Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 17
Molecular Characteristics of Salmonella Spp. Responsible for Bloodstream Infections in a Tertiary Hospital in Nanjing, China, 2019-2021
Authors Hua MM, Li J, Zheng J, Wang JJ, Liu C, Zhang Y, Zhang ZF, Cao XL, Shen H
Received 23 February 2024
Accepted for publication 20 May 2024
Published 12 June 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 2363—2377
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S459941
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Sandip Patil
Miao-Miao Hua,1 Jia Li,2 Jie Zheng,2 Jing-Jing Wang,2 Chang Liu,2 Yan Zhang,2 Zhi-Feng Zhang,2 Xiao-Li Cao,1,2 Han Shen1,2
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Jiangsu University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing University Medical School Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Xiao-Li Cao; Han Shen, Email [email protected]; [email protected]
Objective: To investigate the clinical and molecular characteristics of Salmonella spp. causing bloodstream infections (BSIs) in our hospital.
Methods: We studied 22 clinical Salmonella isolates from BSIs and 16 from non-BSIs, performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and whole genome sequencing (WGS). The analysis included serovars, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), virulence factors (VFs), sequence types (STs), plasmid replicons, and genetic relationships. We also assessed pathogenicity of the isolates causing BSIs through growth, biofilm formation, and anti-serum killing assays.
Results: WGS analysis identified 13 Salmonella serovars, with four responsible for BSIs. S. Enteritidis was the most prevalent serovar, involved in 19 (50.0%) cases. BSIs were caused by 17S. Enteritidis, two S. Typhimurium, two S. Munster and one S. Diguel. Of the 38 isolates, 27 (71.1%) exhibited high resistance to ampicillin, and 24 (63.2%) to ampicillin/sulbactam. Thirty-six types of ARGs were identified, with blaTEM-1B (n = 25, 65.8%) being the most frequent. Ten plasmid replicons were found; the combination of IncFIB(S)-IncFII(S)-IncX1 was the most common in S. Enteritidis (94.7%). Fifteen STs were identified, among which ST11 was the most prevalent and clonally disseminated, primarily responsible for BSIs. A total of 333 different VFs were detected, 177 of which were common across all strains. No significant differences were observed between the BSI and non-BSI isolates in terms of resistance rates, ARGs, plasmid replicons, and VFs, except for seven VFs. No strong pathogenicity was observed in the BSI-causing isolates.
Conclusion: BSIs were predominantly caused by clonally disseminated S. Enteritidis ST11, the majority of which carried multiple ARGs, VFs and plasmid replicons. This study provides the first data on clonally disseminated S. Enteritidis ST11 causing BSIs, highlighting the urgent need for enhanced infection control measures.
Keywords: Salmonella enteritidis, bloodstream infections, serovars, antibiotic-resistance genes, virulence factors, sequence type
Introduction
Salmonella spp. are significant etiological agent of food-borne diseases and gastroenteritis in both humans and animals.1 The genus Salmonella is divided into Salmonella enterica and Salmonella bongori,2 with S. enterica further subdivided into typhoidal and non-typhoidal S. enterica (NTS). Currently, over two thousand NTS serovars have been identified, each with distinct host specificities.2 Gastroenteritis is the primary clinical manifestation in healthy individuals, while bacteremia, which primarily affects the vulnerable or elderly,3 is comparatively rare. The World Health Organization reports that foodborne pathogens are responsible for 94 million cases of gastroenteritis annually, leading to significant global health burdens,3 with NTS being particularly impactful.
The increasing rates of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella, together with the frequent emergence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) strains, are a matter of global concern.4 In particular, the increasing resistance of Salmonella spp. to clinically important antimicrobial agents, such as fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins, has become a global concern,5 leading to clinical management difficulties and an increase in morbidity and mortality,4 due to the lack of clinical efficacy of first- and second-generation cephalosporins and aminoglycosides.
Salmonella pathogenicity is closely linked to numerous virulence factors (VFs) that facilitate adhesion, invasion, intracellular survival, fimbrial expression, systemic infection, toxin production, Mg2+ production, and iron uptake.6 Notably, Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPIs) represent some of the most critical VFs.7 SPI-1 and SPI-2 play pivotal role in systemic infections. They encode type III secretion systems (T3SS) that form a channel in the host cell membrane, facilitating the internalization of bacterial effector proteins.8 Furthermore, SPI-2 is essential for bacterial survival within macrophages and for causing lethal bacteremia in mice.9
Furthermore, the formation of biofilm is an important VF that contributes to the ability to cause acute, latent, or chronic disease. The exact outcome of an infection is determined by the growth state of Salmonella, the immune status of infected host and the immune response elicited.10 In addition to biofilm formation, the MDR in Salmonella significantly enhances the survival ability of pathogens in the human intestinal tract under the selective pressure of antibiotic use,11 which provides favorable conditions for the dissemination of such strains in healthcare centers.
Prior to 2019, Salmonella spp. was rarely detected in the clinical laboratories of our hospital. However, Salmonella spp. have been increasingly implicated in a variety of infections, with BSIs being the most common. S. Enteritidis was the predominant serovar, accompanied by some rare serovars according to the slide agglutination test. We were curious about the characterization of these strains and whether there was a clonal spread of S. Enteritidis, as well as the pathogenicity of the S. Enteritidis associated with BSIs.
In this study, we aimed to characterize Salmonella spp. causing BSIs in our hospital, including the distribution of VFs, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), mutations in target genes, plasmid replicons and genetic relationship, with the Salmonella spp. causing non-BSIs as a control group. Additionally, bacterial growth, biofilm formation, and anti-serum killing experiments were performed to evaluate the pathogenic ability of the strains causing BSIs.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Isolates
In total, 22 consecutive and non-replicate Salmonella isolates that caused BSIs were collected from patients at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2021. Meanwhile, 16 Salmonella isolates that did not cause BSIs during the same period were used as a control group. These 16 Salmonella isolates were collected from stool (n = 11), urine (n = 3), secretions (n = 1), and abdominal fluid (n = 1). All strains were initially identified using a Vitek 2.0 matched GN panel (BioMerieux, France) and matrix-associated laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (BioMerieux).
Clinical Data Collection
The clinical information of the 38 patients was collected from electronic medical records, including general information (agender, age, department, and length of hospitalization), specimen information (source and collection date), infection indicators (White blood cell count and percentage, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, interleukin-6), underlying diseases, invasive procedures, and immune diseases. This study was conducted according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (2023–390). A BSI was defined when a patient presented with systemic signs of infection and positive blood cultures accompanied by abnormal infection indicators.12
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST)
The antimicrobial susceptibility of the 38 clinical Salmonella isolates was evaluated for 13 antimicrobial agents, namely ampicillin (AMP), ampicillin/sulbactam (SAM), ceftriaxone (CRO), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (FEP), imipenem (IPM), ertapenem (ETP), aztreonam (ATM), levofloxacin (LEV), piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SXT), cefoperazone/sulbactam (SCF), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) by microbroth dilution testing. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used for quality control. Results were interpreted according to the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines 2023.13
DNA Extraction and Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS)
Fresh colonies were collected for genomic DNA analysis using a bacterial DNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The extracted DNA was sent to Tiangen Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. for purity check and WGS.
Genomic Analysis
The sequencing data was trimmed and assembled using CLC Workbench version 21.0.4 for genome submission to GenBank and further analysis. The distribution of ARGs and mutations in the target genes was further investigated using the same software. PlasmidFinder 2.1 (https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/PlasmidFinder/) was used to analyze the presence of plasmid replicons, and SeqSero 1.2 (https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/SeqSero/) was used for sequence type (ST) and serovar prediction.
Investigation of the Distribution of Virulence Factors
The 38 genomes were annotated by Prokka (Prokaryotic Genome Rapid annotation software) to obtain annotated GenBank files.14 VFDB database (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs/download.htm) was used to compare with the nucleotide coding sequence files of all VFs extracted in batches from 38 genomes using BLASTN software to obtain the detailed distribution of VFs in all genomes.15 The thresholds “E-value = 1e-5, identity ≥ 70, coverage ≥ 90%, and match length ≥ 30” were strictly set to minimize false positive results.
Construction of a Phylogenetic Tree
The phylogenetic tree was constructed as follows: First, the genomic DNA was annotated using Prokka,14 and the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) alignment sequences of 3505 core genes were obtained using Scoary software.16 A nucleotide substitution model was constructed using Jmodeltest.16 Then, a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using RaxML and 1000 bootstrap samples.17 Finally, the phylogenetic tree was imported into Itol software, branches with bootstrap values less than 50 were removed, and the final phylogenetic tree was obtained. Based on the phylogenetic tree, a heat map was constructed by combining serotypes, STs, ARGs and VFs to show the characteristics of the 38 isolates.
Growth and Biofilm Formation Assays
The ability of the 22 Salmonella isolates causing BSIs to grow and form biofilms was evaluated using the following Methods: a single bacterial colony was inoculated into 5 mL of LB liquid medium and subjected to shaking cultivation at 150 rpm at 35°C.
Overnight. The culture was then diluted 1/100 with saline and transferred to two 96-well plates (100 µL/well). Saline was used as a blank control. For growth ability, OD620 values were measured at 1-hour intervals using a microplate reader (SpectraMax M5) over a period of 7 hours. For the biofilm formation assay, after the 1:100 diluted culture was statically cultured at 37°C for 48 hours, the biofilm was stained with 0.1% crystal violet, then 30% glacial acetic acid was used to dissolve the crystals, and the optical density at 550 nm was measured on a microplate reader (SpectraMax M5). The results were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.5.0 software (San Diego, California, USA). Each experiment was repeated three times.
Anti-Serum Killing Assay
Briefly, single colonies were suspended in 3mL of saline and adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard, which was further diluted to 106 CFU/mL. Serum was mixed with the 106 CFU/mL dilution in a ratio of 1:3 (125ul: 375ul) and incubated in a constant temperature incubator at 37 °C for 3 hours. Colonies on the agar plates were counted at t = 0, 1, 2 and 3 hours. The survival rates of bacteria at different time points were calculated to evaluate the anti-serum ability. The results were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.5.0 software (San Diego, California, USA).
Results
Clinical Characterization
Out of the 38 patients, 17 were male and 21 were female, resulting in a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.24. The period with the highest incidence of Salmonella infection was from July to November (n = 33, 86.8%). Patients with BSIs had a significantly longer hospitalization period compared to those without BSI (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in risk factors between patients with Salmonella BSIs and those without, except for the length of hospitalization.
Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes
High resistance to ampicillin (n = 27, 71.1%) and ampicillin/sulbactam (n = 24, 63.2%) were found, along with low-level resistance to ceftazidime (n = 3, 7.9%), ceftriaxone (n = 2, 5.3%), and cefepime (n = 1, 2.6%). No resistance to imipenem, ertapenem, cefoperazone/sulbactam, and piperacillin/tazobactam was observed (Figure 1A).
Out of the 38 isolates, 28 (73.7%) were resistant to at least two antimicrobials, and seven (18.4%) were MDR, defined as resistant to three or more antimicrobials, contributing to five distinct MDR profiles (Figure 1B). The most frequent MDR profiles observed were AMP-SAM-SXT and AMP-CAZ-ATM-SXT-CIP-LEV. Additionally, one isolate was resistant to seven antimicrobial agents (AMP-CRO-CAZ-FEP-ATM-SAM-SXT), while only two isolates were pan-susceptible. There were no statistically significant differences in resistance rates between BSI-causing and non-BSI-causing groups.
Serovars
Totally, 13 Salmonella Serovars were identified, with Enteritidis (n = 19, 50.0%) being the most common. The distribution of the remaining ones were shown in Figure 2A. Four serovars were responsible for BSIs, including 17S. Enteritidis, 2S. Typhimurium, 2S. Munster and 1S. Diguel (Figure 2B). In addition, 11 serovars caused non-BSIs (Figure 2C).
Antibiotic Resistance Genes
In total, 36 types of ARG were identified (Figure 3A). Among them, blaTEM-1B (n = 25, 65.8%), aph(6)-Id (n = 19, 50.0%), and sul2 (n = 19, 50.0%) were the most prevalent. Notably, blaTEM-1B was detected in all 19S. Enteritidis isolates. Additional β-lactam resistance genes were also detected (Figure 3B). Multiple resistance genes to aminoglycosides, which are not clinically effective, were also detected (Figure 3C). Importantly, 17 of the 19S. Enteritidis strains contained aph(6)-Id, aph(3”)-Ib, and sul2 (Table 1). Furthermore, multiple ARGs were found in three S. Kentucky, two S. Typhimurium, one S. Muenster, and one S. Thompson isolates, resulting in MDR phenotypes (Table 1). We also found that 89.5% (n = 34) of Salmonella isolates had mutations in gyrA and/or parC, including D87Y (n = 19), D87N (n = 4), and S83F (n = 4) in gyrA, and T57S (n = 15), S80I (n = 3), and S80R (n = 1) in parC. Four isolates had double mutations in both gyrA (D87N and S83F) and parC (T57S and S80I/S80R), while the remaining strains had a single mutation in either gyrA (D87Y) or parC (T57S). No mutations were detected in gyrB or parE.
![]() |
Table 1 Serovar, Resistance Profile, Resistance Gene, and Plasmid Replicon(s) of the 38 Salmonella Isolates |
Sequence types
Fifteen Salmonella enterica STs were identified, with ST11 (n = 19, 50.0%) being the most common (Figure 4). The phylogenetic tree constructed from the 38 Salmonella isolates demonstrated specific genetic relationships among the same serovars (Figure 4). Nineteen isolates of S. Enteritidis ST11 shared a strong genetic relationship, indicating clonal dissemination and the potential for outbreaks of this particular clone within a hospital setting (Figure 4).
![]() |
Figure 4 The phylogenetic tree and heatmap of the 38 Salmonella isolates from human patients reconstructed based on the whole-genome sequencing-derived SNPs. |
Plasmid Replicons
Twenty-six out of 38 isolates contained ten different plasmid replicons. The most prevalent plasmid replicons were IncFIB(S), IncFII(S), and IncX1, each found in 52.6% (n = 20) of cases (Table 1). Eight distinct replicon combinations were identified, with the most frequent plasmid profile being IncFIB(S)-IncFII(S)-IncX1 (n = 17, 44.7%), all of which were located in a single contig and were exclusive to S. Enteritidis.
Virulence Factors
Of the 38 Salmonella isolates, a total of 333 different VFs were identified across 10 categories (Supplementary Table 1). VFs related to adhesion, effector delivery systems, and motility accounted for 86.8% of the total. Each strain carried approximately 250–282 VFs, with 177 VFs present in all isolated Salmonella strains (Table 2). The remaining 156 VFs were present only in some isolates, with varying detection rates.
![]() |
Table 2 The Functional Category of 333 Virulent Factors in the 38 Salmonella Isolates |
Notably, we identified a significant number of T3SS-related VFs, including the prg, hil, org, inv, and spa operons encoded by SPI-1 and the ssa, ssr, ssc, and sse operons encoded by SPI-2. These T3SS-associated VFs showed extremely high prevalence rates, with sseC, sseF, sseI/srfH, sseK1, sseK2, sseL, and sspH2 occurring at rates ranging from 63.2% to 97.4%. Additionally, the remaining VFs of SPI-1 and SPI-2, with the exception of ssaX, were prevalent in all 38 isolates.
Furthermore, we found that the same Salmonella serovars shared identical or similar VF profiles (Figure 4), and some VFs were present only in specific serovars. The comparison of VFs between BSI-causing and non-BSI-causing strains showed that the distribution of 7 VFs was significantly higher among the BSI-causing strains (P<0.01), These included effector delivery system genes (ssaO and sseI/srfH), immune modulation genes (rck and rf1), exotoxin (spvB), antimicrobial activity/competitive advantage (mig-5), and stress survival (sodCI).
Pathogenic Ability
The growth curve showed that the 22 Salmonella strains causing BSIs had comparable growth abilities, except for two strains that exhibited rapid growth ability (Figure 5). However, they did not show strong resistance to anti-serum killing (Figure 6). Additionally, 16 (72.7%) isolates were found to be weak biofilm producers, and the other 6 isolates were non-biofilm producers (Figure 7A). Of note, significant differences in biofilm formation were observed between ST11 and non-ST11 Salmonella isolates (Figure 7B). The biofilm formation of S. Enteritidis was significantly higher than that of S. Typhimurium and S. Muenster (Figure 7C).
![]() |
Figure 5 Growth curves of 22 Salmonella isolates causing BSIs. |
![]() |
Figure 6 Anti-serum killing ability of randomly selected Salmonella isolates from that causing BSI. |
Discussion
Salmonella infections are a global public health problem due to the pathogen’s high pathogenicity. BSIs caused by this pathogen occur mainly in children in low-income countries, such as those in Africa, often resulting in prolonged hospitalization and high mortality. Therefore, data on the epidemiology of BSIs caused by Salmonella at the regional level or in resource-limited settings are crucial. In this study, we provided data on the molecular and clinical characteristics of Salmonella isolates causing BSIs to better design new prevention methods and to identify the need for optimized therapeutic strategies.
We found that S. Enteritidis was the most common serovar, followed by S. Typhimurium, which is in line with previous research,18 indicating that S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium are the primary pathogens responsible for Salmonella infections in humans. Notably, this is the first time that S. Diguel has been implicated in human infections. Salmonella infections were found to occur predominantly in elderly patients with severe disease during autumn, which is consistent with previous studies.19–21 Additionally, in our hospital, the Salmonella isolates causing BSIs were mainly found in patients with multiple underlying diseases, likely related to impaired immunity. Host factors that increase susceptibility to invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella infections include immunosuppression, corticosteroids, hematological malignancies, bone marrow and solid organ transplantation.22,23
Further, the high frequency of resistance to ampicillin and ampicillin/sulbactam is similar to previous studies.24 Thus, these antibiotics should be cautiously prescribed for the clinical treatment of infections caused by these strains. Fortunately, the observed frequencies of resistance towards aztreonam, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins were lower than those previously reported.20,25 Additionally, the distribution of MDR strains observed in this study was lower than that reported in Argentina,24 the USA,26 and China.20 This suggests that the third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins may still be effective for the clinical treatment of Salmonella infections in our hospital. The high prevalence of blaTEM-1B in our study is in line with previous studies.27 Such widespread distribution of blaTEM-1B should be monitored, as the extensive IS26-associated gene amplification of blaTEM-1 mediates resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam, and ampicillin/sulbactam.28 Furthermore, only three qnrS1 genes were identified in this study, confirming that mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions of gyrA and parC were the primary mechanisms responsible for fluoroquinolone resistance. It is worth noting that the identification of multiple ARGs alerts us the potential public health issue posed by MDR Salmonella spp. due to their rapid spread among humans and within animal production chains.11 Therefore, the urgent need to enhance surveillance of such strain in both of human medicine and veterinary practice is highlighted.
Moreover, multiple plasmid replicons identified in our study may be associated with the spread of VFs and/or ARGs. It is important to note that IncFIB(S) and IncFII(S) replicons were exclusively detected in S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium, which is in accordance with previous research.27,29 These plasmid replicons are associated with ARGs, cytotoxins, and adhesion factors, which confer hypervirulent bacterial fitness.30 The plasmid profile IncFIB(S)-IncFII(S)-IncX1, which was present in most of the 19S. Enteritidis isolates, was similar to the profile found in human and chicken isolates in Singapore.31 Given that all IncFIB(S)-IncFII(S)-IncX1 sequences were located in a single contig, it is possible that this is a compatible plasmid that contributes to bacterial diversification and adaptation through horizontal gene transfer.32
More importantly, 16 out of the 22 BSIs cases in our study were caused by S. Enteritidis ST11, which exhibited clonal dissemination. As we know, S. Enteritidis ST11 is the most common clone33,34 and the primary cause of bacteremia in children and adults in Africa.35,36 However, Salmonella-related BSIs are rare in China. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of clonally disseminated S. Enteritidis ST11 causing BSIs. Unfortunately, epidemiological contact surveys were not implemented in a timely manner when patient clinical information was available. Therefore, it is unclear whether these patients were infected by the consumption of contaminated food or by another route. Furthermore, we found that the same STs exhibited significant genetic similarity, highlighting the need to strengthen infection control measures to prevent outbreaks. In addition, we report for the first time that S. Diguel and S. Muenster cause human BSIs. Moreover, in contrast to a previous study that demonstrated a direct correlation between serovars and STs,37 the Typhimurium serovar in this study had various STs, suggesting the rapid evolution of Typhimurium. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that S. Senftenberg ST2390 and S. Diguel ST5494 were identified.
The pathogenicity of Salmonella spp, closely related to the expression of VFs, significantly affects the severity of human infections caused by this pathogen.38 Our study detected a large number of VFs in all Salmonella strains, indicating the potential pathogenicity of these strains in our hospital. Additionally, a considerable portion of adhesion-related genes contributed to biofilm formation, enhanced bacterial adhesion and colonization abilities, which are crucial for bacterial pathogenicity. However, strong biofilm formation ability was not observed in these BSI-causing isolates. Although all isolates harbored typical VFs from SPI-1 and SPI-2, which are involved in host cell invasion, host cell apoptosis inhibition, intracellular survival, and replication promotion,39 the growth and anti-serum killing ability evaluated in our study did not appear to be strong regarding the VFs present in the strains. These differences may be due to variations in the expression of VFs. Moreover, all S. Enteritidis isolates carried the invA, hilA, sipA, sipC, sefA, sopB, ssrA, sopE, and sopE2 genes, which is consistent with previous research,6,40 indicating that these VFs may form the basis for the basic pathogenic ability in S. Enteritidis. It is important to note that strains causing BSIs have a higher prevalence of seven VFs. Among them, sseI may attenuate the host’s ability to clear bacteria by obstructing the migration of host immune cells;41 Rck, as an outer membrane protein, mimics natural host cell ligands and triggers engulfment of the bacterium by interacting with the epidermal growth factor receptor;42 SpvB is a pLST-encoded cytotoxic protein associated with enhanced Salmonella survival and intracellular replication.43 Whereas the functions of the remaining 4 VFs remain unknown. Taking all factors into account, as most of the patients with BSIs in our study were of advanced age and had multiple underlying diseases, combined with the pathogenicity of the bacteria, we speculate that the occurrence of BSIs is mainly due to the weakened immune systems of the patients.
Our study has limitations. Firstly, the sample size was small, with less than 40 cases, making it difficult to draw accurate and reliable statistical Conclusions. Secondly, it was a single-centre study, which limits the generalisability of our Results.
Conclusions
The BSIs were mainly caused by S. Enteritidis ST11, which not only carried multiple ARGs, VFs and plasmid replicons, but also showed clonal spread. However, these isolates did not exhibit strong abilities in growth, biofilm formation or anti-serum killing. This is the first time we have provided data on clonally disseminated S. Enteritidis ST11 causing BSIs, highlighting the urgency of implementing infection control measures.
Nucleotide Sequence GenBank BioProject Numbers
All the sequences were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA). The Whole Genome Shotgun BioProject for these isolates has been deposited at GenBank, the BioProject number was PRJNA882512.
Abbreviations
AMP, Ampicillin; ANI, Average Nucleotide Identity; ARGs, Antibiotic-Resistance Genes; AST, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; ATM, Aztreonam; BSIs, Bloodstream Infections; CAZ, Ceftazidime; CIP, Ciprofloxacin; CLSI, Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute; CRO, Ceftriaxone; DALYs, Disability-adjusted life years; ETP, Ertapenem; FEP, Cefepime; IPM, Imipenem; LEV, Levofloxacin; LPS, Lipopolysaccharide; MIC, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration; MDR, Multi-drug resistant; MLST, Multi-locus sequence typing; VFDB, Virulence factor database; PMQRs, Plasmid mediated quinolone resistance genes; pSTV, Virulence-associated plasmid; SAM, Ampicillin/sulbactam; SCF, Cefoperazone/sulbactam; SNP, Single nucleotide polymorphism; SPIs, Salmonella pathogenicity islands; ST, Sequence typing; STs, Sequence types; SXT, Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim; T3SS, Type III secretion systems; TZP, Piperacillin/tazobactam; VFs, Virulence factors; WGS, Whole Genome Sequencing; WHO, World Health Organization.
Data Sharing Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Ethics Approval
This program has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University (The approval number is 2023-390). The need of informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee of the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital due to anonymous and retrospective study design. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers 81902124) and National Key research & development Plan Project (SQ2018YFGH000345).
Disclosure
The authors declare no competing interests in this work.
References
1. Jajere SM. A review of Salmonella enterica with particular focus on the pathogenicity and virulence factors, host specificity and antimicrobial resistance including multidrug resistance. Vet World. 2019;12(4):504–521. published Online First: 20190406. doi:10.14202/vetworld.2019.504-521
2. Andino A, Hanning I. Salmonella enterica: survival, colonization, and virulence differences among serovars. Sci World J. 2015;2015:520179. published Online First: 20150113. doi:10.1155/2015/520179
3. Graham SM, Molyneux EM, Walsh AL, Cheesbrough JS, Molyneux ME, Hart CA. Nontyphoidal Salmonella infections of children in tropical Africa. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19(12):1189–1196. doi:10.1097/00006454-200012000-00016
4. Parisi A, Crump JA, Glass K, et al. Health outcomes from multidrug-resistant salmonella infections in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2018;15(7):428–436.published Online First: 20180406. doi:10.1089/fpd.2017.2403
5. Ma Y, Li M, Xu X, et al. High-levels of resistance to quinolone and cephalosporin antibiotics in MDR-ACSSuT Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis mainly isolated from patients and foods in Shanghai, China. Int J Food Microbiol. 2018;286:190–196. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.09.022
6. Zou M, Keelara S, Thakur S. Molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis isolates from humans by antimicrobial resistance, virulence genes, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2012;9(3):232–238. published Online First: 20120127. doi:10.1089/fpd.2011.1012
7. Fardsanei F, Soltan Dallal MM, Douraghi M, et al. Genetic diversity and virulence genes of Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serotype Enteritidis isolated from meats and eggs. Microb Pathog. 2017;107:451–456. published Online First: 20170420. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2017.04.026
8. Coburn B, Grassl GA, Finlay BB. Salmonella, the host and disease: a brief review. Immunol Cell Biol. 2007;85(2):112–118. published Online First: 20061205. doi:10.1038/sj.icb.7100007
9. Perez JC, Groisman EA. Transcription factor function and promoter architecture govern the evolution of bacterial regulons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(11):4319–4324. published Online First: 2009/03/03. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810343106
10. Paudyal N, Pan H, Elbediwi M, et al. Characterization of Salmonella Dublin isolated from bovine and human hosts. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19(1):226.published Online First: 20191016. doi:10.1186/s12866-019-1598-0
11. D VTN, Venkitanarayanan K, Kollanoor Johny A. Antibiotic-resistant salmonella in the food supply and the potential role of antibiotic alternatives for control. Foods. 2018;7(10). published Online First: 20181011. doi:10.3390/foods7100167
12. Timsit JF, Ruppe E, Barbier F, Tabah A, Bassetti M. Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: an expert statement. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(2):266–284. published Online First: 20200211. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-05950-6
13. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, M100, 33rd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute ; 2023. www.clsi.org.
14. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–2069. published Online First: 20140318. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153
15. Chen L, Yang J, Yu J, et al. VFDB: a reference database for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:D325–8. doi:10.1093/nar/gki008
16. Brynildsrud O, Bohlin J, Scheffer L, Eldholm V. Erratum to: rapid scoring of genes in microbial pan-genome-wide association studies with Scoary. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):262. published Online First: 20161219. doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1132-8
17. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–1313. published Online First: 20140121. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033
18. Mughini-Gras L, Pijnacker R, Duijster J, et al. Changing epidemiology of invasive non-typhoid Salmonella infection: a nationwide population-based registry study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(7):941 e9–41 e14.published Online First: 20191121. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2019.11.015
19. Liang B, Xie Y, He S, et al. Prevalence, serotypes, and drug resistance of nontyphoidal Salmonella among paediatric patients in a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou, China, 2014–2016. J Infect Public Health. 2019;12(2):252–257.published Online First: 20181119. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2018.10.012
20. Yue M, Liu D, Li X, et al. Epidemiology, serotype and resistance of salmonella isolates from a children’s hospital in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 2006–2021. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;15:4735–4748. published Online First: 20220822. doi:10.2147/IDR.S374658
21. Medalla F, Gu W, Friedman CR, et al. increased incidence of antimicrobial-resistant nontyphoidal salmonella infections, United States, 2004–2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(6):1662–1672. doi:10.3201/eid2706.204486
22. Fierer J. Invasive Non-typhoidal Salmonella (iNTS) Infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75(4):732–738. doi:10.1093/cid/ciac035
23. Gordon MA. Salmonella infections in immunocompromised adults. J Infect. 2008;56(6):413–422. published Online First: 20080512. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2008.03.012
24. Parada J, Galas M, Faccone D, Tamiozzo P, Carranza A. Antibiotic resistance and associated resistance determinants in different Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from pigs in Argentina. Vet World. 2022;15(5):1215–1220. published Online First: 20220520. doi:10.14202/vetworld.2022.1215-1220
25. Zeng S, Zhuo Z, Huang Y, et al. Prevalence of Chromosomally Located bla(CTX-M-55) in Salmonella Typhimurium ST34 Isolates Recovered from a Tertiary Hospital in Guangzhou, China. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(3):e0277121.published Online First: 20220526. doi:10.1128/spectrum.02771-21
26. Xu Y, Tao S, Hinkle N, Harrison M, Chen J. Salmonella, including antibiotic-resistant Salmonella, from flies captured from cattle farms in Georgia, U.S.A. Sci Total Environ. 2018;616–617:90–96. published Online First: 20171116. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.324
27. Chen J, Ed-Dra A, Zhou H, Wu B, Zhang Y, Yue M. Antimicrobial resistance and genomic investigation of non-typhoidal Salmonella isolated from outpatients in Shaoxing city, China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:988317. published Online First: 20220913. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.988317
28. Hubbard ATM, Mason J, Roberts P, et al. Piperacillin/tazobactam resistance in a clinical isolate of Escherichia coli due to IS26-mediated amplification of bla(TEM-1B). Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4915.published Online First: 20201001. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18668-2
29. Li Y, Kang X, Ed-Dra A, et al. Genome-Based Assessment of Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Potential of Isolates of Non-Pullorum/Gallinarum Salmonella Serovars Recovered from Dead Poultry in China. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(4):e0096522.published Online First: 20220621. doi:10.1128/spectrum.00965-22
30. Zhao Q, Feng Y, Zong Z. An integrated IncFIB/IncFII plasmid confers hypervirulence and its fitness cost and stability. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022;41(4):681–684. published Online First: 20220119. doi:10.1007/s10096-022-04407-6
31. Aung KT, Khor WC, Ong KH, et al. Characterisation of Salmonella Enteritidis ST11 and ST1925 Associated with Human Intestinal and Extra-Intestinal Infections in Singapore. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(9). published Online First: 20220506. doi:10.3390/ijerph19095671
32. Muthuirulandi Sethuvel DP, Anandan S, Devanga Ragupathi NK, et al. IncFII plasmid carrying antimicrobial resistance genes in Shigella flexneri: vehicle for dissemination. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019;16:215–219. published Online First: 20181018. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2018.10.014
33. Yan S, Zhang W, Li C, et al. Serotyping, MLST, and Core Genome MLST Analysis of Salmonella enterica From Different Sources in China During 2004–2019. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:688614. published Online First: 20210916. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.688614
34. Park CJ, Li J, Zhang X, Gao F, Benton CS, Andam CP. Diverse lineages of multidrug resistant clinical Salmonella enterica and a cryptic outbreak in New Hampshire, USA revealed from a year-long genomic surveillance. Infect Genet Evol. 2021;87:104645. published Online First: 20201125. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104645
35. Feasey NA, Dougan G, Kingsley RA, Heyderman RS, Gordon MA. Invasive non-typhoidal salmonella disease: an emerging and neglected tropical disease in Africa. Lancet. 2012;379(9835):2489–2499. published Online First: 20120514. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61752-2
36. Park SE, Pham DT, Pak GD, et al. The genomic epidemiology of multi-drug resistant invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella in selected sub-Saharan African countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(8). doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005659
37. Ben Hassena A, Haendiges J, Zormati S, et al. Virulence and resistance genes profiles and clonal relationships of non-typhoidal food-borne Salmonella strains isolated in Tunisia by whole genome sequencing. Int J Food Microbiol. 2021;337:108941. published Online First: 20201028. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108941
38. Dos Santos AMP, Ferrari RG, Conte-Junior CA. Virulence factors in salmonella typhimurium: the sagacity of a bacterium. Curr Microbiol. 2019;76(6):762–773. published Online First: 20180521. doi:10.1007/s00284-018-1510-4
39. Deng W, Marshall NC, Rowland JL, et al. Assembly, structure, function and regulation of type III secretion systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(6):323–337.published Online First: 20170410. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.20
40. Campioni F, Moratto Bergamini AM, Falcao JP. Genetic diversity, virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from food and humans over a 24-year period in Brazil. Food Microbiol. 2012;32(2):254–264. published Online First: 20120713. doi:10.1016/j.fm.2012.06.008
41. McLaughlin LM, Govoni GR, Gerke C, et al. The Salmonella SPI2 effector SseI mediates long-term systemic infection by modulating host cell migration. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(11):e1000671.published Online First: 20091126. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000671
42. Mambu J, Virlogeux-Payant I, Holbert S, Grepinet O, Velge P, Wiedemann A. An updated view on the rck invasin of salmonella: still much to discover. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:500. published Online First: 20171208. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2017.00500
43. Yang S, Deng Q, Sun L, et al. Salmonella Effector SpvB Inhibits NF-kappaB Activity via KEAP1-Mediated Downregulation of IKKbeta. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:641412. published Online First: 20210318. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.641412
© 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.