Back to Journals » Cancer Management and Research » Volume 12
LncRNA CCAL Promotes Angiogenesis Through Regulating the MiR-29b/ANGPTL4 Axis in Osteosarcoma
Authors Chen S, Yang M, Chang S
Received 15 July 2020
Accepted for publication 14 September 2020
Published 23 October 2020 Volume 2020:12 Pages 10521—10530
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S272230
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Antonella D'Anneo
Shiyi Chen,1 Mingjia Yang,2 Shimin Chang1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210096, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Shimin Chang
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 450 Tengyue Road, Shanghai 200090, People’s Republic of China
Tel +86 021-65690520
Email [email protected]
Purpose: The objective of this study was to detect the expression of the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) colorectal cancer-associated lncRNA (CCAL) in osteosarcoma tissues and to investigate its role in angiogenesis and the potential molecular mechanisms associated with this effect in osteosarcoma.
Materials and Methods: CCAL expression in 40 osteosarcoma tissues and 40 noncancerous tissues was measured by qRT-PCR (quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction). Tube formation assays were performed to explore the role of CCAL in angiogenesis in osteosarcoma. In addition, the regulatory interaction between CCAL, miR-29b, and ANGPTL4 was investigated via luciferase reporter assay and bioinformatics predictive analysis.
Results: Compared with noncancerous tissues, the expression of CCAL was markedly upregulated in osteosarcoma tissues. Higher CCAL expression levels were closely related to shorter overall survival in patients with osteosarcoma. Additionally, functional analysis indicated that CCAL could facilitate tumour angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo in osteosarcoma. Mechanistically, CCAL upregulated ANGPTL4 expression in osteosarcoma cells, and ANGPTL4 mediated angiogenic induction by CCAL in osteosarcoma. Moreover, CCAL directly targeted miR-29b in osteosarcoma. More importantly, we demonstrated that CCAL upregulated the expression of ANGPTL4 by sponging miR-29b, which promoted angiogenesis in osteosarcoma.
Conclusion: Our results show that CCAL promotes angiogenesis by regulating the miR-29b/ANGPTL4 axis in osteosarcoma.
Keywords: lncRNA CCAL, miR-29b, ANGPTL4, osteosarcoma, angiogenesis
Introduction
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant tumour derived from bone among children and adolescent individuals.1,2 Surgery and intensive adjuvant chemotherapy are the main treatments for patients with osteosarcoma. However, the survival rate is approximately 15–17% in osteosarcoma patients treated with surgery alone.3,4 For osteosarcoma patients with metastasis or relapse, survival has remained virtually unchanged in the past 30 years.1,5 Increasing evidence shows that angiogenesis is a pivotal process in the development and progression of osteosarcoma.6,7 ANGPTL4 (angiopoietin-like 4), a secretory glycoprotein consisting of N-terminal and C-terminal domains, is a member of the angiopoietin family.8 Previous studies have shown that ANGPTL4 plays an important role in tumour angiogenesis.9–11 However, the role of ANGPTL4 in angiogenesis in human osteosarcoma remains largely unknown.
LncRNAs (long noncoding RNAs) are a subgroup of noncoding RNAs that are more than 200 nucleotides in length.12 Accumulating evidence indicates that lncRNAs serve as important players in cancer biology, typically resulting in aberrant expression of gene products that contribute to the progression of a variety of human tumours.13,14 The lncRNA CCAL (colorectal cancer-associated lncRNA) acts as an oncogenic gene in many human cancers.15–17 Currently, it has been reported that CCAL promotes gastric cancer metastasis by regulating the miR-149/FOXM1 axis.16 Additionally, CCAL drives the progression of colorectal cancer through activating the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway by suppressing AP-2α (activator protein 2α).15 However, the biological role and molecular mechanisms of CCAL in the angiogenesis of osteosarcoma have not yet been clarified.
In the present study, we assessed the level of CCAL among osteosarcoma tissues via qRT-PCR. In addition, we further investigated the role and potential regulatory mechanisms of CCAL in the angiogenesis of human osteosarcoma. Ultimately, our findings suggested that CCAL promotes angiogenesis by regulating the miR-29b/ANGPTL4 axis in osteosarcoma.
Materials and Methods
Tissue Specimens
The present study followed the Helsinki declaration guidelines. It was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine (LL-003). Informed consent was obtained from each patient. A total of 40 osteosarcoma tissues were collected from patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma who had undergone surgical resection at Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine between January 2015 and December 2018. All of these osteosarcoma cases were localized primary tumours. There were no patients with metastasis or relapse. Forty normal tissues (referred to as noncancerous tissues) come from corresponding para-tumour tissues and were used as the relevant controls for osteosarcoma.
Cell Culture and Transfection
A human osteoblast cell line (hFOB1.19), osteosarcoma cell lines (HOS, SAOS2, U2OS, and MG-63), and HUVECs (human umbilical vein endothelial cells) were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis and mycoplasma testing were performed in all cell lines used in this study. All cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 (RPMI-1640) medium (Gibco, Rockville, MD, USA) or Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (HyClone, Logan City, UT) containing 10% foetal bovine serum (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) at 37°C under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. A lentivirus-based shRNA (short hairpin RNA) targeting CCAL was obtained from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). All shRNA sequences for CCAL are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 The Sequences of shRNA for CCAL |
Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)
According to the manufacturers’ instructions, total RNA was extracted from 40 osteosarcoma tissues, 40 noncancerous tissues and osteosarcoma cell lines using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, MA). qRT-PCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara, Japan). Primers for GAPDH and CCAL were acquired from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). GAPDH was used as a reference control for CCAL. The primers for CCAL and GAPDH were as follows: CCAL, forward: 5′-AAGGGAGTTTTGTGCGGTGAGAA-3′ and reverse: 5′-TGTGCTGGCTTGTTTGGCTTTATT-3′; ANGPTL4, forward: 5′-GGACCACAAGCACCTAGACCA-3′ and reverse: 5′-GATCCCCAAACCCCGCCTT-3′; and GAPDH, forward: 5′-TCAAGGCTGAGAACGGGAAG-3′ and reverse: 5′-TCGCCCCACTTGATTTTGGA-3′.
Animal Study
BALB/c nude mice (6 weeks) were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). For subcutaneous tumorigenesis assays, U2OS or MG-63 cells (5 × 105) transfected with sh-CCAL or sh-NC were injected into mice. Tumour growth was monitored every 10 days. The tumour volume was calculated as follows: volume = length ×width2 × 0.5. Five weeks after the injections, tumours were collected for immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. All animal assays were approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine. Animal care and procedures were performed in accordance with Animal Research Reporting In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed as previously described.18 Antibodies against CD31 (ab182981) and ANGPTL4 (ab196746) were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). All images were collected via microscopy (Leica, Germany). Tissue slides stained for CD31 were examined to ascertain microvascular density (MVD) in the tissue samples. The detailed process of evaluating microvessel density in tumour tissue was performed as previously described.19,20
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
The conditioned medium of U2OS or MG-63 cells transfected with sh-CCAL or sh-NC was collected. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, ELISAs (Abcam, UK) were performed to measure the level of ANGPTL4 (ab99974). The concentration of ANGPTL4 was determined by measuring the absorbance at 450 nm in a microplate reader.
Tube Formation Assay
HUVECs (human umbilical vein endothelial cells) (2×104/well) were seeded in 96-well plates that contained dissolved Matrigel matrix (BD Biosciences, USA). Conditioned medium from U2OS or MG-63 cells transfected with sh-CCAL or sh-NC was collected and added into the well. After incubation for 6 h at 37°C, the structures (tube-like) in each well were photographed under a microscope (Leica, Germany).
Western Blotting
U2OS or MG-63 cells transfected with an NC mimic or a miR-29b mimic were first lysed using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Then, extracted proteins were separated using sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Separated proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, USA). The membranes were incubated with an ANGPTL4 primary antibody (ab196746) (Cambridge, UK) for 12 h at 4°C and then were incubated with secondary antibodies (Cambridge, UK) at 37°C for 2 h. The reaction was visualized via ECL (Electrochemical Luminescence) (Millipore, USA).
Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay
Luciferase reporter assays were performed with a dual-luciferase assay system (Promega, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. U2OS or MG-63 cells in 96-well plates were simultaneously transfected with a miR-29b mimic (RiboBio, China) and reporter plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After 48 h, luciferase activities were measured by a dual-luciferase reporter assay kit. Then, the ratio of Renilla/firefly luciferase activities was further analysed.
Statistical Analysis
GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA) was used for statistical analysis. All data are expressed as the means ± SD. Pearson correlation analysis was carried out to assess the correlation among the groups. One-way analysis of variance or a Student’s t-test was used to compare quantitative variables. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Upregulated CCAL is Closely Associated with Poor Prognosis in Osteosarcoma
Accumulating evidence indicates that CCAL acts as an oncogene in many human cancers.15–17 However, there have been no studies about the relationship between CCAL and osteosarcoma prognosis. Therefore, to determine the level of CCAL among osteosarcoma, qRT-PCR was performed to detect its expression in 40 osteosarcoma tissues and 40 noncancerous tissues. As shown in Figure 1A, CCAL levels were higher in osteosarcoma tissues than in noncancerous tissues. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to investigate the relationship between patient survival and CCAL expression. The results indicated that high expression of CCAL was associated with poor overall survival in patients with osteosarcoma (Figure 1B). Further results also confirmed that CCAL expression was significantly higher in osteosarcoma cell lines (U2OS, MG-63, HOS, and SAOS-02) than it was in a human osteoblast cell line (hFOB1.19) (Figure 1C). These data demonstrate that CCAL expression is upregulated in osteosarcoma and is related to poor overall survival in patients with osteosarcoma.
CCAL Promotes Tumour Growth and Angiogenesis in Osteosarcoma
To identify the roles of CCAL in tumour growth and angiogenesis in osteosarcoma, U2OS and MG-63 cells were treated with a lentivirus-based shRNA targeting CCAL. The qRT-PCR results showed the efficiency of sh-CCAL in knocking down CCAL in U2OS and MG-63 cells (Figure 2A and B). Subsequently, in vivo studies were performed with U2OS and MG-63 cells. We used U2OS and MG-63 cells to form subcutaneous xenografts that in nude mice, and we found that when CCAL was silenced in those cells, there was dramatic suppression of growth in the xenografts (Figure 2C–E). Moreover, the vascular density in the tumours in the sh-CCAL group was obviously decreased compared with that in the sh-NC group (Figure 2F–H). These observations demonstrated that CCAL promotes tumour growth and angiogenesis in osteosarcoma.
CCAL Promotes Angiogenesis by Regulating ANGPTL4 in Osteosarcoma
To further explore the role of CCAL in angiogenesis in osteosarcoma, tube formation assays were performed in HUVECs treated with conditioned medium from MG-63 or U2OS cells infected with a lentivirus-based shRNA targeting CCAL. The results indicated that decreased tube formation was observed in the sh-CCAL group compared with the sh-NC group (Figure 3A and B). Next, angiogenesis-related cytokine levels were determined in the cell culture supernatants of U2OS and MG-63 cells via ELISA. As shown in Figure 3C, knockdown of CCAL significantly suppressed the secretion of ANGPTL4 in MG-63 and U2OS cells but had no obvious effects on HGF, VEGF-D, VEGF-C, and VEGF. In addition, silencing CCAL significantly inhibited ANGPTL4 mRNA expression (Figure 3D). Similar results were observed regarding the protein expression of ANGPTL4 in MG-63 or U2OS-sh-CCAL tumour tissues, as shown by IHC (Figure 3E). More importantly, treatment with an ANGPTL4 antibody abolished the tube formation induced by CCAL (Figure 3A, F and G). Collectively, CCAL promotes angiogenesis in osteosarcoma by regulating ANGPTL4.
CCAL Directly Targets MiR-29b in Osteosarcoma
Previous studies have proven that lncRNAs play important roles in the development and progression of cancer by serving as microRNA decoys to modulate gene expression.21 To further investigate the molecular mechanisms involved in CCAL-induced ANGPTL4 expression, the potential interactions between lncRNAs and miRNAs were predicted by StarBase prediction software. As shown in Figure 4A, there was a binding site for miR-29b in CCAL. Dual-luciferase reporter assays indicated that luciferase activities of CCAL-WT but not CCAL-MT were dramatically decreased by treatment with miR-29b mimics (Figure 4B). Moreover, knockdown of CCAL resulted in an obvious increase in the expression of miR-29b in MG-63 and U2OS cells (Figure 4C). Additionally, Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated an inverse correlation between CCAL and miR-29b in osteosarcoma tissues (Figure 4D). Our observations indicated that CCAL directly targets miR-29b in osteosarcoma.
ANGPTL4 is a Direct Target Gene of MiR-29b
To further explore the role of miR-29b in the expression of ANGPTL4 induced by CCAL, the potential interactions between ANGPTL4 and miR-29b were predicted via bioinformatics prediction tools (Starbase, miRDB, and TargetScan). The predicted results indicated that there was a binding site for miR-29b in ANGPTL4 (Figure 5A). Next, the relative luciferase activities were determined using reporter plasmids containing miR-29b binding sequences in the wild-type (WT) ANGPTL4 3ʹ-UTR as well as mutant (MT) counterparts. As shown in Figure 5B, the relative luciferase activity was obviously decreased in MG-63 and U2OS cells that were transfected with a miR-29b-mimic. In addition, miR-29b significantly suppressed the mRNA and protein levels of ANGPTL4 and its secretion in MG-63 and U2OS cells (Figure 5C–E). The results of Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a negative relationship between miR-29b and ANGPTL4 in osteosarcoma tissues (Figure 5F). Furthermore, knockdown of CCAL-mediated inhibition of tube formation was blocked in MG-63 and U2OS cells that were transfected with a miR-29b inhibitor (Figure 5G). Taken together, these results suggest that ANGPTL4 is a direct target gene of miR-29b.
Discussion
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant tumour derived from bone among children and adolescent individuals.1,2 For osteosarcoma patients with metastasis or relapse, survival has remained virtually unchanged in the past 30 years.1,5 Accumulating evidence demonstrates that angiogenesis is a pivotal process in the development and progression of osteosarcoma.6,7 The lncRNA CCAL (colorectal cancer-associated lncRNA) acts as an oncogene in many human cancers.15–17 However, little is known about the role and biological mechanisms of CCAL in the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma. In this study, we demonstrated that CCAL upregulated the expression of ANGPTL4 by sponging miR-29b, which promoted angiogenesis in osteosarcoma.
LncRNAs are involved in various types of gene regulation, including transcription and epigenetic or posttranscriptional regulation, which lead to the development of carcinomas and other diseases.22 Moreover, lncRNAs play an important role in tumour occurrence, metastasis, angiogenesis and chemoresistance by acting as ceRNAs (competitive endogenous RNAs) toward miRNAs.23–25 For instance, the lncRNA DANCR promotes tumour progression and cancer stemness features in osteosarcoma by upregulating AXL via miR-33a-5p inhibition.26 The lncRNA TUG1 (taurine upregulated gene 1) could promote osteosarcoma cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis in vivo and in vitro by serving as a miRNA sponge to competitively protect the HIF-1α mRNA 3ʹ UTR from miR143-5p.27 Recently, it has been reported that CCAL could bind to miR-149, suppress the translation of FOXM1 (fork head box M1), and subsequently promote metastasis in gastric cancer.16 Additionally, CCAL drives the progression of colorectal cancer by suppressing AP-2α to activate the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway.15 CCAL promotes papillary thyroid cancer progression by activating the NOTCH1 pathway.28 Furthermore, CCAL has been reported to be significantly upregulated in osteosarcoma tissues and facilitate osteosarcoma cell proliferation, migration and invasion.29 Similar to previous findings, we verified that CCAL was markedly upregulated in osteosarcoma tissues. Higher CCAL expression levels were closely related to shorter overall survival in patients with osteosarcoma. In addition, functional analysis indicated that CCAL could facilitate tumour angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo in osteosarcoma. Mechanistically, CCAL upregulated the expression of ANGPTL4 by sponging miR-29b, thus promoting angiogenesis in osteosarcoma.
Previous studies have shown that miR-29b acts as a tumour suppressor by inhibiting tumour angiogenesis in various cancers, including cervical cancer, endometrial carcinoma, breast cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma.30–33 Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) has been reported to promote angiogenesis by functioning as a ceRNA, sponging the miR-29 family (miR-29a, miR-29b and miR-29c) in osteosarcoma.34 Moreover, it has been reported that miR-29b is downregulated in osteosarcoma tissues and acts as a tumour suppressor of osteosarcoma by targeting CDK6 during the proliferation and migration processes.35 ANGPTL4, a secretory glycoprotein consisting of N-terminal and C-terminal domains, is a member of the angiopoietin family.8 Previous studies have shown that ANGPTL4 plays an important role in tumour angiogenesis.9–11 In addition, ANGPTL4 is a potential molecular target for the treatment of osteosarcoma; its inhibition could conceivably target the primary tumour, inhibit angiogenesis, reduce metastatic events and prevent bone destruction.36 In agreement with these studies, in the present study, bioinformatic analysis predicted a binding site for miR-29b in ANGPTL4. Luciferase assay results demonstrated that ANGPTL4 is a direct target gene of miR-29b in osteosarcoma. A negative relationship between miR-29b and ANGPTL4 in osteosarcoma tissues was also confirmed.
Conclusions
In conclusion, this study is the first to demonstrate that CCAL is an oncogenic lncRNA that promotes angiogenesis by regulating the miR-29b/ANGPTL4 axis in osteosarcoma. Therefore, this finding suggests that CCAL may be considered a novel therapeutic target for patients with osteosarcoma.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Kansara M, Teng MW, Smyth MJ, Thomas DM. Translational biology of osteosarcoma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(11):722–735. doi:10.1038/nrc3838
2. Rogozhin DV, Bulycheva IV, Konovalov DM, et al. [Classical osteosarcoma in children and adolescent]. Arkh Patol. 2015;77(5):68–74. Russian. doi:10.17116/patol201577568-74
3. Bernthal NM, Federman N, Eilber FR, et al. Long-term results (>25 years) of a randomized, prospective clinical trial evaluating chemotherapy in patients with high-grade, operable osteosarcoma. Cancer. 2012;118(23):5888–5893. doi:10.1002/cncr.27651
4. Link MP, Goorin AM, Miser AW, et al. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on relapse-free survival in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(25):1600–1606.
5. Meyers PA, Healey JH, Chou AJ, et al. Addition of pamidronate to chemotherapy for the treatment of osteosarcoma. Cancer. 2011;117(8):1736–1744.
6. DuBois S, Demetri G. Markers of angiogenesis and clinical features in patients with sarcoma. Cancer. 2007;109(5):813–819.
7. Zhu L, McManus MM, Hughes DP. Understanding the Biology of Bone Sarcoma from Early Initiating Events through Late Events in Metastasis and Disease Progression. Front Oncol. 2013;3:230.
8. Li H, Ge C, Zhao F, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha-activated angiopoietin-like protein 4 contributes to tumor metastasis via vascular cell adhesion molecule-1/integrin β1 signaling in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2011;54(3):910–919.
9. Kolb R, Kluz P, Tan ZW, et al. Obesity-associated inflammation promotes angiogenesis and breast cancer via angiopoietin-like 4. Oncogene. 2019;38(13):2351–2363.
10. Hu K, Babapoor-Farrokhran S, Rodrigues M, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 upregulation of both VEGF and ANGPTL4 is required to promote the angiogenic phenotype in uveal melanoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(7):7816–7828.
11. Ma T, Jham BC, Hu J, et al. Viral G protein-coupled receptor up-regulates Angiopoietin-like 4 promoting angiogenesis and vascular permeability in Kaposi’s sarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(32):14363–14368. doi:10.1073/pnas.1001065107
12. Peng WX, Koirala P, Mo YY. LncRNA-mediated regulation of cell signaling in cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36(41):5661–5667. doi:10.1038/onc.2017.184
13. Schmitt AM, Chang HY. Long Noncoding RNAs in Cancer Pathways. Cancer Cell. 2016;29(4):452–463. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2016.03.010
14. Huarte M. The emerging role of lncRNAs in cancer. Nat Med. 2015;21(11):1253–1261.
15. Ma Y, Yang Y, Wang F, et al. Long non-coding RNA CCAL regulates colorectal cancer progression by activating Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway via suppression of activator protein 2α. Gut. 2016;65(9):1494–1504. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308392
16. Luo X, Wang GH, Bian ZL, et al. Long non-coding RNA CCAL/miR-149/FOXM1 axis promotes metastasis in gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(10):993. doi:10.1038/s41419-018-0969-z
17. Deng X, Ruan H, Zhang X, et al. Long noncoding RNA CCAL transferred from fibroblasts by exosomes promotes chemoresistance of colorectal cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2020;146(6):1700–1716. doi:10.1002/ijc.32608
18. Lin X, Yang F, Qi X, et al. LncRNA DANCR promotes tumor growth and angiogenesis in ovarian cancer through direct targeting of miR-145. Mol Carcinog. 2019;58(12):2286–2296. doi:10.1002/mc.23117
19. Marioni G, Franz L, Ottaviano G, et al. Prognostic Significance of CD105- and CD31-Assessed Microvessel Density in Paired Biopsies and Surgical Samples of Laryngeal Carcinoma. Cancers. 2020;12(8):8. doi:10.3390/cancers12082059
20. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis–correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(1):1–8. doi:10.1056/NEJM199101033240101
21. Chan JJ, Tay Y. Noncoding RNA:RNA Regulatory Networks in Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(5):5. doi:10.3390/ijms19051310
22. Bach DH, Lee SK. Long noncoding RNAs in cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2018;419:152–166. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.053
23. Tan X, Banerjee P, Liu X, et al. The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition activator ZEB1 initiates a prometastatic competing endogenous RNA network. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(4):1267–1282. doi:10.1172/JCI97225
24. Chang L, Yuan Y, Li C, et al. Upregulation of SNHG6 regulates ZEB1 expression by competitively binding miR-101-3p and interacting with UPF1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2016;383(2):183–194. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2016.09.034
25. Kumar MM, Goyal R. LncRNA as a Therapeutic Target for Angiogenesis. Curr Top Med Chem. 2017;17(15):1750–1757. doi:10.2174/1568026617666161116144744
26. Jiang N, Wang X, Xie X, et al. lncRNA DANCR promotes tumor progression and cancer stemness features in osteosarcoma by upregulating AXL via miR-33a-5p inhibition. Cancer Lett. 2017;405:46–55. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2017.06.009
27. Yu X, Hu L, Li S, et al. Long non-coding RNA Taurine upregulated gene 1 promotes osteosarcoma cell metastasis by mediating HIF-1α via miR-143-5p. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(4):280. doi:10.1038/s41419-019-1509-1
28. Ye Y, Song Y, Zhuang J, He S, Ni J, Xia W. Long non-coding RNA CCAL promotes papillary thyroid cancer progression by activation of NOTCH1 pathway. Oncol Res. 2018. doi:10.3727/096504018X15188340975709
29. Zhou DK, Yang XW, Li H, Yang Y, Zhu ZJ, Wu N. Up-regulation of long noncoding RNA CCAL predicts poor patient prognosis and promotes tumor metastasis in osteosarcoma. Int J Biol Markers. 2017;32(1):e108–e112. doi:10.5301/jbm.5000240
30. Li Y, Zhang Z, Xiao Z, et al. Chemotherapy-mediated miR-29b expression inhibits the invasion and angiogenesis of cervical cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(9):14655–14665. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.14738
31. Chen HX, Xu XX, Tan BZ, Zhang Z, Zhou XD. MicroRNA-29b Inhibits Angiogenesis by Targeting VEGFA through the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathways in Endometrial Carcinoma. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;41(3):933–946. doi:10.1159/000460510
32. Fang JH, Zhou HC, Zeng C, et al. MicroRNA-29b suppresses tumor angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis by regulating matrix metalloproteinase 2 expression. Hepatology. 2011;54(5):1729–1740. doi:10.1002/hep.24577
33. Li Y, Cai B, Shen L, et al. MiRNA-29b suppresses tumor growth through simultaneously inhibiting angiogenesis and tumorigenesis by targeting Akt3. Cancer Lett. 2017;397:111–119.
34. Gao S, Cheng C, Chen H, Li M, Liu K, Wang G. IGF1 3ʹUTR functions as a ceRNA in promoting angiogenesis by sponging miR-29 family in osteosarcoma. J Mol Histol. 2016;47(2):135–143.
35. Zhu K, Liu L, Zhang J, et al. MiR-29b suppresses the proliferation and migration of osteosarcoma cells by targeting CDK6. Protein Cell. 2016;7(6):434–444.
36. Zhang T, Kastrenopoulou A, Larrouture Q, Athanasou NA, Knowles HJ. Angiopoietin-like 4 promotes osteosarcoma cell proliferation and migration and stimulates osteoclastogenesis. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):536.
© 2020 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.