Back to Journals » Advances in Medical Education and Practice » Volume 15

Factors Affecting Nursing and Midwifery Students Knowledge Regarding Preoperative Nursing Care

Authors Alnjadat R , Etoom M 

Received 13 October 2023

Accepted for publication 31 January 2024

Published 7 March 2024 Volume 2024:15 Pages 161—171

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S441145

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Md Anwarul Azim Majumder



Rafi Alnjadat, Mohammad Etoom

Department of Applied Health Sciences, Irbid University College, Al-Balqa Applied University, Irbid, Jordan

Correspondence: Rafi Alnjadat, Email [email protected]

Background: Preoperative competence is a crucial aspect of nursing and midwifery students’ education to improve the quality of care and patient safety. It assists nursing and midwifery students in maintaining and enhancing their practice by determining strength and areas that should be developed.
Purpose: This study aims to assess the level of nursing and midwifery students’ knowledge regarding preoperative nursing care and determine the most influencing demographic variables.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design using an online self-administered questionnaire was utilised among 202 nursing and midwifery students selected by simple random sampling. The Perceived Preoperative Nursing Care Competence Scale for Nursing students (PPreCC-NS) was used to assess the perceived preoperative nursing care competence of nursing and midwifery students. Descriptive statistics were obtained, and multiple regression was used for data analysis.
Results: The overall level of perceived preoperative nursing care competence was adequate 99.09 (SD = 10.81). The highest mean score was recorded for ability to fulfil legal responsibilities and adherence to ethical principles (M = 23.6, SD = 2.53). The lowest mean score was obtained for research and professional development (M = 17.6, SD = 2.60). The regression analysis showed that place of residency explained significantly about 4.53% of the variance in the nursing and midwifery students’ knowledge regarding preoperative nursing care, and it was the strongest predictor (B = 0.218, p = 0.002).
Conclusion: The perceived level of preoperative nursing care among nursing and midwifery students was found to be adequate and associated with place of residence. Future research should be conducted to explore factors affecting nursing and midwifery students’ preoperative competence in different cultures and contexts.

Keywords: competence, nursing, knowledge, nursing students, preoperative care

Introduction

Preoperative care refers to the physical and psychosocial care used for preparing a patient to undergo surgery safely.1 It begins with the patient’s decision to be operated and ends with their transfer to the operating room.2 Preoperative care aims to identify risk factors that could lead to complications for patients after surgery.3 Patients should be prepared physically, physiologically, and emotionally, and spiritually for surgery to have a positive post‑operative recovery.4 It was found that preoperative patients with high religiosity levels had lower levels of anxiety.5 In addition, preoperative teaching is crucial to surgical patients to minimize anxiety and post-operative complications.6 Thus, a detailed preoperative assessment and evaluation leads to decreases in postoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality.7

Competent nursing care should be provided to surgical patients to ensure that they receive safe and patient-centered care.8 About 321 million operations occur annually worldwide, with an estimated 4664 surgical procedures carried out per 100,000 people.9 Major complications following inpatient surgical procedures occur at a rate of up to 22%, and death rates reach 0.8%. Approximately seven million individuals will suffer from significant problems as a result of surgical procedures each year, and one million patients can die as a consequence of complications after an operation.10 In Jordan, thousands of patients received surgeries, and approximately 1,176,425 procedures were conducted between 2014 and 2018.11

Several studies were conducted to determine knowledge, attitude, practice, and barriers to preoperative nursing care in many areas; nevertheless, gaps exist in the level of nursing and midwifery students’ knowledge regarding preoperative nursing care.

In Jordan, approximately 5318 nursing students were enrolled in 14 nursing faculties and 33 government hospitals.12 Students need highly specialized competencies to diagnose accurately patient conditions and predict and deal with problems that may arise within the course of nursing care.13 Thus far, the preoperative nursing care knowledge of nursing and midwifery students has not been assessed.

The proposed study is expected to increase our understanding about the level of preoperative nursing care among nursing students. This study would fill knowledge gaps in the literature and has the potential to influence clinical practice. In addition, results would increase the awareness of university academic staff in terms of the requirements to improve the level of preoperative nursing care. This work also helps determine which areas of preoperative nursing care need greater focus in designing better educational programs for nursing students. Based on the evidence, this study aims to assess the level of nursing and midwifery students’ knowledge regarding preoperative nursing care and determine the most influencing demographic factors affecting nursing and midwifery students’ knowledge regarding preoperative nursing care.

Methods

Design

A descriptive cross-sectional design using an online self-administered questionnaire was utilized to assess nursing and midwifery students’ knowledge regarding preoperative nursing care. This study was conducted among Jordanian nursing and midwifery students who were above the age of 18 years. The data collection was conducted over a period of time extending from July 3, 2023, to August 7, 2023.

Participants

A probability random sampling method was used to select the study participant, using an online questionnaire. The inclusion criteria were able and willing to participate in the study, being nursing and midwifery students 18 years or older with internet access, male and female, and being able to read Arabic. There was no restriction on the sample size. All nursing and midwifery students in the approached university who met the inclusion criteria were invited to participate in this study. Based on a medium effect size, significance level of 0.05, power level 0.8, and using multiple regression for six predictors a minimum of 98 participants required.14 Over sampling was intended to overcome attrition or incomplete responses. Therefore, a total of 118 students were anticipated.

Study Instruments

The study tool was consisted of self-administered questionnaire. Google forms were used to collect the data, which was then extracted as an Excel file. Google form link contains study questionnaire and was shared by the researcher to study participants in a specific Microsoft teams class designed for the current study aims.

The first part of the instrument was the demographic data (age, gender, years level, cumulative average, housing method, and place of residency). The second part is the Perceived Preoperative Nursing Care Competence Scale for Nursing Students (PPreCC-NS), which was developed by Simsek et al.15 It consists of 22 items covering five domains:5 items in the subdimension of ability to fulfill legal responsibilities and adherence to ethical principles,5 items in the subdimension of evaluation and follow-up of the patient,4 items in the subdimension of preoperative patient preparation,4 items in the subdimension of communication, and4 items in the subdimension of research and professional development.15

The response is measured on a 5-point Likert scale,1–5 where “1” denotes strongly disagree and “5” denotes strongly agree. By adding the responses to each item, the total score is calculated. The lowest and highest possible scores are 22 and 110 respectively. Increasing the score obtained from this scale indicates an increased perceived competence level among nursing and midwifery students in providing preoperative care.15

The level of perceived competence for preoperative nursing care can be determined for nursing and midwifery students using this scale, which is a valid and reliable measurement tool.15 The reliability test of the Arabic version of PPreCC-NS revealed that the Cronbach’s alpha values of the five domains ranged from 0.70 to 0.85, and the total scale of Cronbach’s alpha is > 0.7.16

Statistical Analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 26) for windows was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and frequency) were used to describe and review the demographic data based on the level of measurements. Inferential statistics including multiple linear regression were used to identify the factors affecting nursing and midwifery students’ knowledge regarding preoperative nursing care.

Results

Demographic Characteristics of Participants

In the current study, 206 nursing and midwifery students received the questionnaire. The study’s questionnaire was completed by 202 students in total, yielding a 98% response rate. The results showed that the mean age for participating students was 20.83 (SD = 2.32). Most of participating students were females (76.2%, n = 154). Also, more than half were nursing and midwifery students in their second years (51%, n = 103). In addition, the participating nursing and midwifery students mean cumulative average was 70.3 (SD = 6.65). Furthermore, it was found that more than half of participating students (52.5%, n = 106) lived in villages. Moreover, the highest percentage of participants lived with their families (95.5%, n = 193). (Table 1) shows the demographic characteristics of the participants.

Table 1 Participants Demographic Data

Level of Nursing and Midwifery Students Preoperative Care

The overall mean total score for nursing and midwifery students preoperative care was 99.09 (SD = 10.81). The highest mean score was for ability to fulfil legal responsibilities and adherence to ethical principles (M = 23.6, SD = 2.53), then evaluation and follow-up of the patient (M = 21.3, SD = 3.50), followed by preoperative patient preparation (M = 18.5, SD = 2.21), then communication (M = 17.8, SD = 2.69), and the lowest mean score was for research and professional development (M = 17.6, SD = 2.60) (Table 2).

Table 2 Level of Nursing and Midwifery Students Preoperative Care

Regarding the PPreCC-NS items. The lowest mean score was for the determination of the complications that may develop during the operation process (perioperative process) by evaluating the preoperative patient data (M =4.08, SD = 0.999). On the other hand, the highest mean score was for ensuring the confidentiality and security of written, verbal and electronic patient information in line with ethical principles (M =4.83, SD = 0.551) (Table 3).

Table 3 Level of Nursing and Midwifery Students Preoperative Care in Different Items

Factors Affecting Nursing and Midwifery Students’ Knowledge Regarding Preoperative Nursing Care

Results from multiple linear regression analysis revealed that demographic characteristics accounts for 8.1% of the variance in the nursing and midwifery students’ knowledge regarding preoperative nursing care (Model 1) (R2= 0.081, F(210.84) = 1.87, p = 0.057) (Table 4). In addition, place of residency explained significantly about (4.53%) of the variance in the nursing and midwifery students’ knowledge regarding preoperative nursing care, and it was the strongest predictor (B = 0.218, p = 0.002).

Table 4 Factors Affecting Nursing and Midwifery Students’ Knowledge Regarding Preoperative Nursing Care

Discussion

The study aimed to assess the level of knowledge of nursing and midwifery students regarding preoperative nursing care and determine the most influencing demographic variables.

Nursing students must acquire the necessary competence during their nursing education to perform safely their tasks.17 In the present study, nursing and midwifery students have adequate knowledge regarding preoperative nursing care. Nursing and midwifery students are educated on preoperative nursing care in their courses of Fundamentals of Nursing and Medical Surgical Nursing. Moreover, the clinical practice of students in surgical units could increase their level of knowledge. Durmaz Edeer et al3 reported that clinical practice can improve learning abilities. However, comparing the preoperative care competence of nursing and midwifery students is difficult because of relatively limited studies in this area. Research in the literature examined different samples of nurses and different topics as preoperative patient education. In this regard, future research in this area is important.

Since the International Council of Nurses was established in 1899, ethical issues have traditionally gained focus in the nursing profession.18 The nursing profession’s code of ethics enables nurses to offer ethical, competent and safe care.19 The American Nurses Association encourages ethical commitment in all interactions, even among nursing and midwifery students.20 As soon as a student enters a university or a place of employment, the process of learning professional values begins.21 In the current study, the highest mean score was recorded for ability to fulfil legal responsibilities and adherence to ethical principles. The highest mean score in the scale items ensured that the confidentiality and security of written, verbal and electronic patient information are in line with ethical principles. This result could be related to academic instructions given to the students at the university and to the importance of code of ethics in hospitals. In Jordan, the code of ethics was published in 2013 not for health sector alone but for all public sectors. Rahmani et al22 reported good moral awareness among nursing students. Khamis Mohamed et al23 found that a professional ethics dimension had the highest mean score rated by nursing students. Bijani et al24 found that the adherence to ethical codes was higher among nursing and midwifery students than among practicing nurses. Other researchers found that students had a moderate level of ethical awareness.25,26

The results on the confidentiality and security of patient information are similar to the reports of Alnajjar and Abou Hashish,25 who found that nursing and midwifery students understood that violating patients’ privacy or confidentiality is unethical. Another work conducted by Poorchangizi et al21 stated that the caring category, which included “protecting the confidentiality of the patient” and “protecting the patient”s right to privacy, received the highest mean scores for professional values. Bijani et al, (2017) found that the ethical rule that deals with “respecting the client/patients” privacy when performing nursing interventions’ received the highest average score from nursing students and practicing nurses. By contrast, Sinclair et al27 found that the patient’s right to confidentiality, privacy, dignity or respect was violated by more than two thirds of respondents.

Research is a scientific process that collects and examines data to improve our comprehension of a certain issue or topic.28 Nursing research aims to obtain information involving the creation and comprehension of a problem through observation or any other approach.29 Starting research during the academic year is recommended so nursing students should be knowledgeable about research and should adopt a more positive attitude toward it.30 The International Council of Nurses underlined the significance of incorporating research into nursing students education.31 In the present study, the lowest mean score was recorded for the research and professional development dimension. This could be related to lack of students’ participation in scientific research. Moreover, the majority of nursing and midwifery students in this study were in the first and second year of studying, which means that they did not take the nursing research course. In addition, this result could be related to the lack of attendance for seminars, conferences and training courses in nursing research and the lack of research grants or funding in developing countries. A previous study reported that researchers in developing countries had low funding, high research costs and very low-rate grants.32

Hussain and Afzal33 found that the overall knowledge about research among nursing students is low. By contrast, Bamila N et al30 found that more than half of nursing students had adequate level of knowledge in nursing research. Moreover, Grande et al34 found that most nursing students were aware with the nursing research. Hanibernia S29 found that majority of nursing students had good knowledge in nursing research.

This preoperative assessment aims to identify patient factors that significantly increase the risk for perioperative problems.35 In the present study, based on the evaluation of the preoperative patient data, the lowest mean score was recorded for the determination of complications that may develop during the operation (perioperative process). Although the result is low, it could be considered satisfactory given that most of the participating students reported that they agree to determine the complications that may develop during the operation.

To our knowledge, this study is the first to assess the relative contribution of demographic characteristics to perceived preoperative competence. Based on multiple linear regression, the place of residency is the most significant predictor of the preoperative competence of nursing students. The difference in academic achievement between urban and rural students is a global issue,36 and could be related to the fact that most students lived in villages. In Jordan, more than 90% of individuals reside in urban areas.37 In addition, the discrepancy could be attributed to their different learning capabilities and cumulative average. A previous study reported the significant difference in academic achievement between first-and second-year students in rural and urban areas.38 Another research reported that the academic performance of rural students was significantly worse than that of urban students.39

Nursing competency is related to level of experience.40 The present study did not find an association between students’ age and preoperative competency level. This finding could be explained by the inadequate experience of nursing and midwifery students in clinical settings. Female students obtained higher scores in preoperative care competence, but this finding could be related to the fact that most of the study participants were females. In addition, a previous study reported that female students performed better academically than male students due to their greater effort and attendance in class.41 Furthermore, males were more addicted to social media, which negatively affected their academic performance.42 Cho and Kim43 found that age and gender did not affect global health and cultural competencies. By contrast, a previous work by Madjid et al44 reported that females and students aged 23 years were predictors of clinical competencies.

This study found no association between the cumulative average and level of perceived preoperative nursing care. The cumulative average results are more frequently utilized to assess performance on written examinations or in theory sections but not for practical sessions.41 This socio-demographic characteristic is not examined in the literature.

In this work, students who lived alone and with other students had the lowest score in the preoperative knowledge. This finding could be related to the huge difference in samples among these categories. Moreover, moving away from home and starting an independent life might present difficulties, such as loneliness.45 DEMİR46 found that second year nursing students who lived alone felt unsatisfied with their academic performance, utilized the Internet in the morning and had more afternoon sleepiness.

Implications and Recommendation

The findings may be helpful for nursing educators, nursing managers and decision-makers to develop effective methods for enhancing preoperative nursing care. This study suggests the integration of preoperative instruction through various academic levels, along with clinical training, in the undergraduate curriculum. Understanding the significance of preoperative nursing care requires the creative use of teaching and evaluation techniques. Preoperative nursing care should be improved using inspiring educational methods to increase the proficiency of nursing and midwifery students in preoperative care. In addition, clinical settings are crucial to the process of learning; as such, communication and cooperation between universities and hospitals should be improved. Faculty members in universities and policymakers can use the study’s findings to develop useful strategies, such as routine training, creating rules and ongoing in-service education.

Future research should validate the present results. Other factors that might affect preoperative competence should be investigated. Mixed-method and qualitative studies should also be conducted to provide in depth understanding of the perceived preoperative nursing care competence.

Strength and Limitation

This study is the first to assess the level and factors affecting the perceived preoperative nursing care of nursing and midwifery students. The sample size and response rate in the study is sufficient. Nevertheless, the study has limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. Firstly, the cross-sectional quantitative design adopted may not be sufficient to identify all potential factors influencing the preoperative care competence of nursing students. Secondly, the use of online questionnaires could limit the generalizability of the results. Other activities that occurred concurrently with the survey’s completion could have affected the results. Consequently, “history” might have influenced how students responded to the survey.47

Conclusion

The knowledge of nursing and midwifery students in preoperative care plays an important role in perioperative nursing care. The perceived level of preoperative nursing care among nursing and midwifery students was found to be adequate. In addition, place of residence was associated with preoperative nursing care competence.

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author RA upon reasonable request.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Approval from the Institution Review Board (IRB) was obtained from the Al-Balqa Applied University (1067/2/3/26) to collect data. This current study was conducted in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Online consent form was obtained from each participants. The purpose of this study and its expected results were explained by the researchers. The participants were informed that participation is voluntary, and they have the right to refuse or withdraw participation at any time without explanation and with no penalties. The participants were given assurances that their responses would be confidential.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express a special thanks for all nursing and midwifery students who participated in this study.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no competing interests for this work.

References

1. Johnstone J. How to provide preoperative care to patients. Nurs Stand. 2020;35(12):72–76. doi:10.7748/ns.2020.e11657

2. Maya ÁMS. Nursing care during the perioperative within the surgical context. Invest Educ Enferm. 2022;40:2.

3. Durmaz Edeer A, Vural F, Damar HT, Yasak K, Damar M. The effect of web-based preoperative and postoperative patient care education on nursing students: a randomized controlled study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2019;37(10):541–547. doi:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000552

4. Iqbal U, Green J, Patel S, et al. Preoperative patient preparation in enhanced recovery pathways. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019;35(Suppl 1):S14. doi:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_54_18

5. Bezerra SM, Gomes ET, Galvão PC, Souza KV. Spiritual well-being and hope in the preoperative period of cardiac surgery. Rev Bras Enferm. 2023;71(2):398–405.

6. Bazezew AM, Nuru N, Demssie TG, Ayele DG. Knowledge, practice, and associated factors of preoperative patient teaching among surgical unit nurses, at Northwest Amhara comprehensive specialized referral hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1). doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01175-2

7. Jindal P, Patil V, Pradhan R, Mahajan HC, Rani A, Pabba UG. Update on preoperative evaluation and optimisation. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67(1):39–47. doi:10.4103/ija.ija_1041_22

8. Jaensson M, Falk-Brynhildsen K, Gillespie BM, Wallentin FY, Nilsson U. Psychometric validation of the perceived perioperative competence scale-revised in the Swedish context. J PeriAnesthesia Nurs. 2018;33(4):499–511. doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2016.09.012

9. Rose J, Weiser TG, Hider P, Wilson L, Gruen RL, Bickler SW. Estimated need for surgery worldwide based on prevalence of diseases: a modelling strategy for the WHO Global Health Estimate. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(S2):S13–20. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70087-2

10. Glaysher MA, Cresswell A. Management of common surgical complications. Vol. 35, Surgery (United Kingdom); 2017.

11. Alroumi AS, Alomari MS, Asaleh NA, et al. Foregut surgery in Jordan. Foregut Surg. 2023;3(1):1. doi:10.51666/fs.2023.3.e1

12. Jebreel MS, Tarawneh M, Muien Abu-Shaer M The Hashemite kingdom of Jordan national human resources for health observatory annual report 2017 for health observatory; 2017.

13. Nehrir B, Vanaki Z, Mokhtari Nouri J, Khademolhosseini SM, Ebadi A. Competency in nursing students: a systematic review. Int J Travel Med Glob Health. 2016;4(1):3–11. doi:10.20286/ijtmgh-04013

14. Erdfelder E, FAul F, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

15. Şimşek P, Özmen GÇ, Kemer AS, Aydin RK, Bulut E, Çilingir D. Development and psychometric testing of perceived preoperative nursing care competence scale for nursing students (PPreCC-NS). Nurse Educ Today. 2023;3:120.

16. Etoom M, Alnjadat R. Psychometric proprieties of the Arabic version of the perceived preoperative nursing care competence scale for nursing students (PPreCC-NS). Jordan Journal of Nursing Research. 2024: 1–9. doi:10.14525/JJNR.v3i1.04

17. Kajander-Unkuri S, Meretoja R, Katajisto J, Leino-Kilpi H, Suikkala A. Students’ self-assessed competence levels during nursing education continuum-a cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2020;17(1). doi:10.1515/ijnes-2019-0050

18. Stievano A, Tschudin V. The ICN code of ethics for nurses: a time for revision. Int Nurs Rev. 2019;66(2):154–156. doi:10.1111/inr.12525

19. Ahmed S, Toum M, Abdalla S, Mohammed M. Errors and near-miss errors encountered by nursing students in clinical settings in governmental Universities, Khartoum State. Sudan J Med Sci. 2018;2:5.

20. Fowler MD. Faith and Ethics, Covenant and Code: the 2015 revision of the ANA code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. J Christ Nurs. 2017;34(4):216–224. doi:10.1097/CNJ.0000000000000419

21. Poorchangizi B, Borhani F, Abbaszadeh A, Mirzaee M, Farokhzadian J. Professional values of nurses and nursing students: a comparative study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1). doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1878-2

22. Rahmani P, Behshid M, Seif-Farshad M, Mousavi S, Molaei Tavani F. Moral awareness and its relationship with moral sensitivity among Iranian nursing students: a basis for nursing ethics education. Nurs Open. 2023;10(2):773–780. doi:10.1002/nop2.1344

23. Khamis Mohamed L, Mohamed LK, Dorgham SR, Eid WM. Experiences of Professionalism Attributes Among Undergraduates Nursing Students and Nurses. Vol. 2. Evidence-Based Nursing Research; 2020.

24. Bijani M, Ghodsbin F, Fard SJ, Shirazi F, Sharif F, Tehranineshat B An evaluation of adherence to ethical codes among nurses and nursing students; 2017.

25. Alnajjar HA, Abou Hashish EA. Academic ethical awareness and moral sensitivity of undergraduate nursing students: assessment and influencing factors. SAGE Open Nurs. 2021;3:7.

26. Mohamadi N, Gholami N, Rezaei S, et al. Evaluating staff and students’ knowledge about professional ethics in the Field of Communication, Law and Ethics. Res Med Educ. 2017;9(4):9.

27. Sinclair J, Papps E, Marshall B. Nursing students’ experiences of ethical issues in clinical practice: a New Zealand study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016;17:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2016.01.005

28. Chaturvedi D, Kumar Tak H, Singh Rawat V. Assessment of attitude towards research among nursing students in Rajasthan, India. Int J Adv Nurs Manage. 2023;19–25. doi:10.52711/2454-2652.2023.00005

29. Hanibernia S. Knowledge, attitude, and barriers of nursing research among BSc nursing students, in selected nursing college of Malappuram district. Vol. 4, Manipal Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences; 2018.

30. Bamila NM, Johnsy RT, Student D Knowledge and Attitude of Nursing Students towards Research. Vol. 6, International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology; 2021.

31. Erkin O, Toraman AU, Simsek H, Temel AB Nursing Students’ Attitudes Toward Research-Development: does Taking Research Course Make a Difference?; 2017. Available from: www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences. Accessed February 5, 2024.

32. van Helden P; Paul van Helden. The cost of research in developing countries. EMBO Rep. 2012;13(5):395. doi:10.1038/embor.2012.43

33. Hussain M, Afzal M. Knowledge, attitude and practice of nursing students about research with implementation of educational intervention program leadership and management view project; 2019. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333843249. Accessed February 5, 2024.

34. Grande RAN, Berdida DJE, Villagracia HN, Ablao JN, Garcia PRB. Assessment of nursing students’ research competencies with competency‐based education. J Compet Based Educ. 2021;6(4):211–221. doi:10.1002/cbe2.1260

35. Malley A, Kenner C, Kim T, Blakeney B. The role of the nurse and the preoperative assessment in patient transitions HHS public access. AORN J. 2015;102(2):181–182.

36. Alfonso Echazarra B, Radinger T, Echazarra A. A directorate for education and skills learning in rural schools: insights from pisa, talis and the literature OECD education working Paper No. 196; 2019. Available from: www.oecd.org/edu/workingpapers. Accessed February 5, 2024.

37. Al Maaitah R, Shokeh D, Al-Ja’afreh S. The nursing profession in Jordan: military nurses leading the way. Online J Issue Nurs. 2019;24:3.

38. Zhao K. Rural-urban gap in academic performance at a highly selective Chinese university: variations and determinants. High Educ Res Develop. 2022;41(1):177–192. doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1835836

39. Sumida S, Kawata K. An analysis of the learning performance gap between urban and rural areas in sub-saharan Africa. S Afr J Educ. 2021;41(2):1–17. doi:10.15700/saje.v41n2a1779

40. Maskor NA, Muhamad M, Krauss SE, Mahmood NHN. Relationship between personal values, work experience and nursing competencies among cancer care nurses in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021;22(1):287. doi:10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.1.287

41. Hafidzah WS, Annuar WM, Saat NH, et al. Knowledge and practice of nursing students on health care ethics. Schol J Appl Med Sci. 2017;5(9C):3693–3699.

42. Alnjadat R, Hmaidi MM, Samha TE, Kilani MM, Hasswan AM. Gender variations in social media usage and academic performance among the students of University of Sharjah. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2019;14(4):390–394.

43. Cho MK, Kim MY. Factors affecting the global health and cultural competencies of nursing students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):7. doi:10.3390/ijerph19074109

44. Madjid FT, Villacorte LM, Cajigal JV, et al. Factors Influencing the clinical competency among nursing students: a cross-sectional study. Hail J Health Sci. 2023;5(1):7–12.

45. Mofatteh M. Risk factors associated with stress, anxiety, and depression among university undergraduate students. AIMS Public Health. 2021;8(1):36–65. doi:10.3934/publichealth.2021004

46. DEMİR G. Daytime sleepiness and related factors in nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;59:21–25. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.08.003

47. Polit DF, Beck CT Nursing Research Generating and Assessing Practice. NewsGe; 2017. Available from: https://news.ge/anakliis-porti-aris-qveynis-momava. Accessed February 5, 2024.

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.