the ACE I/D alleles and genotypes, with microalbuminuria or significant changes in the eGFR both of which are established biomarker markers of diabetic nephropathy and renal function, respectively. Several studies have indicated that the ACE D allele and ACE ID and DD genotypes are predisposing factors to diabetic nephropathy and that the II genotype confers a protective effect.25 On the contrary, a previous study found a significant association between the DD genotype (homozygous for the deletion allele) and an increased risk of developing diabetic nephropathy.26

Our study has categorically elucidated the relationship between ACE I/D gene polymorphisms and metabolic indicators and biomarkers used in assessing diabetic nephropathy. As such, we have evaluated the critical biomarker tests from the pool of tests that are usually carried out among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Due to the cross-sectional design of our study, we were unable to further explore the actual relationship between the ACE I/D gene polymorphisms and nephropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients because we found no significant statistical association when we regressed microalbuminuria and eGFR with other metabolic indicators and biomarkers of nephropathy. We therefore recommend case-control and cohort studies to further explore this relationship.

A limitation to this study is that we did not collect information on T2D disease duration as most of the participants could not recall when they were first diagnosed with the disease. Also, the clinical disease is usually diagnosed after several years since symptoms can be mild at the on-set, therefore determining the exact disease duration is not always easy.

Conclusion

The presence or absence of the ACE I/D alleles and genotypes affects the ultimate increase or decrease in serum glucose, glycated hemoglobin, triglycerides, and serum chloride levels. Although there was no significant association between the biomarkers of nephropathy and the ACE I/D alleles or genotypes, the above implicated metabolic indicators should be included in healthcare guidelines used when attending to type 2 diabetic patients. Therefore, genetic testing of the angiotensin converting enzyme insertion/deletion gene polymorphisms should be encouraged among patients to facilitate personalized health care.

Data Sharing Statement

The datasets used to analyze the data during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki.27 Ethics approval was obtained from the Mbarara University of Science and Technology-Research Ethics Committee (study number: MUST-2021-132). It was registered by the national research regulatory body, the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology (study number: HS1941ES). Administrative clearance was obtained from the administration of Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH) and the Head of Department of the Diabetic Clinic. Informed written consent (in English and the local dialect) was obtained from each study participant prior to recruitment into the study. We observed the ethical requirements related to conducting research involving human participants.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the dedication of the research assistants and the acceptance of the study participants without whom these findings could not have been obtained. Appreciation is extended to Opeyemi Olabisi for the intellectual contribution towards the conceptualization of this study, to Fredrickson Wasswa, Naume Joyce Karuhanga, Kennedy Kassaza and Joel Bazira for assisting in the genetic analysis and to Don Bosco Mpanga for the analysis of the clinical biochemistry tests. Soar research foundation is acknowledged for their contribution towards the data management and statistical insights during data analysis. Additionally, the authors thank the leadership of the Multi-morbidity Research Capacity Initiative (MURCI) at Mbarara University of Science and Technology for providing training and mentorship opportunities relating to this work.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number D43TWO11632. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no competing interests in this work.

References

1. Mansouri M, Zniber A, Boualla L, et al. Associations between clinical characteristics and angiotensin-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism in Moroccan population with Type-2 diabetic nephropathy. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant off Publ Saudi Cent Organ Transplant Saudi Arab. 2017;28(2):261–267.

2. Rahimi Z. ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy. J Nephropathol. 2012;1(3):143–151. doi:10.5812/nephropathol.8109

3. Parchwani DN, Palandurkar KM, Hema Chandan Kumar D, Patel DJ. Genetic predisposition to diabetic nephropathy: evidence for a role of ACE (I/D) gene polymorphism in type 2 diabetic population from Kutch Region. Indian J Clin Biochem IJCB. 2015;30(1):43–54. doi:10.1007/s12291-013-0402-4

4. Thomas HY, Ford Versypt AN. Pathophysiology of mesangial expansion in diabetic nephropathy: mesangial structure, glomerular biomechanics, and biochemical signaling and regulation. J Biol Eng. 2022;16(1):19. doi:10.1186/s13036-022-00299-4

5. Kiconco R, Rugera SP, Kiwanuka GN. Microalbuminuria and traditional serum biomarkers of nephropathy among diabetic patients at Mbarara Regional referral hospital in South Western Uganda. J Diabetes Res. 2019;2019:1–7. doi:10.1155/2019/3534260

6. Patel H, Kalia K, Mannari J. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphism increases the susceptibility of diabetic nephropathy in Western Indian Type 2 diabetic patients. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2011;31(4):223–228. doi:10.1007/s13410-011-0053-z

7. Wang P, Huang R, Lu S, et al. RAGE and AGEs in Mild Cognitive Impairment of Diabetic Patients: a Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0145521. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145521

8. Ahmad N, Jamal R, Shah SA, Gafor AHA, Murad NAA. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system gene polymorphisms and type 2 diabetic nephropathy in Asian populations: an updated meta-analysis. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2019;15(4):263–276. doi:10.2174/1573399814666180709100411

9. Conway BR, Maxwell AP. Genetics of diabetic nephropathy: are there clues to the understanding of common kidney diseases? Nephron Clin Pract. 2009;112(4):c213–221. doi:10.1159/000224787

10. Mooyaart AL, Valk EJJ, van Es LA, et al. Genetic associations in diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2011;54(3):544–553. doi:10.1007/s00125-010-1996-1

11. Wyawahare M, Neelamegam R, Vilvanathan S, Soundravally R, Das AK, Adithan C. Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphisms and nephropathy in diabetic patients at a tertiary care centre in South India. Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2017;10:1179551417726779. doi:10.1177/1179551417726779

12. Hemeed RN, Al-Tu’ma FJ, Al-Koofee DAF, Al-Mayali AH. Relationship of angiotensin converting enzyme (I/D) polymorphism (rs4646994) and coronary heart disease among a male Iraqi population with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020;19(2):1227–1232. doi:10.1007/s40200-020-00632-y

13. Jhawat V, Gupta S, Agarwal BK, Roy P, Saini V. Angiotensin converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism is not responsible for antihypertensive therapy induced new onset of type 2 diabetes in essential hypertension. Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2019;12:1179551418825037. doi:10.1177/1179551418825037

14. Li J, Lin Z, Wang S, Shi Q. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) Gene I/D polymorphism is significantly associated with insulin resistance and polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2023;88(3):174–184. doi:10.1159/000530089

15. Ha SK. ACE Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism and Diabetic Nephropathy: clinical Implications of Genetic Information. J Diabetes Res. 2014;2014:1–8. doi:10.1155/2014/846068

16. Ng DPK, Tai BC, Koh D, Tan KW, Chia KS. Angiotensin-I converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and its association with diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis of studies reported between 1994 and 2004 and comprising 14,727 subjects. Diabetologia. 2005;48(5):1008–1016. doi:10.1007/s00125-005-1726-2

17. Ng D, Ramli SNB, Chia KS, Koh D, Tai BC Genetic variation at the angiotensin-l converting enzyme locus and the risk for diabetic nephropathy: an update based on 53 studies and 17 791 subjects. Scopus; 2009. Available from: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/108659. Accessed May 24, 2024.

18. CKD-EPI Creatinine Equation. National kidney foundation; 2021. Available from: https://www.kidney.org/professionals/kdoqi/gfr_calculator/formula. Accessed May 24, 2024.

19. Dhumad MM, Hamdan FB, Al-Mayah QS. Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion (I/D) gene polymorphism in Iraqi type 2 diabetic patients: association with the risk of cardiac autonomic neuropathy. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2020;21(1):1–7. doi:10.1186/s43042-020-00062-8

20. Chivese T, Werfalli MM, Magodoro I, et al. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women of childbearing age in Africa during 2000–2016: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e024345. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024345

21. Sapkota R, Dasgupta R, Das B, Rai L. The insertion I/deletion D polymorphism of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene in type II diabetic. Recent Res Sci Technol. 2013;5(4).

22. Hilawe EH, Yatsuya H, Kawaguchi L, Aoyama A. Differences by sex in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(9):671–682D. doi:10.2471/BLT.12.113415

23. Birhan TA, Molla MD, Abdulkadir M, Tesfa KH. Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphisms with risk of hypertension among the Ethiopian population. PLoS One. 2022;17(11):e0276021. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276021

24. Zeng WL, Yang SK, Song N, Chu FF. The impact of angiotensin converting enzyme insertion/deletion gene polymorphism on diabetic kidney disease: a debatable issue. Nefrol Engl Ed. 2022;42(4):415–431.

25. Jayapalan JJ, Muniandy S, Chan SP. Null association between ACE gene I/D polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy among multiethnic Malaysian subjects. Indian J Hum Genet. 2010;16(2):78–86. doi:10.4103/0971-6866.69351

26. Lee YJ, Tsai JCR. ACE gene insertion/deletion polymorphism associated with 1998 world health organization definition of metabolic syndrome in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(6):1002–1008. doi:10.2337/diacare.25.6.1002

27. WMA - The World Medical Association-WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. [cited 2024 May 5]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.