Back to Journals » Journal of Inflammation Research » Volume 17
Therapeutically Fine-Tuning Autonomic Nervous System to Treat Sepsis: A New Perspective on the Immunomodulatory Effects of Acupuncture
Authors Zhang Z, Zhang D, Lin Q , Cui X
Received 7 May 2024
Accepted for publication 25 June 2024
Published 5 July 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 4373—4387
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S477181
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Ning Quan
Ziyi Zhang,1 Dingdan Zhang,1 Qing Lin,2 Xiang Cui1
1Department of Physiology, Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
Correspondence: Qing Lin, Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA, Tel +1-4432072315, Email [email protected] Xiang Cui, Department of Physiology, Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, People’s Republic of China, Tel + 86-10-64089422, Email [email protected]
Abstract: Recent studies have highlighted the immunomodulatory effects of acupuncture on sepsis and proposed novel non-pharmacological or bioelectronic approaches to managing inflammatory illnesses. Establishing rules for selectively activating sympathetic or vagal nerve-mediated anti-inflammatory pathways using acupuncture has valuable clinical applications. Over the years, studies have revealed the segmental modulatory role of acupuncture in regulating visceral function by targeting the autonomic nervous system (ANS). In this review, we aim to summarize recent findings on acupuncture in treating sepsis, focusing on the underlying ANS mechanism, as well as the rules of acupoint specificity, intensity, frequency, and other parameters utilized in these studies. Mechanistically, the immunomodulatory properties of the sympathetic nervous system have been highlighted. Furthermore, we explore the immunotherapeutic benefits of acupuncture in treating sepsis. A better understanding of the immunoregulatory mechanism of sympathetic nervous system may offer novel approaches for the development of therapeutics to treat or prevent a variety of inflammatory diseases.
Keywords: inflammation, peripheral nerve stimulation, sympathetic nervous system, sympathoadrenal axis, macrophage, bioelectronic medicine
Introduction
Sepsis is a life-threatening visceral dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection.1 It is often observed in patients with severe trauma, septic shock, or major surgical procedures. Sepsis results in many complications, including cardiomyopathy, coagulopathy, septic shock, and multi-organ failure.2 Research data have shown that approximately 30 million patients are affected annually, with a high mortality rate of 25–40%.3–5 Antibiotics are generally used as first-line treatment for sepsis due to foreign invasion. However, continuous or excessive use of antibiotics disturbs microbiota hemostasis and leads to immune dysregulation,6 resulting in organ failure.
Recently, non-pharmacological or bioelectronic approaches, such as acupuncture and peripheral nerve stimulation, have been beneficial in treating sepsis and other inflammatory diseases, suggesting novel and promising therapeutic strategies.7–13 Regarding the fewer side effects and tolerance of bioelectronic approaches, the National Institute of Health (NIH) launched the Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions program in 2016, aimed at refining and developing bioelectronic medicine, particularly peripheral nerve stimulation, for clinical applications. Acupuncture has been the most representative treatment method globally. Notably, over 77 diseases can be treated using acupuncture.14 According to the NIH, over 15 million Americans have been treated using acupuncture,15,16 and approximately 41% of these patients were treated for inflammation-related conditions.17 The World Health Organization currently recommends using acupuncture to treat 16 inflammation-related diseases.17 Notably, recent studies have highlighted that acupuncture mitigates the inflammatory conditions associated with sepsis through the somatotopic and intensity-dependent triggering of the autonomic nervous system (ANS).18–20 However, the acupoint specificity and the optimal stimulation parameters are required to be further determined. This review will focus on how acupuncture modulates the ANS and discuss current evidence on its immunomodulatory effects on sepsis, aiming to advance the understanding and practice of acupuncture in treating sepsis and other inflammatory conditions, and also highlighting the unexplored areas.
Pathogenesis of Sepsis
Inflammation is a crucial defense mechanism in the body. Moderate inflammation has beneficial effects, including restricting the spread of pathogenic microorganisms and facilitating the removal and repair of necrotic tissue.21 As a systemic inflammatory response condition,22,23 sepsis has been recently defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction resulting from a dysregulated host response to infection in 2016.1 Typically, sepsis is diagnosed when two systemic inflammatory response syndromes (SIRS) and one organ dysfunction manifest within 6 h.24 Sepsis can be initiated by a broad spectrum of microorganisms. In about two-thirds of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis, a specific microorganism can be identified. The lungs and abdomen are the most common sites of infection in these cases. Notably, our understanding of the host response trajectory during sepsis is limited primarily because studies predominantly focus on immune dysfunction upon ICU admission, resulting in gaps in our understanding of pre-admission and post-admission characteristics, as well as temporal patterns of the host response.
When the body detects infection or tissue injury caused by invading pathogens like lipopolysaccharide, it triggers the innate immune response by recognizing pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) through specific pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs). This recognition activates macrophages and other myeloid cells, leading to the release of various cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and IL-1β, thus exacerbating the inflammatory condition. Simultaneously, the activated host response during sepsis is further disrupted by the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). PRRs interact with a range of PAMPs and DAMPs, contributing to sustained immune activation and organ dysfunction.25 The escalating levels of cytokines traverse the blood-brain barrier, recruiting and activating glial cells, leukocytes, and other immune cells to release further cytokines. This process culminates in what is termed a “pro-inflammatory cytokine storm” within the central nervous system. Consequently, it induces brain dysfunction, characterized by confusion, delirium, shock, and multiple organ system dysfunction (MOSD).26 Meanwhile, the anti-inflammatory process are initiated to counteract these severe inflammatory challenges by releasing glucocorticoids,27 IL-10, IL-4, and IL-13.28,29 However, in sepsis, an excessive anti-inflammatory response is a double-edged sword that can inadvertently harm normal tissue cells while attempting to combat the pathogen. This prolonged and persistent immune suppression can potentially lead to secondary infections.30 This over-activated immune reaction in response to pro- and anti-inflammatory challenges significantly disrupts the immune system and leads to mortality.
Antibiotics serve as the primary treatment for sepsis and other systemic inflammatory conditions. However, despite their effectiveness in treating sepsis, the emergence of antibiotic resistance, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, has garnered global attention. The annual report from the Center for Disease Control reveals that approximately 2.8 million antimicrobial-resistant infections occur annually in the United States, resulting in over 35,000 deaths (https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest-threats.html). In addition, post-sepsis syndrome sequelae especially persistent immune dysfunction led to recurrent infection, and sepsis, and raises a huge challenge for patient life.31 Therefore, it is imperative to study and develop non-pharmacological or non-invasive approaches to restore immune homeostasis against various infections and inflammatory challenges.
Inflammation Reflex and Anti-Inflammatory Route in Sepsis
Research on the inflammatory reflex has revealed a functional interaction between the parasympathetic (vagal nerve) and sympathetic nervous systems, which fine-tunes the regulation of the innate immune response. In this reflex, the inflammatory signal conveyed by sensory neurons of the vagal nerve is integrated into the brain, triggering a descending anti-inflammatory pathway to counteract inflammatory challenges.32 The primary anti-inflammatory pathways comprise the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, sympathetic nervous system (SNS), and parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) pathways (Figure 1).8,33 Increasing evidence suggests that the nervous system, especially the autonomic system, represents a novel and promising therapeutic target to treat sepsis and various inflammatory conditions.
HPA Axis and Sepsis
The HPA axis represents a neuroendocrine pathway characterized by neural communication between the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) and the pituitary gland.27,34 This neuroendocrine pathway initiates the release of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) from the anterior pituitary gland, thereby inducing the release of anti-inflammatory glucocorticoids, namely cortisol in humans and corticosterone in mice, from the adrenal cortex.35 Glucocorticoids denote steroid hormones that exhibit binding affinity to the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), a receptor present within immune cells and various other cell populations throughout the body.36 HPA activation and subsequent adrenocortical glucocorticoid production during sepsis are important regulatory processes to maintain homeostasis.27 Currently, administration of systemic corticosteroid therapy has shown encouraging outcomes in mitigating the cytokine storm and reducing the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in individuals afflicted with severe acute respiratory syndrome.37,38 However, the controversy surrounding glucocorticoid dose, treatment duration, and central (secondary) adrenal insufficiency has attracted attention.34,39–42 In clinics, low-dose glucocorticoids effectively alleviate early septic symptoms and complications, particularly shock, whereas short-term high-dose glucocorticoids increase mortality.43 In addition, traditional steroids (adrenocorticotropic hormones) and targeted therapeutic agents against specific cytokines (the IL-6 blocker cetuximab and the IL-6R blocker tocilizumab) show limited efficacy.44
SNS-Mediated Immunoregulation in Sepsis
SNS (sympathetic nervous system) comprises two types of neurons: preganglionic and postganglionic sympathetic neurons.45 The SNS mediatted local and systemic sympathetic pathways involving humoral or neuroimmune mechanisms (Figure 1b).8 The local sympathetic pathway primarily involves the postganglionic nerve endings that mediate local inflammatory reactions, while the systemic sympathetic pathway refers to the sympathetic-adrenal medulla axis.46 Typically, NE is the primary neurotransmitter, released by postganglionic sympathetic terminals, and functions by binding to metabotropic, G-protein-coupled adrenergic α and β receptors (β-ARs and α-ARs), which are further subdivided and broadly expressed on immune cells. Also, other bioagents such as such as adenosine triphosphate and neuropeptide Y (NPY) can be released by postganglionic sympathetic terminals as well.45 The regulation of sympathetic neuronal activity is orchestrated by the brain, notably the locus coeruleus and the rostral ventrolateral medulla, which interact with spinal cord preganglionic neurons. Plus, given that preganglionic sympathetic fibers originating from the greater splanchnic nerves directly synapse with and stimulate chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla, the adrenal medulla can be analogous to the sympathetic postganglionic terminals. Activating the sympathoadrenal axis leads chromaffin cells to release epinephrine, NE, and, to a lesser extent, dopamine into the circulation, which then impacts the systemic immune reaction throughout the body by targeting ARs signaling.10
SNS plays a multifaceted and diffuse role in sepsis and other inflammatory conditions by impacting immune cell phenotype and proliferation. Current opinion suggests that the pro- or anti-inflammatory action mediated by the SNS is concentration-dependent (Figure 2). For instance, lower concentrations (10−8-10−9 M) are inclined to bind macrophage α-adrenoceptors, which then activate the NF-κB pathway and convert MΦ macrophage to M1 phenotype, releasing TNF-α and exacerbating inflammation. Conversely, higher concentrations of NE (10−5-10−6 M) tend to bind macrophage β2 adrenoceptors, which inhibit the NF-κB activation and convert MΦ macrophage to M2 phenotype, releasing IL-10 against inflammation.47–49 IL-10-exerted inhibitory effect on sepsis-related TNF-α production is strikingly impaired after applying β-blockade such as metoprolol and propranolol.50 Furthermore, NE plays a role in modulating the functions of T cells, B cells, and NK cells.51 Notably, recent animal studies reported that the sympathetic nervous system orchestrates inflammation resolution and regenerative programs by modulating repulsive guidance molecule A (RGM-A), thereby resolving the inflammation in a murine peritonitis model.52 RGM-A not only can be synergic with NE to impact macrophage converting to M2 by suppressing NF-κB signaling and activating RICTOR and PI3K/AKT pathway but also inhibiting the monocyte recruitment.52,53 Additionally, NE released by postganglionic sympathetic ending could promote the proliferation of bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and swiftly skew HSCs toward anti-inflammatory myeloid cells (Figure 2).54 This evidence suggests potential targets of adrenoceptors in macrophages for clinical application.
Even though endotoxin released from bacterial cell walls causes sympathetic activation and increased circulating NE,55 a systematic review demonstrated that NE has a superior beneficial effect on in-hospital and 28-day mortality in septic shock patients.56 Early use of NE (<6 hours) has been proposed as a key approach in enhancing septic shock and leading to better outcomes.57–60 Current clinical opinion about the beneficial role of NE in sepsis mainly attributes its effects to its vasopressor action, which improves the circulatory failure caused by impaired autonomic control of the heart and vessels.57 However, the immunomodulatory role of NE following early application is less understood.51 NE can decrease proinflammatory cytokines and increase anti-inflammatory IL10 production not only in mice of LPS-induced sepsis model but also in LPS-challenged primary human leukocytes,58 suggesting the beneficial immunomodulatory role of NE in combating sepsis-related infection, shock, and mortality, even though the mechanism remains elusive. Therefore, further investigation is warranted to investigate the precise immunomodulatory mechanism of how NE interacts with the immune cells to exert an anti-inflammatory effect.51 Besides, the sympathetic sprouting following tissue injury and visceral dysfunction has been reported recently, which strengthens the interaction of local sympathetic terminals with peripheral sensory terminals and immune cells by releasing NE and ATP.59 Its role in the inflammation process and visceral homeostatic regulation is worthy of consideration.60–62
PNS-Mediated Immunoregulation in Sepsis
PNS (parasympathetic nervous system) is primarily associated with the vagal nerve, the 10th cranial nerve, which carries 75% of the parasympathetic fibers. The rest of the parasympathetic fibers include the oculomotor nerve (III) for eye function; the facial nerve (VII) for the lacrimal gland, salivary glands, and nasal mucous membranes; and the glossopharyngeal nerve (IX) for the parotid gland. Preganglionic neurons of the PNS originate from the brainstem nuclei and sacral spinal cord, specifically S2–S4. The vagal nerve has been extensively studied among the peripheral nerves involved in immune-brain crosstalk. Its afferent fibers, originating from cell bodies in the nodose ganglia, include visceral and thoracic afferents projecting to the nucleus of the tractus solitarius (NTS) and the area postrema (AP) in the medulla, collectively known as the vagal complex. Vagal nerve is a mixed nerve that not only transmits motor signals (efferent, 20–30%) to its innervated organs, but also conveys sensory information (afferent, 70–80%) from peripheral organs to NTS through releasing acetylcholine, which acts on metabotropic G-protein-coupled muscarinic receptors located on postganglionic cholinergic neurons,63 as well as other cells including smooth muscle cells, glandular cells, and cardiac myocytes in the innervated organs.
Numbers of preclinical and clinical studies have explored the role of the vagal nerve in inflammation reflex.64,65 Studies have shown that the administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), cytokines (such as IL-1β and TNF-α), or pathogens like Campylobacter jejuni stimulates vagal afferent signaling in rodents, as indicated by increased expression of the neuronal activation marker c-fos in the NTS.66–68 In recent decades, there has been significant emphasis on the anti-inflammatory effect of the vagal nerve, particularly in the context of sepsis.69 The efferent component of the vagal nerve transmits signals to the splenic nerve through the celiac-superior mesenteric ganglion complex,70,71 leading to the release of NE into the spleen. NE release stimulates choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) T-cells in the spleen to secrete acetylcholine, which recruits macrophages via binding to α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (α7 nAChR).72 This process suppresses the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α through the nuclear factor kappa beta (NF-κB) pathway without affecting anti-inflammatory cytokines (Figure 1c).69,73 Thus, the activation of the splenic nerve has been proposed as the main mechanism underlying vagal nerve-mediated anti-inflammatory effect. Vagal nerve stimulation significantly reduces TNF-α levels in LPS-challenged human macrophages and in an LPS-induced sepsis model.69,74,75
ANS-Mediated Immunomodulation in Sepsis
Accumulating evidence highlighting the benefits of the ANS in alleviating sepsis and other inflammation conditions. However, some concerns need to be further addressed. Firstly, the neuroanatomical link between the vagal nervous system and the spleen remains controversial. The functionality of vagal nerve stimulation-induced anti-inflammatory effect depends on the integrity of the splenic nerves.75 Extant evidence shows that the efferent component of the vagal nerves conveys signals to the splenic nerve through the celiac-superior mesenteric ganglion complex.70,71 Intriguingly, one recent study using retrograde trans-monosynaptic tracing demonstrated that the vagal nerve not only innervates the sympathetic celiac ganglion but also directly innervates the spleen.76 What’s the significance of this evolution that the celiac ganglion, different from other sympathetic ganglions, is innervated by the vagal nerve worthy of consideration. However, vagal nerve stimulation did not induce the firing of the splanchnic nerve raised more concerns about the functional connection.77 Mughrabi et al investigated the effect of electrostimulation (ES) of the vagal, splanchnic, and splenic nerves on real-time NE release within the spleen using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry.78 Their findings indicated that ES of the splenic nerve plays a more pronounced role in modulating NE release. Furthermore, the observed real-time changes in NE signaling in the spleen during the vagal nerve and splanchnic stimulation were minor compared with the direct stimulation of the splenic nerve.
A recent study suggests that the spleen, the crucial part of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAIP), is exclusively innervated and predominantly controlled by the SNS.79–83 Neuroanatomically, two primary splenic sympathetic nerves traverse the splenic artery and subsequently diverge into multiple sympathetic nerves constituting the splenic neurovascular bundle. These nerves then penetrate the splenic parenchyma. Splenic sympathetic innervation is predominantly concentrated around the vascular structures, with a lesser presence of discrete nerves in the white pulp, primarily within the periarteriolar lymphoid sheaths and red pulp. In these regions, sympathetic fibers interact closely with T-cells and macrophages.84 The cell bodies of these postganglionic sympathetic fibers are predominantly located in the suprarenal (splanchnic) and celiac ganglia. Cao et al investigated the neuromodulatory pathway from the suprarenal-celiac-superior mesenteric ganglion complex to the spleen using neural tracer technology.85 They observed that LPS directly activated the suprarenal-cavitary ganglion and upregulated the expression level of NPY. This suppresses TNF release from macrophages by binding to NPY1R, suggesting a sympathetic mechanism for spleen-mediated CAIP. Moreover, ablation of the splenic sympathetic nerve impairs prostaglandin E2-induced anti-inflammatory action in response to LPS challenge.86 Therefore, further investigations are required to determine how sympathetic or parasympathetic coordinately orchestrates to trigger the spleen-mediated anti-inflammatory process. In addition, other results regarding the frequency of vagal nerve stimulation demonstrated that low-frequency stimulation activates two anti-inflammatory pathways, the CAIP and HPA axis, and may also recruit the sympathetic anti-inflammatory pathway.87,88 Finally, how to navigate NE to binding adrenoceptor of T cell rather than macrophage in spleen is also complex and confusing,89,90 due to macrophage highly expressed adrenoceptors as well. Triggering macrophage β2-AR signaling has been reported as a potential target to combat sepsis and resolve inflammation.
Acupuncture Ameliorates Sepsis by Modulating ANS
Acupuncture has been practiced for years and serves millions of people globally. Current opinion on the fundamentals of acupuncture therapy is attributed to its role in driving autonomic function through the somatic-autonomic reflex.91,92 Our team explored the pattern of acupoint upon acupuncture intervention in modulating visceral sympathetic and vagal function,93–95 termed the “homotopic-acupoint” and “heterotopic-acupoint” (Figure 3). Specifically, acupoints that activate sympathetic nerve activity in the viscera are in the same dermatome as the viscera and are termed homotopic acupoints. Conversely, acupoints that activate the vagal nerve are located primarily in the extremities relative to the remote segments of the viscera and are referred to as heterotopic acupoints. Combining homotopic and heterotopic acupoints forms a homeostatic regulatory mechanism crucial for acupuncture and other somatic or stimulatory treatments.96–100 Therefore, the neuromodulatory pattern of acupuncture in modulating the visceral sympathetic or parasympathetic routes is beneficial for studying various somatic stimulation therapies.
Emerging evidence shows that acupuncture-induced therapeutic effects by activating or inhibiting the ANS have been observed in various pathological context.101 Current interests mainly focus on sympathetic-derived NE and its role in enhancing inflammation following activation. Based on these neuromodulatory principles, researchers have explored the autonomic mechanisms of acupuncture and its beneficial effects on sepsis. Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that acupuncture is essential in mitigating cytokines and enhancing IL-10, a cluster of differentiation CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, and dopamine levels in experimental sepsis models and septic patients.18,48,102 Nevertheless, the controversy regarding acupoint specificity and stimulation parameters poses challenges to the clinical application of acupuncture. The acupoints, stimulation parameters, and corresponding mechanisms summarized in a recent study are listed in Table 1.
![]() |
Table 1 Stimulation Parameters and Associated Mechanisms in Acupuncture for Sepsis: A Comprehensive Overview (2009–2023) |
Acupuncture Activates Sympathetic Pathways for Anti-Sepsis Immunotherapy
Limited evidence has explored the sympathetic mechanism of acupuncture-mediated anti-inflammatory action during sepsis. Liu et al observed that the timing of intervention is crucial for determining whether acupuncture-driven sympathetic signaling has a pro- or anti-inflammatory role in sepsis. Specifically, pretreatment of mice with high-intensity 3 mA electroacupuncture stimulation (ES) at homotopic acupoints (Tianshu, ST25) alleviates LPS-induced sepsis by activating peripheral NPY+ sympathetic neurons, while applying the same ES treatment after LPS modeling exacerbated systemic inflammation.19 However, our team has recently reported inconsistent results. Using the same stimulation parameters, we observed that the post-sepsis modeling application of ES treatment yielded an anti-inflammatory effect in rats of LPS-induced sepsis model.114 Whether this discrepancy is linked to the heterogeneity of the sepsis models requires further investigation. High-frequency electroacupuncture at ST 36 activates the preganglionic innervation of the adrenal medulla, leading to the systemic release of catecholamines. In contrast, low-frequency electroacupuncture activates specific postganglionic innervation of sympathetic nerves, inducing the local release of neurogenic NE.117
Acupuncture Activates Parasympathetic Pathways for Anti-Sepsis Immunotherapy
Existing evidence extensively addresses the acupuncture-induced anti-inflammatory effects on sepsis through the parasympathetic pathway, categorized into two types based on the targeted areas. The first is the traditional approach involving acupuncture at limb acupoints. The second, increasingly popular style in recent years, is auricular acupuncture, noted for its safety and high efficacy. The beneficial effects of auricular acupuncture are primarily attributed to the auricular branch of the vagal nerve, which projects to the nucleus of the solitary tract and facilitates acupuncture signaling. Nevertheless, the beneficial effects of both types of acupuncture are attributed to the efferent vagal nerve-mediated anti-inflammatory pathway.
Zhu et al conducted an initial comparative study investigating the effects of auricular and cervical branch vagal nerve stimulation and transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation at ST36 in a rat model of LPS-induced sepsis.105 Notably, all stimulation intensities were capped at a maximum of 1 mA, a low level expected to activate a vagal nerve reflex. The study demonstrated that stimulation at the auricular, ST36, or direct vagal nerve significantly decreased pro-inflammatory cytokine levels (TNF-α, IL6, IL1β), attributed to the α7nAChR-mediated CAIP. Hong and Qi reported similar results.118,119 However, the distinct mechanisms underlying the effects of auricular and transcutaneous acupuncture have not yet been thoroughly addressed. Luis Ulloa et al observed that dopamine released by the vagal-adrenal medulla axis mediated the anti-inflammatory effect induced by electroacupuncture at ST36 in LPS-induced sepsis, emphasizing the crucial role of the adrenal medulla in acupuncture-mediated effects.18
Furthermore, Liu made significant efforts to close this gap and demonstrated that the prokr2-positive nociceptor in ST36 is responsible for delivering acupuncture signals, subsequently activating the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagal-adrenal gland pathway and inducing catecholamine secretion against LPS-induced systemic inflammation.19,20 The current evidence has outlined a primary neuromodulatory loop for acupuncture at ST36 involving the vagal-adrenal pathway, indicating a promising role for acupuncture-driven vagal-adrenal pathways in alleviating inflammatory conditions. Additional studies should validate the current findings across diverse species and optimize the stimulating parameters to confirm this beneficial role. In addition, transcriptional studies should be considered to reveal cellular mechanisms and identify novel targets for controlling inflammation.
Future Perspective
Growing evidence has emphasized the crucial role of the SNS and vagal nerves in controlling inflammation conditions, such as sepsis, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune disease, chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity, etc.120–122 Sympathoadrenal medulla-mediated systematic anti-inflammatory axis is a promising mechanism against sepsis and other systematic inflammation. Despite NE released by sympathetic terminals or adrenal medulla mediates either sympathetic or vagal nerve-induced anti-inflammatory effect by triggering β2 ADR signaling or synergic with RGM-A to regulate immune cell function,51,123 it has been proposed as the potential therapeutic target for sepsis treatment. Hence, how to selectively fine-tune sympathoadrenal medulla axis using somatic stimulation is worthwhile to explore.12,44 Decades of research have broadly outlined the neuromodulatory effects of acupuncture and other somatic ES on triggering autonomic nervous reflexes.121,124 A significant challenge lies in advancing clinical translation and optimizing stimulation parameters to engage the autonomic pathway effectively. This challenge extends beyond acupuncture and encompasses the entire field of bioelectronic medicine. Based on the aforementioned neuromodulatory pattern of somatic stimulation in modulating sympathetic activity, we assume that there should be a region, such as proximal dermatome to adrenal,114 capable of eliciting firing in the splenic or adrenal sympathetic nerves directly through the somatosympathetic reflex pathway. Conducting more studies that systematically examine the frequency, intensity, and timing of effective acupoint modulation of the ANS under physiological and pathological conditions across different species is important to overcome this challenge. With technological advances, more potent stimulation parameters have been generated and tested in the field of bioelectronic strategies. For instance, kilohertz-frequency stimulation is a promising modality, demonstrating advantages across various stimulation techniques.125 However, in-depth investigations are required to fully comprehend the excitatory or inhibitory role and mechanism of kilohertz-frequency acupuncture stimulation in modulating the ANS and neuroimmune modulation.
In addition, the contradiction in the direct connection between the vagal nerve and the adrenal gland raises concerns about which branch, sympathetic or parasympathetic, predominantly innervates or drives adrenal function to mitigate inflammation. Further neuroanatomical and neuroimmune studies should examine the evidence and mechanisms of sympathetic or vagal-adrenal pathways in inflammation. This pursuit is essential for advancing our understanding of and potentially discovering new therapeutic targets for inflammatory disorders.
Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge and address the controversial results of acupuncture studies because they can, in part, be attributed to the observed heterogeneity across these studies. The diversity in methodologies, species, and outcome measures among acupuncture studies should be noted. Plus, further validation is required to enhance the reliability and robustness of our findings. Finally, advancements in next-generation sequencing have facilitated the exploration of cellular chatting or interactions at single- and multi-tissue/organ levels, enhancing our understanding of transcriptional profiles in immune organs such as the spleen and adrenal glands in the context of sepsis.. The potential for identifying novel targets to manage inflammation through acupuncture therapy in light of these unexplored areas deserves careful consideration.
Summary
The nervous system is crucial in maintaining immune homeostasis. Non-pharmacological interventions, especially acupuncture, have gained attention for their potential to mitigate sepsis and other inflammation by modulating the ANS. However, precise modulation of the sympathetic and vagal nerve pathways to alleviate sepsis requires further investigation. We highlighted the potential efficacy of acupuncture in controlling sepsis by targeting the sympathetic pathway through a comprehensive review that includes the pathophysiology of inflammation and sepsis and an exploration of the current understanding of the roles of sympathetic and vagal nerves in inflammation control. Furthermore, optimizing current stimulation parameters and elucidating transcriptional changes in immune organs and cells during sepsis following acupuncture presents challenges and opportunities.
Moreover, sepsis, cancer, multiple sclerosis, and other autoimmune diseases exhibit several shared pathophysiological features stemming from the inability of the host immune system to cope with the initial insult.126,127 This suggests that understanding acupuncture’s modulatory mechanisms, patterns, and other biomedical approaches could advance the clinical translation of acupuncture-related bioelectronic medicine strategies in inflammatory and immune disease treatment. In conclusion, this review provides valuable insights into the current landscape and future directions of acupuncture-mediated anti-inflammatory action in treating sepsis.
Data Sharing Statement
No data was used for the research described in the article.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate Dr. Bing Zhu and Xinyan Gao of the Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion of the China Academy of the Chinese Medical Sciences for their insightful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7242247), Scientific and technological innovation project of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (No. CI2021A03402), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central public welfare research institutes (No. ZZ15-YQ-049, ZZ-YQ2023003).
Disclosure
All authors disclose no competing interests in this work.
References
1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287
2. Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(9):840–851. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1208623
3. Vincent JL, Marshall JC, Namendys-Silva SA, et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(5):380–386. doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70061-x
4. Acuña-Castroviejo D, Rahim I, Acuña-Fernández C, et al. Melatonin, clock genes and mitochondria in sepsis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74(21):3965–3987. doi:10.1007/s00018-017-2610-1
5. Huang M, Cai S, Su J. The Pathogenesis of Sepsis and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(21): 5376. doi:10.3390/ijms20215376
6. Wong G, Brinkman A, Benefield RJ, et al. An international, multicentre survey of β-lactam antibiotic therapeutic drug monitoring practice in intensive care units. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(5):1416–1423. doi:10.1093/jac/dkt523
7. Acuña-Fernández C, Marín JS, Díaz-Casado ME, et al. Daily Changes in the Expression of Clock Genes in Sepsis and Their Relation with Sepsis Outcome and Urinary Excretion of 6-Sulfatoximelatonin. Shock. 2020;53(5):550–559. doi:10.1097/shk.0000000000001433
8. Ulloa L, Quiroz-Gonzalez S, Torres-Rosas R. Nerve Stimulation: immunomodulation and Control of Inflammation. Trends Mol Med. 2017;23(12):1103–1120. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2017.10.006
9. Zhao Z, Li L, Xin C, Yin Y, Zhang R, Guo J. A bibliometric analysis of 100 top-cited journal articles related to acupuncture regulation of the autonomic nervous system. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:1086087. doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.1086087
10. Pavlov VA, Tracey KJ. Neural regulation of immunity: molecular mechanisms and clinical translation. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20(2):156–166. doi:10.1038/nn.4477
11. Tynan A, Brines M, Chavan SS. Control of inflammation using non-invasive neuromodulation: past, present and promise. Int Immunol. 2022;34(2):119–128. doi:10.1093/intimm/dxab073
12. Ulloa L. Electroacupuncture activates neurons to switch off inflammation. Nature. 2021;598(7882):573–574. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02714-0
13. Zhang Z-Y, Wan H-Y, Jing X-H. Acupoint effects and neuro-immune modulation. World J Acupunct Moxibustion. 2023;33(3):293. doi:10.1016/j.wjam.2023.05.013
14. Lu L, Zhang Y, Tang X, et al. Evidence on acupuncture therapies is underused in clinical practice and health policy. BMJ. 2022;376:e067475. doi:10.1136/bmj-2021-067475
15. Zhang Y, Lao L, Chen H, Ceballos R. Acupuncture Use among American Adults: what Acupuncture Practitioners Can Learn from National Health Interview Survey 2007? Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:710750. doi:10.1155/2012/710750
16. Clarke TC, Black LI, Stussman BJ, Barnes PM, Nahin RL. Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002-2012. Natl Health Stat Report. 2015;1(79):1–16.
17. Wang H, Yang G, Wang S, Zheng X, Zhang W, Li Y. The Most Commonly Treated Acupuncture Indications in the United States: a Cross-Sectional Study. Am J Chin Med. 2018;1–33. doi:10.1142/s0192415x18500738
18. Torres-Rosas R, Yehia G, Peña G, et al. Dopamine mediates vagal modulation of the immune system by electroacupuncture. Nat Med. 2014;20(3):291–295. doi:10.1038/nm.3479
19. Liu S, Wang ZF, Su YS, et al. Somatotopic Organization and Intensity Dependence in Driving Distinct NPY-Expressing Sympathetic Pathways by Electroacupuncture. Neuron. 2020;108(3):436–450.e437. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.07.015
20. Liu S, Wang Z, Su Y, et al. A neuroanatomical basis for electroacupuncture to drive the vagal-adrenal axis. Nature. 2021;598(7882):641–645. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04001-4
21. Li N, Guo Y, Gong Y, et al. The Anti-Inflammatory Actions and Mechanisms of Acupuncture from Acupoint to Target Organs via Neuro-Immune Regulation. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:7191–7224. doi:10.2147/JIR.S341581
22. Abdo H, Calvo-Enrique L, Lopez JM, et al. Specialized cutaneous Schwann cells initiate pain sensation. Science. 2019;365(6454):695–699. doi:10.1126/science.aax6452
23. Vincent JL, Opal SM, Marshall JC, Tracey KJ. Sepsis definitions: time for change. Lancet. 2013;381(9868):774–775. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61815-7
24. Wong A, Otles E, Donnelly JP, et al. External Validation of a Widely Implemented Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model in Hospitalized Patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(8):1065–1070. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626
25. van der Poll T, van de Veerdonk FL, Scicluna BP, Netea MG. The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(7):407–420. doi:10.1038/nri.2017.36
26. Meneses G, Cárdenas G, Espinosa A, et al. Sepsis: developing new alternatives to reduce neuroinflammation and attenuate brain injury. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019;1437(1):43–56. doi:10.1111/nyas.13985
27. Vandewalle J, Libert C. Glucocorticoids in Sepsis: to Be or Not to Be. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1318. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01318
28. Marchant A, Devière J, Byl B, De Groote D, Vincent JL, Goldman M. Interleukin-10 production during septicaemia. Lancet. 1994;343(8899):707–708. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91584-9
29. Marie C, Pitton C, Fitting C, Cavaillon JM. Regulation by anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, TGFbeta)of interleukin-8 production by LPS- and/ or TNFalpha-activated human polymorphonuclear cells. Mediators Inflamm. 1996;5(5):334–340. doi:10.1155/s0962935196000488
30. van der Poll T, Opal SM. Host-pathogen interactions in sepsis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8(1):32–43. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70265-7
31. van der Slikke EC, An AY, Hancock REW, Bouma HR. Exploring the pathophysiology of post-sepsis syndrome to identify therapeutic opportunities. EBioMedicine. 2020;61:103044. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103044
32. Besedovsky HO, Rey A, Sorkin E, Da Prada M, Keller HH. Immunoregulation mediated by the sympathetic nervous system. Cellular Immunology. 1979;48(2):346–355. doi:10.1016/0008-8749(79)90129-1
33. Jänig W. Sympathetic nervous system and inflammation: a conceptual view. Auton Neurosci. 2014;182:4–14. doi:10.1016/j.autneu.2014.01.004
34. Van den Berghe G, Téblick A, Langouche L, Gunst J. The hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis in sepsis- and hyperinflammation-induced critical illness: gaps in current knowledge and future translational research directions. eBioMedicine. 2022;84:104284. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104284
35. Andersson U, Tracey KJ. Neural reflexes in inflammation and immunity. J Exp Med. 2012;209(6):1057–1068. doi:10.1084/jem.20120571
36. Shimba A, Ikuta K. Control of immunity by glucocorticoids in health and disease. Semin Immunopathol. 2020;42(6):669–680. doi:10.1007/s00281-020-00827-8
37. Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, et al. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):693–704. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2021436
38. Sterne JAC, Murthy S, Diaz JV, et al. Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: a Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2020;324(13):1330–1341. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.17023
39. Atkinson SJ, Cvijanovich NZ, Thomas NJ, et al. Corticosteroids and pediatric septic shock outcomes: a risk stratified analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112702. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112702
40. Nichols B, Kubis S, Hewlett J, Yehya N, Srinivasan V. Hydrocortisone Therapy in Catecholamine-Resistant Pediatric Septic Shock: a Pragmatic Analysis of Clinician Practice and Association With Outcomes. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(9):e406–e414. doi:10.1097/pcc.0000000000001237
41. Slusher T, Gbadero D, Howard C, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double blinded trial of dexamethasone in African children with sepsis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996;15(7):579–583. doi:10.1097/00006454-199607000-00004
42. Valoor HT, Singhi S, Jayashree M. Low-dose hydrocortisone in pediatric septic shock: an exploratory study in a third world setting. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009;10(1):121–125. doi:10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181936ab3
43. Minneci PC, Deans KJ, Eichacker PQ, Natanson C. The effects of steroids during sepsis depend on dose and severity of illness: an updated meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15(4):308–318. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02752.x
44. Pan WX, Fan AY, Chen S, Alemi SF. Acupuncture modulates immunity in sepsis: toward a science-based protocol. Auton Neurosci. 2021;232:102793. doi:10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102793
45. Scott-Solomon E, Boehm E, Kuruvilla R. The sympathetic nervous system in development and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021;22(11):685–702. doi:10.1038/s41583-021-00523-y
46. Schiller M, Ben-Shaanan TL, Rolls A. Neuronal regulation of immunity: why, how and where? Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(1):20–36. doi:10.1038/s41577-020-0387-1
47. Wang J, Lu S, Yang F, et al. The role of macrophage polarization and associated mechanisms in regulating the anti-inflammatory action of acupuncture: a literature review and perspectives. Chin Med. 2021;16(1):56. doi:10.1186/s13020-021-00466-7
48. Hasegawa S, Inoue T, Nakamura Y, et al. Activation of Sympathetic Signaling in Macrophages Blocks Systemic Inflammation and Protects against Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32(7):1599–1615. doi:10.1681/asn.2020121723
49. Straub RH, Pongratz G, Weidler C, et al. Ablation of the sympathetic nervous system decreases gram-negative and increases gram-positive bacterial dissemination: key roles for tumor necrosis factor/phagocytes and interleukin-4/lymphocytes. J Infect Dis. 2005;192(4):560–572. doi:10.1086/432134
50. Stolk RF, Tvd P, Angus DC, Hoeven J, Pickkers P, Kox M. Potentially Inadvertent Immunomodulation: norepinephrine Use in Sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(5):550–558. doi:10.1164/rccm.201604-0862CP
51. Thoppil J, Mehta P, Bartels B, Sharma D, Farrar JD. Impact of norepinephrine on immunity and oxidative metabolism in sepsis. Front Immunol. 2023;14. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1271098
52. Körner A, Schlegel M, Kaussen T, et al. Sympathetic nervous system controls resolution of inflammation via regulation of repulsive guidance molecule A. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):633. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08328-5
53. Mirakaj V, Brown S, Laucher S, et al. Repulsive guidance molecule-A (RGM-A) inhibits leukocyte migration and mitigates inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(16):6555–6560. doi:10.1073/pnas.1015605108
54. Liu W, Chen W, Xie M, et al. Traumatic brain injury stimulates sympathetic tone-mediated bone marrow myelopoiesis to favor fracture healing. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):260. doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01457-w
55. Kohm AP, Sanders VM. Norepinephrine and beta 2-adrenergic receptor stimulation regulate CD4+ T and B lymphocyte function in vitro and in vivo. Pharmacol Rev. 2001;53(4):487–525.
56. Vasu TS, Cavallazzi R, Hirani A, Kaplan G, Leiby B, Marik PE. Norepinephrine or Dopamine for Septic Shock:Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. J Intensive Care Med. 2012;27(3):172–178. doi:10.1177/0885066610396312
57. Carrara M, Ferrario M, Bollen Pinto B, Herpain A. The autonomic nervous system in septic shock and its role as a future therapeutic target: a narrative review. Ann Intensive Care. 2021;11(1):80. doi:10.1186/s13613-021-00869-7
58. Stolk RF, Pasch E, Naumann F, et al. Norepinephrine Dysregulates the Immune Response and Compromises Host Defense during Sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(6):830–842. doi:10.1164/rccm.202002-0339OC
59. Devor M, Jänig W, Michaelis M. Modulation of activity in dorsal root ganglion neurons by sympathetic activation in nerve-injured rats. J Neurophysio. 1994;71(1):38.
60. Yin J, Wang Y, Hu H, et al. P2X7 receptor inhibition attenuated sympathetic nerve sprouting after myocardial infarction via the NLRP3/IL-1β pathway. J Cell Mol Me. 2017;21(11):2695–2710. doi:10.1111/jcmm.13185
61. Mclachlan EM, Jänig W, Devor M, Michaelis M. Peripheral nerve injury triggers noradrenergic sprouting within dorsal root ganglia. Nature. 1993;363(6429):543–546. doi:10.1038/363543a0
62. Cui X, Sun G, Cao H, et al. Referred Somatic Hyperalgesia Mediates Cardiac Regulation by the Activation of Sympathetic Nerves in a Rat Model of Myocardial Ischemia. Neurosci Bull. 2022;38(4):386–402. doi:10.1007/s12264-022-00841-w
63. Olofsson PS, Rosas-Ballina M, Levine YA, Tracey KJ. Rethinking inflammation: neural circuits in the regulation of immunity. Immunol Rev. 2012;248(1):188–204. doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01138.x
64. Bonaz B, Sinniger V, Pellissier S. The Vagus Nerve in the Neuro-Immune Axis: implications in the Pathology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1452. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01452
65. Bonaz B, Sinniger V, Pellissier S. Anti-inflammatory properties of the vagus nerve: potential therapeutic implications of vagus nerve stimulation. The J Physiol. 2016;594(20):5781–5790. doi:10.1113/JP271539
66. Goehler LE, Gaykema RPA, Hammack SE, Maier SF, Watkins LR. Interleukin-1 induces c-Fos immunoreactivity in primary afferent neurons of the vagus nerve. Brain Res. 1998;804(2):306–310. doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00685-4
67. Wan W, Janz L, Vriend CY, Sorensen CM, Greenberg AH, Nance DM. Differential induction of c-Fos immunoreactivity in hypothalamus and brain stem nuclei following central and peripheral administration of endotoxin. Brain Res Bull. 1993;32(6):581–587. doi:10.1016/0361-9230(93)90158-8
68. Goehler LE, Gaykema RPA, Opitz N, Reddaway R, Badr N, Lyte M. Activation in vagal afferents and central autonomic pathways: early responses to intestinal infection with Campylobacter jejuni. Brain Behav Immun. 2005;19(4):334–344. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2004.09.002
69. Borovikova LV, Ivanova S, Zhang M, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates the systemic inflammatory response to endotoxin. Nature. 2000;405(6785):458–462. doi:10.1038/35013070
70. Pavlov VA, Chavan SS, Tracey KJ. Molecular and Functional Neuroscience in Immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2018;36:783–812. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053158
71. Kressel AM, Tsaava T, Levine YA, et al. Identification of a brainstem locus that inhibits tumor necrosis factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(47):29803–29810. doi:10.1073/pnas.2008213117
72. Bernik TR, Friedman SG, Ochani M, et al. Pharmacological stimulation of the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway. J Exp Med. 2002;195(6):781–788. doi:10.1084/jem.20011714
73. Deutschman CS, Tracey KJ. Sepsis: current dogma and new perspectives. Immunity. 2014;40(4):463–475. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2014.04.001
74. Huston JM, Gallowitsch-Puerta M, Ochani M, et al. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation reduces serum high mobility group box 1 levels and improves survival in murine sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(12):2762–2768. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000288102.15975.ba
75. Huston JM, Ochani M, Rosas-Ballina M, et al. Splenectomy inactivates the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway during lethal endotoxemia and polymicrobial sepsis. J Exp Med. 2006;203(7):1623–1628. doi:10.1084/jem.20052362
76. Zhu X, Huang J-Y, Dong W-Y, et al. Somatosensory cortex and central amygdala regulate neuropathic pain-mediated peripheral immune response via vagal projections to the spleen. Nat Neurosci. 2024. doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01561-8
77. Pavlov VA, Tracey KJ. Neural regulators of innate immune responses and inflammation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004;61(18):2322–2331. doi:10.1007/s00018-004-4102-3
78. Mughrabi IT, Gerber M, Jayaprakash N, et al. Voltammetry in the spleen assesses real-time immunomodulatory norepinephrine release elicited by autonomic neurostimulation. J Neuroinflammation. 2023;20(1):236. doi:10.1186/s12974-023-02902-x
79. Katafuchi T, Ichijo T, Take S, Hori T. Hypothalamic modulation of splenic natural killer cell activity in rats. J Physiol. 1993;471:209–221. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019898
80. Elenkov IJ, Haskó G, Kovács KJ, Vizi ES. Modulation of lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by selective alpha- and beta-adrenergic drugs in mice. J Neuroimmunol. 1995;61(2):123–131. doi:10.1016/0165-5728(95)00080-l
81. Kees MG, Pongratz G, Kees F, Schölmerich J, Straub RH. Via beta-adrenoceptors, stimulation of extrasplenic sympathetic nerve fibers inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF secretion in perfused rat spleen. J Neuroimmunol. 2003;145(1–2):77–85. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.09.011
82. Vida G, Peña G, Deitch EA, Ulloa L. α7-cholinergic receptor mediates vagal induction of splenic norepinephrine. J Immunol. 2011;186(7):4340–4346. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1003722
83. Willemze RA, Welting O, van Hamersveld HP, et al. Neuronal control of experimental colitis occurs via sympathetic intestinal innervation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(3). doi:10.1111/nmo.13163
84. Cleypool CGJ, Brinkman DJ, Mackaaij C, et al. Age-Related Variation in Sympathetic Nerve Distribution in the Human Spleen. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:726825. doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.726825
85. Yu J, Xiao K, Chen X, et al. Neuron-derived neuropeptide Y fine-tunes the splenic immune responses. Neuron. 2022;110(8):1327–1339.e1326. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.01.010
86. Nance DM, Macneil BJ. Immunoregulation by the sympathetic nervous system. Neuroimmune Biology. 2001:121–139.
87. Martelli D, Farmer DG, Yao ST. The splanchnic anti-inflammatory pathway: could it be the efferent arm of the inflammatory reflex? Exp Physiol. 2016;101(10):1245–1252. doi:10.1113/ep085559
88. Komegae EN, Farmer DGS, Brooks VL, McKinley MJ, McAllen RM, Martelli D. Vagal afferent activation suppresses systemic inflammation via the splanchnic anti-inflammatory pathway. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;73:441–449. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2018.06.005
89. Takenaka MC, Guereschi MG, Basso AS. Neuroimmune interactions: dendritic cell modulation by the sympathetic nervous system. Semin Immunopathol. 2017;39(2):165–176. doi:10.1007/s00281-016-0590-0
90. Guyot M, Simon T, Panzolini C, et al. Apical splenic nerve electrical stimulation discloses an anti-inflammatory pathway relying on adrenergic and nicotinic receptors in myeloid cells. Brain Behav Immun. 2019;80:238–246. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2019.03.015
91. Ma Q. Somatotopic organization of autonomic reflexes by acupuncture. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2022;76:102602. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2022.102602
92. Uchida S, Kagitani F, Sato-Suzuki I. Somatoautonomic reflexes in acupuncture therapy: a review. Auto Neurosci. 2017;203:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.autneu.2016.11.001
93. Li YQ, Zhu B, Rong PJ, Ben H, Li YH. Neural mechanism of acupuncture-modulated gastric motility. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(5):709–716. doi:10.3748/wjg.v13.i5.709
94. Zhu B, Xu WD, Rong PJ, Ben H, Gao XY. A C-fiber reflex inhibition induced by electroacupuncture with different intensities applied at homotopic and heterotopic acupoints in rats selectively destructive effects on myelinated and unmyelinated afferent fibers. Brain Res. 2004;1011(2):228–237. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2004.03.034
95. Liu K, Wang S-Y, Cui X, et al. Acupuncture Regulation of Gastrointestinal Function by Selection of Homotopic and Heterotopic Acupoints. In: Lin J-G, editor. Experimental Acupuncturology. Springer Singapore; 2018. 197–210.
96. Zhao YX, He W, Jing XH, et al. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation protects endotoxemic rat from lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:627023. doi:10.1155/2012/627023
97. Tang YW, Cui X, Liu K, et al. Manual acupuncture stimulation of acupoints at the same and adjacent spinal segments promotes uterine contractility. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2020;45(9):708–713. doi:10.13702/j.1000-0607.200476
98. Cui X, Cao HL, Liu Q, Liu K, Gao XY, Zhu B. Electroacupuncture at “Neiguan”(PC6) decreased cardiac sympathetic hyperactivity and improved cardiac function in chronic myocardial ischemia model rats. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2020;45(4):264–268. doi:10.13702/j.1000-0607.190942
99. Zhu B. Correspondence between Meridian circuit and somato-segment arrangement. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2021;46(10):815–820. doi:10.13702/j.1000-0607.20210790
100. Li YQ, Zhu B, Rong PJ, Ben H, Li YH. Effective regularity in modulation on gastric motility induced by different acupoint stimulation. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(47):7642–7648. doi:10.3748/wjg.v12.i47.7642
101. Li YW, Li W, Wang ST, et al. The autonomic nervous system: a potential link to the efficacy of acupuncture. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:1038945. doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.1038945
102. Yang G, Hu RY, Deng AJ, Huang Y, Li J. Effects of Electro-Acupuncture at Zusanli, Guanyuan for Sepsis Patients and Its Mechanism through Immune Regulation. Chin J Integr Med. 2016;22(3):219–224. doi:10.1007/s11655-016-2462-9
103. Hu S, Zhang LJ, Bai HY, Bao CM. The effects of electro-acupuncturing at Zusanli point on intestinal proinflammatory factors, diamine oxidase and tissue water content in rats with sepsis. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2009;21(8):485–487.
104. Shi X, Zhang LJ, Bai HY, Bao CM, Hu S, Guan L. Effects of electroacupuncture on hepatic blood flow and lipid peroxidation in septic rats. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2010;30(5):397–400.
105. Zhao YX, He W, Gao XY, Rong PJ, Zhu B. Effect of electroacupuncture of auricular concha on inflammatory reaction in endotoxaemia rats. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2011;36(3):187–192.
106. Song JG, Li HH, Cao YF, et al. Electroacupuncture improves survival in rats with lethal endotoxemia via the autonomic nervous system. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(2):406–414. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182426ebd
107. Villegas-Bastida A, Torres-Rosas R, Arriaga-Pizano LA, Flores-Estrada J, Gustavo-Acosta A, Moreno-Eutimio MA. Electrical Stimulation at the ST36 Acupoint Protects against Sepsis Lethality and Reduces Serum TNF Levels through Vagus Nerve- and Catecholamine-Dependent Mechanisms. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:451674. doi:10.1155/2014/451674
108. Zhang L, Huang Z, Shi X, et al. Protective Effect of Electroacupuncture at Zusanli on Myocardial Injury in Septic Rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018;2018:6509650. doi:10.1155/2018/6509650
109. Han YG, Qin X, Zhang T, et al. Electroacupuncture prevents cognitive impairment induced by lipopolysaccharide via inhibition of oxidative stress and neuroinflammation. Neurosci Lett. 2018;683:190–195. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.06.003
110. Harpin D, Simadibrata CL, Mihardja H, Barasila AC. Effect of Electroacupuncture on Urea and Creatinine Levels in the Wistar Sepsis Model. Med Acupunct. 2020;32(1):29–37. doi:10.1089/acu.2019.1369
111. Xie DP, Zhou GB, Chen RL, et al. Effect of Electroacupuncture at Zusanli (ST36) on Sepsis Induced by Cecal Ligation Puncture and Its Relevance to Spleen. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020;2020:1914031. doi:10.1155/2020/1914031
112. Wu YR, Pan YH, Zhan Z, Yang S, Jiang JF. Parasympathetic innervation contributes to the increase of survival rate and anti-inflammatory effect of electroacupuncture at “Ciliao”(BL32) in rats with lethal endotoxemia. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2021;46(11):942–947. doi:10.13702/j.1000-0607.201080
113. Go YY, Ju WM, Lee CM, Chae SW, Song JJ. Different Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Parameters Modulate the Anti-Inflammatory Effects on Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Inflammation in Mice. Biomedicines. 2022;10(2).
114. Zhang Z, Cui X, Liu K, et al. Adrenal sympathetic nerve mediated the anti-inflammatory effect of electroacupuncture at ST25 acupoint in a rat model of sepsis. Ana Rec. 2022;306(12):3178–3188. doi:10.1002/ar.25102
115. Zhang Y, Zheng L, Deng H, et al. Electroacupuncture Alleviates LPS-Induced ARDS Through α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor-Mediated Inhibition of Ferroptosis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:832432. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.832432
116. Zhang J, Wang M, Hu X, et al. Electroacupuncture-driven endogenous circulating serum exosomes as a potential therapeutic strategy for sepsis. Chin Med. 2023;18(1):106. doi:10.1186/s13020-023-00816-7
117. Kim HW, Uh DK, Yoon SY, et al. Low-frequency electroacupuncture suppresses carrageenan-induced paw inflammation in mice via sympathetic post-ganglionic neurons, while high-frequency EA suppression is mediated by the sympathoadrenal medullary axis. Brain Res Bull. 2008;75(5):698–705. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.11.015
118. Hong GS, Zillekens A, Schneiker B, et al. Non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation prevents postoperative ileus and endotoxemia in mice. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019;31(3):e13501. doi:10.1111/nmo.13501
119. Song Q, Hu S, Wang H, et al. Electroacupuncturing at Zusanli point (ST36) attenuates pro-inflammatory cytokine release and organ dysfunction by activating cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway in rat with endotoxin challenge. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2014;11(2):469–474. doi:10.4314/ajtcam.v11i2.35
120. Martinez-Sanchez N, Sweeney O, Sidarta-Oliveira D, Caron A, Stanley SA, Domingos AI. The sympathetic nervous system in the 21st century: neuroimmune interactions in metabolic homeostasis and obesity. Neuron. 2022;110(21):3597–3626. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.017
121. Ulloa L. Bioelectronic neuro-immunology: neuronal networks for sympathetic-splenic and vagal-adrenal control. Neuron. 2023;111(1):10–14. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.015
122. Thapa S, Cao X. Nervous regulation: beta-2-adrenergic signaling in immune homeostasis, cancer immunotherapy, and autoimmune diseases. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023;72(8):2549–2556. doi:10.1007/s00262-023-03445-z
123. Araujo LP, Maricato JT, Guereschi MG, et al. The Sympathetic Nervous System Mitigates CNS Autoimmunity via β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling in Immune Cells. Cell Rep. 2019;28(12):3120–3130.e3125. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.042
124. Pavlov VA, Tracey KJ. Bioelectronic medicine: preclinical insights and clinical advances. Neuron. 2022;110(21):3627–3644. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.003
125. Neudorfer C, Chow CT, Boutet A, et al. Kilohertz-frequency stimulation of the nervous system: a review of underlying mechanisms. Brain Stimulation. 2021;14(3):513–530. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2021.03.008
126. Mirouse A, Vigneron C, Llitjos JF, et al. Sepsis and Cancer: an Interplay of Friends and Foes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(12):1625–1635. doi:10.1164/rccm.202004-1116TR
127. Li H, Pan X, Zhang S, et al. Association of autoimmune diseases with the occurrence and 28-day mortality of sepsis: an observational and Mendelian randomization study. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):476. doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04763-5
© 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.