Back to Journals » Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology » Volume 17

Insights into Intrinsic Atopic Dermatitis: immunogenicity, Dysbiosis, and Imaging (Reflectance Confocal Microscopy, Optical Coherence Tomography)

Authors Gavrilita E , Silion SI, Bitca ML, Tatu AL 

Received 11 January 2024

Accepted for publication 18 May 2024

Published 11 June 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 1377—1386

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S459096

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Jeffrey Weinberg



Elena Gavrilita,1,2 Simona Ioana Silion,1,2 Miruna Lorelei Bitca,1 Alin Laurentiu Tatu1– 3

1Dermatology Department, “Sf. Cuvioasa Parascheva” Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, Galați, Romania; 2Multidisciplinary Integrated Center of Dermatological Interface Research MIC-DIR, “Dunărea de Jos” University, Galați, Romania; 3Clinical Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University, Galați, Romania

Correspondence: Elena Gavrilita, Tel +40746680485, Email [email protected]

Abstract: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a frequent inflammatory condition that usually begins during early childhood, but it increasingly starts to debut, even in the elderly. Based on immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels and clinical features, two subsets of this disease have been recognized: intrinsic and extrinsic. When speaking about AD, most specialists think about filaggrin (FLG) mutations resulting in epidermal barrier defects, which is the case in most atopic patients, but some have a normal barrier, as seen by imaging, and still have specific clinical lesions along with metal allergies. Specific molecules (IL-10, IFN-γ, and HBD-3) have been shown to greatly impact the interactions between internal and external factors in this peculiar form of AD. A less-known protein, suprabasin, has been highlighted as a promising explanation for nickel anomalies in intrinsic AD.

Keywords: atopy, OCT, RCM, HBD-3, IFN-γ, suprabasin

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a well-known chronic inflammatory skin condition associated with pruritus, usually beginning during the first years of childhood; however, it can also affect the elderly. Chronic hand eczema can be a primary sign in adults.1 Two types of AD have been identified, an extrinsic type (eAD), which is mainly characterized by increased levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE) and affects the majority of patients (70–80%), and an intrinsic (iAD) form, which has normal IgE levels but still has positive results for the air-borne and food allergens tests, delayed onset, and has been observed more often in females.1 For the latest type, intrinsic AD, some authors have proposed terms such as “non-allergic AD” or ‘atopiform dermatitis’,2 which mimicked the pattern of classical AD.2 These patients have a less frequent personal or family history of atopy and very low rates of recurrent conjunctivitis.2 Tokura et al have described that the main features of intrinsic AD would include a later onset, milder forms, the presence of Dennie-Morgan folds, lack of ichthyosis vulgaris, and palmar hyperlinearity.3 Brenninkmeijer added less frequently observed keratosis pilaris, pityriasis alba, and nonspecific hand or foot eczema.2 At the molecular level, filaggrin gene mutations are less important in iAD, as they appear mostly in eAD, where they cause an increased percutaneous transfer of external antigens through the disrupted barrier.4

IFN-γ

Immunologically, iAD has low levels of interleukin (IL) −4, −5 and −13, but high expression of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ+) Th1 cells.3,5,6 Keratinocytes, which are influenced by IL-4 and IL-13, exhibit reduced filaggrin (FLG) gene expression7, loricrin and involucrin downregulation, all leading to the compromised barrier seen in eAD. In a Japanese study published in 2012, the team observed an increase in IFN-γ+ Th1 cells along with low levels of IgE, stimulating naive B cells to produce IgE and discovered that even a small amount of IFN could inhibit IgE production, leading to the conclusion that IFN-γ contributes to the normal level of IgE in IgE-low AD (iAD).6,8 Another key action of IFN-γ is the upregulation of Th1 chemokine production and the downregulation of Th2 (IL-4 and IL-13). In eAD, where there is already a barrier defect, Th2 cells and eosinophils infiltrate the lesions; however, in iAD, higher levels of IFN-γ inhibit the chemotaxis and action of Th2 chemokines.9 In contrast, TNF-α/IFN-γ induces inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-8, and IL-6. IFN-γ causes abnormal lipid composition in AD skin, leading to a defectuos barrier.10

AMPs

It has been previously shown that IL-4 and IL-13 (Th2 cytokines) downregulate antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) expression and inhibit epidermal differentiation.5,11 In 2005, Howell et al compared the levels of LL-37 in normal, eAD, iAD, and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) tissue samples by immunostaining. The results showed that there was significantly lower LL-37 staining, especially in the granular cell layer and stratum corneum in the normal and AD skin, compared to ACD.12 Past studies showed that cathelicidin LL-37 and HBD-2 have a low expression in non inflamed skin of healthy subjects and unaffected skin of AD patients. Also AD patients with infectious complications such as dermatitis herpeticatum had low AMPs. Interestingly, research demonstrated that AD patients supplemented with oral vitamin D or after topical administration of vitamin D had an upregulation of AMPs. Even after repeated UVB light exposure, due to the keratinocyte vitamin D synthesis, the same effect of upregulation was observed.13 HBD-3 was reported to improve tight junction barrier function in the epidermis and autophagosomes in keratinocytes.14

Th2 Interleukins and HBD-3

The chemokines produced by “atopic” keratinocytes attract eosinophils and type 2 helper T cells into the skin.15 Due to the inflammatory stimuli of keratinocytes, atopic skin has a greater affinity for Staphylococcus aureus colonization, especially in the upper levels of the epidermis, compared to other inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis.16,17 Human β-defensin-3 (HBD-3) is an AMPs that has been shown to exhibit antibacterial effects against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Streptococcus pyogenes.5,18 A study published in 2003 showed that HBD-3 levels were decreased in the skin of AD patients.18 Howell et al demonstrated that HBD-3 expression was lower in iAD and eAD than in psoriasis, but almost none in normal skin, thus enforcing the theory that HBD-3 is stimulated by inflammatory stimuli.5 Th2 cell interleukins, IL-4 and IL-13, were demonstrated to inhibit the mobilization of keratinocyte HBD-3 from their cytoplasm into the S. aureus surface to be neutralized.19 In contrast, IL-10 acts indirectly on HBD-3 expression by inhibiting TNF-α and IFN-γ. In vitro experiments, concluded that IL-10, IL-4, and IL-13 together expressed a synergistic effect on the HBD-3, compared to IL-10 or IL-4/IL-13 alone.5

Gut Microbiota Is It Different Between iAD and eAD?

According to a latest research published in 2023, gut microbiota is different between the two AD phenotypes. Species from the genera of Fusicatenibacter, Blautia and Lachnospira are more abundant in eAD. On the other hand species from the phylum of Bacteroidetes are increased in the intestinal flora. The species Alistipes shahii which is known to produce short chain fatty acids is enriched in iAD. Being an internal inflammation inhibitor, it is inversely correlated with IgE level, eosinophils count and SCORAD index.20

Staphylococcus Aureus and iAD

Given the low HBD-3 expression and mobilization from keratinocytes, S. aureus colonization remains an important pathological factor in iAD. Apart from its simple presence, Al Kindi et al discovered the second immunoglobulin-binding protein (Sbi), a virulence factor specific for S. aureus strains, which induces the release of IL-33 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (Th2 cytokines) from keratinocytes without the Toll-like receptor pathway.21 Regarding novel therapies for reducing S. aureus colonization, autologous bacteriotherapy with coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) seemed to reduce the presence of S. aureus in AD lesional skin by 99%, which could benefit eAD as well as iAD.22

IL-10

IL-10 is expressed by mononuclear cells in AD and is known to downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumoral necrosis factor and interferon gamma (TNF-α and IFN-γ), along with IL-13, and is observed at high levels in the skin and peripheral blood of AD patients compared to normal individuals and psoriasis patients.12 Dividing into subtypes of AD, iAD has been characterized by increased IL-10 and low AMPs, but there is an added role of IL-13 and IL-4 along with IL-10 in the correlation with decreased AMP expression.12 Neutralization with antibodies against interleukin IL-10, IL-4, and IL-13 in atopic dermatitis skin has been shown to augment antimicrobial peptide expression.5

Psoriasis Like Immunogenicity

When discussing iAD, lesional skin showed comparable Th2 activity compared to eAD, but stronger Th1 (IFN-γ), Th22 (IL-22) and Th17 (IL-17, IL-12/IL-23p40, CCL20) responses were observed in affected skin in iAD.23 IL-22 gene expression is increased in both iAD and psoriasis, but not in eAD.23 IL-17A is found solely in the iAD transcriptome.23,24 For eAD, IgE levels were positively correlated with SCORAD values, which is not the case for iAD, where Th17-associated chemokine CCL20 levels were associated with the disease severity score.24 Th17 cell differentiation has been demonstrated to be regulated by gut microbiota, but also Th17 cytokines impact the intestinal mucosa microenvironment.25 CCL20 also known as macrophage inflammatory protein-3α is expressed constitutively in natural barriers such as skin, gut, tonsils, appendix.26

Skin TEWL and pH

In terms of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin surface hydration, iAD is similar to normal skin within normal levels of hydration and transepidermal water loss of moisture.27,28 Healthy skin has been demonstrated to be populated by a diversity of microbes, the most common being Cutibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis, compared with AD, where S. aureus is the dominant spot.29 An acidic skin pH (<5.5) promotes the growth of S. epidermidis but suppresses species such as S. aureus and Propionibacteria.30 There is no information about whether iAD skin, apart from having normal TEWL and hydration, has a proper pH or is more neutral, thus promoting S. aureus colony development or its pH depending on the severity.

Metal Sensitivity and Type 1 Immunity

Patients have a 2.4 fold higher rate of positive patch tests for nickel, cobalt, and chromium.31 In addition, the sweat and serum of these patients contains constitutionally higher concentrations of nickel compared to that of the eAD and normal populations. Even though some might present a negative patch test to nickel, the chance of high nickel serum concentration is higher in iAD.31 The response to these metals is Th1/Th17 mediated and also nickel and cobalt have the ability to stimulate toll-like receptor 4 leading to allergic reactions.31 Exposure to high nickel levels is known to lead to oxidative damage in the liver, kidneys, spleen, and intestines.32 Studies on mice that have been fed with nickel showed a decreased abundance of Colidextribacter, a bacterium that produces inosine, which can reduce the malondialdehyde concentration (lipid peroxidation product).33–35

Other Than Filaggrin

Previous studies have shown that the filaggrin (FLG) gene mutation is not one of the etiopathological features of iAD, but later articles discovered an (onco-) protein expressed in various epithelial tissues such as the skin and superior gastrointestinal tract, called suprabasin (SBSN).36 It is produced by spinous cells of the stratified epithelia.37 Aoshima et al observed that SBSN was significantly lower in the stratum corneum of patients with AD than in normal skin. Serum SBSN was lower in AD patients than in normal individuals, but iAD was even lower than eAD, and the expression of SBSN was unaffected by IL-4 and IL-13 in the epidermis. Histologically, SBSN deficits are linked to abnormal epidermal differentiation and keratinocyte apoptosis.36 In a study conducted in mice, suprabasin shortage in epithelia led to thinner oral mucosa and possibly contributed to increased metal absorption, resulting in the elevation of blood nickel concentration.35,37

Janus Kinase Inhibitors. Are They Better for iAD?

Currently, the most frequently used worldwide for the treatment of moderate to severe forms of AD is dupilumab, which acts on IL-4Rα by blocking the release of IL-4 and IL-13.38

A retrospective study compared the efficacy of dupilumab on patients with iAD and eAD. Although eAD is an endotype mainly Th2 polarized and iAD has the Th1 components, there was no statistical difference in favor of dupilumab being more efficient for one of the two endotypes.39 Alternative treatments for unresponsive patients consist of JAK inhibitors, such as abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib. Their inhibitory actions are mediated by JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2, thereby affecting a wider spectrum of cytokines.40 IFN-γ is known to induce JAK/STAT signaling pathway, therefore regarding the high interferon expression.41 Furthermore, JAK inhibitors have a broad spectrum of action, covering all the cytokine types (Th1, Th2, Th3) implicated in the pathogenesis of both endotypes of AD, therefore this class can be thought as a more appealing way of treating iAD.35 Additionally, a simple anthraquinone, purpurin, found in Rubia tinctorum and Rubia cordifolia, has highly antioxidative properties, such as inhibiting TNF-α/IFN-γ-induced cytokines and chemokines and remarkably suppressing JAK1/STAT1/STAT3 phosphorylation.42

Imaging in Intrinsic AD

In terms of imaging techniques our team has used the reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) from Vivascope, the dynamic optical coherence tomography (D-OCT) from Vivosight and line field OCT (LC-OCT) from Damae Medical in one patient with IgE of 55 UI/mL and history of atopy since childhood. The confocal microscopy images showed numerous vesicles of different sizes with rich cellularity of leukocytes and enlarged keratinocytes, closer from vesicles being observed eccrine ducts as small black circles each surrounded by two hyperreflective circles (Figures1 and 2). The honeycomb pattern was focally disarranged by areas of spongiosis.43

Figure 1 Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) image depicting a fragment from an acute eczematous lesion located on the lateral side of hand. The capture shows multiple vesicles (dark round masses) filled with inflammatory cells (yellow arrows) and grey shadows as keratinocytes (blue arrow). Surrounding the vesicles the epidermis has a disarranged cobble stone pattern (green arrows).

Figure 2 Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) image at the depth of stratum spinosum. Eccrine glands ducts openings (pink arrow); vesicle with increased cellularity (yellow star); spongiosis and disrupted honeycomb pattern (green arrows), enlarged, bright keratinocytes in the periphery of the vesicle (red arrow).

In D-OCT we had a faster picture of the number, size and location of vesicles. In an active eczematous lesion, a psoriasiform type of vascular pattern, such as vertical capillary elongation surrounded by darker areas of spongiosis has been observed, lacking the classical horizontal dilated vessels seen in eAD. There were some spots of slight hyperkeratosis, but overall the stratum corneum had a continuous, undisrupted appearance (Figure 3). On the other hand, normal appearing skin, but pruriginous did not show the psoriasiform pattern, but dermal vessels with enlarged laminae in a horizontal manner. The dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) could be distinguished by a slightly darker band and the stratum corneum had a normal appearance (Figure 4).

Figure 3 D-OCT (dynamic OCT) capture of discoid eczema lesion. Multiple vesicles (yellow stars); acanthosis; elongated capillaries in a psoriasiform pattern (blue arrows); areas of hyperkeratosis (Orange arrows).

Figure 4 OCT image of pruritic, normal looking skin in an intrinsic atopic dermatitis patient. Horizontal dermal vessels enlargement and density increase (blue arrows); slight demarcation of dermal-epidermal junction as subtle darker band (Orange arrow).

LC-OCT images have the advantage of combining both RCM with OCT. In Figure 5 the elements of the epidermis are clearly delimitated, although in the stratum spinosum are inflammatory modifications, such as vesicles, spongiosis, areas with increased inflammatory cellularity (pinpoint white structures).43 Stratum corneum is thickened, but stratum disjunctum is mostly uninterrupted with few variations in size and layering.

Figure 5 Vertical LC-OCT (line-field optical coherence tomography) section depicting numerous macro and micro vesicles in the epidermis (yellow stars); stratum corneum thickened (green star), stratum disjunctum continuous, undisrupted (pink arrow); stratum spinosum of different thicknesses with inhomogeneous areas.

Discussion

Given the considerably fewer studies combing features of etiopathogenesis of intrinsic atopic dermatitis combined with advanced imaging like OCT and RCM, our mini-review aimed to gather data on this topic and emphasize possible correlations. The timeline of the articles cited in this study was between 1995 and 2023 and our research was done using PubMed and Clarivate with the key words “intrinsic atopic dermatitis”. From the 279 results on PubMed and 357 articles on Clarivate, we have selected only the ones that discussed had the term “intrinsic” atopic dermatitis specifically mentioned and afterwards we selected only the ones that studied the immunity, the skin and gut microbiota and the imaging papers. The imaging content is an original addition to this research, from our knowledge no other imaging investigation has been done on iAD. The images were captured in the summer of 2023 from a 26 years old female patient diagnosed with iAD from a discoid active eczematous lesion on the lateral-intern side of the right hand.

There is still a debate about the phenotype of the iAD patient, some authors considering Dennie-Morgan folds as a very frequent element; no ichthyosis vulgaris or palmar hyperlinearity and little to none keratosis pilaris, pityriasis alba or nonspecific hand/foot eczema.2,3 (Table 1)

Table 1 Main Differences Between AD Subtypes

Low or normal IgE levels (Table 1), which define the subtype of AD, might be highly linked to the elevated levels of IFN-γ secreted by Th1 cells; thus, IL-10 is increased in iAD, which inhibits IFN-γ; however, there is no explanation for the high levels of IFN-γ and low expression of HBD-3.6 iAD is characterized by milder forms, possibly determined by higher levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10. (Table 2)

Table 2 Immunological, Bacterial and OCT Differences Between AD Subtypes

HBD-3 expression was lower in iAD, even though IL-4 and IL-13 levels were lower and did not have the synergistic power to suppress defensin, which is seen in eAD. (Table 2)

iAD seems to have a psoriatic immunologic pattern, characterized by increased Th22, Th17, and Th1 activity.23 (Table 2) These particularities are reflected in the images of D-OCT as extended vessel loops and loss of DEJ visualization. Also the stratum corneum appears normal imaging in both D-OCT and LC-OCT. Features of eczema present were numerous vesicles, inflammatory cells, spongiosis and focal orthokeratosis.

Higher serum and skin levels of nickel continuously present in these patients could be a possible cause of the permanent inflammatory state, and even higher peaks obtained by oral intake of nickel-rich diets can aggravate the disease. Based on these suppositions, diets based on low-nickel foods or nickel chelators such as sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (DCC) could be tested as potential treatments.44

As the latest breakthroughs concerning the better understanding of intrinsic AD, scientists have identified the role of the epidermis as an anti-apoptotic factor and the lack of suprabasin protein in the upper layers of the epidermis in iAD.36,37

Given the aforementioned facts about Staphylococcus aureus, it still remains an important dominant factor in the mechanism of iAD performance (Table 2), but new emerging bacterial strains, such as Colidextribacter, seem to play an important role in this particular condition.33

Conclusion

Taking into consideration all the differences between iAD and eAD, starting from the cytokine pattern, high nickel levels, different microbiota and intricated imaging, this entity should be treated more personalized than classical types of AD. Possibly needing special diets, chelators and different monoclonal antibodies than the currently approved ones. Skin and gut dysbiosis is definitely present, taking into consideration all inflammatory conditions and skin/serum/digestive imbalance.

Further research is needed for better understanding of iAD features, on both imaging and molecular levels, thus leading to correctly diagnosis and targeted therapies.

Abbreviations

AD, atopic dermatitis; IgE, immunoglobulin E; iAD, intrinsic atopic dermatitis; eAD, extrinsic atopic dermatitis; IL, interleukin; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; Th, T helper cell; FLG, filaggrin; TNF, tumoral necrosis factor; AMP; antimicrobial peptide; ACD, alergic contact dermatitis; LL-37, cathelicidin-derived antimicrobial peptide 37 residue; HBD, human beta defensin; HBD-3, Human β-defensin-3; TEWL, transepidermal water loss; SBSN, suprabasin; S.aureus, Staphylococcus aureus; CoNS, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus; JAK, Janus kinase; TYK, tyrosine kinase; RCM, reflectance confocal microscopy; D-OCT, dynamic optical coherence tomography; LC-OCT, line-field optical coherence tomography; DEJ, dermal-epidermal junction; DCC, sodium diethyldithiocarbamate.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge that the present study was academically supported by the “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, Romania through the Multidisciplinary Integrated Center of Dermatological Interface Research MIC-DIR.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Leung DY, Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. Lancet. 2003;361(9352):151–160. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12193-9

2. Tokura Y, Hayano S. Subtypes of atopic dermatitis: from phenotype to endotype. Allergol Internat. 2022;71(1):14–24. doi:10.1016/j.alit.2021.07.003

3. Tokura Y. Extrinsic and intrinsic types of atopic dermatitis. J Dermatological Sci. 2010;58(1):1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2010.02.008

4. Weidinger S, Rodríguez E, Stahl C, et al. Filaggrin mutations strongly predispose to early-onset and extrinsic atopic dermatitis. J Investigat Dermatol. 2007;127(3):724–726. doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700630

5. Howell MD, Boguniewicz M, Pastore S, et al. Mechanism of HBD-3 deficiency in atopic dermatitis. Clin Immunol. 2006;121(3):332–338. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2006.08.008

6. Kabashima-Kubo R, Nakamura M, Sakabe J, et al. A group of atopic dermatitis without IgE elevation or barrier impairment shows a high Th1 frequency: possible immunological state of the intrinsic type. J Dermatological Sci. 2012;67(1):37–43. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2012.04.004

7. Howell MD, Kim BE, Gao P, et al. Cytokine modulation of atopic dermatitis filaggrin skin expression. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(1):150–155. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2007.04.031

8. Kim BE, Leung DY, Boguniewicz M, Howell MD. Loricrin and involucrin expression is down-regulated by Th2 cytokines through STAT-6. Clin Immunol. 2008;126(3):332–337. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2007.11.006

9. Mori T, Kabashima K, Yoshiki R, et al. Cutaneous hypersensitivities to hapten are controlled by IFN-gamma-upregulated keratinocyte Th1 chemokines and IFN-gamma-downregulated langerhans cell Th2 chemokines. J Investigat Dermatol. 2008;128(7):1719–1727. doi:10.1038/jid.2008.5

10. Ungar B, Garcet S, Gonzalez J, et al. An integrated model of atopic dermatitis biomarkers highlights the systemic nature of the disease. J Investigat Dermatol. 2017;137(3):603–613. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2016.09.037

11. Howell MD, Fairchild HR, Kim BE, et al. Th2 cytokines act on S100/A11 to downregulate keratinocyte differentiation. J Investigat Dermatol. 2008;128(9):2248–2258. doi:10.1038/jid.2008.74

12. Howell MD, Novak N, Bieber T, et al. Interleukin-10 downregulates anti-microbial peptide expression in atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;125(4):738–745. doi:10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23776.x

13. Reinholz M, Ruzicka T, Schauber J. Cathelicidin LL-37: an antimicrobial peptide with a role in inflammatory skin disease. Anna Dermatol. 2012;24(2):126–135. doi:10.5021/ad.2012.24.2.126

14. Peng G, Tsukamoto S, Ikutama R, et al. Human β-defensin-3 attenuates atopic dermatitis-like inflammation through autophagy activation and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling pathway. J Clin Invest. 2022;132(17):e156501. doi:10.1172/JCI156501

15. Giustizieri ML, Mascia F, Frezzolini A, et al. Keratinocytes from patients with atopic dermatitis and psoriasis show a distinct chemokine production profile in response to T cell-derived cytokines. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;107(5):871–877. doi:10.1067/mai.2001.114707

16. Cho SH, Strickland I, Tomkinson A, et al. Preferential binding of Staphylococcus aureus to skin sites of Th2-mediated inflammation in a murine model. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;116(5):658–663. doi:10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01331.x

17. Morishita Y, Tada J, Sato A, et al. Possible influences of Staphylococcus aureus on atopic dermatitis-- the colonizing features and the effects of staphylococcal enterotoxins. Clin Experiment All. 1999;29(8):1110–1117. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.00593.x

18. Harder J, Bartels J, Christophers E, Schroder JM. Isolation and characterization of human beta -defensin-3, a novel human inducible peptide antibiotic. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(8):5707–5713. doi:10.1074/jbc.M008557200

19. Kisich KO, Carspecken CW, Fiéve S, Boguniewicz M, Leung DY. Defective killing of Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis is associated with reduced mobilization of human beta-defensin-3. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122(1):62–68. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.022

20. Liu X, Xu J, Wang Z, et al. Differential changes in the gut microbiota between extrinsic and intrinsic atopic dermatitis. J Autoimmun. 2023;141:103096. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103096

21. Al Kindi A, Williams H, Matsuda K, et al. Staphylococcus aureus second immunoglobulin-binding protein drives atopic dermatitis via IL-33. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147(4):1354–1368.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2020.09.023

22. Nakatsuji T, Gallo RL, Shafiq F, et al. Use of autologous bacteriotherapy to treat staphylococcus aureus in patients with atopic dermatitis: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. JAMA dermatol. 2021;157(8):978–982. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1311

23. Suárez-Fariñas M, Dhingra N, Gittler J, et al. Intrinsic atopic dermatitis shows similar TH2 and higher TH17 immune activation compared with extrinsic atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(2):361–370. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.04.046

24. Czarnowicki T, Krueger JG, Guttman-Yassky E. Skin barrier and immune dysregulation in atopic dermatitis: an evolving story with important clinical implications. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;2(4):371–381. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2014.03.006

25. Chen L, Ruan G, Cheng Y, Yi A, Chen D, Wei Y. The role of Th17 cells in inflammatory bowel disease and the research progress. Front Immunol. 2023;13:1055914. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1055914

26. Schutyser E, Struyf S, Van Damme J. The CC chemokine CCL20 and its receptor CCR6. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003;14(5):409–426. doi:10.1016/S1359-6101(03)00049-2

27. Choi SJ, Song MG, Sung WT, et al. Comparison of transepidermal water loss, capacitance and pH values in the skin between intrinsic and extrinsic atopic dermatitis patients. J Korean Med Sci. 2003;18(1):93–96. doi:10.3346/jkms.2003.18.1.93

28. Mori T, Ishida K, Mukumoto S, et al. Comparison of skin barrier function and sensory nerve electric current perception threshold between IgE-high extrinsic and IgE-normal intrinsic types of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162(1):83–90. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09440.x

29. Hülpüsch C, Tremmel K, Hammel G, et al. Skin pH-dependent Staphylococcus aureus abundance as predictor for increasing atopic dermatitis severity. Allergy. 2020;75(11):2888–2898. doi:10.1111/all.14461

30. Lambers H, Piessens S, Bloem A, Pronk H, Finkel P. Natural skin surface pH is on average below 5, which is beneficial for its resident flora. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2006;28(5):359–370. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2494.2006.00344.x

31. Yamaguchi H, Hirasawa N, Asakawa S, Okita K, Tokura Y. Intrinsic atopic dermatitis shows high serum nickel concentration. Allergol Int. 2015;64(3):282–284. doi:10.1016/j.alit.2015.01.003

32. Wu B, Cui H, Peng X, et al. Dietary nickel chloride induces oxidative intestinal damage in broilers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(6):2109–2119. doi:10.3390/ijerph10062109

33. Wu B, Liu Y, Zhen J, et al. Protective effect of methionine on the intestinal oxidative stress and microbiota change induced by nickel. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;244:114037. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114037

34. Cosgun BE, Erdeml ME, Gul M, et al. Crocin protects intestine tissue against carbon tetrachloride-mediated oxidative stress in rats. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2018;37(4):399–409. doi:10.4149/gpb_2017057

35. Suzuki T, Kondo S, Ogura Y, et al. How do classical subtypes correspond to endotypes in atopic dermatitis? Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(1):265. doi:10.3390/ijms25010265

36. Aoshima M, Phadungsaksawasdi P, Nakazawa S, et al. Decreased expression of suprabasin induces aberrant differentiation and apoptosis of epidermal keratinocytes: possible role for atopic dermatitis. J Dermatological Sci. 2019;95(3):107–112. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2019.07.009

37. Matsui T, Hayashi-Kisumi F, Kinoshita Y, et al. Identification of novel keratinocyte-secreted peptides dermokine-alpha/-beta and a new stratified epithelium-secreted protein gene complex on human chromosome 19q13.1. Genomics. 2004;84(2):384–397. doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.03.010

38. Gooderham MJ, Hong HC, Eshtiaghi P, Papp KA. Dupilumab: a review of its use in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(3 Suppl 1):S28–S36. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.022

39. Gelato F, Mastorino L, Stepkina E, et al. Is dupilumab as effective in intrinsic atopic dermatitis as it is in extrinsic atopic dermatitis? J Clin Med. 2023;12(6):2189. doi:10.3390/jcm12062189

40. Nezamololama N, Fieldhouse K, Metzger K, Gooderham M. Emerging systemic JAK inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a review of abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib. Drugs Context. 2020;9:8. doi:10.7573/dic.2020-8-5

41. Seif F, Khoshmirsafa M, Aazami H, Mohsenzadegan M, Sedighi G, Bahar M. The role of JAK-STAT signaling pathway and its regulators in the fate of T helper cells. Cell Communic Sign. 2017;15(1):23. doi:10.1186/s12964-017-0177-y

42. Oh JH, Kim SH, Kwon OK, et al. Purpurin suppresses atopic dermatitis via TNF-α/IFN-γ-induced inflammation in HaCaT cells. Inter J Immuno Pharmacol. 2022;36:3946320221111135. doi:10.1177/03946320221111135

43. Gavrilita E, Tatu AL. 195 Dupilumab treatment monitoring in severe atopic dermatitis by reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography. J Investigative Dermatology. 2023;143(5):1. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2023.03.197

44. Benoit SL, Schmalstig AA, Glushka J, Maier SE, Edison AS, Maier RJ. Nickel chelation therapy as an approach to combat multi-drug resistant enteric pathogens. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):13851. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50027-0

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.